1 + 1 = ( 2 or 3 or 1 ) maybe all is correct ?

EDIT :copied up from "A later post"


This is a more " proper way of measuring " or looking at things.

Unit factor : no ( ) used in this, giving the result we learn, by mathematics !
1+1 = 2 units

Result factor :
If units is inside the : ( )  look at it as blending the 2 together
to make a hybrid or offspring, call it the result factor , it talks about all units
( 1+1 ) = 3 , unit 1, unit 2 and the third unit.

Hybrid / offspring factor :
this talks about the single new unit from the, result factor
you can not have a " hybrid / offspring 3rd unit ", unless you have
2 units blended together resulting in the new single unit.

(1)+(1) = 1

Soundblend
we take 1 sine wave, and add a second sine wave, what happens now ....
This is just my tought.....


First answer :  (1) + (1) = 2
we see both waves separate, then that calculus is correct.

but :
Second answer:  1 + 1 = 3

but we did not learn that at scool but that is correct too.

Why 3 :
Because we see:
wave 1 and wave 2, added together, making a 3rd hybrid wave
it got both sources, but is a new wave of the 2 others

* A new creation, and we see it as a special one.


It all comes down to how we look at stuff... ;-)

No. Adding two waveforms is just not the same thing as adding two numbers.
 
You can look at stuff in a lot of different (incorrect) ways or play games with units, but that doesn't mean it is a useful pursuit.

drewfx1
 
 
No. Adding two waveforms is just not the same thing as adding two numbers.
 
You can look at stuff in a lot of different (incorrect) ways or play games with units, but that doesn't mean it is a useful pursuit.

Forget the numbers and waveform's then, use : 

Tree , Stone , water ...... whatever that may fit in

BTW:  what is correct and what is not, it all come down to what we learn, and how we look at things
not everyone got the same solution on a problem, that's why we all are different, but still alike..

i am not using the numbers at ordinary mathematics, but rather in a way to show, a different thinking.

But because we are used to use numbers and not a tree in mathematics.

Example what is :

* Fire + X = ?
* Human + 3000ft = ?

This do not make any sense, because it is not a "common" learning, but it probably be worth the amusement value.

See, if we have not already learned it, then we will try to figure it out by using known factors.
If we can't, we would probably use the X factor, then confusion comes.

Factor :  X
we cant foresee anything (x) , is usually unknown until it is revealed in some way.

Making sure your units are consistent is kinda' important.
 

not everyone got the same solution on a problem

 
... absolutely, and when it happens it can be costly.  consider the following examples:
 
In 1999 NASA lost its Climate Orbiter
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric/
 
In 1983 Air Canada Flight 143 ran out of fuel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider
 
Both of these involved unit conversion mistakes on a grand scale.
 
 
 

There are three types of people in the world, those who can count and those who can't.
 
(And, yes, being a life-long geek, I know the binary one as well.  )

If we consider entanglement as explained through  quantum mechanics(which I don't understand), then when you added the ones together something else happened across the room or across the universe in direct relation to that action in another series of systems. The entanglement leaves a danglement? At the very least it might cause a stray quark or two.

Actually there are only two kinds of people in the world: Me...and everybody else.

There are two kinds of people in the world: those who insist on dividing everyone into two types, and those who don't. I am definitely in the latter group.

There are two kinds of people in the world: those who insist on dividing everyone into two types, and those who don't. I am definitely in the latter group.

 
I thought there were three: dogs, pigs and sheep.
 
To keep things consistent and in the spirit of the thread, I think if you add them up you get 1 with units of sheepdogpigman.

Starise

Soundblend- I think you're onto something, but things get fuzzy when you measure different things.Especially  small things. Take light for instance, It is described as both a particle and a wave in physics and it appears to be both. In the slit experiment light seems to simultaneously pass through both slits as  a wave and a particle and appears to excite itself on the other side of the plate. (ok guys hold the jokes)There are waves from the light and the sum of the waves is present as a difference and a combination. It is as if the light is the same coming through both slits, yet there are different outcomes on the other side. How can the same exact thing be passing through two different locations?  The short answer is there are things we don't understand and are attempting to put maths to.

Much of mesurements is not accurate or proper to what they need to measure
they simply dont know how, or miss an unknown third method of what need to measure
measurement will not be true, or it will be confusing, that is why it get Fuzzy.

Now light a (Photon) or any particle, can exist in several state's at once, (with higher energy levels)
or it's charge if you will use that.
A particle has a spin, it has it north and south pole, it has a charge and a vibration, they have fields.

If a electron is at 4th orbit of an atom, and it emits energy, a (photon), it loses vibration and drop down to
the 3rd orbit lvl in the atom.
You may get this electron up to the 4th or even higher depending on the charge it gets but not higher
than the atom itself allows.
All particles endeavours to consist in a stable state. (in order)

Unstable state is when, particles exchange energies, inhales or emits, or going from 1 state to another.

look at the atomic bomb, that is an un-controlled emission, creating ultra high vibrations
in the atoms ( atom core ), creating heat and radiation, and it finally burst in to a big boom !

look at the Atomic reactor creating electricity
it is the same process, but it is controlled by cooling the core down with water they prevent
the core (atoms) to vibrate to much.
that is an unstable, "controlled" state.


All particles vibrate, cause of they'r charge, we can call it their frequencies a ( wave )
With increased charge ( vibration ) the abilities of the particle get even more spectacular.
we can call that parallel states, the ability to be in the past , present, and future

Human use time to calculate happenings because we move sloooow, and it is limited to a low energy lvl
but in higher lvl of energies: time do not exist

Our mind's is limited to a certain size of information, or what we possible have a ability to reveal.

Well certain discoveries has been made by "mistakes" , we can call it luck.

Interesting i have never seen that Double Slit Experiment : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

What amazes me is gravity and it's Source.  that is something i want to know more about.
Maybe we need to study the quark's for and ( gluons) for that.

Ever heard about the higg's field  : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pD6BRGgpnK0
Higg's Boson : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIg1Vh7uPyw

Your Mass is NOT From the Higgs Boson : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztc6QPNUqls

I would say one of the result of mass (m) : 

Is a charge (e) or (q , coloumb) of the particle, and a particle accelerated movement, velocity (v1 to v2)
the greater charge and velocity ( movement of the particle ), the greater it's mass compared
to other particles, or to the observer.
when it has reached its maximum, It will stay at a (e_stable) and (V_stable) and (m_stable)
until it reacts on to something and emits (looses) energy and mass.

but this is just another coarse result, and not the source of mass.

quarks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxQwkdu9WbE

Now pardon me for my skills, but i just have 9 years of basic school
and the tiny stuff i know i have learned at the library when i had a basic quick interest for it.
But that dont mean that i have my own opinions and understanding of  physics.

craigb
 
Particle or wave?  You decide! 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STF0moww_zQ

uhhm (state) is probably a wrong way to say it, i mean by that a particle can be :
a particle and at the same time act as a wave

right word to use is probably : condition ?
sorry for my bad English ;-)
 
Btw nice video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STF0moww_zQ 

Uh? eh? dah? doh? hoy-i-yoy-i-yoy-i-yoy!
11 = 17 and the answer to everything is "42"!

 
 
 
 

 

 
To keep things consistent and in the spirit of the thread, I think if you add them up you get 1 with units of sheepdogpigman.

Related in some way to Al Gore's Manbearpig?