17" Laptop for SONAR?

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
RTGraham
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1824
  • Joined: 2004/03/29 20:17:13
  • Location: New York
  • Status: offline
2005/09/08 23:52:23 (permalink)

17" Laptop for SONAR?

I need to replace my badly out-of-date laptop fairly quickly. I have looked at the offerings from ADK, and their 7000 or 3800 models both look like excellent options; but I'm wondering if anybody knows of, or has any experience with, a 17-inch laptop that is good for audio. I haven't seen much discussion of 17-inchers - most of the laptops recommended for audio seem to be 15-inch models.

Sager has a couple of 17-inch offerings (the 9880 and the 4791, both of which are full-blown P4 processors), but evaluating their specs with regard to audio is beyond my expertise.

Any insights?

Thanks!

~~~~~~~~~~
Russell T. Graham
Keys, Vocals, Songwriting, Production
russell DOT graham AT rtgproductions DOT com
www DOT myspace DOT com SLASH russelltgraham
#1

38 Replies Related Threads

    wynnsong
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 504
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:57:42
    • Location: Los Angeles
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 00:37:33 (permalink)
    I use a Toshiba Satellite p25(somethiing)....Runs pretty darn good.... depends on what you are using it for though (softsynths or recording audio) It has a p4 3.0 ghz chip, up to 2 gig of ram (I just upgraded) as does my box at work, but the one at work seems more capable than the laptop. If you are really interested my buddy is getting rid of his..... He needed something smaller.

    Good luck
    #2
    jack_holeman
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Joined: 2005/08/23 01:06:19
    • Location: Colorado
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 00:41:30 (permalink)
    I'm never sure about how I am received because I always tell it like it is.

    Cell phones are the coming thing in devices and they will be fitted for midi.

    Heckle and Jeckle were magpies who sang songs to lizards and bar flies... Out of the Blue a buzzard came through and turned all the music to cow pies! And that was an improvement! Post midi at http://groups.msn.com/imaginationonfile/
    #3
    johnb99
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 23
    • Joined: 2005/09/02 20:27:42
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 01:00:06 (permalink)
    RT - the key to look at is the processor and memory. The 17" will make it easier to spread out your layout but has nothing to do with capabilities.
    #4
    Rick O Shay
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 115
    • Joined: 2005/01/26 21:35:59
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 02:26:19 (permalink)
    I got myself a plain ol' Dell 9300. I think it's a 1.86 ghz Pentium M and I have a gig of RAM. I disabled the on-board audio device and got a firewire audio interface. I ordered it with a 7200rpm internal drive and another 7200rpm external USBII drive.

    I just finished a CD project on it and it worked great. 15-20 tracks per song, lots of compressors, reverbs, etc, DR-008, Kontakt 2 and Garritan Personal orchestra. Audio files were stored on the external drive and DR-008, K2 and GPO files were stored on the internal drive.

    Never had a problem and had plenty of CPU power to spare.
    #5
    b3gsus@msn.com
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1293
    • Joined: 2003/12/05 09:52:57
    • Location: Scotts Hill, North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 06:29:16 (permalink)
    Hey Russell,

    I too am inquiring into the best option for a fully functional Satelite to my main Pooter! I've done some reading about the Centrino being powerful but I'd like to hear from others about this.... Scott Reams....any input???? Thanx Wildman

    Wildman,,aka,,,"Nick Danger"
    Studiocat Core2Quad Q9550 w/P45 Cset XP-Pro Sonar Pro 8, 2 FF 800, Wclock, Avalon VT-737, Focusrite V Master,Eureka, 2-LA-4s, Neumann U87,TLM-103,Rode NTK,MCU,Event SP8s, DynAudio BM5As VS-2480 4 DA88
    2-Mackie 24/8buss
    #6
    b3gsus@msn.com
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1293
    • Joined: 2003/12/05 09:52:57
    • Location: Scotts Hill, North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 06:31:15 (permalink)
    Wynnsong, Can you elaborate about this machine of your friends??? Thanks, Wildman
    If you are really interested my buddy is getting rid of his..... He needed something smaller.

    Wildman,,aka,,,"Nick Danger"
    Studiocat Core2Quad Q9550 w/P45 Cset XP-Pro Sonar Pro 8, 2 FF 800, Wclock, Avalon VT-737, Focusrite V Master,Eureka, 2-LA-4s, Neumann U87,TLM-103,Rode NTK,MCU,Event SP8s, DynAudio BM5As VS-2480 4 DA88
    2-Mackie 24/8buss
    #7
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 06:43:32 (permalink)
    I have a 17" Dell Inspiron 9300 with a 2,13Ghz centrino base. It has the not-so-popular PCI-E thing (which I still need to find out what does). I have a gig of RAM, 60Gb 7200RPM internal drive, 160Gb external firewire drive and an Edirol USB audio interface. I get some pretty sick track counts on this thing. I have up to 45 audio and freezed tracks with plug-ins on most of them which are not freezed. I never thought I'd ever get so much out of it, but it runs pretty smooth. I do increase the latency to be able to mix properly, but only up to about 15ms.

    I would recomend a 17" centrino system any day, if you're after a portable sollution
    #8
    b3gsus@msn.com
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1293
    • Joined: 2003/12/05 09:52:57
    • Location: Scotts Hill, North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 06:53:42 (permalink)
    ProjectM, Thank you for your input! I will look further! Incidentally, most of my Ancestors are, Sweedish/Norwegian! I look forward to visiting there sometime very soon! Wildman

    Wildman,,aka,,,"Nick Danger"
    Studiocat Core2Quad Q9550 w/P45 Cset XP-Pro Sonar Pro 8, 2 FF 800, Wclock, Avalon VT-737, Focusrite V Master,Eureka, 2-LA-4s, Neumann U87,TLM-103,Rode NTK,MCU,Event SP8s, DynAudio BM5As VS-2480 4 DA88
    2-Mackie 24/8buss
    #9
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 08:10:29 (permalink)
    Hey Not bad. Yes, check out Norway. It's election year so hopefully we'll get rid of that friggin' nazi of a priest currently occupying the throne of Norway. But you'll be most welcome over here anyway:) Eventhoug,h, I have to warn ya! The country is nothing like it's in the postcards. It's really quite **** most of the time. But the people are good... and there's nothing like Norwegian BLACK METAL!

    Enjoy the Lutefisk and have fun folowing your ancestors. And good luck with the Lap-Top
    #10
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 08:17:19 (permalink)
    By the way, I can't wait to check out Sonar 5. I really hope it'll be as sweet as it looks. and it'll look darn good on my 17" WUXGA display
    #11
    eric_peterson
    Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1103
    • Joined: 2003/11/25 10:24:05
    • Location: The jungles of Oregon ...
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 08:17:39 (permalink)
    I use a Toshiba Satellite p25(somethiing)....Runs pretty darn good.... depends on what you are using it for though (softsynths or recording audio) It has a p4 3.0 ghz chip


    I have one of these as my kitchen computer and I use it occasionally for DV editing. I found that the internal hard drive was too slow, so I added an external 250 GB FW drive and then things smoothed out. YMMV.
    #12
    bermuda
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
    • Location: Bermuda
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 12:12:32 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: jack_holeman

    I'm never sure about how I am received because I always tell it like it is.

    Cell phones are the coming thing in devices and they will be fitted for midi.


    A Cell phone will not be an adequate DAW for many a moon !

    Yes I believe you can get cell phones with midi functioning already.

    The UK kids in 2005 went nuts over ringtones... one became a number one hit (cringe) and the advertising when I was there on TV was a one ringtone advert MINIMUM on every commercial break .

    US Pyro now gives funtionality for ringtones, and there have been posters here who indirectly hinted at that they wanted to create ringtones.... The folks who did the Crazy Frog (now have an albumn out) Turned over £13 million pounds ...it's medium business in the UK and the flood gates opened.

    The US is next ...trust me it was hell and I was only there for 2 weeks


     Yes.
    #13
    flatpicknut
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 270
    • Joined: 2003/11/26 22:15:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/09 12:29:33 (permalink)
    For me, a large screen on the laptop was less important than adding a second external monitor. My laptop screen runs in 1024x768 and holds the misc stuff like softsynths, while the larger external monitor has SONAR. BTW, I have basically given up on doing any serious field work with my laptop, as "portable" is a bit difficult to achieve once I start considering all the external gear I'd need - like a small keyboard/controller, the preamp/audio interface and/or mixer, any external sound mod boxes, microphones, etc. I'm using my laptop in my "studio" but am saving for a PC. Much easier and cheaper to change monitors, add memory, add hard drives, etc.
    post edited by flatpicknut - 2005/09/09 12:36:45
    #14
    RTGraham
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1824
    • Joined: 2004/03/29 20:17:13
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/10 13:09:55 (permalink)
    Thanks for the replies, folks. After some further research and discussion, it seems that there is currently more power available, at least from the standpoint of audio work and stability, in the 15" models. Some promising 17" models are apparently on the horizon, but I can't afford to wait the month or two that it will take for them to appear.

    Again, thanks for the input.

    ~~~~~~~~~~
    Russell T. Graham
    Keys, Vocals, Songwriting, Production
    russell DOT graham AT rtgproductions DOT com
    www DOT myspace DOT com SLASH russelltgraham
    #15
    losguy
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5506
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
    • Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/10 14:20:02 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: ProjectM
    I have a 17" Dell Inspiron 9300 with a 2,13Ghz centrino base. It has the not-so-popular PCI-E thing (which I still need to find out what does). I have a gig of RAM, 60Gb 7200RPM internal drive, 160Gb external firewire drive and an Edirol USB audio interface. I get some pretty sick track counts on this thing. I have up to 45 audio and freezed tracks with plug-ins on most of them which are not freezed. I never thought I'd ever get so much out of it, but it runs pretty smooth. I do increase the latency to be able to mix properly, but only up to about 15ms. ... I would recomend a 17" centrino system any day, if you're after a portable sollution

    ProjectM, this is exactly the laptop I have, except the Centrino is 1.6GHz. Sorry for my ignorance... I take it from reading the above that "sick"="good"? If so, then what you're saying is encouraging, even for my lower clock rate. I was concerned about the PCI-E thing, too, but it looks like you've managed to get some decent plugin/track count out of it (depends on the specific plugins, of course). For live/demo work (which is all I'd be doing with it) somthing like this would be plenty for what I need.

    BTW, I have verified that this machine will support dual-screen mode very nicely, using the internal screen and one external screen. I've already used it this way with a video projector, and plan to use it in the office with a large LCD monitor. It has a standard VGA port and also an HD video port on the back. I haven't tried using both of those ports at the same time yet, to see if dual-screen is supported that way for two external monitors.

    Psalm 30:12
    All pure waves converge at the Origin
    #16
    jcschild
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3409
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
    • Location: Kentucky y'all
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/10 17:14:31 (permalink)
    Hey Losguy, and Projectm.

    can you guys run the ADK Sonar test on the Dell 9300 and post some numbers?
    also please let me know if PCMCIA or Firewire audio card and what

    i have seen conflicting reports on that laptop
    thanks
    scott
    ADK
    #17
    diamondjim
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 241
    • Joined: 2003/11/30 21:47:25
    • Location: Oracle, AZ
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/10 19:35:00 (permalink)
    Not sure why you would need a 17", but I have a Sony Vaio PCG-K23 with a 15.4" screen that sports 1280 x 800 widescreen, very bright and clear LCD, which works fine for Sonar in live recording situations. If you are using this for your main DAW I would stick with a box and put 2 monitors. I have used the VAIO several times for location recording with great success. This is a big humming laptop, about 6-7 lbs. Anything bigger would be too much to lug around.

    There are probably cheaper updated versions of this. I paid around $2G for this with 756 Meg. and a 2.7 ghz P4.


    -+ http://www.barnjazz.com +-
    pcAudioLabs Core2 Duo E6600 2.6GHz, 4 Gig Ram, Plextor DVD/CD writers, RME FF800, Tascam FW-1884, Frontier Tranzport, JBL LSR4328P monitors, UAD-1, Sonar 6 PE, Wavelab 6, Harbal, Ozone3, BFD, Rapture, Project5, DimP
    #18
    picobrain
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18
    • Joined: 2004/07/02 23:24:41
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/10 22:16:18 (permalink)
    How about a dual core athlon in laptop?
    #19
    losguy
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5506
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
    • Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/11 00:03:25 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: jcschild
    Hey Losguy, and Projectm. ... can you guys run the ADK Sonar test on the Dell 9300 and post some numbers? ... also please let me know if PCMCIA or Firewire audio card and what ... i have seen conflicting reports on that laptop
    thanks ... scott ... ADK

    Hi Scott, it could be awhile before I would take that laptop live. Before then, I couldn't justify a proper audio interface for it, be it PCMCIA, FW, or USB2, and I'm not sure what any results with the built-in audio might mean to you (or anyone). I must say that the built-in speakers sound better on this beast than any other laptop I've heard. I think it actually has a sub, if you can imagine that. Anyway, right now it's my business/office/travel/presentation machine.

    Psalm 30:12
    All pure waves converge at the Origin
    #20
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/12 09:10:18 (permalink)
    Losguy: I honestly have no idea of how the PCI-E thing is working or affecting my system. I have no problems with the performance, and I haven't actually put very much effort into tweaking the OS yet. But yes, it works fine and I use the Sonitus pack of course and Native instrument stuff as well as Garritans personal Orchestra and a hefty use of vSampler 3. With a decent Audio interface, I don't think there would be a problem making fairly decent pro-sounding stuff on it either. I currently use the Edirol UA-700 and feel there's a lack in headroom on the thing. I would love to give E-MU 1616m a try. The 1820m sounds great.

    And for dual screen, go for it! It's easy and conventient. I had a 15" lcd hooked up the first time which couldn't fit the desktop into so it just got funny using it. But I hooked up a 17" Dell Widescreen which was great! I will check the digital port on a 20" flat screen TV as well. And see how that goes.

    And yes, Sick = insanely great

    jcschild: I will look into it and report everything:) Yes, I have heard about some conflicts there too, but it doesn't seem to be such an issue anymore, at least not to me, and I know if you bump into a problem, there are a million ways to work around this quite easily. Just read around the forum.

    diamondjim: Lap-Tops are good for field recording. And I nearly bought the 15,4" version, but then I found the money for the 17" screen and just went ahead and got the 17"one. It's great, but a luxury:) However, I don't think I could go back to anything smaller.

    The buildt in Audio on the 9300 has a sub. It's insane, a 1" sub. Great sound, but the soundcard is useless to any serious audio work. MAybe some DV editing and mucking around but that's it, in my oppinion. I also use the lap-top with an Echo Indigo DJ PCMCIA card so I can send clicks and sequences to my drummers ears and all the sequences to the PA separately. Every now and then I use the card for "mixing on the move". It's perfect in my band situation.
    #21
    losguy
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5506
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
    • Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/12 10:58:09 (permalink)
    Right, don't get me wrong about that built-in laptop speakers. It sounds better compared to most laptop speakers, most of which are nothing but tinny little tweeters (if that). So right, don't plan on doing anything serious with it. It's just the best-sounding laptop on the boardroom table... but that's about it.

    If I get a chance, I'll try the built-in audio to see how noisy it is, but I'll be surprised if it's useful at all.

    [Edited for typos]
    post edited by losguy - 2005/09/12 11:05:08

    Psalm 30:12
    All pure waves converge at the Origin
    #22
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/12 11:59:53 (permalink)
    Very true indeed. For a lap-top it's great sound to it. It's not bad watching a DVD on it with that sound when you're on a cabin trip to the mountains either:)

    However, it's hopeless to get Sonar to work on it. It won't accept the drivers or something. But it just forces me to use a decent audio interface instead, which isn't a bad thing. Fruityloops and SF are ok on it, tho.

    I managed to record some rain directly to the Sigmatel it with a batery powered condensator mic I don't know anything about, but with great result. Not too much noise actually, but I am curios to the noise level when using a dynamic mic.
    #23
    losguy
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5506
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
    • Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/12 13:24:58 (permalink)
    I'd expect that for a dynamic, it would really need a preamp.

    Edit: BTW, thanks for saving me the trouble of trying to make the built-in SigmaTel work with SONAR. It's really a mismatch, anyway. There may be some WDM or ASIO drivers somewhere that work for the SigmaTel, but for the trouble, it's probably better just to go with something else.
    post edited by losguy - 2005/09/12 13:34:16

    Psalm 30:12
    All pure waves converge at the Origin
    #24
    wthrman
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 82
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 00:09:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/12 17:09:13 (permalink)
    In my experience, Alienware kicks some pretty serious butt. Check them out. Their quality is tops, and their prices are much better than they used to be.

    www.alienwre.com

    #25
    dewdman42
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 839
    • Joined: 2004/09/20 16:37:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/12 17:24:30 (permalink)
    There are so many options...

    I got an HP Zt3000 which I read a lot of great reviews about. So far, it works pretty well, including with Sonar. I had to special order to get a higher resolution screen. My screen is 1680x1280 or something like that. wide screen. Easy to read and lots of real estate. Works great. the soundcard drivers for it are WDM also...and work quite well with Sonar for editing and mixing. A bit latent and I would never use it to record. I use a firewire soundcard for that which also seems to work fine. I really like HP laptop, but I will say its not as rugged as the IBM's. Even though the prices are cheap, I tend to avoid Dell like the plague.

    -steve
    #26
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/13 02:35:46 (permalink)
    Losguy: I have read somewhere on the forum that you can actually make Sonar work with the Sigmatel and Asio4all at 48KHz if you really want to. It could be usefull. I haven't tried it my self since I have the Echo Indigo, but you never know when built -in speakers come handy

    dewdman: I am just curious, but why do you avoid Dell? I have nothing but good experience with Dell as a DAW machine, both lap-tops and desktops. And the same goes for HP. I reckon they're both great off-the-shelf brands. But like you said, there are so many options and I am sure that for every user you get different results with the same machines. I know I always back away from Compaq machines. They keep messing things up for me (and off course I blame the computer!!!)

    I thought Sonar could work with nearly any driver type. What could be wrong with the Sigmatel then? I thought the incompatibility issue had to do with other things and therefore needed something like Asio4all?
    post edited by ProjectM - 2005/09/13 02:43:03
    #27
    jcschild
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3409
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
    • Location: Kentucky y'all
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/13 10:33:19 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: wthrman

    In my experience, Alienware kicks some pretty serious butt. Check them out. Their quality is tops, and their prices are much better than they used to be.

    www.alienwre.com




    Hi Wthrman,

    actually if your refering to the 17" P4 laptop they sell its a clevo D900 series.
    which actually sucks really bad for audio. this is the same as the Sager 9000 series or the one we sell (D900)
    it does rock for gaming and video editing!

    Scott
    ADK
    #28
    dewdman42
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 839
    • Joined: 2004/09/20 16:37:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/13 14:40:39 (permalink)

    dewdman: I am just curious, but why do you avoid Dell? I have nothing but good experience with Dell as a DAW machine, both lap-tops and desktops. And the same goes for HP. I reckon they're both great off-the-shelf brands. But like you said, there are so many options and I am sure that for every user you get different results with the same machines. I know I always back away from Compaq machines. They keep messing things up for me (and off course I blame the computer!!!)



    well don't get me wrong, I bought a Dell for my mom and dad. I reccomend Dell for most people. For the money its hard to go wrong with a Dell computer *IF* you reformat the HD and reinstall XP from scratch your way instead of the Dell way, which is loaded with support crap and marketing crap that is all borderline spyware. But their stuff is about as cheap as you can get...and generally solid for the money.

    My main gripe with Dell is that they tend to use proprietary parts, and it usually comes down making it difficult to replace things, except from Dell. Also hard to get drivers sometimes.

    Speaking of laptops, my friend got that high end Dell laptop that is designed for gaming, etc.. His intent was to use it for music. Turns out you cannot get the WDM driver for that laptop, the driver is only available from Dell and Dell only provides the status quo MME driver. He tried and tried and tried and could never really get Sonar to work with the built in soundcard on that computer. Now that being said...I hear stories from people with HPs that are frustrated about not being to get good audo performance from the cardbus soundcard. So pick your poison. I picked my HP laptop because at the time, I read a bunch of reviews and it stacked up better in that price/feature range than any others, including Toshiba, Dell, IBM, etc.. The game is contantly changing though. I don't use cardbus either and I've had zero problems. Also the form factor of my HP is much thinner than any dells I've seen. I actually did consider a Dell laptop as well for a while, but I can't remember the reasons now that it was eliminated.

    But my feelings about Dell have more to do with a general feeling that they tend to do tricks to make their stuff cost less and those tricks usually involve proprietary parts. I avoid their desktops like the plaque. I would much rather build my own PC using exactly the motherboard, cpu, vid card, etc. that I want. Their laptops are probably on par with any of the other laptops...ALL of whom use proprietary parts to build up their machines. At that point you just gotta read the reviews and try to find other users who are actually using laptops for audio production to make sure its going to work for you. make sure you're going to find good support. ANother reason I chose my HP was because there is a super good 3rd party forum for this exact model of laptop with thousands of posts and info about supporting it. It far exceeds any support offered from Dell or HP. That was also a key factor for me. I found out everything I needed to know to make my laptop rip from that forum. Maybe you can find something similar for your Dell laptop.


    #29
    losguy
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5506
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
    • Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
    • Status: offline
    RE: 17" Laptop for SONAR? 2005/09/13 19:55:42 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: ProjectM
    Losguy: I have read somewhere on the forum that you can actually make Sonar work with the Sigmatel and Asio4all at 48KHz if you really want to. It could be usefull. I haven't tried it my self since I have the Echo Indigo, but you never know when built -in speakers come handy

    Yeah, thanks, I thought I read that somewhere too. It probebly could be handy, sometime, to use the builtin speakers and/or line in/out. But being stuck at one sample rate, and one that I don't typically use at that (48kHz), would be quite un-handy.

    On a sort-of-related subject, I thought I saw that SONAR 5 will be able to adjust for different bit depths dynamically (i.e. projet at one bit depth, track audio file at another bit depth). I wonder... will it also be able to do sample-rate conversion dynamically? So that a project recorded at one rate could be played back / appended to at another rate? I know this isn't optimal for studio production use, but for weird live situations or project-sharing/porting it could be useful (i.e. not having to convert all the tracked audio to the new rate).

    Psalm 30:12
    All pure waves converge at the Origin
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1