2 mics in phase

Author
greg54
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 551
  • Joined: 2011/01/27 18:13:52
  • Status: offline
2011/06/21 18:58:08 (permalink)

2 mics in phase

I'm going to use an SM57 and a ribbon mic to record guitar  (SM57 up close to the cab, the ribbon about 3' away).   Someone told me to make sure they're in phase.    Stupid questiion, but, How do I put them in phase??

Intel Core i7 4770 quad core 
16 GB DDR3, 1600 MHz SDRAM 
1T SSD; 2T 7200 GB HD's
Windows 10 Professional 64 bit   
Solid State Logic SSL2 interface 
Sonar Platinum

 
 
#1

18 Replies Related Threads

    Karyn
    Ma-Ma
    • Total Posts : 9200
    • Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
    • Location: Lincoln, England.
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/21 19:23:49 (permalink)
    Put them the same distance from the sound source and they'll be in phase.

    Mekashi Futo
    Get 10% off all Waves plugins.
    Current DAW.  i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum

    #2
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/21 19:25:22 (permalink)
    You just set them both up during the recording phase and record their signals onto two tracks. It is during the mix phase that you try to invert the phase of one of those tracks. The idea is to mix the two mics and maybe get a blend.

    When you invert the phase of one of them then the sound will change. For the better or worse? Hard to tell but the two resultant sounds will be different. Decide which one works best for you.

    With bass when you record though a DI and a MIC the phase thing will more often result in one of them sounding better. But with guitar it is more about one sound vs another.

    Putting both of them the same distance away is a good starting point. Even when doing that you will still get a difference between the two options and you may still prefer the sound of one of them being out of phase. But you are only limited to one version of two mics being summed and that is when they are equal distance. You miss out on the million other options when they are not.

    So here is the approach when they are not. Put one of them at a fixed distance from the speaker and make the other moveable. Try getting the guitarist to play and while you are in the control room, listen to what happens when an assistant moves the movable one in and out while you are summing the two in the control room. You need to do that twice as well with the second variation being one of them out of phase. You might hit a fantastic sweet spot where the two sound awesome together. They won't necessarily be the same distance from the speaker when this happens either. It is a form of EQ that sounds like nothing else and not even EQ can match it. You also need to be aware that the levels of these two mics (when being summed) also have a fairly big impact on the sound.

    But this is a bit more complicated. Do the equal distant thing first. Don't just assume the two in phase signals are best. You must audition the out of phase version just in case. It opens up a bit of a can of worms the moment you use two mics on a guitar cab. If you are not sure use one mic instead!

    Who says the best guitar sound is right in front. They say the tip of the flame is further out. So the idea of having one 3 feet away is actually a good one. I am assuming you are overdubbing this guitar and it is the only thing making sound in the room. In fact putting two mikes the same distance away is a bit of a waste of two mics. You are better off having one a very different distance to the other. Recording a guitar sound futher out is not the same as slipping multiple guitar tracks in time either. But that approach is good when the two mikes are equal distace, at least you can get some variation on the tones that result.

    The main thing is experiment and do some tests first to find out.


    post edited by Jeff Evans - 2011/06/21 19:56:42

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #3
    drewfx1
    Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/21 19:48:12 (permalink)
    Another way to adjust the phase relationship of 2 mics recorded to different tracks is to move one of the tracks by either delaying the closer or mic or moving the more distant mic up in time.

    You can think roughly 1ms per foot, but really you just adjust it until  the most important frequencies are adding together rather than canceling each other out.

     In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
    #4
    greg54
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 551
    • Joined: 2011/01/27 18:13:52
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/21 20:03:53 (permalink)
    Thanks!! 

    Greg

    Intel Core i7 4770 quad core 
    16 GB DDR3, 1600 MHz SDRAM 
    1T SSD; 2T 7200 GB HD's
    Windows 10 Professional 64 bit   
    Solid State Logic SSL2 interface 
    Sonar Platinum

     
     
    #5
    rockinrobby
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1265
    • Joined: 2010/06/17 19:28:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/21 22:36:39 (permalink)
    If one is farther away, the sound will reach it later, you can either move that track slightly forward, or move the one that's recorded close back a little. Otherwise, when you play them, you'll hear a phasing effect. And even still unless you get them perfectly aligned... 

    Why are you recording it this way intentionally? 
    post edited by rockinrobby - 2011/06/21 22:37:58

    http://www.reverbnation.com/rockinrobby

    Evil lurks here among us again... "Beware."
    #6
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 00:31:45 (permalink)
    Or save yourself a lot of grief and use one mic.




    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #7
    Rbh
    Max Output Level: -52 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2349
    • Joined: 2007/09/05 22:33:44
    • Location: Indiana
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 01:06:32 (permalink)
    I agree with Robby... using delay  or slipping the track accurately is the better method than inverting the phase. This time aligns the transients properly.




    I7 930 2.8 Asus PDX58D
    12 Gig
    Appollo
    CbB, Sonar Pro, Reaper, Samplitude, MixBuss
     Win7 Pro

    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=902832
    #8
    rockinrobby
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1265
    • Joined: 2010/06/17 19:28:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 01:58:27 (permalink)
    Well yeah, or just use 1 mic :-) I use 2 sometimes? One on the 12th fret, and one over the bridge? But I notice that they can be out of phase, even in that close grouping? I may try just using 1...

    http://www.reverbnation.com/rockinrobby

    Evil lurks here among us again... "Beware."
    #9
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 02:42:06 (permalink)
    Good to bring up the concept of adjusting the timing (track advance) of the further microphone. You don't have to pull it back all by 3 ms either if the mikes are 3 feet apart.  Do it in .5 ms increments and see how things sound along the way.

    Measure the distances between the guitar cab and the two microphones. That info will come in handy if you are doing any precise calculations.

    One mike is easy but two mikes can be fun. Also when I mentioned keeping one fixed and the other move, I meant only by a foot or so either in front of or behind the fixed mike. 1ms either way. Slight distance changes often result in noticable tone changes.

    I have been lucky to be in some quite nice dead rooms with minimal reflections and phasey stuff happens much less with any of these experiments in that environment.

    Always check the out of phase alt  sound. Some frequencies will align poorly as a result of the second mike phase reversed, but other things will align better. You can get two very good and strong sounds either way. It is a good technique for separating two guitar parts. If you double a guitar part and flip the phase of the second mike for that, it will help to separate the two similar guitars even though guitar and amp settings may not have changed much.

    Once you have got two channels representing one source I still think the moment you start panning them some form of stereo image will form and it is often good. It has to happen. If you pan you get three sounds from the two mikes. The left and right sides are more their normal mono sounds and the centre image is the combined sound in or out of phase. The more you pan the less you hear the phase reversal.

    But if you dont like any of it then just go back to that great SM57 you have got right in front and you won't go wrong.

    Another interesting thing to do is to setup a guitar cab and have a mike say 4 feet away. Point that mike at the cab but don't point the cab at the mike. Instead point it away on a slight angle. Put a large piece of wood about 2 feet away from the cab in the direction the cab is pointing. Setup a second mike near the first one but aim it at the piece of wood. You will get a nice stereo image of a single point source sound.  Due to extra time required for sound to go the direction of the wood.

    You can do this up close too with one mike right in front aimed at a cab that is pointing away. Set up the wood a foot or so away in the direction of the cab and have the second mike next to the first one aimed at the wood. It is also good to move the mike aimed at the wood in various positions going towards the wood speeding up the delay times.

    The reflection off the concept wood works great because when you look directly at the wood it sounds the same as looking directly at the cab.

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #10
    greg54
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 551
    • Joined: 2011/01/27 18:13:52
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 10:16:14 (permalink)
    A lot of guitarists use 2 mics when recording  (a guitar cab).  I heard a song by a friend, and his guitar tone was really nice.  I asked him about mic'ing his guitars, and he said he used his SM57 and a ribbon mic.   But he said to make sure they're in phase. 

    So I'm going to try recording my guitar that way.   I just didn't understand about the mics being in phase.  

    Thanks!!!  I appreciate all your input!!

    Greg
    post edited by greg54 - 2011/06/22 10:19:55

    Intel Core i7 4770 quad core 
    16 GB DDR3, 1600 MHz SDRAM 
    1T SSD; 2T 7200 GB HD's
    Windows 10 Professional 64 bit   
    Solid State Logic SSL2 interface 
    Sonar Platinum

     
     
    #11
    SCorey
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 538
    • Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:14
    • Location: Salt Lake City, UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 10:33:09 (permalink)
    Someone told me to make sure they're in phase.

    Don't worry too much about it.  If it's a problem it'll be fairly obvious.  Listen to one mic, then bring in the other mic.  If it sounds better, then you're fine. If it sounds worse, then move one or the other or both mics. 


    -Steve Corey
    #12
    greg54
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 551
    • Joined: 2011/01/27 18:13:52
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 10:46:37 (permalink)
    Good to know, Steve.  Thanks!

    Intel Core i7 4770 quad core 
    16 GB DDR3, 1600 MHz SDRAM 
    1T SSD; 2T 7200 GB HD's
    Windows 10 Professional 64 bit   
    Solid State Logic SSL2 interface 
    Sonar Platinum

     
     
    #13
    skullsession
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1765
    • Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
    • Location: Houston, TX, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 11:37:57 (permalink)
    There's always the opposite way as well.

    Place both mics on the sound source.  Flip the phase button on one preamp.  Then, move the distant mic around the room (with headphones on, while someone plays the guitar) until you get the sound to null as much as possible.  Then...go back to the control room and flip the phase on the preamp once more.

    Now...you're IN phase.

    HOOK:  Skullsessions.com  / Darwins God Album

    "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
    #14
    Tap
    Max Output Level: -30 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4536
    • Joined: 2008/10/09 11:55:30
    • Location: Newburyport, MA
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 12:16:54 (permalink)
    Skull ...  Yes that's probably the quickest and simplest solution and probably the easiest to implement for the performance.  I suppose if further refinement is needed, then modest movement of the second mic wav could be performed as well.

    MC4 - M-Audio FW410 / Behringer UCA202 - Fender Strat / Jazzmaster / DuoSonic / Washburn / Peavy Foundation M-Audio Radium 49 Roland Juno 106 / JazzChorus / Seymore Duncan Convertible - HP A1230N ( AMD Athalon 3800+ 2G Ram + 200G HD )

    http://soundclick.com/cut2thechaise

    #15
    greg54
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 551
    • Joined: 2011/01/27 18:13:52
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/22 12:40:48 (permalink)
    Thanks, guys!  

    Intel Core i7 4770 quad core 
    16 GB DDR3, 1600 MHz SDRAM 
    1T SSD; 2T 7200 GB HD's
    Windows 10 Professional 64 bit   
    Solid State Logic SSL2 interface 
    Sonar Platinum

     
     
    #16
    rockinrobby
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1265
    • Joined: 2010/06/17 19:28:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/23 00:58:44 (permalink)
    Or pay for a good guitar track from one of the pros here? Just sayin... There are a lot of people with a lot of talent... (I'm not counting myself among them). 

    http://www.reverbnation.com/rockinrobby

    Evil lurks here among us again... "Beware."
    #17
    Philip
    Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4062
    • Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/26 21:14:34 (permalink)
    +1 Bitflipper: 'Been there and done that: the 2 mics thing.  What a loser I've been!

    TBH, I'm having apparent luck using one good mic (U87) and pre (Avalon) for everything.

    In addition, 2 mics add twice the dirt as one.  Even Skull's excellent method seems like it would introduce twice the ambient distortion ... plus some phasiness if closer than 32 ft (if 1 msec = 1 foot, per Drew). 

    I'm not sure even Waves X-Noise remover can save that guitar tone's crackle, hiss, white noise, pink noise, etc.

    OTOH, somehow, EWQL uses 2 'special' mics on their MOR Les Paul guitars, FWIW; but every sample is cleaned to the max.  To my ears, their double mic-d guitars sound great only when LT-RT Haas delayed ... not something I'd want for solo lead guitars.

    Your ears judge.  Jeff has excellent ideas; but combining 2 separate takes is what many of us do with our guitars.

    Philip  
    (Isa 5:12 And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD)

    Raised-Again 3http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=12307501
    #18
    jbow
    Max Output Level: -0.2 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7601
    • Joined: 2003/11/26 19:14:18
    • Status: offline
    Re:2 mics in phase 2011/06/26 21:33:44 (permalink)
    I think you either have the mics the same distance or the second mic 3x the distance of the closer mic and it wont be out of phase but 2x distance will be out of phase... don't ask me why, I don't know... somehow I just learned it along the way.

    J

    Sonar Platinum
    Studiocat Pro 16G RAM (some bells and whistles)
    HP Pavilion dm4 1165-dx (i5)-8G RAM
    Octa-Capture
    KRK Rokit-8s
    MIDI keyboards...
    Control Pad
    mics. 
    I HATE THIS CMPUTER KEYBARD!
    #19
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1