5.2--worth it?

Author
Phoenix
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1886
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 18:25:33
  • Location: Long Island, New York
  • Status: offline
2006/05/03 00:42:23 (permalink)

5.2--worth it?

I know that on forums in general, people post more frequently when things are going wrong than when they are going right, so it doesn't surprise me that so far I've read more from folks who have had problems with 5.2 and had to return to 5.01, or before. Can't tell from these posts whether this is an exception or the rule, though, so I'm wondering...how are most of you doing with Sonar 5.2?
#1

16 Replies Related Threads

    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 01:38:41 (permalink)
    Phoenix ...

    No problems here (but I didn't have any dramas with 5.0.1 either).

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #2
    kstevege
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 490
    • Joined: 2003/12/06 20:57:59
    • Location: Patchogue, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 01:59:04 (permalink)
    Working great for me!!

    Steve
    #3
    stingie@tstt.net.tt
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 541
    • Joined: 2003/11/28 15:23:53
    • Location: Deep Space
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 04:53:43 (permalink)
    Excellent.

    Nice Tracks Recording Studio. Intel Dual core 13ins i5 MacBook Pro 2.5 Ghz. Quad core i5, Win 7 home premium 64 bit, 8 Ghz memory, 2 WD Caviar Black 7200 HDs. G-Tech hard drives, M-Audio Axiom 25, Fender Stratocaster guitar, Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 DSP firewire audio interface.
    #4
    Dave Horch
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 214
    • Joined: 2004/12/28 05:09:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 05:16:59 (permalink)
    great here - on a 1.9Ghz mowsheen with only 512 RAM!! DAMN!
    #5
    netstat
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 323
    • Joined: 2004/08/04 11:15:14
    • Location: Central
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 12:14:29 (permalink)
    I've had no problems either.

    Mahalo, Jan
    #6
    The Great Juan
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 243
    • Joined: 2004/08/30 21:47:43
    • Location: Hendersonville, TN
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 12:32:38 (permalink)
    No problems here either
    #7
    Bill OConnell
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 760
    • Joined: 2003/11/10 12:50:44
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 12:51:00 (permalink)
    So far so good.
    #8
    lazarous
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1461
    • Joined: 2005/09/15 11:55:42
    • Location: Minneapolis, MN
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 12:53:47 (permalink)
    Warm and yummy goodness on this end. Even with the UAD1 installed.

    Corey

    Ath 64 3500+
    MSI K8N N2 Plat ATX 939 Mobo
    2Gb DDR2 400
    RME Hammerfall HDSP 9652
    UAD1 4.2
    WinXP Pro SP2
    Sonar 8.3PE
    New Henry and Buster episodes available!
    #9
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 16:17:43 (permalink)
    it seems more stable .. although i haven't had a lot of stick time on it. but, it hasn't
    crashed when tracking .. and that was my biggest problem with 5, 5.01.

    jeff
    #10
    dcastle
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2623
    • Joined: 2004/11/15 12:40:02
    • Location: Inland Empire
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 17:03:20 (permalink)
    Greetings,

    I've found all of the SONAR 5 releases to be stable for me! In addition, I am really impressed with the gapless audio engine --- I didn't think it was going to be any big deal for me, but I have really grown to love it, and only now realize how much I missed it before.

    Regards,
    David

    ASUS M3A78 AMD 9950 Quad 2.6G 8GB
    Shure • Rhode • Audio-Technica • Allen&Heath GL2200-24
    MOTU 24i • Presonus Firepod • E-MU 1212m • Zoom H2
    SONAR 2XL-8PE • Sound Forge 1-9 • Audacity 0.1-1.3
    #11
    Boogie
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2106
    • Joined: 2003/11/19 15:45:21
    • Location: CALIFORNIA
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 20:34:51 (permalink)
    5.2 here and all is just hunky dory.

    #12
    juca
    Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1376
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 19:00:49
    • Location: Itajai - Santa Catarina - Brazil
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/03 20:58:04 (permalink)
    Hi:
    Sonar 5.2 working very fine. The only litle behaviour I have is when looping a region in a project which make use of VSTi´s. After any loops, a sound distortion similar to the one which occur when you set the latency so much low and the VSTi´s go out of sync.
    But you´ll suprise with the upcoming VST Adapter version (to be released shortly). It will solve this problem.
    For all the other specs, Sonar 5.2 rock, so after the adapter update Sonar 5.2 will rock totally!
    Greetings.

    ****** Juca Nascimento ******
    Keyboards/Composer/Arranger

    #13
    Phoenix
    Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1886
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 18:25:33
    • Location: Long Island, New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/11 13:20:19 (permalink)
    Thanks all for your comments.
    Juca, just curious...does the problem happen whether or not you freeze the VSTs?
    #14
    djhunt
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 69
    • Joined: 2006/04/24 22:09:00
    • Location: Middletown, CT
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/11 14:14:43 (permalink)
    Running swell for me here.
    #15
    Duojet
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1413
    • Joined: 2003/12/06 22:02:31
    • Location: NJ, US
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/11 14:55:05 (permalink)
    5.0 was not too good for me. 5.01 was an improvement, but 5.2 is running quite stable. a big improvement. i'm pretty happy with it.

    Intel Core2Duo e8400
    Abit IP35-E
    4GB Ram
    Windows 7 SP1 64 Bit
    EMU 1820m

    DFHS2, BFD2, Battery3, Amplitube2, GuitarRig3, Kontakt4, Ampeg SVX, Line6 PodXT
    #16
    Muziekschuur at home
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1442
    • Joined: 2006/03/01 03:30:22
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5.2--worth it? 2006/05/11 15:16:14 (permalink)
    a8v deluxe & AMD 3800x2 1 GIG kingston dual channel memory ) (Zalman 7000 cooler)
    Sonar 5.2 & beta adapter (first version)
    No problems (No vsampler)
    (homebuild into a 19" case)
    I am happy that Cakewalk offers a surround package wich offers stereo into surround wich is more than Logic offers
    and is comparable with Nuendo 3 & the surround package.

    The fact you can integrate Adobe audition /wavelab or Soundforge into the menu (so any kind of editor can be integrated)
    makes the package comfortable.
    #17
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1