5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5?

Author
s_barber
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 390
  • Joined: 2006/02/03 17:34:20
  • Status: offline
2006/02/03 18:13:56 (permalink)

5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5?

I have a Dell Laptop Pentium M 1.7 Ghz., XP Pro with 1 GB RAM and 5400 RPM 80 GB Hard Drive. Will the laptop and 5400 RPM drive be enough horsepower to run Sonar 5 Producer? I'm planning to use firewire to drive an M-Audio or Echo Firewire interface 8-10 channel or something comparable. I see they recommend a 7400 RPM HD. I don't expect to go track crazy but expect to use a fair amount of plug ins and effects. Anyone have ideas or experience with this?

Used to run Cakewalk 2.0 DOS on a 286 years(eons?) ago. This will be a real techology jump but don't want to buy the SW if the goose won't fly.

Thanks.
#1

6 Replies Related Threads

    yep
    Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4057
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 15:21:41
    • Location: Hub of the Universe
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5? 2006/02/03 21:38:36 (permalink)
    Download the demo, start using it, and see what happens.

    Slower hard disks will have a harder time keeping up if you are playing back or recording lots of tracks, especially at higher sample rates/bit depths, or if you are using demanding (big) sample-based plugin instruments. Hard disk speed doesn't pose much of a hinderance to your ability to run effects and synthesizers-- that has more to do with CPU, RAM, and bus speed.

    Working at higher latencies will take a lot of the strain off the hard disk, but will comprimise your ability to hear what you're doing in real time (i.e. there will be a delay between when you press a key on the keyboard and when you hear the note from the plugin instrument)-- this can be a problem if you plan to use a lot of software synthesizers and samplers, but maybe less of an issue when recording "real" instruments.

    Sonar comes with a couple of handy little meters in the lower right corner-- one indicates CPU usage, the other indicates disk usage. They run from green to yellow to red, then Sonar crashes-- gives you a very good idea of how much is too much and where your weakness is.

    To run a full-blown, full-featured "studio in a box" that is reliable enough to be called professional, you almost certainly need two fast hard drives, a fast system bus, lots of RAM, and a heavy-duty CPU. On the other hand, Sonar will absolutely boot up and run on much creakier machines and there are plenty of people making great home recordings today who would love to have your system, so you might be fine.

    Perhaps more to the point, fast hard drives are not a requirement of Sonar so much as they are a requirement of modern computer recording in general-- Logic, ProTools, Nuendo, N-Tracks, Samplitude, whatever-- it's not some Sonar-specific requirement, it's the physical demands of moving large amounts of digital audio data in real-time. So when you say you "don't want to buy the SW if the goose won't fly," you should rephrase that and say, "I don't want to do computer recording if my hard drive is too slow," and see if it's still something you agree with.

    cheers.
    post edited by yep - 2006/02/03 21:44:02
    #2
    bill durham
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 460
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 11:26:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5? 2006/02/03 22:35:00 (permalink)
    Negative Ghost Rider....the pattern is full.

    You will cuss and scream if you try to do it with a 5400 rpm drive.

    BD

    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/4/bdandfriends_music.htm

    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/billdurham_music.htm
    #3
    motux
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 68
    • Joined: 2005/09/17 14:46:16
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5? 2006/02/05 08:27:21 (permalink)
    I'm running Sonar 5PE on my 2Ghz PentiumM with the internal 100Gb 5400RPM HD without breaking a sweat
    #4
    saturdaysaint
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 447
    • Joined: 2004/07/20 07:55:24
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5? 2006/02/05 22:24:59 (permalink)
    My guess is that Sonar 5 probably eats up more CPU cycles than older versions, but hard-drive useage should be similar. To ensure higher track counts, you might want to use 16-bit rather than 24 bit and 44 khz rather than 48 or higher - with those settings you should be able to have a respectable track count.
    #5
    jb
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2020
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:45:25
    • Location: heart of late capitalist darkness
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5? 2006/02/06 13:57:36 (permalink)
    Compaq V2000, Turion Ml37, 1g ram, Firebox. I forgot to switch the project from the 5400 drive to the external 7200 drive and after recording 28 24/44 tracks at 3 ms latency(double-mic acoustic guitars), two at a time with input monitoring on, a perfect space on a bus and Sonitus comp on the master, I then upped the latency to 6 ms. and added 4 vocal, 3 bass and 2 electric guitars as well as a Sonitus reverb and 3 Sonitus track compressors. Obviously recording 8 tracks at once may not be so easy but there you are ...

    Best,

    Celeron 300A o/c 450, SBLive, Win98SE
    #6
    skyy38
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4
    • Joined: 2006/09/15 16:42:01
    • Status: offline
    RE: 5400 RPM Enough Juice To Run Sonar 5? 2012/05/16 03:02:41 (permalink)
    motux


    I'm running Sonar 5PE on my 2Ghz PentiumM with the internal 100Gb 5400RPM HD without breaking a sweat
     
    So in the present day, I shouldn't worry about running Pro Tools MP on my Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2 GHz with the internal 500gb 5400 RPM HD, right?
     
    I do have ONE more question though....it's about the system requirements for the USB Controller Keyboard.



    #7
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1