A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand.

Author
4partmusic
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 67
  • Joined: 2003/11/15 13:50:17
  • Location: Blue Springs MO
  • Status: offline
2013/08/02 09:15:28 (permalink)

A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand.

My son loves dirt track racing (stay with me here) but the local track is under fire for noise control.  This probably wouldn't work but if you recorded the various cars, A-mods, B-mods etc.  Took them into Sonar and reversed phase and then played that back at the track at fairly high volume over a PA would it actually cancel out some of the noise and lessen the volume?
 
Probably a silly question and not a normal use for recording software.
 
Thanks,
Terry
 
 
 
 
#1

12 Replies Related Threads

    jb101
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2946
    • Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 09:19:17 (permalink)
    I'm pretty sure this wouldn't work as the sound of the vehicles will be constantly changing in pitch etc., so there wouldn't be any nulling.

     Sonar Platinum
    #2
    robert_e_bone
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 8968
    • Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
    • Location: Palatine, IL
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 10:07:22 (permalink)
    I think it's a good idea, BUT it would never work, for exactly the reasons noted in the above reply from the other poster.
     
    Flipping the phase only works on identical frequencies.
     
    I think you would end up with the noise folks coming a lot sooner and madder.
     
    Sorry, 
     
    Bob Bone
     

    Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!"
     
    Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) 
    Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22
    Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64
    Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others
    MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es
    Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms  
    #3
    Guitarpima
    Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4125
    • Joined: 2005/11/19 23:53:59
    • Location: Terra 3
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 10:14:55 (permalink)
    Plant those evergreen bushes that grow tall around the track. Trees as well. That's your best bet but it takes a while.

    Notation, the original DAW. Everything else is just rote. We are who we are and no more than another. Humans, you people are crazy.
     
     Win 7 x64  X2  Intel DX58SO, Intel i7 920 2.66ghz 12gb DDR3  ASUS ATI EAH5750  650w PSU 4x WD HDs 320gb  DVD, DVD RW Eleven Rack, KRK Rokit 8s and 10s sub
    #4
    konradh
    Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3325
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 10:23:49 (permalink)
    You are quite clever to think of this, but I agree that there are too many variables.  If you could come up with an advanced technique that worked, you could probably retire to the South of France.
     
    I even tried the old trick of recording a second track with no music but only the unwanted hiss and buzz, and reversing phase.  I got only about a 30% (subjective measurement) improvement because of subtle variations, although that plus HPF helped.
     
    The technique is best for very constant sounds like 60-cycle hum.
    post edited by konradh - 2013/08/02 23:00:19

    Konrad
    Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/

    Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka.  Rokit 6s. 
    #5
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 10:39:53 (permalink)
    Not a silly question at all. That principle is used in active "bass traps" to cancel resonances and flatten room response. Just not very well, and for the same reason the scheme wouldn't work at the race track.
     
    The problem is that noise is spreading out and bouncing around in a chaotic fashion, so that the actual spectral characteristics will not measure the same at any two points. Consequently, any correction that worked at one location would not be appropriate for another location.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #6
    wizard71
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 836
    • Joined: 2012/02/12 05:45:05
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 12:03:08 (permalink)
    Love this question. It would be a scientific achievement indeed to do this and I am sure it would cost millions if it were actually possible. Free ear muffs for moaning locals would be much simpler. Or electric cars ;-)

    http://www.youtube.com/SpaceTimeAces
    https://soundcloud.com/space-time-aces
    Sonar Platinum - Win 8.1 x64 - Haswell 4770k - ASrock Z87 pro3 - 32gb ram - Fractal design R4 case - 3x HDD 1 USB 2.0 external 1x cr M4 ssd for samples - Octa-capture - Sontronics Aria - Sontronics STC-1s - BX8 monitors - ARC 2 system - Kawai CA63 piano - Kawai MP6 Stage piano - Fender custom Telecaster FMT - Yamaha LL6 - Fender P bass


    #7
    jonny3d
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 179
    • Joined: 2010/05/02 11:51:37
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 12:09:48 (permalink)
    For what it's worth ..I was sharing this post with my son in law, Andy...he thought if you could put a wireless mic on each racer and send that thru reverse polarity unit broadcast thru the PA..interesting thought and perhaps the most feasible!
     
    #8
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 12:19:14 (permalink)
    For the sound to "null"... it has to be exactly 180 degrees out of phase.
    You wouldn't be able to mic each car... and shoot all that sound thru a PA... and expect it to null.
    The cars are moving, the noise is changing dynamically...
    The PA would be stationary.
     
    Theoretically, If you could mic each car... and each car had an onboard sound generator that could output the same dynamic noise 180 degrees out of phase... this would be plausible.
     
    I believe auto manufacturers have already experimented with this for reducing noise
     
     
     

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #9
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 12:23:51 (permalink)
    Noise cancellation is a good idea, but not practical w/ so many variables as others have said.  You would have to have a mic at every house and enough computer power to instantly compute the noise and reverse the phase and pa it at that location.  Much like the Bose noise cancelling headphones etc.  Maybe talk to the NSA?
     
    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #10
    4partmusic
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 67
    • Joined: 2003/11/15 13:50:17
    • Location: Blue Springs MO
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 18:25:19 (permalink)
    Thanks for the responses.  I didn't think it would work but it was worth a shot.  Johnny 3D that was an interesting thought but I think Jim's point of the PA being stationary would play a part as well wouldn't it?
     
    Thanks again everyone.
    Terry
    #11
    SuperG
    Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1371
    • Joined: 2012/10/19 16:09:18
    • Location: Edgewood, NM
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 19:34:48 (permalink)
    They're doing it on internally on new jets and turboprop planes these days - cuts down on cabin noise. I've got a set of active noise cancelling ear buds - fantastic technology.

    laudem Deo
    #12
    jb101
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2946
    • Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
    • Status: offline
    Re: A little OT and probably too technical for me to understand. 2013/08/02 22:29:27 (permalink)
    robert_e_bone
    in the above reply from the other poster.
     
    Bob Bone
     



    Really, Bob?
     
    Can you not bring yourself to say jb, at least?  It would have taken less time.
     
    Sorry if I've offended you that much..

     Sonar Platinum
    #13
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1