A problem with my pedal setup.

Author
dxp
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 252
  • Joined: 2007/06/04 12:56:34
  • Location: Indiana
  • Status: offline
2013/06/05 07:25:39 (permalink)

A problem with my pedal setup.

I have a DigiTech modeling pedal that is supposed to be connected to the amp thru the effect loop and not the main input.
I also have a couple pedals I just added that of course connect thru the main input of the amp.
Is it OK to connect the new pedals (Boss CS3 and TC Electronics Flashback Delay) in series with the DigiTech and use the effects loop input or do these type of pedals HAVE to be connected thru the main amp input?
Thanks for any help
 
Dave
#1

11 Replies Related Threads

    Guitarhacker
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24398
    • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/05 08:01:58 (permalink)
    I think you could easily run them in the fx loop without any issues. You won't blow them up, if that's what you're concerned about. So.... give it a try and see how you like it.
     
    You could also run the modeler straight in as well.  Try the various combinations for connecting things, see what one you like the best and use that.
     
    Of course, the only connection you do want to avoid is to connect the FX devices to the speaker outputs..... but you know that already..... that will very likely cause some stinky smoke.

    My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

    MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
    Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


    BMI/NSAI

    "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
    #2
    dxp
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 252
    • Joined: 2007/06/04 12:56:34
    • Location: Indiana
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/05 08:13:05 (permalink)
       yeah best to avoid that...
     
    I just wasn't sure if there was some impedance mis-match or something that would damage
    either a pedal or the amp. I don't know much about that stuff.
    I wonder why the documentation on the modeling pedal says to connect it thru the effects loop?
    It also has a switch on it to change if you are plugging it in direct to an audio interface and bypassing an amp all together.
    As long as the end result of plugging here and there is nothing more than the sound quality vs the stinky smoke, experimenting is good...
     
     
    #3
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/05 22:25:39 (permalink)
    Dave, I'll give you my take for what it's worth.
     
    All special effects like verb, delay, chorus, flange, and the like, are better when put in your effects loop because you want those effects to be clean.
     
    Effects like eq, compression, pitch tranposer, wah, volume pedal, distortion, etc, are best in the front of the amp because they are primarily "dirty colored effects". If you put them in a loop, it would be like putting a distortion box directly into a mixing board.
     
    Now with your current situation, if the modeling pedal is supposed to be in the loop, then that's where it should go. The Boss CS 3 could be placed in the loop or in the front. Though that contradicts what I said up there, I don't know how the modeler works and you may very well need to compress it through the loop. You'll have to experiment and see if you need that. The delay I would definitely run through the loop.
     
    Your best bet is to experiment though because every pedal and situation is different. I'll tell you my reasoning for the above advice though just so you know the method to my madness. Let's look at the front of your amp as a channel in Sonar. Any effects that you put into the front of your amp would be equal to you putting effects into your FX bin on a track in Sonar. This often times makes the signal a bit dirty when you use verbs, delay, chorus and the like. You're better off when you put those effects in a bus, create a send and then insert a send on the track. With me so far?
     
    Ok, when we go into your effects loop in your amp, it's the equal to creating that bus and inserting a send to a track. You're working off of two signals now. You have your dry/driven sound, and then your uncolored, effected sound. This makes reverbs, chorus, flange, phasor etc more lush/transparent without the dirty part of your signal chain dirtying things up, understand? So that's why I wouldn't normally put a compressor in my effects loop. It would be like using one as an effects send and I normally do NOT like to do things that way because 8 times out of 10, a compressor is going to sound its best in a guitar rig in the front input instead of the effects loop.
     
    But because you have that modeling thing going on, I have no idea what your needs may be...so that's why I'm saying experiment a little. But a good rule of thumb for me has been what I've shared above. Good luck! :)
     
    -Danny
    post edited by Danny Danzi - 2013/06/05 22:27:23

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #4
    Dude Ivey
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 280
    • Joined: 2012/12/25 01:28:32
    • Location: Athens, Texas
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/05 23:27:59 (permalink)
    What type of effects loop does your amp have? Series or Parallel? This is important. My amp has both,therefore different effects go in different loops.

    X-3e/X-2a, Windows 7 64bit, Intel i7-2600, 16Gb ram, 4 Tb HDD, 32 inch monitor, RME FireFace UFX, Shure SRH1840 Headphones, KRK Rockit 5 monitors w/ KRK 10 inch sub and 3 Dachshunds.
    #5
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/06 06:31:45 (permalink)
    I recently spent a whole day re-ordering my Fx chain, plugging them all into different positions in the board and seeing what works best "in front" or "in the loop".
     
    Turns out my original configuration wasn't too far off.
     
    Like Danny says, anything that affects your tone in the Time Domain (Delay/Reverb/Flange etc) are laways best in the loop
     
    Distortion/Wah/Compression for me always work best in front of the amp.
     
    The only real eye opener for me was the position of the Wah - everyone (on GS) says put it at the front of the chain, but this really messes up my distortion, so I now run Distortion 1 > Wah > Distortion 2, for maximum flexibility

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #6
    dxp
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 252
    • Joined: 2007/06/04 12:56:34
    • Location: Indiana
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/06 06:34:09 (permalink)
    @ Dude Ivey - Man I have no idea if it is series or parallel.
     
    @Danny - Great explanation Danny. I did not know any of that stuff.
          The analogy to the track/bus send in SONAR brought it all together.
          Given the fact I have to plug my guitar in SOMEWHERE, and the recommendation
           for the modeling pedal is the effects loop, along with your recommendation for the delay
           being there, I guess the compressor just has to fall in line and go there as well.
     
    This does lend itself to another question though. For you guys that have huge setups with
    lots of pedals and such, how do you handle the 'where do I plug it in' situation given the
    guidelines you mentioned above Danny?
    Certainly there are mixtures of pedals, distortions, delays, reverbs etc in a lot of people's
    rigs. How can you possibly follow the guidelines mentioned above with that combination?
    Perhaps you don't and it's just the 'experiment and see where it sounds best' principal.
     
    Thanks for the input. Always appreciated.
     
    Dave 
     
    #7
    dxp
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 252
    • Joined: 2007/06/04 12:56:34
    • Location: Indiana
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/06 07:28:31 (permalink)
    @ Jonesey - That sounds like a fun day of experimentation. Curious, did you quantify the
    differences in the sound by just playing/listening or did you record it and listen to the playback, or both?
    Also, was there any alcohol involved? 
     
    #8
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/06 09:38:38 (permalink)
    No alcohol involved, hell not even any weed, and I was purely switching pedal order & playing/listening, so I guess you could argue my results weren't entirely objective, but I had a fun time!

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #9
    dxp
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 252
    • Joined: 2007/06/04 12:56:34
    • Location: Indiana
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/06 13:03:35 (permalink)
    Bristol_Jonesey
    No alcohol involved, hell not even any weed, and I was purely switching pedal order & playing/listening, so I guess you could argue my results weren't entirely objective, but I had a fun time!


     
    objectivity can be over-rated at times...    
    MAYBE you should redo the experiment with the  'proper frame of mind' in place....
     
    #10
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/06 13:56:16 (permalink)
    Well I can't speak
    dxp
    @ Dude Ivey - Man I have no idea if it is series or parallel.
     
    @Danny - Great explanation Danny. I did not know any of that stuff.
          The analogy to the track/bus send in SONAR brought it all together.
          Given the fact I have to plug my guitar in SOMEWHERE, and the recommendation
           for the modeling pedal is the effects loop, along with your recommendation for the delay
           being there, I guess the compressor just has to fall in line and go there as well.
     
    This does lend itself to another question though. For you guys that have huge setups with
    lots of pedals and such, how do you handle the 'where do I plug it in' situation given the
    guidelines you mentioned above Danny?
    Certainly there are mixtures of pedals, distortions, delays, reverbs etc in a lot of people's
    rigs. How can you possibly follow the guidelines mentioned above with that combination?
    Perhaps you don't and it's just the 'experiment and see where it sounds best' principal.
     
    Thanks for the input. Always appreciated.
     
    Dave 
     



    Well I can't speak for everyone in this situation, but most guys have a few different signals flowing through their rigs. When I use my big rig, Goliath, everything goes through a Bradshaw Switching System. I have my "front end" which would be like the front of your amp, then I have my "loop" but the Bradshaw doesn't have just one loop...it has several channels as well as several loops. I don't want to confuse you with that thing though.
     
    As far as mixtures, all my dirty effects go in my front end. Meaning, both of my pre-amps. Digitech 2101, a Tri-Axis and an old Rocktron Chameleon for back up. I also have a few Boss compressor sustainer pedals that are in this same chain because they boost a little when needed. The cool thing about the Bradshaw is, you press one button and it controls what effects are present in that patch as well as what will not be there. So I leave those compressors on at all times. They run through 2 channels of the Bradshaw. When I click a patch that uses them, their channels open up.
     
    I run my pitch transposer (intelligent) in the front end as well. The reason being, to me this is like another guitar. It needs the dirty signal and it needs a lot of it. This thing in my effects loop would require me to turn up the inputs on it which would bring in hiss. In the front end part of my chain, this gets the signal it needs and I don't need it to be in stereo. I can always use imaging effects in my loop to simulate stereo if I need it.
     
    All my delay effects, verbs, sampler, unintelligent pitch transposer (this one doesn't need the signal like the intelligent one needs. Tuning and signal boost is super important on the other one...with this one, it doesn't need any of that...totally different animal) phaser, flange, special effects. I want all these effects to be clean. Now let's look at it another way.
     
    Everything I've said above is NOT the case when I play with my Van Halen tribute band. Eddie didn't use a loop in the old days. All his effects went right in line in the front of the amp. So that's what I do also when I use that rig. This makes my delay, flange, verb, phaser a bit dirty...but it's supposed to be that way because that was part of Ed's sound.
     
    Knowing where to put things is trial and error. The same as me telling you "ok, this is the order I would use" if you listed all your effects. You may try something different than I suggest with one pedal that makes a drastic difference for you in YOUR particular situation, know what I mean? Like for example...anyone that puts a Wah last in the chain will experience a wah/volume effect that sounds terrible. The sound will wah, but it will also change volume and sort of disappear in the mix.
     
    If you put the wah FIRST in the chain and everything else after, when you wah the sound, only the sound "wah's" and will NOT change in volume to where it disappears. Your volume will stay the same all during your "wah" time which is the way *I* personally prefer my sound to be. With order/arrangement, it depends what you want to do. Do you want to delay your flange or flange your delay? Do you want to distort your effects, or effect your distortion? This is where the order of where you put things comes into play. I like my distortion first....followed by a compressor to keep it tight...or vice versa depending on the compressor used, followed by flange, chorus, phaser, delay then verb last so the verb packages it up. That's if I were running all my stuff in the front end.
     
    For the hybrid of front end and effects loop, the same as above but all the stuff that isn't distortion/eq/wah/boost/compression would be in the loop. You just have to experiment and see what makes the most sense to you as well as what sounds the best in your set up. There are no right or wrongs other than to me, a wah last in the chain is wrong because you lose volume. Everything else...experiment and have fun. This is how unique sounds and players inspired generations. :) 
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #11
    dxp
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 252
    • Joined: 2007/06/04 12:56:34
    • Location: Indiana
    • Status: offline
    Re: A problem with my pedal setup. 2013/06/06 18:00:39 (permalink)
    Ahhh so the front end switching giz is the key then.
    Enlightening thread for me as I had no idea some of these pedals should or could be connected via the effects loop. Honestly I just thought that was if you had some external processing gear to send it thru.
    Duh, pedal -external -gear.
    I do feel kinda' stupid right now... Lol. That is ok tho. I have been educated.
    Thx to all that responded.
    Danny, if ever you did NOT have a story I would feel the end is nigh....

    dave
    #12
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1