A vote on what you consider to be the next important update to Sonar.

Page: < 123 Showing page 3 of 3
Author
LJB
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1502
  • Joined: 2009/07/29 10:31:31
  • Location: South Africa
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 09:23:01 (permalink)
I'm going retro on my next projects, so full VST1 and Windows 98 support please.

Ludwig Bouwer, One Big Room Studios.
--------------------
Cakewalk
with all the trimmings / Win 10Pro 64 / Intel i7-7700 / Asus Prime Z270k / 16GB DDR4 / RME HDSP9652 / RME UFX / Black Lion Audio ADA8000 / ART MPA & ART Pro Channel / Focusrite Voicemaster Pro / Aphex 107

Check out my work at www.onebigroom.co.za

#61
Truckermusic
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1924
  • Joined: 2005/07/22 10:34:16
  • Location: Riverview, Florida
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 09:25:11 (permalink)
5

Staff View Notation improvement!

Clifford

http://www.soundclick.com/cliffordamundsen 
NZXT Phantom Case (in Black)
Windows 7, Service Pack 1, 64 Bit OP
Sonar X3 Producer, 64 Bit 
Asus P8P67 Pro Rev.3 MoBo
16 Gig of Ram 
4.5 Gighz
Intel i-7 2600k Quad Core Sandy Bridge
Unibrain Firewire Card
Edirol FA-101 Firewire interface
Mackie Big Knob
NI Komplete 8
Machine 2
#62
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5562
  • Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
  • Location: Baton Rouge Area
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 09:29:25 (permalink)
LJB


I'm going retro on my next projects, so full VST1 and Windows 98 support please.

LOL!! 

Grem

Michael
 
Music PC
i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, 
Home PC
AMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 
Surface Pro 3
Win 10  i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
#63
Jalcide
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 48
  • Joined: 2012/07/11 23:50:54
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 11:24:24 (permalink)
 #1

(cuz it will help achieve #2 and #4. #4 due to how it reduces cpu utilization for plugins not processing audio at a particular point in time.)

- nested track folders, please!
- bus folders! (n-deep, nest-able, of course)
- full color customization of absolutely everything. if certain UI elements must be image-based, perhaps an xml file to make them editable with a user-generated image replacement folder. not even full theme-ing, just the ability to tweak the existing artwork for getting our darker themes happening, would be huge. :-) if you do this, i'll make a dark colorized theme for us.
- an alternate mode / setting for the audio engine to force it to favor pre-buffering over low-latency (for those times when it comes in handy)
- a larger, more customizable area uptop, above the time rulers, for visually defining the song parts (intro, verse, chorus, etc.)
- more logic-like bezier curve tools for the automation lanes
- ability to have several instances of the console window open, with per-track settings, or smart rules for showing / hiding different types of channels (for those of us with several monitors) :-)
- allow VST windows to remember their width when they are narrower than the VST toolbar
post edited by Jalcide - 2012/09/10 12:32:21
#64
Del
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 168
  • Joined: 2004/08/20 13:36:46
  • Location: USA
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 11:53:30 (permalink)
bobguitkillerleft


A way better "spectrum analyzer"that could be part of the Pro Channel,something as sophisticated as BIAS Repli-Q,would be spectacular,that alone could make X2 "The Indusrty Standard" 


Oh, I like this suggestion!   Especially if its part of the ProChannel......

I also like the suggestions about more options for adding color.



Regards,
Del
 
www.thebrothersglaser.com
 
DAW: Cakewalk by Bandlab-64bit 
 
 
#65
dmbaer
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
  • Location: Concord CA
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 12:10:05 (permalink)
Voice in the wilderness here ... but what I most want is better tempo tools for those of us who do only in-the-box MIDI orchestrations.
 
As to VST3, I have yet to see a compelling reason to even care about it.
#66
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 12:15:58 (permalink)
I vote for the same three I voted for before X2.

1. Full color customization
2. Nested folders
3. True drum kit piece solo within a multi-out audio folder when drum map is used
#67
Juan Sanchez
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 310
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 17:37:03
  • Location: Lansing, MI
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 12:20:11 (permalink)
5

Take Care, Juan Sanchez

Rockin in the free world
#68
TraceyStudios
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 603
  • Joined: 2005/10/13 12:40:33
  • Location: Chandler, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 16:05:49 (permalink)
I woudl really like to see custom toolbar options

AMD FX-6100 six-core processor 3.3GHz
8 Gig RAM
SONAR X3 Producer
Tascam FW1884
Mackie Blackbird
Presonus Digimax
Avalon U5
BFD2
SL Trigger
Alesis DM8 Pro drums
KRK Rokit 8s
KRK 10s
ARC2

Folgers Dark Roast, a bit of crazy :)
& lots of help from the forums!
 
http://www.reverbnation.com/blakkmire
#69
A1MixMan
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1706
  • Joined: 2003/11/19 16:15:11
  • Location: SunriseStudios
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be the next important update to Sonar. 2012/09/10 17:49:13 (permalink)
Staff View updates.

A1
#70
firefly9000
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 87
  • Joined: 2012/05/23 21:48:03
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be the next important update to Sonar. 2012/09/10 18:17:41 (permalink)
Here's an alternative to Staff view improvements (that seems to be taking forever to fix): integration in Sonar of either Finale or Sibelius - I know I tried Sibelius a while back but could not get it for the life of me to work properly in Sonar.

I'm not a programer but basically it would be great if you could write in Finale/Sibelius and those midi tracks could be routed to a sampler/synth etc... Being a classically trained musician I find it much more useful to follow harmonies and counterpoint in notation rather than dots and lines of PRV. The PRV does have its place but sometimes I feel like I'm writing Morse code rather than music...

This would leave notation programming to the ones that have a lot of experience with it. Maybe it could be a win/win for both Sonar and Finale... Just a thought...
#71
Jackdied
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 99
  • Joined: 2012/06/11 16:37:37
  • Status: offline
Re:A vote on what you consider to be important in Sonar. 2012/09/10 18:39:19 (permalink)
4
#72
Page: < 123 Showing page 3 of 3
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1