ARE MULTIPLE SSD'S REALLY NECESSARY

Author
Delphinion
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11
  • Joined: 2011/03/09 04:31:39
  • Status: offline
2012/02/24 19:18:37 (permalink)

ARE MULTIPLE SSD'S REALLY NECESSARY

I know that multiple 'regular' Hard Disk Drives are recommended for performance, eg, one for the Operating System and Programs and another one for Audio files (and even a third one for Softsynths and Samples). But does this still apply with the new Solid State Drives, considering their speed? Could a single SSD do what multiple HDD's do?
post edited by MikeHell - 2012/02/24 19:24:21
#1

5 Replies Related Threads

    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:ARE MULTIPLE SSD'S REALLY NECESSARY 2012/02/25 04:23:53 (permalink)
    Unfortunately, to get a reasonable amount of space (> 1Tb) you're still looking at a huge cost outlay.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #2
    Delphinion
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11
    • Joined: 2011/03/09 04:31:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:ARE MULTIPLE SSD'S REALLY NECESSARY 2012/02/26 17:54:36 (permalink)
    Cost aside, my question is, would one SSD be faster than multiple HDD's?
    #3
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:ARE MULTIPLE SSD'S REALLY NECESSARY 2012/02/27 11:28:55 (permalink)
    Hi Mike,
     
    The answer is not a simple blanket yes or no.
    The latest generation of (reasonably affordable) SSDs sustain slightly over 500MB/Sec.
    That's over 3 times the speed of the fastest conventional HDs.
    That said, I wouldn't want a single 120GB SSD to be my boot drive, audio drive, and samples drive.
    Far too small... and you're asking a lot from a single unit.
     
    My personal DAWs consist of the following:
    • Fast conventional HD for OS/Apps
    • Fast conventioanal HD for Audio
    • Pair of fast conventional HDs for disk-streaming sample libraries
    • Latest generation SSD for disk-streaming sample libraries
    This yields all the performance and space I need... while keeping the budget within reason.
     
     
    I like to use SSD for disk-streaming specific sample libraries... as it allows me to pull a LOT of polyphony.
    IMO, This is where SSD really shines.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #4
    haydn12
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 322
    • Joined: 2007/01/29 17:12:04
    • Status: offline
    Re:ARE MULTIPLE SSD'S REALLY NECESSARY 2012/02/27 16:02:59 (permalink)
    I use the same setup as Jim Roseberry has above except that I have an 80 GB SSD for my OS/Apps drive. 

    LA Scoring Strings is on my other SSD as this library with all the divisi sections needs the fast SSD performance.

    Jim
    #5
    tyacko
    Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1190
    • Joined: 2007/01/06 07:20:16
    • Location: Pittsburgh, PA
    • Status: offline
    Re:ARE MULTIPLE SSD'S REALLY NECESSARY 2012/02/28 07:50:32 (permalink)
    Just this weekend I moved samples onto an SSD (Superior Drummer 2 was my main reason) as I was having CPU spikes I couldn't figure out (even at 1024).  Once I move the from a conventional 7200rpm to my SSD I was able to run the same project (no other changes) at 128 samples and even 64 samples with minor pops/clicks and No CPU spikes.  Yay!

    I also run an SSD for my OS drive as I really like the fast startup of the OS and Apps.

    Tom

    Our SoundClick page

    ASUS P9X79 PRO, Intel i7 3930K, 32gig RAM G.SKILL Ripjaws, RME Babyface USB, GeForce GTX 550 Ti, UAD-2, Intel 510 120gig SSD Drive, Win7 64-bit, Sonar X1E 64-bit, Studio One V2 
    #6
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1