ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for ....

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
timboe
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 760
  • Joined: 2004/01/07 09:01:29
  • Status: offline
2011/01/29 22:30:30 (permalink)

ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for ....

Hi CW

Please see this  Avid / PT  Link:-

Pro Tools Feedback Community Register

Very significanlty   Avid has already announced that this Register will form the core-foundation-basis for all future PT development.


Along with  PT9, this is no small move from Avid - all other DAW developers would be naive to ignore not just what Avid is doing but how they are doing it.

Surely something similar to this Feedback / Feature Request Register - along with a similar commitment from CW Management for it to be the basis of Sonar development  -  would go a  very-very-very  long way to   [ regaining ]  and staying the overall  best / most full-featured DAW on the market.

I have not posted this just for fun or to start some sort of  PT  vs  X1  discussion.

It is such a brilliant but simple idea - the best part is that if you look at the Register Request list, you can see  [ mostly and generally ]   just how well featured Sonar already is.

I think this is a golden opportunity - a paradigm shift for CW which I am certain all users would welcome - just imagine how brilliant  X2 etc.....  could be with this sort of feedback and input ....... and for the Bakers ...... there would never be a repeat of the recent  X1 " kafuffle ".


I really hope this post is taken with the genuine and good intent that I have presented it with.

TIm


post edited by timboe - 2011/01/29 22:34:10
#1

74 Replies Related Threads

    Lynn
    Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6117
    • Joined: 2003/11/12 18:36:16
    • Location: Kansas City, MO
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/29 22:35:15 (permalink)
    This is certainly less contentious than this forum can be, and more black and white.  Although I do give the CW staff kudos for participating in these debates.

    All the best,
    Lynn

    my songs
    www.soundclick.com/lynnwilson

    www.youtube.com/lywilson
    my videos

    Cakewalk by Bandlab| Sonar Platinum @ 64bits| i7 860 | 8 gigs ram | W10 @ 64 bits | RME FF 400
    #2
    trimph1
    Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6348
    • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
    • Location: London ON
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/29 22:37:06 (permalink)
    I can see how that would work as well...

    The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

    Bushpianos
    #3
    VigilantSound
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 474
    • Joined: 2008/07/06 13:17:59
    • Location: Vancouver,BC
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 06:09:16 (permalink)
    +1

    ASUS P5BV-C, Intel Core 2 Quad 2.8 Ghz, Q9300,
    4 gigs Ram, Win7-64 bit OSX 10.6
    ADK 9000 I7, 6 gigs Ram, MacBookPro I7, 4 gigs Ram
    MOTU 828Mk3, MOTU microbookII
    SONAR PE X2A, Pro Tools 9.0.6, StudioOnePro 2.5.4
    Ableton Live 9, Waves V.9, 


    www.jesseahemmanuel.com




    #4
    LJB
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1502
    • Joined: 2009/07/29 10:31:31
    • Location: South Africa
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 07:01:18 (permalink)
    +1

    Ludwig Bouwer, One Big Room Studios.
    --------------------
    Cakewalk
    with all the trimmings / Win 10Pro 64 / Intel i7-7700 / Asus Prime Z270k / 16GB DDR4 / RME HDSP9652 / RME UFX / Black Lion Audio ADA8000 / ART MPA & ART Pro Channel / Focusrite Voicemaster Pro / Aphex 107

    Check out my work at www.onebigroom.co.za

    #5
    Supercomposer
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 259
    • Joined: 2010/05/27 05:11:09
    • Location: In a Lear-Jet above you
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 07:20:44 (permalink)
    Pro Tools seriously needs some user input!!!

    Seems like Avid never had the idea that Freeze, VST and a 64 bit version could be useful to "some" users...  
    post edited by Supercomposer - 2011/01/30 08:52:09

    ME is the Supercomposer, and all your base are belong to us (Yes, I mean Germany)

    System Spec: CPU 2x X7560 Xeon 16-Core, 48 GIG Ram Kingston, Intel with Supermicro Workstation MP Boards, RME HDSPe, PNY Quadro 6000
    #6
    trimph1
    Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6348
    • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
    • Location: London ON
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 07:36:15 (permalink)
    Supercomposer


    Pro Tools seriously needs some user input!!!

    Seems like Avid never had the idea that Freeze, VST and a 64 bit version could be usefule to "some" users...  

    They didn't? Checked ...only RTAS and AU....dang...


    Do they have 64 bit now?  Check...seems to be none in search...dang....


    And they call themselves Pro-Tools?

    The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

    Bushpianos
    #7
    damon777
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 101
    • Joined: 2008/05/19 13:14:46
    • Location: Mansfield Notts UK.
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 07:42:24 (permalink)
    As if Cakewalk aren`t aware of what the competition may or may not be doing, there will never be a complete DAW, its the same with ourselves, forever in the process of becoming.

     Dell XPS 430, 8GB 
     Win7 64
     VS 100 x2
     PCR 500
     8.5 PE
     X1D Expanded 
     X2A Producer E  
     Omnisphere, Stylus, Trillian
     Alesis M1 620`S
     Alesis M1 520`S.
     Novation Nocturn. 
    #8
    neiby
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 765
    • Joined: 2007/06/19 14:34:54
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 10:27:02 (permalink)
    Nothing is ever perfect. That's why it's so important to keep moving forward. One great way to do that is to continually improve your product by implementing some of the features that are most often requested by your users. I think this is a brilliant idea. I've seen other software developers do something similar. I would love it if CW did something like this. It could be limited to those with registered products.
    #9
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 10:38:43 (permalink)
    Avid also forgot to make their software compatabile for 3rd pary interfaces. So far all you guys threatening to run to Protools you'll have to buy a new sound device. Add $300 more to that investment.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #10
    trimph1
    Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6348
    • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
    • Location: London ON
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 10:40:23 (permalink)
    Heeheehee....

    The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

    Bushpianos
    #11
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 10:43:01 (permalink)
    Middleman


    Avid also forgot to make their software compatabile for 3rd pary interfaces. So far all you guys threatening to run to Protools you'll have to buy a new sound device. Add $300 more to that investment.

    I've been running PT9 on my MOTU 896 for 2 months now.

    Stop by and have a listen any time.... I'll let you play some nice amps and guitars too.


    #12
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 10:52:32 (permalink)
    Middleman


    Avid also forgot to make their software compatabile for 3rd pary interfaces. So far all you guys threatening to run to Protools you'll have to buy a new sound device. Add $300 more to that investment.
    That was very true, but not anymore. With the 9 release they opened it for use with any hardware. Pretty cool for such old geezers! It's even said to work nicely on onboard lap top soundcards.
     
    I had a session in a studio that just installed PT9 and it is an outstanding piece of software. There's no chance in hell I go there for midi and composing dutys, but as far as Pro Tools go, it's a major step up.
     
    BTW, to the OP: Brilliant idea! +1 here
    post edited by ProjectM - 2011/01/30 10:53:49

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #13
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 11:01:35 (permalink)
    Yes in PT9 they do offer 3rd party support, that's true, however, there is no support for automatic delay compensation in 3rd party devices. So although you can get it to run, have fun getting all those plugins tweaked for smooth operation. That has to take the creative mood and bite it in the butt. Imagine a 40 plus track project with plugin in compensation on every plug in. Get out your calculator.
    post edited by Middleman - 2011/01/30 11:03:42

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #14
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 11:04:52 (permalink)
    You should come over and try it... at least before you start making stuff up.

    :-(




    #15
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 11:05:14 (permalink)
    Really? No delay compensation? That's too bad. It seems like the Pro Tools people are still the same I'll never switch to PT for any reason what so ever. I don't like working with it. However, taking my mixes to a PT equiped studio doesn't bother me. It's good for mixing as long as there is an engineer there so I don't have to struggle with it myself;)

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #16
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 11:05:52 (permalink)
    mike_mccue


    You should come over and try it... at least before you start making stuff up.

    :-(


    What do you say Mike? There are delay compensation?

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #17
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 11:07:03 (permalink)
    Yes, there certainly is.


    #18
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 11:09:17 (permalink)
    Then there are no problems then I really like that PT made it compatible with any hardware. Those M-Boxes has been annoying me for several years. Now PT has become a serious contender in the niche market

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #19
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 11:09:50 (permalink)
    Hang on while I get the link where it talks about this:
     
    Ok, first..from the Avid site.
     
    "Pro Tools 9.0 Systems and Third Party Interfaces

    Pro Tools 9 is the first Pro Tools release that will operate with third party audio interfaces. Although Avid will not officially qualify or support use of these interfaces, we will post helpful information and customer experiences with third party interfaces on this page as that information becomes available." 
     
    There is an article, which I am still searching for which describes the issue for 3rd party devices but here is the disclaimer for LE and M-Powered users as well that ADC is not available and you have to use time and adjuster to make things work.
     
    "ADC ADC When opening a Pro Tools 9.0 session that uses Automatic Delay Compensation on a Pro Tools LE or M-Powered system, ADC will no longer be available. Use the Time Adjuster plug-in to manually compensate for plug-in delays"
     
    Another interesting note when moving to PT9, say goodbye to your VST plugins, they don't work there. 
      
    Ok, from the manual...
     
    Pro Tools HD accounts for converter delays
    when using Automatic Delay Compensation.
    However, when using non-HD hardware,
    System Delay only displays internal
    delay and does not take into account any latency
    incurred by the analog-to-digital
    (ADC) or digital-to-analog (DAC) converters
    in your audio interface.
    More to come...
     
    post edited by Middleman - 2011/01/30 12:07:21

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #20
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:05:16 (permalink)
    I just did the ping test again... because I know, if you look hard enough over at DUC, you'll find me asking about this BEFORE I knew the answer. But of course I actually wanted to know the answer.

    Automatic compensation in SONAR for my MOTU 896HD rig at 64 samples = 108 samples

    Automatic compensation in PT9 for my MOTU 896HD rig at 64 samples = 108 samples


    Furthermore I paid $599 outright for a free standing full install of PT9, but if I had wished to buy some "approved hardware" I could have bought a M-Box and PT9 for +/- $450 from Sweetwater. Yes, I could have saved money buy buying a hardware, software bundle... but I didn't want to be burdened with storing something i didn't want... so I bought the software and moved forward. So much for the extra $300 theory.

    Some actual first hand info.





    #21
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:07:44 (permalink)
    Middleman

    Another interesting note when moving to PT9, say goodbye to your VST plugins, they don't work there.
     
     
     
     
    Then I break out the disks and install the RTAS versions.


    #22
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:07:46 (permalink)
    "Another interesting note when moving to PT9, say goodbye to your VST plugins, they don't work there."


    More falsehoods and lies, making stuff up is weak... you buy the VST wrapper (I think, but may be mistaken, that it's the same wrapper Cakewalk bought and uses) and use all the VSTs you want.




    #23
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:10:22 (permalink)
    mike_mccue


    "Another interesting note when moving to PT9, say goodbye to your VST plugins, they don't work there."


    More falsehoods and lies, making stuff up is weak... you buy the VST wrapper (I think, but may be mistaken, that it's the same wrapper Cakewalk bought and uses) and use all the VSTs you want.



    I believe you are right. Everyone forgets that Sonar still has no native VST support.

    #24
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:10:47 (permalink)
    Yes, but don't mispreresent that moving to PT9 is going to be a happy place for all users. It may be a nightmare depending on their interface and other aspects of their system. If you have it running that's great and it is a very nice environment but that experience for a lot of the users that come here and can't get Sonar working, is not going to be necessarily easier for them.
     
    By the way, I was going to move to PT9 and checked this all out however the addtional $1600 for the add on capabiltities that actually competes with Sonar was a show stopper.
     
    Lies huh? It states on the Avid site that they don't support VST. Also yes the RTAS approach can be done but not all VSTs have their counterpart in RTAS. Additional cost. The lies and myth are that it's inexpensive and easy to move to Protools 9, it's not.
    post edited by Middleman - 2011/01/30 12:15:15

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #25
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:17:13 (permalink)
    I didn't misrepresent anything...

    I caught you telling lies and explained that you are making stuff up.

    You might wish to review the first 9 posts before you started telling lies.

    You were not reacting to any misrepresentation... you were just spouting bull-ego.

    I doubt you read the first 9 posts... otherwise you wouldn't have just posted, "Yes, but don't mispreresent that moving to PT9 is going to be a happy place for all users." because no one on this thread has said anything to that effect.





    #26
    UnderTow
    Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3848
    • Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:23:17 (permalink)
    mike_mccue


    Yes, there certainly is.
    I believe he is referring to automatic record delay compensation. You know, the small offset cause by the latency of the interface itself.
    Still, I'm sure that will get addressed at some point. This is their first version supporting 3rd party interfaces. I haven't used it yet (all the Studios I work at are on PT 7 or PT 8), but I am guessing it is pretty darned solid. Right?

    UnderTow
    #27
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:23:58 (permalink)
    You can call it lies if it helps you sleep but there are considerable issues in moving to PT9 that you are skating over. Avid does not support 3rd party devices, however they are claiming it works. If the Cake did that, I think you would be one of the peasants beating on the castle door.

    I have no ego by the way, 30 years of marriage have beat that out of me.


    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #28
    UnderTow
    Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3848
    • Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:27:19 (permalink)
    10Ten


    Middleman

    Another interesting note when moving to PT9, say goodbye to your VST plugins, they don't work there.




    Then I break out the disks and install the RTAS versions.
    And the FXPansion VST to RTAS wrapper.

    Anyway why are people attacking Pro Tools? Is the idea of having this kind of feedback system for Sonar good for us Sonar users yes or no? That is the only thing that counts. Anything else is childish and stupid.

    UnderTow
    #29
    kubalibre
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 614
    • Joined: 2007/07/31 18:25:06
    • Status: offline
    Re:ATTN: Cakewalk .... I think this could be the answer we need / are looking for .... 2011/01/30 12:36:48 (permalink)
    Middleman


    Yes in PT9 they do offer 3rd party support, that's true, however, there is no support for automatic delay compensation in 3rd party devices. So although you can get it to run, have fun getting all those plugins tweaked for smooth operation. .


    Bullcr*p, Running RME hardware here with PT9 having full ADC, that is what all the fuzz is about.  
    Support for 3rd party ASIO compatible interfaces with full delay compensation.
    But be careful with that VST to RTAS wrapper. Native VST would be much much better like in Cubase or Studio One. For big projects with a lot of Virtual instruments, PT can get very unfriendly even if you are running RTAS versions. According to their architecture they are *slightly* more CPU intensive - and not 64 bit.
    post edited by kubalibre - 2011/01/30 12:45:51

    ---------------------------------------------
    all crash on the louspeaker
    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1