Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface?

Author
maximumpower
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 731
  • Joined: 2011/05/13 19:14:34
  • Location: Ohio
  • Status: offline
2015/07/07 18:32:30 (permalink)

Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface?

Why do interfaces have built in effects? Is it for running in a standalone mode?
 
If all I was using it for is to get audio into Sonar, is there any value to having the effects inside the audio interface?

Win 10 (64 bit), i7-2600k 3.4GHz , 8 GB RAM, SATA III (500GB SSD - System, 2TB WD Black - Data), Sonar Platinum x64, m-audio Profire 610

#1

9 Replies Related Threads

    mettelus
    Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5321
    • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
    • Location: Maryland, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/07 19:52:06 (permalink)
    The biggest selling point for these is to use on monitoring mixes to cut down on latency. Although these could also be recorded, I doubt that is a common application, since post production options abound.

    Mine only has compression, EQ, and reverb DSP, and I would not bake those in, but other interfaces have more DSP goodies.

    ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
    #2
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/07 20:40:26 (permalink)
    The primary benefit is that you can apply effects to the monitor mix when tracking. Singers can hear delay or reverb in the headphones that isn't actually recorded.
     


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #3
    ampfixer
    Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5508
    • Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
    • Location: Ontario
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/07 21:37:07 (permalink)
    All the DSP in my interface is also provided with a VST interface for use inside the DAW. I thought that I'd never use them but the reverbs that are included sound great to me and have UI's that I can easily deal with. I assume that the VST plugs are using the DSP but I'm not sure.

    Regards, John 
     I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps.
    WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig,  Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6 
    #4
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/07 22:54:32 (permalink)
    Audio interfaces with full onboard DSP (and tablet control) can do "double-duty" as a digital mixer for live use.
     

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #5
    maximumpower
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 731
    • Joined: 2011/05/13 19:14:34
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/08 06:50:25 (permalink)
    Thank you all!

    Win 10 (64 bit), i7-2600k 3.4GHz , 8 GB RAM, SATA III (500GB SSD - System, 2TB WD Black - Data), Sonar Platinum x64, m-audio Profire 610

    #6
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/08 10:38:25 (permalink)
    It's a feature worth concidering if you work with clients. Myself I don't need reverb when tracking, but almost all my clients seems to demand it. 
    You get what you pay for. Look at the price of good quality effects and then the price of your interface and you can quickly see that the little chip they add is one of those processors they stick in budget mixing boards. The same next to useless effects that you can't really tweek very much. 
     
    And compression or EQ is useless if it happens after the D/A. Think about it. 
     
    In the end we generally have good quailty effects in our DAW so there is no point in using these budget effects going in and printing them. So the best use of these effects is monitoring and adding reverb to the headphones for tracking. 
     
    I'd choose good drivers over bells and whistles if shopping for an interface. 
     

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #7
    Mystic38
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1622
    • Joined: 2010/08/30 17:40:34
    • Location: Mystic, CT
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/11 07:27:35 (permalink)
    I have a motu828mkII plus a focusrite 18i20 for i/o extension, and so +1 to all the above.. the DSP allows for offline mixing, FX, and lots of busses.
     
    1. Live mixer... synths, mics, drum machines can all be used with the computer turned off with no cable rerouting
    2. The # of busses allows for individual headphone monitor mixes for vocalist, guitarists etc.. each with reverb/compression as required without affecting the dry signal.
     
     

    HPE-580T with i7-950, 8G, 1.5T, ATI6850, Win7/64, Motu 828 III Hybrid, Motu Midi Express, Sonar Platinum, Komplete 9, Ableton Live 9 & Push 2, Melodyne Editor and other stuff, KRK VXT8 Monitors
    Virus Ti2 Polar, Fantom G6, Yamaha S70XS, Novation Nova, Novation Nova II, Korg MS2000, Waldorf Micro Q, NI Maschine Studio, TC-VoiceLive Rack, 2012 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 2001 Gibson Les Paul DC, 1999 Fender Am Hardtail Strat, Fender Blues Jr, Orange TH30/PPC212, Tak EF360GF, one mic, no talent.
    #8
    sven450
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 945
    • Joined: 2004/03/16 08:11:49
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/11 09:56:55 (permalink)
    Really helpful when tracking vox.  I usually track vox last, and I have a ton of tracks and can't run low latency, so the onboard DSP comes in really handy to hear verb in my cans then add the real later.

    Sonar Platinum/Bandlab Sonar
    Roland Octa-Capture            
    Win 10 
    i7 6700  16 Gig Ram
    Some songs
    Covers:  https://soundcloud.com/cygnuss/sets/covers
    Originals:
     https://soundcloud.com/cygnuss/sets/originals
    #9
    PluginDiscounts.com
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 92
    • Joined: 2015/07/08 20:57:27
    • Status: offline
    Re: Advantage of DSP effects built into an interface? 2015/07/15 10:08:08 (permalink)
    sven450
    Really helpful when tracking vox.  I usually track vox last, and I have a ton of tracks and can't run low latency, so the onboard DSP comes in really handy to hear verb in my cans then add the real later.


    This is the primary situation where I can see having onboard DSP effects as an advantage. When you have to increase your buffer size due to either track counts or CPU issues. There are other workarounds, though.
    #10
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1