Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
zaurska
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14
  • Joined: 2011/10/20 19:06:05
  • Status: offline
2012/10/23 16:54:13 (permalink)

Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone

Hi
 
Should I get the same quality with Amplitube3 VST in X2 as I do standalone?  When routed into X2 the sound is way way off standalone, not just low input but like its a different DLL. (it isn't is it?)
 
1 audio track
Same quality settings
Same ASIO
VST 64bit
Amplitube 3.9 2-19
 
No comparison...
 
Anyone else?
 
Z
 
Win7 64bit
I5 3570k
M audio fast track Pro
#1

7 Replies Related Threads
    djtrailmixxx
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 235
    • Joined: 2008/10/29 13:47:01
    • Status: offline
    Re:Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone 2012/10/23 17:10:31 (permalink)
    There are quality settings on the upper right corner somewhere

    Sonar Platinum X64 - Win 10 x64 - Intel SB-E 3930 - Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - 16GB DDR3 - AMD R290X - 4x 1TB SSD RAID 0 (Sys and Data partitions) - 2x UAD2 Quad - 1x UAD2 Octo - UAD Apollo Dual
    #2
    cclarry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 20964
    • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
    • Status: offline
    Re:Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone 2012/10/23 17:13:11 (permalink)
    zaurska


    Hi
     
    Should I get the same quality with Amplitube3 VST in X2 as I do standalone?  When routed into X2 the sound is way way off standalone, not just low input but like its a different DLL. (it isn't is it?)
     
    1 audio track
    Same quality settings
    Same ASIO
    VST 64bit
    Amplitube 3.9 2-19
     
    No comparison...
     
    Anyone else?
     
    Z
     
    Win7 64bit
    I5 3570k
    M audio fast track Pro
    Interestingly enough...I haven't used Amplitube 3.9 in X2 yet...I just got it in the Total Studio
    Bundle (which was a STEAL - Krazy good deal)
    I will have to check it out and let you know...





    #3
    sdupayage
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 15
    • Joined: 2011/01/10 03:27:12
    • Status: offline
    Re:Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone 2012/10/23 17:17:35 (permalink)
    You should try to put your track in stereo. I guess that you route your guitar through one mono track and then add Amplitude on your it as an effect. Then if it's the case you have a mono Amplitude. Force the track to be stereo and it should change your life :)
    #4
    zaurska
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 14
    • Joined: 2011/10/20 19:06:05
    • Status: offline
    Re:Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone 2012/10/23 17:33:46 (permalink)
    Yay

    Un-tick "Enable mono processing" in AT3 VST plug in properties.

    Then very sweet.
    #5
    sharke
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13933
    • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
    • Location: NYC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone 2012/10/23 21:22:55 (permalink)
    I have to say Amplitube is fast becoming my favorite guitar amp sim, especially for crunchy blues/rock sounds. I spend far less time fiddling with it than I do with GR5 or TH2 anyway. 
    #6
    SilverfoxUK
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 257
    • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
    • Status: offline
    Re:Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone 2012/10/24 04:04:11 (permalink)

    sharke


    I have to say Amplitube is fast becoming my favorite guitar amp sim, especially for crunchy blues/rock sounds. I spend far less time fiddling with it than I do with GR5 or TH2 anyway. 

    Have to agree. And I'm only using  Amplitude free! 


     Even the free version is brilliant. Everyone should have this plug at their disposal. Did I say it's free? 




    Compared to GR it just sounds better to me. TH2, which I have had a small tinker with, seems closer to AT3

    X3 64bit (final update)
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
    Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
    6 GB Corsair RAM
    V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
    M-AudioAxiom 49
    Korg PadKontrol
    BCF2000 



    #7
    vinny199
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 218
    • Joined: 2005/06/18 20:12:40
    • Location: London, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Amplitube 3, poor quality compared to standalone 2012/10/25 08:32:14 (permalink)
     
    Yay Un-tick "Enable mono processing" in AT3 VST plug in properties. Then very sweet. Could you pls clarify that Zaurska?


    i thought this was the correct setup if you wanted amplitube to understand the imput signal was mono, and coming from one side of the stereo inputs.

    I thought it did not affect the ability for amplitube to then be used in setreo on a track (when used in stereo mode: 2 amps routing, on a stereo track)

    I'd really like to understand that.

    advice much apreciated,


    Cheers,

    Vinny
    http://www.vinnypiana.co.uk/

    X1d expanded
    PC i7, win 7 x64, 2.8 ghz; 12 gig ram
    Motu ultralite (firewire)
    #8
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1