King Conga
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 519
- Joined: 2003/11/10 19:59:07
- Location: Garner, NC
- Status: offline
Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
I've posted on AMD's forum about this issue, but I'm just checking here for good measure if there's any kind of remedy in Sonar. I've got SampleTank 3, and MDrummer L plugins. I'm using them as VST2 because it seems VST3 takes up even more CPU power than VST2. Specifically, when I look at Sonar's CPU meter, the 1st core of 6, running at 3.8MHz seems to be using 3X's what any of the other cores are, thus forcing me to bump up my latency, but even then core 1 is using WAAY more than I think it should. So, other than boosting the latency, (which ain't helping much) is there any way in Sonar to better distribute that effort amongst the other cores? I realize core 1 handles all of the Win7 OS tasks, but that shouldn't cause this much problem. I'm not a real geek, as far as CPU's go, just enough to make sure I don't blow my MOBO up, so please be kind in your tech speak. Tanks, KC
Mobo:ASUS M5A97 EVO/CPU:AMD FX-6200 WD SSD 250Gig Video:AMD Radeon HD 6670, 2Gig RAM Sys: RAM:16Gig/120Gig SSD, 1TByte O/S: Win10 Pro 64-Bit PreSonus 1818VSL/Alesis Fusion 8HD/Presonus FaderPort8, JBL LSR308 Sonar Plat/Aud. CS6/BIAB2019/ST3.7/SO3.5
|
tenfoot
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2186
- Joined: 2015/01/22 18:12:07
- Location: Qld, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/10 22:01:51
(permalink)
There are many other threads on this topic. Have you disabled core parking? If you google there are various utilities/methods to do this.
Bruce. Sonar Platinum 2017-09, Studio One 3.5.3, Win 10 x64, Quad core i7, RME Fireface, Behringer X32 Producer, Behringer X32 Rack, Presonus Faderport, Lemure Software Controller (Android), Enttec DMXIS VST lighting controller, Xtempo POK.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/10 22:06:48
(permalink)
The first core is generally busier than the others for a fairly simple reason: Windows itself doesn't multi-thread all that well. And lots of plugins and instruments don't either. Sonar itself is conspicuously well-coded in this regard. But as an end user, there's not a whole lot you can do about it.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/10 22:15:07
(permalink)
> Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores? Yup. Turn off Intel speed step (AMD equivalent is power now?) and/or Windows core parking.
post edited by Doktor Avalanche - 2015/06/10 22:21:50
Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
|
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/10 22:26:47
(permalink)
Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
|
arachnaut
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1168
- Joined: 2007/05/05 17:24:33
- Location: Sunnyvale, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/10 23:35:42
(permalink)
- Jim Hurley - SONAR Platinum - x64 - Windows 10 Pro ASUS P8P67 PRO Rev 3.0; Core i7-2600K@4.4GHz; 16 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X; GeForce GT 740; Saffire Pro14 MixControl 3.7; Axiom 61 64-Bit audio, SR: 48kHz, ASIO 256 samples latency, Rec/Play I/O Buffers 512k, Total Round Trip Latency 13 ms, Pow-r 3 dither
|
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/11 00:18:07
(permalink)
Or windows 10 if stable enough. I agree 8.1 is better at handling core distribution then 7. Hopefully 10 will be better than 8.1.
Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
|
arachnaut
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1168
- Joined: 2007/05/05 17:24:33
- Location: Sunnyvale, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/11 02:22:02
(permalink)
Yes, wait and get Win 10 for free. As an example, here is a project running (in Win8.0 or 8.1, I forget when it was) 8 Maschine 2 instances I made while doing Maschine 2 Beta tests. You can see that the cores are well-balanced. Win7 did not behave like that. Core 0 has to process all the interrupts and Maschine 2 generates lots of them, but still things look good. From early adopters, it appears Windows 10 will be even better at audio handling.
post edited by arachnaut - 2015/06/11 02:32:21
- Jim Hurley - SONAR Platinum - x64 - Windows 10 Pro ASUS P8P67 PRO Rev 3.0; Core i7-2600K@4.4GHz; 16 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X; GeForce GT 740; Saffire Pro14 MixControl 3.7; Axiom 61 64-Bit audio, SR: 48kHz, ASIO 256 samples latency, Rec/Play I/O Buffers 512k, Total Round Trip Latency 13 ms, Pow-r 3 dither
|
tomixornot
Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1674
- Joined: 2011/03/05 11:31:26
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/11 07:06:16
(permalink)
You've probably have know this already, but I'll mentioned it anyway, at Sonar Preference, Audio, Playback and Recording, there is a check box for "Use Multiprocessing Engine" to make sure it's checked. Then at Configuration File look for Thread Scheduling Model, with setting of 2.
Albert i7 2600K @ 3.40GHz / MB Intel DP67BG / 16GB Ram- ADATA 250GB SSD (Boot)- Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB HDD (Samples)Audio interface : Motu 828 MK ii i7 6700K @ 4.00GHz / MB Asrock Z170 / 16GB Ram- Samsung EVO 850 120GB / 500 GB SSD Audio interface : Roland Quad Capture Win 10 Pro / Sonar Platinum
|
BassDaddy
Max Output Level: -33 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4232
- Joined: 2012/12/31 13:55:58
- Location: I'm an American. From America!
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/11 10:35:24
(permalink)
Google the subject and learn as much as you can about it. It is something you need know. I would love to see someone come out with a tutorial video on "Things you need to know about computers to use your DAW". I would buy it. And arachnaut, thanks for the reminder about the Windows 7 to 8 move. There was a lot of talk about how W8 would be better for audio production. If Windows 10 is another step up that would be great.
It's Bass, not Bass. i7 2700K, 16GB DDR3, 2 SSD sample drives and OS drive, HDD SATAIII for projects, 2 24" monitors Focusrite Saffire Pro 24, Focusrite VRM Box, LAVA Lamp, SONAR Platinum 64 bit, Mackie MCU and 1 MCU XT, Akai Advance 49, Windows 10, Komplete 9 Ultimate, Cakewalk, Toontrack, IK, AAS, XLN, UVI, Air Music Tech, Waves Factory, Sample Tek and Sonivox VSTi's. Overloud, T-Racks, Audio Damage, D16, Nomad Factory, Waves Gold FX
|
joel77
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 489
- Joined: 2004/01/14 11:47:08
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/11 11:39:17
(permalink)
Good thread! I'm going to do some research. And YES, if someone made a video of computer how to's for audio, I'd buy it and any updates that follow. For those of us who don't go into the dark depths of our DAW computers, something like this would be invaluable.
Joel Glaser Studio 52 God Bless America ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sonar x64, Win 7 Pro, Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R, Intel i7-930 2.86GHz dual quad core, 12GB Corsair DDL3, Asus ATI Radion HD 4350, WD 500 GB SATA, Dual WD 1TB SATA HDs, ME RayDAT, Alesis HD24XR - A/D-D/A https://www.facebook.com/...dio-52/811309178917929www.thebrothersglaser.com
|
Vastman
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2508
- Joined: 2006/08/30 02:49:18
- Location: Oakland, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/11 13:20:53
(permalink)
Hey, Jim... that balanced load looks very sexy...amazing! my win7 system load sharing just sucks... upgrade to 10 is now a high priority for me. This hasn't really been a performance problem until now... my i7-4930 was robust enough, although Diva sometimes causes hiccups. But with some recent additions, like Infinity it's becoming much easier to overload the first core and bring things to a halt. Your graph is great news... a likely reprieve till intel gets around to more cores...someday...
post edited by Vastman - 2015/06/11 13:27:00
Dana We make the future... Climate Change MusicVastMaschine:SP4L/W10/i74930K/32GB/RME/CAD E100s; The Orchestra! NOVO!/Inspire/BohemianViolin&Cello, ARK1&2,/MinimalCapriccioMaximoSoto/OE1&2, Action&Emotive/Omni2/Tril/RMX/All OrangeTree/Falcon/APE Jugs/Alpha&Bravo/BFD3 & SD3Gravity/DM307/AEON/DM/Damage/Diva/HZebra/Hive/Diversion/VC4/Serum/Alchemy/blablablaSpitfire/8DIO/SL/KH/EW/NI; Shred1&2/AGF,G,M&T Torch&Res&Ren/GD-6; Ibanez SR1200&SR505NOVAX FanFret Tele&Strat
|
kitekrazy1
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3524
- Joined: 2014/08/02 17:52:51
- Status: offline
Re: Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores?
2015/06/11 14:38:03
(permalink)
Doktor Avalanche > Any Way to Better Distribute Use of Multiple CPU Cores? Yup. Turn off Intel speed step (AMD equivalent is power now?) and/or Windows core parking.
Is that what it is? I upgraded an AMD system that has the UEFI Bios. There's a lot more in that then Core2/AM3 boards.
|