Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels?

Author
GVDV
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 37
  • Joined: 2006/01/04 18:48:34
  • Status: offline
2007/03/02 11:35:08 (permalink)

Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels?

Hi,
After much hard thought and research I've decided to go Mac (Pro) for my audio sequencing (multitrack) and video editing needs.

While I plan to use Final Cut Express to for my ('prosumer') video editing needs, I had had my heart set on using Sonar Producer Edition 6 as my multitrack program (will be using an RME FireFace 400 as my audio interface).

I have heard of people successfully and unsuccessfully using PC sequencing programs like Sonar via Bootcamp, and am wondering if anyone here has done this as I plan to install XP or Vista on the Mac and use Sonar.

I'm specifically interested in any conflicts/problems/solutions, and - the main bain of recording audio on the PC in a multitrack situation when using an audio interface - would love to know about the degree of latency that results.

Thanks,

GVDV
#1

14 Replies Related Threads

    Graham
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 539
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 11:22:42
    • Location: Brunei
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/02 11:43:42 (permalink)
    I've been looking at this as well - you need to be careful with your audio interface, as to date, firewire does not work under parallels although I believe it does under bootcamp. I have also been wary that until the introduction of Leopard where it will be included natively, Bootcamp is a beta release with a time limit. I can't seem to pin down anywhere when the time limit runs out.

    regards

    Garham

    MacPro/Macbook Pro
    #2
    GVDV
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Joined: 2006/01/04 18:48:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/02 13:22:56 (permalink)
    Hi Graham,
    What does the fact that beta releases have a time limit mean in terms of your hesitation? Could it mean that the Powers That Be could decide to discontinue Bootcamp.

    Or could it mean that they fix certain problems (or leave them in), so it would be a disadvantage to get it while it's still in beta?

    BTW I don't know if you know about it, but a good site that I've found (nice posts, mostly somewhat informative) for Mac stuff is macrumors.com (be sure to spell it the American way, and with a plural). When you go the page, you'll be able to click on 'forums'. In all of my audio and video stuff I also read forums on homerecording, audioforums, audiominds, and harmony-central (that hypen is important). All are .com's. I find digifreq good for sonar, but there aren't many people on there.

    All the best,
    GVDV
    #3
    inmazevo
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3276
    • Joined: 2006/01/03 18:30:38
    • Location: Pacific Northwest
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/02 14:02:15 (permalink)
    Mac Pro is a sweet machine.
    Do you have it yet? If so, which one?

    If not... hold off for a few weeks (4-6).
    Apple is gearing up for the next release of OS X (which is both more 64bit than Tiger AND contains the official, non-beta release of boot camp), as well as getting ready for several booths at Musikmesse, and also an April 15th release at NAB.

    Announcement rumors are flying... speculation at this point, but here are some of the top ones:
    - New version of OS X (this one's a given)
    - New version of Logic Pro (LP8... I think this might actually happen this time, since it's the only Pro app that hasn't been updated in a VERY long time)
    - New version of Final Cut (maybe...)
    - 8 core version of Mac Pro (this one seems likely, since the quad Xeons are available)

    I'm considering replacing my Core 2 Duo Windows machine with an 8 core Mac Pro, should they be available, dual-booting Vista and OS X on it.

    Logic Pro 8 I'll definitely get within 6 months (if released), but my primary concern is replacing Adobe Premiere Pro, which I use now, with Final Cut (new version or not).
    Adobe has announced that the next version of their video suite will NOT be Vista 64bit capable, only 32 bit, and since they have an 18-24 month new release schedule, that kills the app for me.
    Why do video on Vista if your video app only sees 4GB of memory for nearly the next two years.
    Bye, bye, Adobe.

    Anyway, the possibility of an 8 core machine makes a 6 week wait not too bad, and even if you don't get one, the prices on the quad Mac Pros will likely come down, or you'll get more for your money.

    Just something to think about.

    - zevo
    post edited by inmazevo - 2007/03/02 14:28:30
    #4
    RTGraham
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1824
    • Joined: 2004/03/29 20:17:13
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/03 05:40:19 (permalink)
    I've been using SONAR on a MacBook Pro for a few months now, and the Mac is a great SONAR machine, as long as you configure it properly. I'm using both BootCamp and Parallels, depending on the situation. I found that ASIO4ALL is the best route for using the computer's internal sound. Under BootCamp I have extremely low-latency operation (128 or even sometimes 64 samples), but under the current version of Parallels I have to keep the ASIO buffer up at 1024 to avoid crackling. I have to install the new Parallels update to see if there's any change. In both environments, I downloaded and installed the Realtek driver from their website, instead of depending on the generic driver that Parallels or BootCamp installs.

    I also use an Mbox 2 with the computer, and its performance under Windows on a MacBook Pro depends on a few specific settings. First of all, it doesn't work at all under Parallels (again, I have to test under the new update). In BootCamp, I have to have all network adapters and bluetooth disabled, otherwise the Digidesign ASIO driver may crash, and Pro Tools may crash. Pro Tools really doesn't run well at all in BootCamp on the MacBook Pro at this time, but SONAR runs just fine. However, due to a limitation in the Digidesign ASIO driver, I currently have to disable SONAR's multiprocessor support if I'm using the Mbox, otherwise SONAR will hang. Performance is still quite good in single-processor mode, though - no problem with most softsynths at an ASIO buffer size of 128.

    ~~~~~~~~~~
    Russell T. Graham
    Keys, Vocals, Songwriting, Production
    russell DOT graham AT rtgproductions DOT com
    www DOT myspace DOT com SLASH russelltgraham
    #5
    RTGraham
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1824
    • Joined: 2004/03/29 20:17:13
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/03 05:44:19 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Graham

    I have also been wary that until the introduction of Leopard where it will be included natively, Bootcamp is a beta release with a time limit. I can't seem to pin down anywhere when the time limit runs out.



    All BootCamp really does is partition the hard drive and create a CD of Windows drivers for your computer's hardware. Once you've installed Windows, there's nothing to time out - you're now running a dual-boot Windows machine. It seems like Apple is just incorporating the language of a "time limit" so that they have no obligation to support the beta software once they release the true product under Leopard.
    #6
    GVDV
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Joined: 2006/01/04 18:48:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/03 14:20:17 (permalink)
    Hi Graham, Russell, zevo,
    Many thanks for the helpful and informative replies.

    I have a couple of questions based on what you said, Russell, about what you said about disabling all network adapters and bluetooth when using your MBox2. This is important to me because I forgot to mention originally that I will be using an RME FireFace 400 audio interface.

    So, Russell, if you wouldn't mind, could you go through what network adapters you disable, and any other settings that help in getting the MBox to work? Which drivers do you use?

    There is an interesting article in Electronic Music's 'Computer Music Product Guide 2006' which I will summarize and post elsewhere in this forum this weekend, which talks about optimizing Mac's and PC's but not using PC software on Mac, so anything you can say will be helpful to me.

    zevo, I've been asking a lot of questions about FCE and its audio editing options on the macrumors.com forum. People there are very nice, but don't seem to have a great need for sophisticated features in FCE. I would imagine that it might be worth your while to move up to Final Cut Pro HD (they're all HD now, I think). One thing about FCE that I was surprised by is that it only supports 96Khz, I think, although the sound editing program that it comes bundled with, Soundtrack, might support up to 192Khz, I don't know.

    And zevo, your advice about waiting for what will probably be the imminent release of the 8 cores is also what I've been told on macrumors.com, so I'm going to stick to that. Of course, I hope that the 8 core machines will replace the quad cores in terms of cost, rather than being even more expensive because I'm breaking the bank already in terms of going for the quad cores.

    Thanks once again
    GVDV.
    #7
    inmazevo
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3276
    • Joined: 2006/01/03 18:30:38
    • Location: Pacific Northwest
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/03 15:24:46 (permalink)
    I wouldn't be surprised to see the upper end Mac Pro have two of these, and cost $3500:

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819117110

    Hopefully, they'll have something I can actually afford as well. I'd ditch both of my machines, and move everything to that, and dual boot.

    We'll see.

    - zevo
    #8
    eratu
    Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2856
    • Joined: 2007/01/27 22:08:32
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/03 16:33:27 (permalink)
    My advice: If you are hell bent on getting a Mac, just get Logic, PT or DP and be done with it and stick with OSX. Running Windows on a Mac can be touch and go in some cases, and you have to have the exactly right hardware config to make it work perfectly. And don't count on any real support. So since you're already over there, why not just go all the way? Windows on a Mac cracks me up. It's a fad. There is nothing special about Mac hardware, especially lately. If you want a Windows DAW and you're willing to shell out that much for a Mac, then buy a real DAW from someone like ADK Pro Audio or Sonica. Those will actually be upgradeable as time goes by and are designed with the components to do the job right, plus you have the backing of DAW experts. Buy a Mac and be prepared to get screwed, as I have been over and over by them -- unless you commit 100%... and even then, you'll still get screwed. Buy an ADK and those guys will support your through thick and thin and you can trust you'll be able to upgrade much more easily. Same money, better machine.
    #9
    LionSound
    Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3616
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 08:07:03
    • Location: Los Angeles
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/03 16:37:17 (permalink)
    I'm not into the Windows on Mac either. I agree with Eratu ... if you want a Mac, just go ahead and use OSX. If you want a high end workstation to run your Windows DAW just build an Opteron or Xeon system, or have ADK do it for you.

    www.soundclick.com/lionsound

    FirstStrike 1.2 IS RELEASED! www.fsmod.com
    #10
    tarsier
    Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3029
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 11:51:35
    • Location: 6 feet under
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/04 11:28:28 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: eratu
    Running Windows on a Mac can be touch and go in some cases, and you have to have the exactly right hardware config to make it work perfectly.

    But that's the point of the Mac. They control the hardware, and Bootcamp supplies the driver CD for you. You don't really have to worry about the hardware configuration, it's pretty well taken care of for you. It is far simpler than the myriad of choices out there for PCs, and my MacBook Pro runs Sonar like a champ with my MOTU 828 mkII.

    Now, if you truly want a no muss no fuss system, then absolutely buy from one of the dedicated DAW builders. But the new Mac Pros are pretty close to being a great turnkey Sonar system. They're powerful, support lots of RAM, have lots of drive bays, and they're quiet. They lack PCI slots, but there are many firewire interfaces to choose from.

    The only problems I've encountered with my MacBook Pro and Sonar are inherent Windows problems like wireless and bluetooth interrupting audio--I have to disable those when running Windows no matter which hardware I'm on. When I boot OSX to run Performer, I can have both those enabled and the audio never glitches under similar loads. I even ran a live sound gig with the MacBook and the 828. I set Sonar to a 1.5 ms latency and used input monitoring to eq the mics to the sound system. Worked great.
    #11
    eratu
    Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2856
    • Joined: 2007/01/27 22:08:32
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/04 12:02:28 (permalink)
    You're lucky. :) I hope it continues well for you! And if it works, keep with it!
    #12
    inmazevo
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3276
    • Joined: 2006/01/03 18:30:38
    • Location: Pacific Northwest
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/04 13:47:54 (permalink)
    Windows on a Mac cracks me up. It's a fad.


    Maybe, but I doubt it, and certainly hope not.
    There's a much larger audience for things like virtualization and multipurpose machines than there used to be.

    At work, we virtualize almost everything now... it's SO much cheaper and easier to maintain.
    At home, the ability to run two or three OS on one machine makes sense in terms of cost and physical space.

    I've been running Windows and Linux on PCs for years... and slightly less often, I've run OS X and Linux on Macs...
    Now, I can do all three on one box, and duplicate the whole bit with my laptop.

    It's very expensive to have a Mac laptop, and a Mac desktop, and a Windows laptop, and a Windows desktop... and keep them all fairly current... and cover them with insurance... and maintained... and they don't all share audio/midi interfaces well so some of that is duplicated as well.
    Now... it's just two boxes and two audio interfaces... Thousands cheaper.

    I agree that if you are buying the Mac specifically for Windows, that's probably a fad (with the exception of the Mac Pro, which is nearly impossible to duplicate for the same cost by a turn-key vendor or build it yourself). You really might as well get Logic Pro, which I have, and it works very well on Macs already.

    Just my .02...
    - zevo
    post edited by inmazevo - 2007/03/04 14:11:54
    #13
    RTGraham
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1824
    • Joined: 2004/03/29 20:17:13
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/04 14:58:18 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: GVDV

    So, Russell, if you wouldn't mind, could you go through what network adapters you disable, and any other settings that help in getting the MBox to work? Which drivers do you use?



    I started by installing Pro Tools under Windows (in the Boot Camp environment), and following all of the instructions in the Pro Tools installation guide about making sure DMA is enabled for all drives, etc. It's really just the "usual" Windows tweaks - things like going into the Device Manger's Advanced properties and setting CPU priority for background tasks, etc. All of these tweaks really are optional on today's powerful systems, and the Pro Tools manual suggest that you try them only if you're having performance problems (with the exception of the DMA setting, which is a requirement). Since Digidesign's hardware and software are so incredibly selfish about wanting to be the only thing running on the system, I felt that if I could get Pro Tools solid as a starting point, then I would have a basis of stability for using the Mbox2 in other ways as well. I then discovered that Pro Tools wouldn't play back at all within Windows on a Mac unless I went into Device Manager and disabled all devices under the "Network" sub-heading. It was also suggested on a forum that I disable Bluetooth, which I did within Device Manager as well. I then discovered that SONAR would crash with the Mbox2 unless I unchecked the box in advanced audio options for multiprocessor support. Now everything's smooth - but a lot of these tweaks, while generally useful for streamlining an audio laptop, are probably unnecessary with the RME hardware.

    ORIGINAL: GVDV

    There is an interesting article in Electronic Music's 'Computer Music Product Guide 2006' which I will summarize and post elsewhere in this forum this weekend, which talks about optimizing Mac's and PC's but not using PC software on Mac, so anything you can say will be helpful to me.



    I don't really think of it as "using PC software on Mac" - I'm using PC software in Windows. Just like any other PC. In this case, Windows just happens to be installed on a silver laptop with an ATI graphics card, a Realtek sound card, an Atheros wireless adapter, some major manufacturer's motherboard, an Intel processor, etc. (Or within Parallels, Windows is installed on a virtual machine, with Pentium specs, 1.5GB of ram - which is an adjustable value - and virtualized video, sound, and network devices.)

    ORIGINAL: eratu

    My advice: If you are hell bent on getting a Mac, just get Logic, PT or DP and be done with it and stick with OSX. Running Windows on a Mac can be touch and go in some cases, and you have to have the exactly right hardware config to make it work perfectly. And don't count on any real support.



    Interesting point. When I went this route, I fully expected that I might find myself using PT all the time, especially since I love OSX. But frankly, I haven't had the time to learn PT as well as I would like. I am, fortunately, an extremely busy professional working musician and producer, and when I need to get stuff done quickly and done right, I still go to SONAR, which only runs in Windows. I can run a PT session if I have to, and I'm acceptably quick and proficient for most people, but my first choice (my comfort zone) is still SONAR, especially with S6's features. And if I haven't had time to get quicker in PT, then I'm certainly not going to spend the money, and time, to start from scratch with Logic or DP, both of which I haven't touched in at least 5 years. Man, I sound like an advertisement for SONAR. Maybe I should talk to Cakewalk's artist relations department.
    post edited by RTGraham - 2007/03/04 15:28:15
    #14
    Sonifferous
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 214
    • Joined: 2005/01/30 12:16:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Anyone Using Sonar on Mac via Bootcamp or Parallels? 2007/03/05 08:28:06 (permalink)
    I'm writing an article on this topic, to be published sometime this week.

    But a couple things of note:

    1) Parallels has NO firewire support
    2) Parallels cannot utilize multiple CPUs

    I'd ignore most of the mac bashing in this thread, the ones who made the statements had some monumentally faulty logic in their arguments.

    I have a quad-core mac pro, best purchase I've ever made, although I agree with the poster who said to wait for Apr 15 to see if the octocores come out. (Although the current mac pro can be retrofitted with 8 cores.)
    #15
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1