Yes, I found the master copy, and it is the same, dated 2002.

First, thanks to all and especially one member who sent me fresh copies of the ini files. Sadly (or not I suppose) my ini files are fine, and match the ones sent to me. Check one more potential culprit off the list (although of course I did copy the fresh version onto my system, but no change in behavior!)
 
So I've submitted a request to Tech Support... I'll report back when I get an answer.
 
To address the "not a lot really" question... it isn't decadence really, as it is not the same as using 800 tracks. Rather it is having different articulations handy, and with the current state of the art in sample libraries, that means either key switching, or tons of tracks. The old Big Orchestral Brass library, which I love, requires 303 MIDI tracks to cover all the instruments and articulations. Which is why I no longer use it<G>!

There is also the problem - opportunity? - of layering. If I layer a couple string libraries together it often sounds much more realistic.

Also keep in mind that if Sir George wanted to add strings to a Beatles tune he went out and hired a string section!!! That's one, maybe two tracks for every nuance, articulation, and stand rattle!
 
So I'll stick with this is not excessive, or decadent - it is a way of working with large sample libraries, and lots of them, and it has become the norm in some markets. I'm no where near making money in those markets, but I am working my way in that direction... and setting up a template that lets me work quickly is one of the steps. Getting my favorite sequencer to behave properly is a prerequisite. And I am very confident that it will, since several folks here can easily work with this many tracks... just need to find out what's wrong with my system and/or installation.
 
Thanks again folks!