cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
OK, a little background. I've been involved in recording to some degree for 40 years, but I've never been a "recording engineer" per se. I have a layman's understanding of most of the key concepts, but not the hands-on experience that produces great recordings. Obviously technology has changed enormously with the move to DAW-based recording, mixing, and mastering. recently I have had enough free time to work my way up the learning curve. I think I now understand most of what is functionally possible within SONAR. That is quite impressive, of course. But to some degree the explosion of options can be the enemy of good sound. The SONAR projects I have undertaken so far are more about practicing the functions than actually getting the best audio result. I have been happy with the results, but I have the feeling that I have created too much mud in the tracks by using effects more actively than I should. I am wondering if anybody has seen what is, essentially, a compendium of best practices for working with DAWs. I am looking for rules of thumb such as: - When is it better to group on buses and apply effects as a group versus effects on individual channels?
- What effects are better on the master bus rather than individual channels?
- How can you keep the sound clean? How much reverb to use? Use reverb on all voices or just some? Use the same reverb throughout the mix or mix different reverb effects on different instruments?
- Strategies for compression
- Ways to bring out important voices without making them louder (chorusing, flanging)?
- etc
Does this make any sense?
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/14 21:05:51
(permalink)
These questions pertain to mixing music as a whole and there are countless books and whole colleges dedicated to the study of how to do it right. There is no substitute for listening and playing.
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/14 21:22:11
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby meh 2013/07/15 09:16:59
Try "Mixing Secrets" by Mike Senior. It's an awesome book.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/14 21:37:12
(permalink)
sharke Try "Mixing Secrets" by Mike Senior. It's an awesome book.
Thanks. I've ordered it. The outline seems like exactly what I'm looking for. There have been other comments on this forum indicating that a lot of professional studios are going out of business. It is obvious to me that a "serious hobbyist" really can do some very high quality work with DAWs and fairly economical audio interfaces. But the technology can also make a real mess of the sound if not used wisely. Knowledge really is the key thing.
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 00:30:01
(permalink)
Experience through a combination of knowledge, experimentation, failures, successes, tools, and an appropriate mind set, are a lifelong pursuit, in just about any field. Music production, particularly, is all of the above, as a melding of both art and science, and also quite subjective. Ordering books and looking for tips is all part of the process - in a good way - so keep at it, and try to learn something from all that you do. There is also a giant load of really bad music out there, created and produced by inexperienced and untrained folks. Do your best and you will find some measure of success and satisfaction in life. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5562
- Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
- Location: Baton Rouge Area
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 03:10:25
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby meh 2013/07/15 09:17:24
I would suggest "Mixing Audio: Concepts, Practices and Tools" by Roey Izhaki. This book is very in depth. It has helped me tremendously.
Grem Michael Music PC i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, Home PCAMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 Surface Pro 3Win 10 i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
|
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5562
- Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
- Location: Baton Rouge Area
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 03:13:22
(permalink)
robert_e_bone Do your best and you will find some measure of success and satisfaction in life. Bob Bone
Well said.
Grem Michael Music PC i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, Home PCAMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 Surface Pro 3Win 10 i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 04:25:49
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby meh 2013/07/15 09:17:41
Try "Mixing Secrets" by Mike Senior. It's an awesome book. I would suggest "Mixing Audio: Concepts, Practices and Tools" by Roey Izhaki. This book is very in depth. It has helped me tremendously. I have both and thoroughly recommend each of them. Add to that Scott Garrigus's Sonar Power X2 and you don't really need anything else, maybe Bob Katz's "mastering audio"
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 08:35:11
(permalink)
Mixing Secrets is a good book, I have it myself..... however, a book only takes you so far. By all means, read, study and grow in the technical knowledge obtained from books and reading. The best way to grow is to build on the 40 years of experience you do have.... at whatever level that is.... is to jump in and start working on it and applying it. How fast you progress is totally up to you. Record your stuff and post it on the songs forum and ask specifically for mixing and engineering advice based on what you did to the recording. We have people here with really good ears and most of them can tell you what they are hearing, and how you can correct and improve the process on your end.....and they don't mind sharing that knowledge with others. Using the Songs Forum as your sounding board, you should see improvement as you apply the lessons learned.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 08:47:48
(permalink)
robert_e_bone There is also a giant load of really bad music out there, created and produced by inexperienced and untrained folks.
I think that is part of the problem. There are probably more bad examples than good examples. The same thing is true of music notation software and arranging. Music notation doesn't make a person a better arranger. In some ways, it brings out the worst -- or it gives a less capable arranger an opportunity to produce something that appears on the surface to be a lot like the work of the best arrangers. If one visits some of the sites where people upload their arrangements (and I am particularly sensitive to big band arrangements), the normal situation is that 90% are WAAAAAAAAY too cluttered. The notation software doesn't ever tell you to stop adding notes. And likewise, the DAW software doesn't ever tell you to stop adding effects. Well, at least the DAW software TRIES to warn us by having dropouts when we really go over the top. :) Part of the problem is that most of the effects are additive (reverb, chorusing, surround, etc.) Those are the ones that risk mud. EQ "can" be subtractive and should be used that way most of the time, to carve out space for more important material. Compression can be subtractive, but is mostly used as a way to just boost the overall volume. What I'm saying is that the DAW tools just sit there begging us to add more crap to our mix, when it is often better to be in subtractive mode.
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 09:54:06
(permalink)
Yup. It is a double-edged sword. Software like Sonar DOES give folks, even those untrained and inexperienced, a way to pursue the ability to create, and it gives what used to be truly only obtainable by vast amounts of money to the masses, which I think is a FABULOUS thing to be able to do. The trick is to become good at it along the way, Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 20964
- Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 10:04:08
(permalink)
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 10:13:03
(permalink)
your best friend in the world is you tube, though its hard to differentiate the real methods of the art one can build even off experimental ideas by tubers with little knowledge bulling there way through a video. in other words; even the users who have no idea about mixing leave something to the imagination.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 10:36:03
(permalink)
robert_e_bone Software like Sonar DOES give folks, even those untrained and inexperienced, a way to pursue the ability to create, and it gives what used to be truly only obtainable by vast amounts of money to the masses, which I think is a FABULOUS thing to be able to do.
Without any doubt. I have had a lot of software programs over the years. Band-in-a-box remains the most eerily humanesque one to me. That is, I have been a professional software person for many decades, and I still marvel at when comes out the speakers sometimes with Band-in-a-box. "How did they do that?" SONAR is different. I understand perfectly well HOW they did it. It is all very much orthogonal programming. But the amazing thing about SONAR (and probably mostly true of all the leading DAWs) is how they have been able to organize so much complexity and sophistication into a package that really is accessible (after a fair learning curve) by people who are less technical and more artistic. In terms of the function for the dollar, SONAR is by far the best value of any software I have ever owned. So far, I have been dealing with the program mostly on a mechanical basis, just learning how all the parts fit together. This morning I went back to work on a project I thought I had completed. It was an accompaniment for a vocalise by Bordogni. I had started that project with an existing MIDI file of Bordogni's piano accompaniment, then layered other instruments into a richer accompaniment. But the piano always sounded clunky. I studied that more. It was evidently entered on a notation program that did not capture velocity. All the velocities are exactly the same within each 1- or 16-bar section. I assume the person who entered that added some MF, and PP marks here and there to step the velocities up and down. But the whole effect is very robotic, and the piano often gets in the way. I found it was actually pretty easy with Sonar to "curve" the velocities, making them sound much more human. It only took about 10 minutes for a 3 minute song, which is a lot better than I expected. Now that there are some nice variations in the velocities, I will spend some time with the settings in TruePianos, which I believe can enhance that even more.
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 11:15:32
(permalink)
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 11:50:27
(permalink)
|
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3325
- Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 13:41:54
(permalink)
- When is it better to group on buses and apply effects as a group versus effects on individual channels? I group similar instruments (e.g., string section, back-up vocals) on a bus with a single reverb on the bus to save CPU power and enable me to change the reverb for all at once. (It would be weird if the violas had half the reverb of the violins, etc.) Drums are an exception because, even though it is not realistic, our ears are used to hearing different amounts of reverb on different drums. For most non-reverb effects, I use a separate effect for each track because some effects sound bad when processing too much data or too many notes at once.
- What effects are better on the master bus rather than individual channels? I don't put anything on the master bus except what people normally think of as "mastering effects," like compression or limiting. For group buses, see coments above.
- How can you keep the sound clean? How much reverb to use? Use reverb on all voices or just some? Use the same reverb throughout the mix or mix different reverb effects on different instruments? 1-I use way less reverb than most people because I am a freaking weirdo, so best not to ask me how much. 2-I think it makes sense to use the same or similar reverb (but different amounts) on the natural (organic) sounds like voices, acoustic instruments, orchestra, etc. For electronic sounds, anything goes. 3-About clean: I cringe if something isn't clean but lots of people go dirty on purpose. Example: Listen to "Siberia" by Lights (current hit). EVERYTHING but the voice is distorted big time and on purpose. I like the group and the song but I hate the way they did that. To each his own. 4-Too many effects, especially plug-ins, cheapen the sound to my ears. Example: I like EZMix2, but I am very careful about using some of the presets because I think they sound cheap or dirty. (Some are great.) Guitar Rig is very clean sounding for the most part (unless you pick distortion) and is one of the better plugs. I would not use it on voice. 5-Don't let you mic get too hot. It is easy to distort vocals even when the handy little Sonar meter is all green because the signal overblew the mic or the preamp.
- Strategies for compression. Search Sound on Sound archives. Excellent articles.
- Ways to bring out important voices without making them louder (chorusing, flanging)? Mild compression helps. Stereo image helps. Making sure you don't use too much reverb helps. Manual compression (riding the fader) helps. For vocals, a lack of 2-3K power can make voices hard to understand. (The other edge of that sword is that too much can make the vocal really ugly.) If you cut too much 1.2-2.5K or so out of the vocal, it will get lost. One trick is to cut other instruments a little in that range so they don't fight the vocal, or drop them in the mix while the vocal is active. Similar concepts apply to other insturments: you can temporarily boost the bass midrange when you want a lick to come through.
There are some general mixing tips like setting your bass and kick volume first to get your master at a certain level, then adding in guitars and keyboards, etc. but most of it is trying, fixing, trying again, etc. I have one project open now that has about 65 tracks and every minor change requires lots of adjustments to lots of tracks.
Konrad Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/ Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka. Rokit 6s.
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 15:39:19
(permalink)
Nicely put, sir. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
dmbaer
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2585
- Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
- Location: Concord CA
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/15 16:27:10
(permalink)
cclarry your best friend in the world is you tube, though its hard to differentiate the real methods of the art one can build even off experimental ideas by tubers with little knowledge bulling there way through a video
Yes, there's a massive amount of material on youtube, but it's largely luck-of-the-draw. The problem is finding what's good amongst all the less-than-worthy-of-your-time material. A better solution, if you've got a hundred bucks and a little patience, is groove3. They have a good number of professionally produced videos that are well worth taking the time to watch. They have a sale every now and then (at least twice a year, I think) that gives you a one-year all-access pass for $100. Money very well spent, IMO.
|
hellogoodbye
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1343
- Joined: 2004/03/22 05:46:36
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/16 09:14:02
(permalink)
dmbaer Yes, there's a massive amount of material on youtube, but it's largely luck-of-the-draw. The problem is finding what's good amongst all the less-than-worthy-of-your-time material. A better solution, if you've got a hundred bucks and a little patience, is groove3. They have a good number of professionally produced videos that are well worth taking the time to watch. They have a sale every now and then (at least twice a year, I think) that gives you a one-year all-access pass for $100. Money very well spent, IMO.
I agree with the YouTube comment. 9 out of 10 video's suck. People who mumble something like 'Right, well... today I will... er... right... Oh let's get that screen out of the way... okay, now, today we will see... er, try... (coughs softly) oh, what happened there... wait, right, yeah, well, okay, that should do it... oh er... yeah, now, today I will show you how to er... (takes a sip of coffee) how to er... (shouts off mic: yeah, I'll do that tomorrow, mom!). Okay, let's get going. This video will be about (coughs loudly) er...' And this goes on for 45 minutes. And in the end you usually have learned nothing new. Yeah, most YouTube tutorials suck big time. As an alternative for Groove3 (in case you want to mainly learn about Sonar): one of the best video's ever imho is SWA's Complete Sonar X2 Tutorial. It's REALLY complete and very well done.
Sonar 8.5 PE, Edirol FA-66, Behringer C-1. All instruments in my songs are VSTi's. Check out Soundclick
|
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1153
- Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/16 10:18:07
(permalink)
hellogoodbye 'Right, well... today I will... er... right... Oh let's get that screen out of the way... okay, now, today we will see... er, try... (coughs softly) oh, what happened there... wait, right, yeah, well, okay, that should do it... oh er... yeah, now, today I will show you how to er... (takes a sip of coffee) how to er... (shouts off mic: yeah, I'll do that tomorrow, mom!). Okay, let's get going. This video will be about (coughs loudly) er...'
Maybe it is a generational thing, but I am becoming sensitive to people who say "OK now I'm gonna go ahead and ..." I saw a video last week where the young lady did this "gonna go ahead" thing 7 times in the first 2 minutes. I couldn't keep watching, it was so annoying. Don't tell me you're "gonna go ahead". Just go ahead. You don't have to ask permission. We WANT you to go ahead. Honest.
|
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3325
- Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/16 10:27:35
(permalink)
Youtube has some good stuff but try to stick to things produced by professionals.
Konrad Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/ Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka. Rokit 6s.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/16 10:57:52
(permalink)
I don't know about pros being the ones to listen to. I recall one mastering pro touting the advantage of Monster Cables in mastering. To me after that he became a joke. Sometimes its best to not look behind the curtain.
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/16 12:54:35
(permalink)
I like watching the cats walk across the computer keyboards when the camera is rolling, stepping on all kinds of functional key combinations. A little editing would go a long way. Comic critter relief, Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/16 13:49:08
(permalink)
hellogoodbye
dmbaer Yes, there's a massive amount of material on youtube, but it's largely luck-of-the-draw. The problem is finding what's good amongst all the less-than-worthy-of-your-time material. A better solution, if you've got a hundred bucks and a little patience, is groove3. They have a good number of professionally produced videos that are well worth taking the time to watch. They have a sale every now and then (at least twice a year, I think) that gives you a one-year all-access pass for $100. Money very well spent, IMO.
I agree with the YouTube comment. 9 out of 10 video's suck. People who mumble something like 'Right, well... today I will... er... right... Oh let's get that screen out of the way... okay, now, today we will see... er, try... (coughs softly) oh, what happened there... wait, right, yeah, well, okay, that should do it... oh er... yeah, now, today I will show you how to er... (takes a sip of coffee) how to er... (shouts off mic: yeah, I'll do that tomorrow, mom!). Okay, let's get going. This video will be about (coughs loudly) er...' And this goes on for 45 minutes. And in the end you usually have learned nothing new. Yeah, most YouTube tutorials suck big time. As an alternative for Groove3 (in case you want to mainly learn about Sonar): one of the best video's ever imho is SWA's Complete Sonar X2 Tutorial. It's REALLY complete and very well done.
The Groove3 videos are generally great but some of them are of variable quality. I like some presenters better than others. There are a couple of them who don't seem to explain things very well. I watched one where the guy was mixing some drums and the guy was saying : "Next, the snare. We'll just fire this compressor up....and set that there...and set that there....and set the attack there....and the release about there.....great. Now the kick....." I think my favorite is Eli Krantzberg, the guy who does the Sonar videos among others. He speaks very clearly and seems to have a good sense of what the student needs to know.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
hellogoodbye
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1343
- Joined: 2004/03/22 05:46:36
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/17 12:55:53
(permalink)
sharke The Groove3 videos are generally great but some of them are of variable quality. I like some presenters better than others. There are a couple of them who don't seem to explain things very well. I watched one where the guy was mixing some drums and the guy was saying : "Next, the snare. We'll just fire this compressor up....and set that there...and set that there....and set the attack there....and the release about there.....great. Now the kick....."
I saw that Groove3 video too. Well, for a few minutes and then I closed it to never open it again. It was supposed to teach you how to mix but all he did was show you how he mixed his project, only by giving you the exact settings for the effects he used without saying once why... totally and utterly, utterly, utterly, UTTERLY useless. And that was one you even had to pay for! So no, it doesn't necessarily have to be a 'pro' who made the video...
Sonar 8.5 PE, Edirol FA-66, Behringer C-1. All instruments in my songs are VSTi's. Check out Soundclick
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 2007/12/26 22:09:28
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/17 16:40:21
(permalink)
I have to agree on that Master Class video's quality. No explanation of why a whole bunch of settings were chosen. I did not bother to watch the remaining videos that made up the series. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|
hellogoodbye
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1343
- Joined: 2004/03/22 05:46:36
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/18 05:46:25
(permalink)
While we are at the subject of video's and specially bad ones about mixing: are there any real GOOD video's about mixing? I have 'Mixing Secrets' by Mike Senior (not read it yet) but I would also like a good (or excellent!) video about it all.
Sonar 8.5 PE, Edirol FA-66, Behringer C-1. All instruments in my songs are VSTi's. Check out Soundclick
|
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3325
- Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/18 14:19:17
(permalink)
I suppose when I said "professional" I should have qualified it. I just meant you won't get a lot of technical information from a video with 4 views made by a kid in his room and with a long introduction like "Yo, yo, your boy J-Q here. How you doing? I'll be making beats witch yall after I give a shout out to Mario..." I agree with the thought above that tutorials that are centered around a specific song are less useful than those that address general issues like 1-notching out EQ space for different sounds, 2-gain staging, 3-controlling the low end, 4-fixing sibilince, 5-creating a powerful rhythm section that doesn't bury the voice, 6-stereo imaging, 7-vocal effects, 8-EQ bands and Q, etc.
Konrad Current album and more: http://www.themightykonrad.com/ Sonar X1d Producer. V-Studio 700. PC: Intel i7 CPU 3.07GHz, 12 GB RAM. Win 7 64-bit. RealGuitar, RealStrat, RealLPC, Ivory II, Vienna Symphonic, Hollywood Strings, Electr6ity, Acoustic Legends, FabFour, Scarbee Rick/J-Bass/P-Bass, Kontakt 5. NI Session Guitar. Boldersounds, Noisefirm. EZ Drummer 2. EZ Mix. Melodyne Assist. Guitar Rig 4. Tyros 2, JV-1080, Kurzweil PC2R, TC Helicon VoiceWorks+. Rode NT2a, EV RE20. Presonus Eureka. Rokit 6s.
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Are "DAW Best Practices" published anywhere?
2013/07/18 17:34:26
(permalink)
I'm reading Roey Izhaki's "Mixing Audio" at the minute (got the e-book cheap from the link I posted above) and I have to say its one of the best textbooks I've ever read. After having spent a year at this audio game I felt ready to tackle a more thorough, technical text on the subject and this is perfect. I'm learning so much. It's the perfect compliment to Mike Senior's book - the two of them are a winning combination IMO.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|