Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond?

Author
scrizzle7
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2014/12/31 05:02:45
  • Status: offline
2015/06/14 01:07:04 (permalink)

Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond?

With Sonar now a part of the Gibson family do you think they will bring us some type of controller/mixer (or combo) that fully integrates w/ Sonar kinda like the Roland V Studio stuff, but a controller only?  Either working with another Midi keyboard company or in house.  I mean out-of-the-box compatibility.  Mixer(faders and knobs), Transport, Tap Tempo, Menu & Track Selection, ect,...... and for god sakes PRO CHANNEL...some motorized fader action would be nice.  I mean everything.  Touchscreen is cool and all but personally I would like to have a choice of either.  I just hate seeing all these new controllers coming out that's either partially compatible or specifically meant for a different DAW.  I currently have an Impulse 49 Keyboard that works ok, but Automap is very unstable and unpredictable. Took me forever to finally get it working correctly and it still only lets me control some features, but not all. 
 
I was looking @ the Nektar Panorama P4/P6 keyboard (love the 1 motorized fader idea) only to find out of course they don't support Sonar.  I'm sure you could painstakingly set up the general control surface but would love something already setup for us before I go out and spend $500 bucks.  And yes I've seen the Nektar LX series which does have support for Sonar but still not full compatibility and it looks kinda cheesy.  Sonar itself has been very stable for me for the most part and is a great program just wish I had something to make the workflow even better sitting on my desk.
 
Sorry if this sounded like a rant, but just wondering if you guys think they will ever bring us something like this....

Sonar Platinum 64bit/ E-mu XL7(w/ Mo Phatt Rom)/ NI Maschine Studio & Komplete 8/ Novation Impulse 49/ Akai MPD 32/ Propellerhead Reason 6.5/ Focusrite Saffire PRO 26/ Windows 8.1 Pro 64/ Intel i7-4770k 3.50GHz 16GB Ram
#1

15 Replies Related Threads

    TheMaartian
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2774
    • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
    • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/14 01:46:06 (permalink)
    I have a P6, and love it. I just moved from Studio One 2 Pro to SPlat, rather than upgrade to S1 v3.
     
    Nektar provides what looks like reasonable integration with S1, but it really sucks. I find it hard to understand when their S1 support package is in v1.4. It's still a mess. All of the encoders (all 16 of them) are defined incorrectly being the most egregious problem. I thought.
     
    Now that I'm starting to use it with SPlat, I did a full factory reset on the P6...and it's like an entirely new surface. Now that I'm playing on it, I'm noticing that the S1 SysEx must have also screwed up the velocity curve for the keyboard the same way the encoders were screwed up. I've now got full range (7-bit; woot!) velocity coming in to my VIs.
     
    You're right, it'll take some time to map the P6 to SPlat the way I want it, but...when I'm done...it'll be the way I want it, not the way some inexperienced technodweeb wanted it.
     
    So, I'm willing to spend the time to do it my way (sorry, Frank).
    post edited by TheMaartian - 2015/06/14 01:52:16

    Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
    Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
    PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
    NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
    #2
    scrizzle7
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3
    • Joined: 2014/12/31 05:02:45
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/14 02:10:34 (permalink)
    TheMaartian
    I have a P6, and love it. I just moved from Studio One 2 Pro to SPlat, rather than upgrade to S1 v3.
     
    Nektar provides what looks like reasonable integration with S1, but it really sucks. I find it hard to understand when their S1 support package is in v1.4. It's still a mess. All of the encoders (all 16 of them) are defined incorrectly being the most egregious problem. I thought.
     
    Now that I'm starting to use it with SPlat, I did a full factory reset on the P6...and it's like an entirely new surface. Now that I'm playing on it, I'm noticing that the S1 SysEx must have also screwed up the velocity curve for the keyboard the same way the encoders were screwed up. I've now got full range (7-bit; woot!) velocity coming in to my VIs.
     
    You're right, it'll take some time to map the P6 to SPlat the way I want it, but...when I'm done...it'll be the way I want it, not the way some inexperienced technodweeb wanted it.
     
    So, I'm willing to spend the time to do it my way (sorry, Frank).


     
    @TheMaartian
    I thought I read somewhere that the motorized fader on the P4/P6 doesn't work w/ Sonar.... is this true?  If it's not then this keyboard might just be my next stop gap until they come w/ something specifically for Sonar.

    Sonar Platinum 64bit/ E-mu XL7(w/ Mo Phatt Rom)/ NI Maschine Studio & Komplete 8/ Novation Impulse 49/ Akai MPD 32/ Propellerhead Reason 6.5/ Focusrite Saffire PRO 26/ Windows 8.1 Pro 64/ Intel i7-4770k 3.50GHz 16GB Ram
    #3
    TerraSin
    Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1975
    • Joined: 2005/08/05 00:27:13
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/14 12:20:53 (permalink)
    Considering how poorly supported the VS-700 was, I hope not. Especially now that TASCAM is their main supplier for things like mixers. I sold my DM-4800 because of how terrible that company was at something as simple as coding a proper driver for their hardware and their support was arrogant and obnoxious. Rather not deal with that again.
    #4
    TheMaartian
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2774
    • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
    • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/14 13:33:30 (permalink)
    The motorized fader requires a special protocol (not MIDI), although it can be used as a standard fader, just with reduced MIDI resolution. Studio One doesn't support it, either.
     
    What I am most concerned about at the moment, being new to SONAR, is whether or not it supports soft pickup (doesn't start acting on MIDI controls until the controller reaches the same value as the current state of the device parameter being controlled). That's my next thing to learn, challenge to overcome.
     
    Re Tascam drivers...
     
    They, like many (most?) others, outsourced their driver development. With the new line of audio interfaces, they've brought their driver development back in-house. I can't speak for other product lines, but my v1.00 US-16x08 driver works very well (significantly better than my PreSonus AudioBox 44VSL driver, which, on v1.3, still completed sucked). My iLok works. Finally. After wasting a year on a bad driver (of course, it took most of the year to identify the culprit). There are minor little issues with the v1.00 Tascam driver, but no showstoppers.
     
    So, I'm thinking Tascam are going in the right direction, as is SONAR. And, yep, there's my Gibson SG bass, on its stand to my right. When spec'd or acquired, I had no idea all three where from the same big family.
     
    How copacetic!

    Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
    Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
    PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
    NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
    #5
    Vastman
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2508
    • Joined: 2006/08/30 02:49:18
    • Location: Oakland, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/14 16:16:44 (permalink)
    I would suggest as many as willing contact Nektar and bug them about Sonar integration... The listen, it is supposedly on their list, they are adding DAWs slowly and the squeaky wheel....

    Dana
    We make the future... Climate Change Music
    VastMaschine:SP4L/W10/i74930K/32GB/RME/CAD E100s; The Orchestra! NOVO!/Inspire/BohemianViolin&Cello, ARK1&2,/MinimalCapriccioMaximoSoto/OE1&2, Action&Emotive/Omni2/Tril/RMX/All OrangeTree/Falcon/APE Jugs/Alpha&Bravo/BFD3 & SD3
    Gravity/DM307/AEON/DM/Damage/Diva/HZebra/Hive/Diversion/VC4/Serum/Alchemy/blablabla
    Spitfire/8DIO/SL/KH/EW/NI; Shred1&2/AGF,G,M&T Torch&Res&Ren/GD-6; Ibanez SR1200&SR505
    NOVAX FanFret Tele&Strat 
    #6
    azslow3
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3297
    • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
    • Location: Germany
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/14 18:14:14 (permalink)
    TheMaartian
    The motorized fader requires a special protocol (not MIDI), although it can be used as a standard fader, just with reduced MIDI resolution. Studio One doesn't support it, either.

    Why you think so? MCU, Alphatrack, Faderport, A&H Qu, etc have motorized faders and use MIDI.

    Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
    GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
    RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
    www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
    #7
    TheMaartian
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2774
    • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
    • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/14 19:15:57 (permalink)
    azslow3
     
    Why you think so? MCU, Alphatrack, Faderport, A&H Qu, etc have motorized faders and use MIDI.

    Not what I meant. Sorry for the confusion. There is MIDI. And then there are stacks like the Mackie HUI MIDI Mapping Protocol. It is my understanding that the control commands for motorized faders (like ON and OFF) use a specific protocol that is outside of MIDI. That doesn't mean  that the device can't pass MIDI data. That's the whole point of most of them.
     
    More, rather than less, confusing? Hope not.

    Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
    Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
    PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
    NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
    #8
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/15 01:47:20 (permalink)
    Fact. Since Gibson have acquired Tascam. Tascam have been able to bring driver development in house. Their recent efforts on new hardware has proven that they do excellent work. They've also picked up some of the slack for their older products. They seem to be benefiting just like Cakewalk have in the last 1.5 years.

    VS700 support is down to Roland and while it was bundled with Sonar it was never a cakewalk product. All drivers and associated software was provided and developed by Roland.

    I can't see any control surface development with Sonar as the focus. Cakewalk are focussing on touch screen support. I conclude from that that they are not looking to advance control surface technology. The fact that they have released their various SDKs for their development into the public domain speaks volumes. If you want to see the SDKs they are on Git Hub.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #9
    azslow3
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3297
    • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
    • Location: Germany
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/15 04:42:39 (permalink)
    TheMaartian
    azslow3
    Why you think so? MCU, Alphatrack, Faderport, A&H Qu, etc have motorized faders and use MIDI.

    Not what I meant. Sorry for the confusion. There is MIDI. And then there are stacks like the Mackie HUI MIDI Mapping Protocol. It is my understanding that the control commands for motorized faders (like ON and OFF) use a specific protocol that is outside of MIDI. That doesn't mean  that the device can't pass MIDI data. That's the whole point of most of them.
     
    More, rather than less, confusing? Hope not.

    From what I have found in the Internet, Mackie HUI use "normal" CC 14bit to set faders. MCU use PitchBend. StudioMix use NRPNs (http://www.azslow.com/index.php/topic,120.0.html). Old devices had MIDI connectors only, so that was unavoidable.
     
    Modern devices connect with USB. So they have a choice:
    1) "pack" the data into "class complaint" MIDI, so they can save on driver development, automatically support any OS (Windows, Apple and Linux) and work with virtually any music software. These advantages can turn out to be commercial disadvantage, the device can work "forever" and the list of supported software is not under control from the device producer side.
    2) introduce "proprietary" protocol and write own (USB device) driver. It is quite some work, but the producer can dictate which version of OS is supported and which software is supported. So, they can "force obsolete" the device so customers have to pay for the "new hardware" (which can be essentially the same).
     
    Unfortunately, the trend is to take the way (2). For many reasons, they still "send MIDI" in addition. But the possibilities in MIDI mode are normally artificially limited (touch sensitive endless encoders are "magically" no longer touch sensitive and no longer endless, display indicate just MIDI number instead of controlled parameter, etc). All that has nothing to do with music and technical difficulties, it is "commerce pure".
     

    Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
    GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
    RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
    www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
    #10
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/15 13:33:49 (permalink)
    Yea, I think Cake is geared more to touchscreens than making the same mistakes w/ Roland.  A dedicated hardware controller is a hard sell, even if the V-700 was perfect for Roland-era SONAR.  And if you make your controller generic there is a much bigger market but less integration.  Unless Tascam has given up controllers (and there are making some nice hardware interfaces), anything they do make will have a tight SONAR template (from the git go).
     
    Even on Protools w/ Raven most of the mixers I know still use a lot of mouse and keystrokes.  I'd like to see a big touch screen w/ hardware knobs and maybe a single fader.  But that is just me.  The guy that reviewed SONAR in SOS loves multitouch for riding faders, so maybe touch only is the way forward, but I still like some tactile feedback.
     
    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #11
    ØSkald
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1248
    • Joined: 2010/12/22 16:52:47
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/15 15:58:33 (permalink)
    I think a digital mixer with Mackie control is what you need if you have space.

    Asus TUF Z370-Pro Gaming, Bugera Trirec Infinium, Cakewalk Platinum, Corsair RM750 750W, Corsair Vengeance DDR4 4x8GB, Gigabyte GTX 960 2GB, Genelec 6010A with 5040A sub, Ibanez AEG10II BK, Ibanez Iron Label RGIR27E BK, Ibanez Iron Label RGIR28FE BK, Ibanez RG550 RF, Ibanez RG570 FMCS, Ibanez SR506 BM, Intel Core i7 8700K, USB, NI Komplete 11 Ultimate with Kontrol S61, Samsung 960 EVO M.2 NVMe SSD, Samsung SSDs 840 EVO 1TB, Toontrack EZdrummer 2, Toontrack EZMix 2, Toontrack Superior Drummer 3, UA Apollo Twin Duo, Windows 10 Pro
    #12
    LunaTech
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 273
    • Joined: 2012/02/04 09:58:46
    • Location: Atlanta, GA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/15 18:08:55 (permalink)
    Hello,
     
    Please search the Forum topic for , "You can control Sonar As Deep As You Want" created by user Azslow3. He has worked with me on my Zed R16 and QU 24 using his utility to turn these mixers (and other devices for other users) into very capable control surfaces for Sonar in my case going beyond the offering of standard midi and even HUI emulation (not supported by Sonar). I believe his efforts are worth a serious "look see". IHTH

    "Life could capture me with songs of innocence...
    And enrapture me with pleasures galore...
    Suddenly it could all quickly fade away...
    But I'm not surprised any more...."

    Sonar Platinum Pro- Win 10 64- I7 6800k - Asus - 32gb DDR4-SB ZX sound card (cd output to mixer)- Toshiba 960gb SSD (OS - Audio APPs)- 4TB Seagate (Storage/ App Content)- M-Audio Keystation 88 Pro - Akai MPD 232 - Zed R16 - PT 12 - A&H QU 24- Axiom 61 - XD 80usb
     
    "When He is all you have, He is everything you need"
    #13
    Kamikaze
    Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3013
    • Joined: 2015/01/15 21:38:59
    • Location: Da Nang, Vietnam
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/16 03:37:15 (permalink)
    Being my Roland Quad Capture won't work with Rapture Pro in stand alone. I'd only consider a Cakewalk device if it was fully endorsed and they'd write the drivers for it.
     
    They'd need to sort out the none Cakewalk Pro-Channels first, to have them act like the in house Pro Channels.

     
    #14
    azslow3
    Max Output Level: -42.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3297
    • Joined: 2012/06/22 19:27:51
    • Location: Germany
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/16 17:00:28 (permalink)
    Jarsve
    I think a digital mixer with Mackie control is what you need if you have space.

    Not that I had plans to get some, but I have tried to check what digital mixers (on the market) can do as control surfaces. The information is just from the documentation. I could interpret it wrong.
     
    Tascam DM-3200
    MC protocol support, all controls. So, Tascam has already "a control surface". It is a bit heavy and not something you want to put on computer table
     
    Yamaha 01v96i
    Support HUI (more or less complete), generic MIDI (limited).
     
    A&H Qu.
    Has midi mode for some subset of controls. Works at the level of BCF2000 without encoders but with many channels (16,24,32... model specific).
     
    Midas M32/ Behringer X32
    8 channels only as control surfaces.
     
    Presonus StudioLive.
    Has proprietary communication protocol and support selected subset of DAWs.
     
     

    Sonar 8LE -> Platinum infinity, REAPER, Windows 10 pro
    GA-EP35-DS3L, E7500, 4GB, GTX 1050 Ti, 2x500GB
    RME Babyface Pro (M-Audio Audiophile Firewire/410, VS-20), Kawai CN43, TD-11, Roland A500S, Akai MPK Mini, Keystation Pro, etc.
    www.azslow.com - Control Surface Integration Platform for SONAR, ReaCWP, AOSC and other accessibility tools
    #15
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re: Are There Any Plans for a Dedicated Controller for Platinum & Beyond? 2015/06/17 09:35:39 (permalink)
    LunaTech
    Hello,
     
    Please search the Forum topic for , "You can control Sonar As Deep As You Want" created by user Azslow3. He has worked with me on my Zed R16 and QU 24 using his utility to turn these mixers (and other devices for other users) into very capable control surfaces for Sonar in my case going beyond the offering of standard midi and even HUI emulation (not supported by Sonar). I believe his efforts are worth a serious "look see". IHTH


    Azslow3 has already posted in this thread. 3 posts back.

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #16
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1