Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 555
- Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
Hi folks! I know its a question that’s been asked many times, by many folks, but I’m going to ask again anyway, as I value everyone’s input and – after tons of research and legwork – I’m sort of at a mental, overthinking-way-too-much deadlock about what to do: What suggestions would folks make regarding an audio interface upgrade...? Some background. After a financial reshuffling, I have found myself with some budget to upgrade my studio. I was previously using a V-studio 700, loved it, but grew disenchanted when it was orphaned by Roland, and decided to part with it while it still had some resale value. So last week I sold it, and now I have an opportunity to reboot my studio setup, starting with a nice upgrade to the audio interface. I use Sonar Platinum, in Windows 10 64bit, and my main interest is orchestral / hybrid scoring. I record in stereo, and I work almost exclusively in-the-box, using sample libraries (I have many). So I’m not overly concerned about built-in mic preamps, or multiple ins and outs. I occasionally record vocals, but usually just myself (or a friend), one track at a time. I already have a couple of decent preamps and a modest collection of mics. In a way, the VS-700 was a bit wasted on me – I never really used the preamps much, or the multiple inputs (but I liked the conversion and the wonderful control surface). To replace it, all I want is really nice conversion. My budget: I’ll go as high as $3,000, give or take. I’ve been pondering a few scenarios, and eyeing some major hardware – Prism’s Lyra, Lynx Hilo, even the Lynx E22 or E44. I looked at some of the UA stuff, but without certified Windows 10 drivers, I don’t think I’ll go that way. UA offers good conversion, but I don’t think they are in the same class as Lynx or Prism. I can always get myself a USB satellite, if I want to use UA plugins (which I do). I know folks rave about the Hilo and Lyra. They are under serious consideration. I was rather impressed with Hilo’s design and functionality, including its routing options, and the pretty cool touchscreen interface. I also hear the conversion is uncompromising and utterly first-class. Same for Lyra, and the preamp is apparently excellent (although I really don’t need it). However, I am also very tempted by another approach: Lynx’s PCIe solutions. The E22 and E44 converters are supposed to be as good as the Aurora’s (which are supposed to be pretty damn good), and I have to think that the latency with a PCIe interface should be better than Hilo or Lyra. In particular, the E22 really offers everything I need – great conversion, two channels in and out, solid drivers and good support. And the price is low enough that it leaves budget available for other nice toys and accessories (there is always more to buy – like a UAD Satellite, Omnisphere 2, Albion One, a new control surface, oh the list goes on…). But how does the E22’s conversion compare to Hilo or Lyra? My research suggests that Hilo is still a few tiers above its PCIe brethren, and I wonder how much of a difference that would make to my recordings… Anyway, sorry for rambling on. I’d be curious and grateful for anyone’s input or observations. Am I missing any major players in the mid/high-end conversion sweepstakes? And I’d be very curious to hear what other folks would do if they were dealing with my budget and workflow needs… Thanks! Rob
post edited by Amicus717 - 2016/04/15 00:43:44
Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/15 10:41:10
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Amicus717 2016/04/16 11:34:23
I'd go with the E44. I can't imagine the conversion would be that much better in the Hilo/Lyra. Some people claimed the TASCAM UH-7000 sounds the same (haven't compared the two but it has great conversion). The E units spec better than the old aurora units, which have been in many professional environments. If Goldfrapp can sell millions using them, I don't think it will cramp your style. If you needed portability or were doing pro mastering it could be worth the extra. Most conversion these days is good - Lynx is great. Having 4 I/O (with 4 digital I/O) provides you a lot more flexibility for very little extra outlay. It allows you to easily buss out sounds and record them back into your rig and hear the effect. Otherwise you need a variable patchbay or splitters. That is likely a function you will need. Of course, the Hilo has ADAT for expansion and does have a bit extra going as far as specs. You can't go wrong w/ it. But if it was my money the E44 is a better deal.
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/15 11:06:48
(permalink)
|
JonD
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2003/12/09 11:09:10
- Location: East of Santa Monica
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/15 11:47:06
(permalink)
The zenstudio does look nice, but as a USB 2.0 device, I'd be concerned about latencies. I haven't heard that they've managed low latency drivers like RME.
SonarPlat/CWbBL, Win 10 Pro, i7 2600K, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB DDR3, Radeon HD5450, TC Electronic Impact Twin, Kawai MP11 Piano, Event ALP Monitors, Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro, Too Many Plugins, My lucky hat.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/15 12:55:08
(permalink)
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/15 12:56:41
(permalink)
|
Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 555
- Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/16 11:12:34
(permalink)
Thanks for the feedback, folks. Much appreciated. I think the E44 might be the way to go, as per AT's suggestions above. I had heard of Antelope Audio, but hadn't really looked into their products all that much and didn't realize how many different interfaces they actually produce, so I appreciate the links. They do look very nice, although I just don't need that many inputs or mic pres. In the years I owned the VS-700, I can't remember a single time I used more than two of its eight pres -- and I only did that twice (that I can recall). I also didn't get a clear sense of the quality of Antelope's drivers. A scattering of user reviews (which I know should be taken with some grains of salt) spoke of driver issues in Windows. That may or may not be true, but its enough to make me leery. I've had some struggles over the years with great hardware sabotaged by sketchy driver support (EMU 1212m, Mackie Onyx mixer with Firewire card, to name a couple), and I sort of felt burned by Roland (and was never able to get my VS-700 all that stable in Win 10, for whatever reason - it ran, but I rarely had a session without at least one crash). I know Lynx has an awesome reputation for drivers and support. Combine that with their high-end conversion, and its make for a really appealing package.
Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/17 11:13:42
(permalink)
If you're 100% ITB, there is absolutely no reason to spend more than $500 on an audio interface. You don't need 8+ channels, ADAT, S/PDIF or multiple outputs (unless you do surround), and you don't care about interface latency. All you want is a reliable device from a reputable company, and you don't need to spend $3k to get that. Spend that money on your computer instead, e.g. more RAM, better speakers, an additional video monitor, or an SSD for your sample libraries. Maybe some high-end headphones. I can think of a lot of things that would be money better spent than a premium audio interface.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
JonD
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2003/12/09 11:09:10
- Location: East of Santa Monica
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/17 11:38:37
(permalink)
bitflipper If you're 100% ITB, there is absolutely no reason to spend more than $500 on an audio interface. You don't need 8+ channels, ADAT, S/PDIF or multiple outputs (unless you do surround), and you don't care about interface latency. All you want is a reliable device from a reputable company, and you don't need to spend $3k to get that.
I guess the counter-argument to this is sometimes we may need to go momentarily OOTB (out of the box). I like a bit of reverb in the cans when recording vocals. My Steinberg units have this covered with onboard FX, but many interfaces don't. Now if the interface has s/pdif, I can connect my M350 FX unit digitally and enjoy quality reverb on the monitoring mix with negligible latency. The alternative is to use a reverb VST, but depending on the interface, the latency can be too high so that the reverb (with the vocal) sounds off and distracting. Also, as a fan of the VRM box, I "need" s/pdif out on the interface to use it.
SonarPlat/CWbBL, Win 10 Pro, i7 2600K, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB DDR3, Radeon HD5450, TC Electronic Impact Twin, Kawai MP11 Piano, Event ALP Monitors, Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro, Too Many Plugins, My lucky hat.
|
kitekrazy1
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3524
- Joined: 2014/08/02 17:52:51
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/17 17:56:04
(permalink)
bitflipper If you're 100% ITB, there is absolutely no reason to spend more than $500 on an audio interface. You don't need 8+ channels, ADAT, S/PDIF or multiple outputs (unless you do surround), and you don't care about interface latency. All you want is a reliable device from a reputable company, and you don't need to spend $3k to get that. Spend that money on your computer instead, e.g. more RAM, better speakers, an additional video monitor, or an SSD for your sample libraries. Maybe some high-end headphones. I can think of a lot of things that would be money better spent than a premium audio interface.
I disagree only because an RME unit will pay for itself and they are not under $500. They don't make doorstops.
Sonar Platinum, W7 Pro 32GB Ram, Intel i7 4790, AsRock Z97 Pro 4, NVidia 750ti, AP2496 Sonar Platinum, W7 Pro, 16GB Ram, AMD FX 6300, Gigabyte GA 970 -UD3 P, nVidia 9800GT, Guitar Port, Terratec EWX 2496
|
Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 555
- Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/18 15:07:58
(permalink)
That doesn't jive with what I've read and been told, but I don't presume to know first hand, as I've never worked with high end converters. I have been told that upgrading your converters can make quite a difference - depending on lots of other factors, of course. The guy who told me this owns and runs a Toronto-based studio that has done some pretty significant work in recent years, and he swears by Lynx -- says of all the companies producing interfaces, Lynx "really has their $#@% together", to quote directly. This guy's main hardware is a RADAR system, I believe, but he also has an Aurora rig at home, and he says it is fantastic. I do understand that in general, digital/analog conversion has come a long way in the last 10 years, and even mid-range interfaces offer up pretty good specs and performance. Do they really compare to Lynx's converters, or even RME's or MOTUs high-end products? And will the average home-studio dude like me notice the difference?
Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/18 17:32:34
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby mettelus 2016/04/20 07:50:17
For what it's worth the DA convertor chip in my RME UFX is also used in a Presonus interface that costs quite a lot less.
What you principally get with higher end interfaces is not just better convertors but better electronics supporting them. There isn't however a whole series of steadily better and better convertor chips as the price rises, certainly not when you get to RME, Apogee etc. The other thing more money tends to buy you is lower noise analogue components and circuits and better preamps.
I ran a comparison a while ago between my UFX and an old Cakewalk badged UA-101. The UFX pres and line inputs are good for at least a 3dB reduction in noise per channel and if the specofications are to be believed a bit less distortion each. Which hardly matters if you rarely work with more than a few recorded tracks and do most things ITB. It does make quite a difference in the summed noise floor and headroom if you are working with a dozen or more recorded tracks. In your case that may not be a factor.
If you need a couple of mic inputs, a couple of line inputs or so and a flexible mixer for it (including built in reverb, delay, dynamics and eq all of which can be printed or sent to the monitor bus only) I'd suggest considering the RME Babyface. RME drivers have a well-earned reputation for rock-solid performance at low latency and while no-one knows what the future may hold, RME have a history of supporting their products for a long time, rather than discontinue driver support when an operating system upgrade occurs and point out your old interface is now a brick, so you'll be overjoyed to hear they've a new interface you can buy.
Once you get to RME or UA etc. you're already into the region where the returns per extra dollar get smaller and smaller. An effect which increases more and more as the prices go up.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
steveo42
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 90
- Joined: 2015/11/14 18:18:04
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/18 19:41:30
(permalink)
|
Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 555
- Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/18 23:18:16
(permalink)
I felt the same after reading Soundonsound's review. Which is too bad, as the 192 looks like it should be a great piece of gear. tlw - Thanks for the input. As far as converters go, my friend made the same point -- the actual chip is only part of the equation, and it was the components and circuitry supporting the chip that played a big role in how it sounded. He felt Lynx was doing really outstanding work getting the best from the converter chips they were using (Aurora uses one of Cirrus Logic's chips, I believe, which is also found in a lot of other interfaces). I checked out the Babyface Pro, and yeah its a pretty nice piece of gear. My local music store has one available for rent, so possibly I should grab it for a weekend and see what it's like...my interim soundcard is an old ESI Juli@ that I had lying around, and it might be interesting to compare the them. The ESI was a pretty good card in its day, and I think it still holds up pretty well.
Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
|
steveo42
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 90
- Joined: 2015/11/14 18:18:04
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 00:23:55
(permalink)
I was chomping at the bit for the Studio 192 because I run Studio One.. When the early reports about horrible RTL started to surface I got concerned and dug deeper and decided to go with a MOTU Ultralite AVB instead. It has been flawless from day one. As always, look at the data and decide for yourself.
post edited by steveo42 - 2016/04/19 11:14:37
|
fireberd
Max Output Level: -38 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3704
- Joined: 2008/02/25 14:14:28
- Location: Inverness, FL
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 05:29:08
(permalink)
Just a comment on Presonus. A few years ago I was looking for a replacement for a dead Focusrite Saffire Pro 40. I tried 3 NEW Presonus 8 channel firewire interface units and they all had a hardware problem. One had one channel that would not work, another was DOA, and the third had a problem with the headphone circuit. I bought a Presonus Dual Blue Tube preamp and as it turned out it had the typical "starved plate" low voltage tube that was basically nothing more than a buffer. It did nothing for the mic's. I dumped it in favor of a "real" tube mic preamp.
"GCSG Productions" Franklin D-10 Pedal Steel Guitar (primary instrument). Nashville Telecaster, Bass, etc. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero M/B, i7 6700K CPU, 16GB Ram, SSD and conventional hard drives, Win 10 Pro and Win 10 Pro Insider Pre-Release Sonar Platinum/CbB. MOTU 896MK3 Hybrid, Tranzport, X-Touch, JBL LSR308 Monitors, Ozone 5, Studio One 4.1 ISRC Registered Member of Nashville based R.O.P.E. Assn.
|
JonD
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2003/12/09 11:09:10
- Location: East of Santa Monica
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 11:26:26
(permalink)
steveo42 I wouldn't touch a Presonus Studio 192 with a barge pole. http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/mar16/articles/presonus-studio-192.htm
Interesting -- and surprising. USB 3 should translate to lower latencies (than USB2 and firewire) for the unit. It takes a special kind of design skill to make one that's worse. That said, the review is over a year old. Anyone know if they've improved on those original drivers?
SonarPlat/CWbBL, Win 10 Pro, i7 2600K, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB DDR3, Radeon HD5450, TC Electronic Impact Twin, Kawai MP11 Piano, Event ALP Monitors, Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro, Too Many Plugins, My lucky hat.
|
steveo42
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 90
- Joined: 2015/11/14 18:18:04
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 11:37:38
(permalink)
JonD
steveo42 I wouldn't touch a Presonus Studio 192 with a barge pole. http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/mar16/articles/presonus-studio-192.htm
Interesting -- and surprising. USB 3 should translate to lower latencies (than USB2 and firewire) for the unit. It takes a special kind of design skill to make one that's worse. That said, the review is over a year old. Anyone know if they've improved on those original drivers?
The review is from March 2016.
|
Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 555
- Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 11:38:40
(permalink)
As I understand it, usb3 offers more bandwidth but won't make a huge difference in latency...
Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 17:12:12
(permalink)
As far as bandwidth goes, firewire 400 is still quite adequate in most real-life situations. USB2 has more bandwidth than almost anyone outside studios with a huge number of input and output channels will find limiting.
USB3 might contribute a little to latency reduction, but I doubt it's even measurable. I get the same minimum latency from my UFX via firewire (adaptor connected to Mac Thunderbolt bus), USB2 and USB3. Mac or PC makes no noticeable difference either.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
JonD
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2003/12/09 11:09:10
- Location: East of Santa Monica
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 17:23:47
(permalink)
steveo42 The review is from March 2016.
Doh! I sat in a DeLorean last week (seriously). We didn't do 88 miles per hour (actually it's just sitting), but ever since then my sense of time has been off. Well, I guess that's a "no" on the updated drivers.
SonarPlat/CWbBL, Win 10 Pro, i7 2600K, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB DDR3, Radeon HD5450, TC Electronic Impact Twin, Kawai MP11 Piano, Event ALP Monitors, Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro, Too Many Plugins, My lucky hat.
|
steveo42
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 90
- Joined: 2015/11/14 18:18:04
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/19 18:54:16
(permalink)
JonD
steveo42 The review is from March 2016.
Doh! I sat in a DeLorean last week (seriously). We didn't do 88 miles per hour (actually it's just sitting), but ever since then my sense of time has been off. Well, I guess that's a "no" on the updated drivers.
lol ! That's funny!
|
Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 555
- Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/20 22:35:13
(permalink)
This has been very helpful, and I appreciate everyone's input. Still have no idea what I'm going to do, but I'm thinking in broader terms than I was before, and that's probably a good thing :) Rob
Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
|
Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 555
- Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/22 11:11:11
(permalink)
Hmm, a friend of a friend has offered to sell me his RME Fireface UC for $600. Used, but looks to be in pristine shape. The guy selling it says it works perfectly, and he is totally vouched for by someone I trust. Worth considering? I know of RME's reputation, but I have never heard their products, and don't a lot about the UC. Frankly, I normally am not a big fan of buying used electronic hardware...
Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Audio Interface / conversion upgrade ideas
2016/04/22 14:01:03
(permalink)
ABSOLUTELY, a good price if from a trusted source
|