AnsweredBalanced speaker cable recommendation.

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
2016/10/27 18:44:44 (permalink)

Balanced speaker cable recommendation.

I went to the local music store today to pick up some balanced cables for my monitors. They wanted $30 for a six foot* cable. I decided I would look online first. Anyone have any recommendations for this? I'm looking for balanced TRS to XLR. I don't wanna break the bank for cables... I don't want them to be crap either.
 
*EDITED
#1
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8424
  • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 18:56:35 (permalink)
Is there not more than one Music store around? I buy mine from Tom Lee and they are top quality. You must have meant 6 feet not 6 inch... that would not reach anything  : )   A 10' cable is $22 Can, And they often have sales where I'll pick cables up half price.  
I would think Sweetwaters cheaper cables are fine too. Not sure about MF, I seem to remember the cheap stuff being,,, cheap stuff... 
http://tomleemusic.ca/19651  
 
 
Oh and a small point,,, They are not technically speaker cables, They are balanced connection or patch cables.
A true Speaker cables as you probably already know is unshielded wire and can have different connections like binding post, Banana, 1/4" TS or Speakon.
 
A balanced cable has many uses beyond patching in a powered speaker. You probably knew this but you title threw me off for a second.
post edited by Cactus Music - 2016/11/06 20:30:16

Johnny V  
Cakelab  
Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
 http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
 
 
#2
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2774
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
  • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 18:56:55 (permalink)
I can't speak for these specific cables, but Sweetwater's Pro Co line of cables is pretty good for the money, definitely an upgrade from Hosa, when you don't want to pay Mogami prices. Here are links to 2ft female and male TRS to XLR cables, as an example.
 
http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/BPBQXF2
http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/BPBQXM2
 

Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
#3
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 19:02:23 (permalink)
Thanks guys. I did indeed mean 6 foot.
There indeed are more music stores around. I just happen to live a block away from a Long and McQuade. I find the stores in town usually have pretty similar prices, so I thought I'd ask here before running all over.
#4
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 19:03:37 (permalink)
Another question. Are balanced cables specifically used for powered monitors (which I have.)  I ask because so many of the speaker cables that were available on the racks were unbalanced.
 
#5
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2774
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
  • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 19:08:28 (permalink) ☼ Best Answerby RSMCGUITAR 2016/10/27 19:15:24
Good video on the subject.


Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
#6
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 19:16:05 (permalink)
Great link. thank you! I finally totally get it. Also, what a genius idea.
#7
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 19:17:16 (permalink)
Still though, why so many unbalanced speaker cables for sale?
#8
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2774
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
  • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 19:38:37 (permalink)
RSMCGUITAR
Still though, why so many unbalanced speaker cables for sale?

Why are there so many Dodges and Kias for sale? Price point! They get the job done. Maybe not as well. Maybe for not as long. But when $$$ are scarce, you do what you gotta do. The show must go on.
 
Heck, pull the 60 Hz hum off the audio, modulate it with an LFO, bit crush it and call it a bass track. 

Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
#9
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 19:52:13 (permalink)
TheMaartian
 
Price point!


Suspicion confirmed!
#10
daryl1968
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10984
  • Joined: 2010/06/01 22:51:43
  • Location: Englishman in deepest, darkest Wales
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 20:11:53 (permalink)
Whirlwind cables have a lifetime guarantee and are excellent.
#11
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8424
  • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 20:49:19 (permalink)
Speaker cables carry a higher voltage and need to be heavy gauge wire. Shielding is a waste of time because they are not at all subject to RF interference.  Speaker cables need 2 wires of identical gauge. So you can use 2 wire extension cord from the hardware store for what it's worth.  I used #12 gauge for my PA and # 14 gauge for my studio monitors which of course are not powered. My powered speakers use the cables I posted above.
 
 Look up some prices on line and go back to L&McQ and ask for a price match. I know Tom Lee will always do this for me with in reason. That's why I shop there now. They always try their best to price match even against US prices.   
 

Johnny V  
Cakelab  
Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
 http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
 
 
#12
JohanSebatianGremlin
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 402
  • Joined: 2016/03/17 22:27:15
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/27 21:58:44 (permalink)
RSMCGUITAR
Still though, why so many unbalanced speaker cables for sale?


To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a balanced speaker cable. Speaker cables carry an amplified signal (i.e. watts) to a transducer. To my knowledge, that is always a two-conductor affair.

You do not want to use speaker cable to carry signal to a powered monitor. Yes, its a speaker. But when its a powered speaker, what you're actually doing is running signal to an amplifier. The amplifier is then carrying that signal to the transducer via its own internal hard wiring. Therefore no speaker cables are used when powered monitors are involved. Only balanced patch cables should be used in that scenario. Same as you would use to run between a mixer and an EQ or an EQ and a crossover or a crossover and an amplifier. Because again, what we're really doing is carrying the signal to an amplifier which just so happens to be installed in the back of a speaker cabinet. 

As for the price of balanced cables, I know of no better price buster when it comes to high quality audio cables than building your own. You can buy a couple hundred feet of very high quality bulk wire and a bunch of very high quality cable ends, heat shrink and a very good soldering iron setup for far less than the price of half a dozen so so quality ready made cables. Spend some quality time on youtube absorbing soldering how-to videos and you'll be soldering like a pro by the time you finish your third cable. A little time and effort can really save you a ton of cash.
#13
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/28 03:34:19 (permalink)
I hadn't thought of making my own cables. However, at the moment, I only need two cables. It might be a little much to get into making cables for 2*6 footers.
#14
JohanSebatianGremlin
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 402
  • Joined: 2016/03/17 22:27:15
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/28 11:40:03 (permalink)
Bulk cable doesn't have an expiration date. You only need two now, but sooner or later you'll need more.
#15
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2774
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
  • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/28 11:45:43 (permalink)
Cactus Music
Speaker cables carry a higher voltage and need to be heavy gauge wire. Shielding is a waste of time because they are not at all subject to RF interference.  Speaker cables need 2 wires of identical gauge. So you can use 2 wire extension cord from the hardware store for what it's worth.  I used #12 gauge for my PA and # 14 gauge for my studio monitors which of course are not powered. My powered speakers use the cables I posted above.
 
 Look up some prices on line and go back to L&McQ and ask for a price match. I know Tom Lee will always do this for me with in reason. That's why I shop there now. They always try their best to price match even against US prices.   

True, but ONLY if you are driving passive speakers with a power amplifier. I think the OP is referring to the line level signals sent from his audio i/f to his powered monitors. Shielding is definitely helpful, and balanced makes a lot of sense.

Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
#16
trgtdron
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31
  • Joined: 2015/11/17 16:18:44
  • Location: Ranger GA
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/31 06:14:18 (permalink)
E-Bay man go there.
#17
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/31 14:45:45 (permalink)
I ended up ordering some cables from these guys: http://www.primecables.com/c-1010-audio-cables 
#18
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/31 21:52:54 (permalink)
Those are very good prices. Let us know how they work out.
 
These days I buy all my cables from PartsExpress.com. I initially ordered a couple for a non-critical application to see what kind of quality they were, as they were very inexpensive. They turned to be excellent quality, metal plugs with strain reliefs, heavy insulation that tends not to tangle. Since then I've bought a bunch more.
 
A 10' TRS-TRS is $6.85. A 30' microphone cable with gold-plated contacts is $12.76. I couldn't have made my own cables for less.


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#19
RSMCGUITAR
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1318
  • Joined: 2014/12/27 02:33:15
  • Location: Toronto
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/10/31 22:31:46 (permalink)
They came today. They seem really great so far. I'm glad I held off.
#20
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1979
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
  • Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/05 10:54:02 (permalink)
I don't wish to seem disrespectful or argumentative, but there are quite a few technical errors in that video!

He confuses balanced vs single-ended vs symmetrical, which is a common enough error, but if you are going to present a video about interconnections I do think you owe it to your audience to be precise. He also completely misrepresents how a balanced interface works! (at least he understands the difference between polarity and phase!)
 
There are lots of really good resources that describe audio interconnections various levels of tech speak, I'd recommend Rane, Jensen Transformers or Audio Systems Group as good starting points.
 
The really short version:
A balanced source presents an equal impedance from each of two signal conductors to a common reference, most often ground. It is not necessary that both signal conductors carry a signal, but if they do they do need to be  of opposite polarity, as described in the video.

The benefit here comes from that  equal impedance to common - any external noise will be impressed equally to both conductors, making it much easier for a balanced input to subtract the common signal.
 
A balanced input can be a difference amplifier or a transformer, the key specification is the common mode rejection ratio, a fancy way of representing how well the input stage rejects any signal common to the two input pins. It works perfectly well if the desired signal is on one or both pins.
 
Here is a really cool trick that works really well when connecting a single-ended  source to a (properly) balanced input
- connect the source signal pin to the high side of the input
- connect shield from the source - through a resistor that is approximately equal to the source impedance - to the low side of the input. This creates a balanced source.
- you can even use the shield on a coaxial cable, but a twisted pair will work better.
 
But I digress...
 
It is  equally important to remember that the shield on a shielded cable has no affect on magnetic fields, which is the field generated by 60 Hz noise makers. It is very effective in shielding the signal conductors from high frequency interference. The cable twist is feature that reduces the effect of magnetic fields, and it is REALLY effective.
 
Most folks don't give it a lot of thought, but loudspeaker wiring can be (and often is) balanced, no not the active, line level stuff, we're talking the high power, low impedance output from an amplifier.

This is not all that complicated, but is a plethora of inaccurate information all over the internet, and it can be difficult to sort it all out.

As far as where to get cables (any audio cables really) I  highly recommend building them yourself. Not only will you save a little money, you'll be able to repair them should they have problems. It is not difficult at all to do so.

But if you really don't wish to, then any reputable audio supply house can provide different grades of assembled cables. I like Full Compass, but there are many out there. If you have a local music store (not one of the big box chains) you can also likely get good cables at reasonable prices.

-- Bill
Audio Enterprise
KB3KJF
#21
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2774
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
  • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/05 11:15:31 (permalink)
wst3
I don't wish to seem disrespectful or argumentative, but there are quite a few technical errors in that video!

He confuses balanced vs single-ended vs symmetrical, which is a common enough error, but if you are going to present a video about interconnections I do think you owe it to your audience to be precise. He also completely misrepresents how a balanced interface works! (at least he understands the difference between polarity and phase!)
 
There are lots of really good resources that describe audio interconnections various levels of tech speak, I'd recommend Rane, Jensen Transformers or Audio Systems Group as good starting points.
 
The really short version:
A balanced source presents an equal impedance from each of two signal conductors to a common reference, most often ground. It is not necessary that both signal conductors carry a signal, but if they do they do need to be  of opposite polarity, as described in the video.

The benefit here comes from that  equal impedance to common - any external noise will be impressed equally to both conductors, making it much easier for a balanced input to subtract the common signal.
 
A balanced input can be a difference amplifier or a transformer, the key specification is the common mode rejection ratio, a fancy way of representing how well the input stage rejects any signal common to the two input pins. It works perfectly well if the desired signal is on one or both pins.
 
Here is a really cool trick that works really well when connecting a single-ended  source to a (properly) balanced input
- connect the source signal pin to the high side of the input
- connect shield from the source - through a resistor that is approximately equal to the source impedance - to the low side of the input. This creates a balanced source.
- you can even use the shield on a coaxial cable, but a twisted pair will work better.
 
But I digress...
 
It is  equally important to remember that the shield on a shielded cable has no affect on magnetic fields, which is the field generated by 60 Hz noise makers. It is very effective in shielding the signal conductors from high frequency interference. The cable twist is feature that reduces the effect of magnetic fields, and it is REALLY effective.
 
Most folks don't give it a lot of thought, but loudspeaker wiring can be (and often is) balanced, no not the active, line level stuff, we're talking the high power, low impedance output from an amplifier.

This is not all that complicated, but is a plethora of inaccurate information all over the internet, and it can be difficult to sort it all out.

As far as where to get cables (any audio cables really) I  highly recommend building them yourself. Not only will you save a little money, you'll be able to repair them should they have problems. It is not difficult at all to do so.

But if you really don't wish to, then any reputable audio supply house can provide different grades of assembled cables. I like Full Compass, but there are many out there. If you have a local music store (not one of the big box chains) you can also likely get good cables at reasonable prices.


Good info, wst3!
 
Back in the day, when I was making my own cables, I used to make twisted pair cables with multistrand wire of the appropriate gauge. I'd cut two equal lengths, knot one end of the pair of wires, get someone to hold the knotted end in a right-angle needle nose pliers and I'd lock the other end of the pair in a power drill, stand far enough away to make the pair of wires taut, and slowly drill my way to a twisted pair. Worked great. The resulting cable was easy to route.

Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
#22
TheMaartian
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2774
  • Joined: 2015/05/21 18:30:52
  • Location: Flagstaff, AZ
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/05 11:15:38 (permalink)
wst3
I don't wish to seem disrespectful or argumentative, but there are quite a few technical errors in that video!

He confuses balanced vs single-ended vs symmetrical, which is a common enough error, but if you are going to present a video about interconnections I do think you owe it to your audience to be precise. He also completely misrepresents how a balanced interface works! (at least he understands the difference between polarity and phase!)
 
There are lots of really good resources that describe audio interconnections various levels of tech speak, I'd recommend Rane, Jensen Transformers or Audio Systems Group as good starting points.
 
The really short version:
A balanced source presents an equal impedance from each of two signal conductors to a common reference, most often ground. It is not necessary that both signal conductors carry a signal, but if they do they do need to be  of opposite polarity, as described in the video.

The benefit here comes from that  equal impedance to common - any external noise will be impressed equally to both conductors, making it much easier for a balanced input to subtract the common signal.
 
A balanced input can be a difference amplifier or a transformer, the key specification is the common mode rejection ratio, a fancy way of representing how well the input stage rejects any signal common to the two input pins. It works perfectly well if the desired signal is on one or both pins.
 
Here is a really cool trick that works really well when connecting a single-ended  source to a (properly) balanced input
- connect the source signal pin to the high side of the input
- connect shield from the source - through a resistor that is approximately equal to the source impedance - to the low side of the input. This creates a balanced source.
- you can even use the shield on a coaxial cable, but a twisted pair will work better.
 
But I digress...
 
It is  equally important to remember that the shield on a shielded cable has no affect on magnetic fields, which is the field generated by 60 Hz noise makers. It is very effective in shielding the signal conductors from high frequency interference. The cable twist is feature that reduces the effect of magnetic fields, and it is REALLY effective.
 
Most folks don't give it a lot of thought, but loudspeaker wiring can be (and often is) balanced, no not the active, line level stuff, we're talking the high power, low impedance output from an amplifier.

This is not all that complicated, but is a plethora of inaccurate information all over the internet, and it can be difficult to sort it all out.

As far as where to get cables (any audio cables really) I  highly recommend building them yourself. Not only will you save a little money, you'll be able to repair them should they have problems. It is not difficult at all to do so.

But if you really don't wish to, then any reputable audio supply house can provide different grades of assembled cables. I like Full Compass, but there are many out there. If you have a local music store (not one of the big box chains) you can also likely get good cables at reasonable prices.


Good info, wst3!
 
Back in the day, when I was making my own cables, I used to make twisted pair cables with multistrand wire of the appropriate gauge. I'd cut two equal lengths, knot one end of the pair of wires, get someone to hold the knotted end in a right-angle needle nose pliers and I'd lock the other end of the pair in a power drill, stand far enough away to make the pair of wires taut, and slowly drill my way to a twisted pair. Worked great. The resulting cable was easy to route.

Intel i7 3.4GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB HD Win10 Home 64-bit Tascam US-16x08
Studio One 4 Pro NotionMelodyne 4 Studio Acoustica 7 Guitar Pro 7
PreSonus FaderPort Nektar P6 M-Audio BX8 D2 Beyerdynamic DT 880 Pro
NI K9U XLN AK, AD2 AAS VS-2, GS-2, VA-2, EP-4, CP-2, OD Toontrack SD3, EZK
#23
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1979
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
  • Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/05 12:20:10 (permalink)
TheMaartian
Good info, wst3!
 
Back in the day, when I was making my own cables, I used to make twisted pair cables with multistrand wire of the appropriate gauge. I'd cut two equal lengths, knot one end of the pair of wires, get someone to hold the knotted end in a right-angle needle nose pliers and I'd lock the other end of the pair in a power drill, stand far enough away to make the pair of wires taut, and slowly drill my way to a twisted pair. Worked great. The resulting cable was easy to route.



I used to do that for power wiring, but now there are several companies that sell twisted pair power cables... so I trade cheap for lazy<G>!

-- Bill
Audio Enterprise
KB3KJF
#24
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8424
  • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/05 13:00:33 (permalink)
I know the OP needed a Balanced connection to powered speakers. I was only trying to clarify what an actual speaker cable is for those who may not understand this. Many don't. I have had to point this out many times when helping Churches straighten out issues with their sound systems. The logic is if the connection fits, use it. 
The title of this thread is misleading as there is no such thing when audio people communicate as a balanced speaker cable. It's a nit picky thing but I think it's relevant to use the proper terminology as much as possible around here.
 
The other one I nit pick about is the term Sound Card when we talk about audio interfaces.  

Johnny V  
Cakelab  
Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
 http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
 
 
#25
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1979
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
  • Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/05 13:16:26 (permalink)
Cactus Music
I know the OP needed a Balanced connection to powered speakers. I was only trying to clarify what an actual speaker cable is for those who may not understand this. Many don't. I have had to point this out many times when helping Churches straighten out issues with their sound systems. The logic is if the connection fits, use it. 
The title of this thread is misleading as there is no such thing when audio people communicate as a balanced speaker cable. It's a nit picky thing but I think it's relevant to use the proper terminology as much as possible around here.
 
The other one I nit pick about is the term Sound Card when we talk about audio interfaces.  


Actually there is no such thing as a balanced cable. There are balanced sources, and there are balanced inputs, the cable itself is not balanced.
 
However, there are many amplifiers that do not connect one side of the output to a common reference, so both pins will present the same impedance with respect to  common, making them balanced  sources.

AND, very few (if any?) loudspeakers connect one side to a common reference, making them balanced inputs.

That doesn't make the speaker cable balanced, but it does mean the circuit is.

Signal balance and symmetry are one of the most misunderstood topics in audio, right up there with twisted pairs, shielding, and the dreaded "Pin-1" problem<G>!

-- Bill
Audio Enterprise
KB3KJF
#26
WallyG
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 833
  • Joined: 2013/05/03 11:37:52
  • Location: Arizona
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/06 13:44:33 (permalink)
wst3
 
...Actually there is no such thing as a balanced cable. There are balanced sources, and there are balanced inputs, the cable itself is not balanced....



I agree with what you have posted on this thread, but disagree with the above statement. A TRS "Balanced" cable contains 2 conductors plus shield that is used to conduct differential signals between balanced sources and balanced inputs. An TS "Unbalanced" cable will not work with Balanced Sources/Inputs since three conductors are required to work with this scheme. (As an Analog Integrated Circuit Design Engineer, I've designed differential amplifiers with a high CMRR.)
 
A Cat 5E cable is another example of a "Balanced Cable" where 4 sets of "twisted" pairs that transmit digital signals of opposite polaritry. The twisting of the wires means both wires will "pick up" electrical noise but will be rejected by the inputs since the one of the signals gets inverted and summed. Thus the noise is cancelled by subtraction.
 
Walt 
 

Roland Jupiter 80, Roland D50, Roland Integra 7, Roland BK-7m, Yamaha Montage 6, ARP Odyssey, Excelsior Continental Artist, Roland FR-8X, 1967 Fender Jaguar, Fender Strat,  Fender 1965 Twin Reverb reissue, Selmer Trumpet, Akai EWI, Studio One 4 Professional, Melodyne Studio 4, Behringer X-Touch, RME Fireface UCX, MOTU MIDI Express XT - ADK Pro Audio Hex Xtreme 6 Core i7 4.5GHz, 64GB, 480GB SS, 3 X 3TB Hard Drives, Win 10, 2 X 27" & 1X 46" Monitors,
My WEB site - www.gontowski.com/music
#27
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1979
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
  • Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/07 12:55:37 (permalink)
Hi Walt,
 
I'm afraid you have not swayed me<G>... a cable can not be inherently balanced or unbalanced (more properly single-ended?). A cable can have some number of conductors, and if there is only one signal conductor and a shield that it can not be used to connect a balanced source to a balanced input.

By way of analogy, a simple operational amplifier can measure the difference between the "+" and "-" input pins, which makes it a difference amplifier, but it is NOT a balanced input because the inverting and non-inverting inputs present a VERY different impedance with respect to common, and when you add feedback it changes again. Yet a lot of companies sell devices with nothing but a simple op-amp as the input, and they call them balanced.

Does that make sense? I'm not trying to be difficult, but as an industry audio engineers have become remarkably sloppy in their use of terminology that was once well understood.

-- Bill
Audio Enterprise
KB3KJF
#28
WallyG
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 833
  • Joined: 2013/05/03 11:37:52
  • Location: Arizona
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/07 15:11:50 (permalink)
 
Hi Bill,
 
First of all I don't think you're being difficult. We're just having a good technical discussion, and this how people (myself included) learn. In some cases, people find they are really in complete agreement but didn’t understand where the other person was trying to convey, i.e.
 
wst3
 …cable can not be inherently balanced or unbalanced (more properly single-ended?)…

 
Not sure what you mean here? A TRS cable is a three conductor cable that can be used as a stereo cable or balanced cable. Google “TRS balanced cable”.
 
wst3
…if there is only one signal conductor and a shield that it can not be used to connect a balanced source to a balanced input…

I agree, you must use a balanced cable.
 
wst3
By way of analogy, a simple operational amplifier can measure the difference between the "+" and "-" input pins, which makes it a difference amplifier, 

While a simple operational amplifier can measure the difference between the “+” and “-“ inputs, without an embedding network the output voltage cannot be predicted since the open-loop gain varies significantly from device to device and is too high to be of any use.
 
wst3
…but it is NOT a balanced input because the inverting and non-inverting inputs present a VERY different impedance with respect to common…

If you look at a schematic of a typical Op-Amp, you’ll see that the inputs are identical albeit out of phase. The input impedance for each input is simply the Beta of the input transistor times the re + RE of the input transistor which is very high (and higher due to Beta) and since components in I.C.s are inherently matched, the Zin of both inputs should be almost identical.
 
wst3
..and when you add feedback it changes again…

 
You can add 4 resistors to an op-amp and make it a crude diff-amp, but the resistors lower the input resistance and takes away for the advantage of an op-amp, i.e. high input impedance.
 
wst3 
...Yet a lot of companies sell devices with nothing but a simple op-amp as the input, and they call them balanced...



Can you give me a Manufacturer and part number? I'm interested.
 
Thanks,
 
Walt
 

Roland Jupiter 80, Roland D50, Roland Integra 7, Roland BK-7m, Yamaha Montage 6, ARP Odyssey, Excelsior Continental Artist, Roland FR-8X, 1967 Fender Jaguar, Fender Strat,  Fender 1965 Twin Reverb reissue, Selmer Trumpet, Akai EWI, Studio One 4 Professional, Melodyne Studio 4, Behringer X-Touch, RME Fireface UCX, MOTU MIDI Express XT - ADK Pro Audio Hex Xtreme 6 Core i7 4.5GHz, 64GB, 480GB SS, 3 X 3TB Hard Drives, Win 10, 2 X 27" & 1X 46" Monitors,
My WEB site - www.gontowski.com/music
#29
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1979
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
  • Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
  • Status: offline
Re: Balanced speaker cable recommendation. 2016/11/08 13:42:23 (permalink)
Hi again Walt,
 
I suspect we're going to have to agree to disagree on the cable thing, but some last minute thoughts are interspersed...
 
WallyG
 
Hi Bill,
 
First of all I don't think you're being difficult. We're just having a good technical discussion, and this how people (myself included) learn. In some cases, people find they are really in complete agreement but didn’t understand where the other person was trying to convey, i.e.

 
Agreed, it is all about language, and words (who knew) do matter<G>!
 
wst3
 …cable can not be inherently balanced or unbalanced (more properly single-ended?)…

 
WallyGNot sure what you mean here? A TRS cable is a three conductor cable that can be used as a stereo cable or balanced cable. Google “TRS balanced cable”.



So what would you call a cable of shielded twisted pair construction when used to connect a single-ended source to a single-ended input? How about a single-ended source to a balanced input? My point, which may be nothing more than semantics, is that the cable does not posses the characteristic of being balanced or not. It depends entirely on how it is used.
 
wst3
By way of analogy, a simple operational amplifier can measure the difference between the "+" and "-" input pins, which makes it a difference amplifier, 

WallyGWhile a simple operational amplifier can measure the difference between the “+” and “-“ inputs, without an embedding network the output voltage cannot be predicted since the open-loop gain varies significantly from device to device and is too high to be of any use.

There are uses, but then I'd really be picking nits, so yes, without a feedback network the opamp is of little use to audio.
 
wst3
…but it is NOT a balanced input because the inverting and non-inverting inputs present a VERY different impedance with respect to common…

WallyGIf you look at a schematic of a typical Op-Amp, you’ll see that the inputs are identical albeit out of phase. The input impedance for each input is simply the Beta of the input transistor times the re + RE of the input transistor which is very high (and higher due to Beta) and since components in I.C.s are inherently matched, the Zin of both inputs should be almost identical.

Without the feedback network some opamps do have identical input Z, some don't. However, as you pointed out, in most audio circuits you are going to apply negative feedback, and that changes the effective input Z of the inverting input. They are no longer equal, and CMMR will decrease.

The better solution is to use two opamp stages as buffers, and feed them to the diff amp. Most of the time I see this referred to as an instrumentation amplifier, although I'm not sure that's a universal name.
 
wst3
..and when you add feedback it changes again…

 
WallyGYou can add 4 resistors to an op-amp and make it a crude diff-amp, but the resistors lower the input resistance and takes away for the advantage of an op-amp, i.e. high input impedance.

We agree!
 
wst3 
...Yet a lot of companies sell devices with nothing but a simple op-amp as the input, and they call them balanced...

WallyGCan you give me a Manufacturer and part number? I'm interested.

I can't really - I worked for a couple of them. I fought tooth and nail to do away with designs like that, along with bringing pin 1 into the enclosure and wimpy power supplies. Sometimes I won those battles<G>, but I can't really brag about the wins without exposing the losses...

Take care,
 
Bill

-- Bill
Audio Enterprise
KB3KJF
#30
Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1