bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
Moobs is just too big to measure.
Maths or no maths, no Juan wants to touch the "problem"
|
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6585
- Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 11:56:12
(permalink)
☼ Best Answerby bapu 2014/03/22 12:06:50
You mean "+1" is too complicated for people?
 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
|
Old55
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 19791
- Joined: 2008/09/19 20:10:05
- Location: Californiashire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 12:03:15
(permalink)
It doesn't seem that difficult--you know the answer will equal at least a 2D.
Should auld acquaintance be forgot--hey, who the hell are you guys? X2(X3 pending hardware upgrade), Emulator X2, E-mu 1212M, Virtual String Machine
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 12:27:14
(permalink)
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 12:58:42
(permalink)
I formed a new society today, and anyone is welcome to join me.
I even came up with this catchy and easy to remember acronym: "F.E.C.K."
And it's a lot easier to say than the full name, the rather awkward sounding and difficult to pronounce: "Society For Dyslexic Acronym Creators".
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:04:46
(permalink)
I forgot to mention - there is also "F.E.C.K. U.S.A.", which is obviously for our Chinese, Russian and Nigerian members.
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:08:07
(permalink)
Sorry, but no monkeys or kittens are eligible for membership.
Or meerkats.
Or anyone from Antarctica or St Lucia.
Or people suffering from Dyslexia.
|
Straummy
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 113
- Joined: 2013/09/07 12:58:21
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:08:58
(permalink)
 Oi fat boy. Can't you take anything seriously?
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:09:20
(permalink)
|
Straummy
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 113
- Joined: 2013/09/07 12:58:21
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:11:20
(permalink)
How come you don't allow "people suffering from Dyslexia" to join "F.E.C.K. - The Society For Dyslexic Acronym Creators" then?
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:12:07
(permalink)
It was test.
And you failed it.
If you were dyslexic, you wouldn't have been able to understand that particular 'test' exclusion.
|
Straummy
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 113
- Joined: 2013/09/07 12:58:21
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:12:27
(permalink)
|
quantumeffect
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2771
- Joined: 2007/07/22 21:29:42
- Location: Minnesota
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:18:10
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2014/03/22 13:19:07
I thought a bapu “calculation” was a way to quantify unfunny and the bapu “equation” was a quantitative relationship between funny and unfunny: UnF = log ( 100 / %F ) Where Unf = unfunny F = funny In other words if something is 100% F then UnF = 0. As F approaches 0%, UnF becomes infinitely large. The results are expressed on a bapu scale. So if something is really funny we say it is 0 on the bapu scale. Edit - Scale not Unit
post edited by quantumeffect - 2014/03/22 13:20:15
Dave 8.5 PE 64, i7 Studio Cat, Delta 1010, GMS and Ludwig Drums, Paiste Cymbals "Everyone knows rock n' roll attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact." H. Simpson "His chops are too righteous." Plankton during Sponge Bob's guitar solo
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 13:22:20
(permalink)
quantumeffect
So if something is really funny we say it is 0 bapu.
Or +1 Straummy?
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 14:54:21
(permalink)
quantumeffect
I thought a bapu “calculation” was a way to quantify unfunny and the bapu “equation” was a quantitative relationship between funny and unfunny:
UnF = log ( 100 / %F )
Where
Unf = unfunny
F = funny
In other words if something is 100% F then UnF = 0.
As F approaches 0%, UnF becomes infinitely large.
The results are expressed on a bapu scale.
So if something is really funny we say it is 0 on the bapu scale.
Edit - Scale not Unit
I see that you haven't catered for 'rounding errors' in this formula.
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 15:32:12
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby bapu 2014/03/22 17:09:55
Jonbouy
quantumeffect
I thought a bapu “calculation” was a way to quantify unfunny and the bapu “equation” was a quantitative relationship between funny and unfunny:
UnF = log ( 100 / %F )
Where
Unf = unfunny
F = funny
In other words if something is 100% F then UnF = 0.
As F approaches 0%, UnF becomes infinitely large.
The results are expressed on a bapu scale.
So if something is really funny we say it is 0 on the bapu scale.
Edit - Scale not Unit
I see that you haven't catered for 'rounding errors' in this formula.
There R no rounding errors with Bapu Calculations. He is already round.
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
paulo
Max Output Level: -13 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6218
- Joined: 2007/01/30 05:06:57
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 17:22:55
(permalink)
Bapu+is = Bapu+does ?
Seems easy enuff to me.
I've always thought it somewhat cruel that dyslexia is a difficult word to spell.
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 17:48:40
(permalink)
And who the hell put an "s" into the word "lisp?" 
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
jbow
Max Output Level: -0.2 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7601
- Joined: 2003/11/26 19:14:18
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/22 18:00:46
(permalink)
OK... move away from the mirror. Slowly... just back away and get dressed. Go have some coffee and a few doughnuts.
Take two pills and call someone in the morning.
J
Sonar Platinum Studiocat Pro 16G RAM (some bells and whistles) HP Pavilion dm4 1165-dx (i5)-8G RAM Octa-Capture KRK Rokit-8s MIDI keyboards... Control Pad mics. I HATE THIS CMPUTER KEYBARD!
|
UbiquitousBubba
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8912
- Joined: 2008/07/09 16:55:12
- Location: Everywhere Else
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 09:07:14
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby craigb 2014/03/24 12:24:58
While measuring posts on the Bapu scale can be beneficial, I think it's also a good practice to factor in the relative Snark and Becan values to measure the posts on the Beagle scale.
I attempted to quantify the Progressive Music Units, (PMU), in relation to the overall non-linear but self-similar aspects of posts. As posts demonstrated qualitative transformations to new dynamical states, predictably, the outcomes were progressively more complex. As the PMU increases, there is a corresponding increase in the appearance of new forms of order out of chaotic regimes. Unfortunately, I got lost in the math. The Pedro scale is just too hard for me.
|
Mesh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 27360
- Joined: 2009/11/27 14:08:08
- Location: Online right here!
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 09:16:28
(permalink)
UbiquitousBubba
While measuring posts on the Bapu scale can be beneficial, I think it's also a good practice to factor in the relative Snark and Becan values to measure the posts on the Beagle scale.
I attempted to quantify the Progressive Music Units, (PMU), in relation to the overall non-linear but self-similar aspects of posts. As posts demonstrated qualitative transformations to new dynamical states, predictably, the outcomes were progressively more complex. As the PMU increases, there is a corresponding increase in the appearance of new forms of order out of chaotic regimes. Unfortunately, I got lost in the math. The Pedro scale is just too hard for me.
Hi
Platinum Gaming DAW: AsRock Z77 Overclock FormulaI7 3770k @ 4.5GHz : 16GB RAM G.Skill Ripjaws X 250GB OS SSD : 3TB HDD : 1TB Sample HDDWin 10 Pro x 64 : NH-D14 CPU Cooler HIS IceQ 2GB HD 7870Focusrite Scarlett 2i4The_Forum_Monkeys
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 12:27:20
(permalink)
Mesh
UbiquitousBubba
While measuring posts on the Bapu scale can be beneficial, I think it's also a good practice to factor in the relative Snark and Becan values to measure the posts on the Beagle scale.
I attempted to quantify the Progressive Music Units, (PMU), in relation to the overall non-linear but self-similar aspects of posts. As posts demonstrated qualitative transformations to new dynamical states, predictably, the outcomes were progressively more complex. As the PMU increases, there is a corresponding increase in the appearance of new forms of order out of chaotic regimes. Unfortunately, I got lost in the math. The Pedro scale is just too hard for me.
Hi
Good times! :-)
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 13:08:32
(permalink)
So just how impressive IS the Bapu? Well, I just did some math and figured out that he's averaging almost 22 posts a day! Compare that with my yappy self at less than 12 per day (or even our favorite pooch at just under 16 per day). Wow! 
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 13:26:50
(permalink)
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 15:14:33
(permalink)
Bah. Stitch a few loops together and there you have it!
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
Old55
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 19791
- Joined: 2008/09/19 20:10:05
- Location: Californiashire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 15:31:50
(permalink)
I hope Bapu has good circulation.
Should auld acquaintance be forgot--hey, who the hell are you guys? X2(X3 pending hardware upgrade), Emulator X2, E-mu 1212M, Virtual String Machine
|
Mesh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 27360
- Joined: 2009/11/27 14:08:08
- Location: Online right here!
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 15:34:13
(permalink)
bapu
Moobs is just too big to measure.
Maths or no maths, no Juan wants to touch the "problem"
You can get a reduction no?
Platinum Gaming DAW: AsRock Z77 Overclock FormulaI7 3770k @ 4.5GHz : 16GB RAM G.Skill Ripjaws X 250GB OS SSD : 3TB HDD : 1TB Sample HDDWin 10 Pro x 64 : NH-D14 CPU Cooler HIS IceQ 2GB HD 7870Focusrite Scarlett 2i4The_Forum_Monkeys
|
Old55
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 19791
- Joined: 2008/09/19 20:10:05
- Location: Californiashire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 17:04:47
(permalink)
Is Craig the number one poster child in indecent posts?
Should auld acquaintance be forgot--hey, who the hell are you guys? X2(X3 pending hardware upgrade), Emulator X2, E-mu 1212M, Virtual String Machine
|
paulo
Max Output Level: -13 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6218
- Joined: 2007/01/30 05:06:57
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 17:17:30
(permalink)
Old55
Is Craig the number one poster child in indecent posts?
I hope no-one googles that........
|
Old55
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 19791
- Joined: 2008/09/19 20:10:05
- Location: Californiashire
- Status: offline
Re: Bapu calculation too hard, say forum members
2014/03/24 18:10:08
(permalink)
Should auld acquaintance be forgot--hey, who the hell are you guys? X2(X3 pending hardware upgrade), Emulator X2, E-mu 1212M, Virtual String Machine
|