Re:CAL - the word that dare not speak its name. Noel, what's the story here, please?
2009/12/04 14:21:42
(permalink)
one more vote to at least keep Cal support!
Oddly enough, when I was forced to choose a new DAW platform (after the demise of Commodore and the sale of Blue Ribbon Soundworks) Cal and to a lesser degree Studioware were two of the biggest reasons I jumped on the Cakewalk bandwagon. MIDI support in general was also high on the list. I think MIDI support has stayed in the front of the pack, and I mitigated the loss of StudioWare with MIDIQuest, but dang, I was bummed with the original "CAL goes bye-bye" announcement (buried as it was<G>!) For a long time I did keep a copy of CWPA (8 or 9) on my DAW just to develop Studioware panels and CAL scripts. But as new features were added to Sonar, and not to CAL the value has diminished.
I never really saw CAL as a macro recorder, though I suppose that's a very good application for it. I always saw it as the box of parts one sometimes needs to cobble together a tool that solves a problem.
Perl would be an ideal replacement!
-- Bill
Audio Enterprise
KB3KJF