cowboydan
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 908
- Joined: 2012/01/13 06:10:21
- Location: Asperen, Netherlands
- Status: offline
CPU Movement in the Performance window SOLVED (for me anyway)
When I open X1 or X2 , when I look at the performance window there is no CPU movement. On X3 after opening I see a lot of CPU movement in the window. Is there an explanation for this ? Does Sonar use a lot of CPU even though nothing is playing and nothing is being done?
post edited by cowboydan - 2013/11/27 13:10:56
|
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8672
- Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
- Location: Mars.
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 07:02:00
(permalink)
Are you opening the same project? And what's it like when you playback and record? Also temporarily disable your virus scanner. Why are you running 32 bit windows?
Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed. @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38. Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
|
cowboydan
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 908
- Joined: 2012/01/13 06:10:21
- Location: Asperen, Netherlands
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 07:04:45
(permalink)
Not the same projects. I get more activity with playback and record and I only use the windows security on the computer.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 07:42:41
(permalink)
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8672
- Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
- Location: Mars.
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 08:12:07
(permalink)
Ok to be clear is playback and record worse with X3 than it is with X2? Please use the same project so you are comparing eggs with eggs (open X2 project, save as X3, open it again) to see if this makes a difference. Please disable virus scanner when you are opening the projects (not sure what you mean by "windows security", but if it's security essentials then that is a virus scanner). ... and do a defrag first. Then you may have a point :). Cheers... Alex p.s. Why are you running 32 bit windows you realise you are not addresssing all of your memory above 4gb?
post edited by CakeAlexS - 2013/11/27 08:25:02
Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed. @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38. Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
|
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8672
- Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
- Location: Mars.
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 08:27:04
(permalink)
p.s. Geoff you are running 64 bit windows not 32 bit, so not exactly eggs comparing with eggs, but I get the point.... I suggest checking out what I said though here and in the other post to make this a little more scentific: http://forum.cakewalk.com/Lag-switching-between-projects-m2939170.aspx The other thing is that nobody here is stating how they are opening their projects. Are they opening sonar and the project at the same time from windows, or are they opening sonar, waiting for a minute, then opening a project?
Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed. @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38. Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
|
cowboydan
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 908
- Joined: 2012/01/13 06:10:21
- Location: Asperen, Netherlands
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 09:42:44
(permalink)
He Alex I am also running Windows x64. I have no issue with the sound of the tracks or anything as far as that goes. It just seems strange that with the same setup (computer, sound card, etc) in x2 gives nothing in the performance windo with cpu cores and with X3 I have all cores jumping around without doing anything. BTW I just start Sonar and wait for the Quick Menu and then open the file. I hope just like everyone else. I also have 16Gig of memory working as to not have the CPU working too hard.
|
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8672
- Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
- Location: Mars.
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 10:22:07
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby mettelus 2013/11/27 13:21:37
Ah you've written Windows 8/32bit in your header, so it's 64 bit :) Anyway you may have a point, I would recommend though going through the optimizations in this post and the other post to see if it makes a difference first before we can point at a smoking gun.
Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed. @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38. Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 11:35:52
(permalink)
☼ Best Answerby cowboydan 2013/11/27 13:20:11
Preferences > Audio > Playback and Recording > Always Stream Audio Through FX. This setting and functionality are new to X3. X1/X2 will behave similarly after you start and stop playback once, enabling the audio engine. But the idle load will still be lower because it doesn't stream silent audio through all FX all the time. The advantages of doing this are documented in the New Features section of the Ref. Guide.
post edited by brundlefly - 2013/11/27 12:14:39
SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424 (24-bit, 48kHz) Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
|
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8672
- Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
- Location: Mars.
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 11:37:32
(permalink)
I didn't know this, thanks for the tip Dave. Let's see if OP reports back that this makes a difference.
Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed. @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38. Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 12:08:46
(permalink)
I was under the impression it had to do with vst 3 pretty much exactly what dave is saying
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
cowboydan
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 908
- Joined: 2012/01/13 06:10:21
- Location: Asperen, Netherlands
- Status: offline
Re: CPU Movement in the Performance window
2013/11/27 13:10:05
(permalink)
brundlefly Preferences > Audio > Playback and Recording > Always Stream Audio Through FX. This setting and functionality are new to X3. X1/X2 will behave similarly after you start and stop playback once, enabling the audio engine. But the idle load will still be lower because it doesn't stream silent audio through all FX all the time. The advantages of doing this are documented in the New Features section of the Ref. Guide.
That was the one. I went to preferences and unchecked it. Now the idle mode shows nothing on the performance scale.
|