olemon
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 768
- Joined: 2011/10/27 05:35:19
- Status: offline
Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
I was watching a tutorial that used a Pro-Q2 and a Brainworx bx_controller V2, which the author called a Mid-Side Encoder, to analyze a reference mix. Is Channel Tools a Mid-Side Encoder? Is any plugin that has M/S processing a Mid-Side Encoder? For example, I have a T-RackS3 Classic EQ that has M/S. Thanks.
post edited by olemon - 2015/06/14 19:00:43
https://www.reverbnation.com/scottholson Platinum, Studio One 3 Pro, Win 10 (x64), AMD FX-8350, ASUS M5A97 R2.0, 16GB, RME UCX, Digimax DP88, Faderport 8, Revive Audio Mod Studio Channel, Vintage Audio M72, Summit Audio TLA-50, KRK Rokit 5 G2 Monitors, Guitars "If you wait till the last minute, it only takes a minute."
|
olemon
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 768
- Joined: 2011/10/27 05:35:19
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 13:25:50
(permalink)
https://www.reverbnation.com/scottholson Platinum, Studio One 3 Pro, Win 10 (x64), AMD FX-8350, ASUS M5A97 R2.0, 16GB, RME UCX, Digimax DP88, Faderport 8, Revive Audio Mod Studio Channel, Vintage Audio M72, Summit Audio TLA-50, KRK Rokit 5 G2 Monitors, Guitars "If you wait till the last minute, it only takes a minute."
|
Wookiee
Rrrrugh arah-ah-woof?
- Total Posts : 13306
- Joined: 2007/01/16 06:19:43
- Location: Akahaocwora - Village Yoh Kay
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 13:52:30
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby olemon 2015/06/15 14:21:09
Channel Tools is indeed a Mid Side processor. But I think it does a bit of both, is so much as it encodes and decodes but I could be wrong. Page 1597 of the users guide explains channel tools. The Voxengo is a very useful tool.
post edited by Wookiee - 2015/06/15 14:10:08
Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. Karma has a way of finding its own way home.
Primary, i7 8700K 16Gigs Ram, 3x500gb SSD's 2TB Backup HHD Saffire Pro 40. Win 10 64Bit Secondary i7 4790K, 32GB Ram, 500Gb SSD OS/Prog's, 1TB Audio, 1TB Samples HHD AudioBox USB, Win 10 64Bit CbB, Adam's A7x's - Event 20/20's, Arturia V6, Korg Digital Legacy, Softube Modular, Arturia Keylab-88, USB-MidiSport 8x8
|
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1979
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
- Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:03:34
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby olemon 2015/06/15 14:21:03
olemon I was watching a tutorial that used a Pro-Q2 and a Brainworx bx_controller V2, which the author called a Mid-Side Encoder, to analyze a reference mix. I have a sneaking suspicion there is a question buried above, but I'm not sure what it is. I can however answer the next bit. olemonIs Channel Tools a Mid-Side Encoder? Is any plugin that has M/S processing a Mid-Side Encoder? For example, I have a T-RackS3 Classic EQ that has M/S. Channel Tools is a Mid-Side encoder. And any plugin that provides Mid-Side or M/S controls is encoding the Left and Right channels as Mid and Side. I don't own any T-Racks stuff, but if it say it has M/S then it probably does. In case Mid-Side itself has you perplexed... "Normal" stereo recordings have two channels, left and right. Most of the time this is sufficient, but over the years (and we're talking the beginning of Stereo FM broadcasting, so that's a lot of years) there have been applications where left and right channels were not sufficient to preserve the stereo image. Some clever engineers figured out that they could use a matrix to encode and decode the channels so that the mono signal was preserved, and that timing errors between the two channels were minimized. (The timing problem was a real challenge for early stereo broadcasters, and especially those awful broadcast "cart" machines, among others. Oh yeah, that would include the infamous long playing record!) Enough history! The MID channel is the sum of the left and right channels, or all the content. The SIDE channel is the difference between the left and right channels, and for the most part represents the spatial localization information. It is trivial to decode (or encode for that matter) to switch between the two formats. To convert from L+R to M/S: route your left and right channels to a single buss - call that MID route your left channel, and a polarity inverted copy of the right channel to a second buss - call that SIDE To reverse the process: route MID and SIDE to a single buss, and call that LEFT route MID and a polarity inverted copy of SIDE to a second buss and call that RIGHT It's a good idea to use channels and busses to get a feel for the process and how it works, but you can also use the included Channel Tools for the same result. This matrix approach has many applications - Mid/Side and Blumlein microphone configurations are one example, and the old Sonic Hologram (or whatever Carver and Polk called their respective products) is another. Where we use it most, I'd guess, is for signal processing. Compressing the MID while leaving the SIDE alone creates a very different effect than compressing left and right. The same applies to equalization, reverb, even delays and modulated delays. The beauty of MID/SIDE encoders is that once you've encoded you can use the rest of your processors in their old-fashioned configurations - as long as you remember what you did<G>! Does that help?
-- Bill Audio Enterprise KB3KJF
|
olemon
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 768
- Joined: 2011/10/27 05:35:19
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:06:43
(permalink)
Wookiee Channel Tools is indeed a Mid Side processor. But I think it does a bit of both, is so much as it encodes and decodes but I could be wrong. The Voxengo is a very useful tool.
Thanks, Wookiee. In the video, the encoder was ahead of the equalizer. The technique was to split the stereo track into M/S, then mute one and use the EQ to analyze what was present in the other. I didn't try it yet, but I was fairly sure I could do that with Channel Tools, or even two EQ's. The EQ with M/S activated would serve as the encoder in the chain.
https://www.reverbnation.com/scottholson Platinum, Studio One 3 Pro, Win 10 (x64), AMD FX-8350, ASUS M5A97 R2.0, 16GB, RME UCX, Digimax DP88, Faderport 8, Revive Audio Mod Studio Channel, Vintage Audio M72, Summit Audio TLA-50, KRK Rokit 5 G2 Monitors, Guitars "If you wait till the last minute, it only takes a minute."
|
olemon
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 768
- Joined: 2011/10/27 05:35:19
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:15:28
(permalink)
wst3 Does that help?
Yes it does, Bill! I understand M/S, or least what it means on a plugin and I have used the technique a few times. I just hadn't encountered the encoder/decoder jargon before as it related to M/S. Thank you for the detailed explanation. I read about some of what you described, but it wasn't presented that clearly.
https://www.reverbnation.com/scottholson Platinum, Studio One 3 Pro, Win 10 (x64), AMD FX-8350, ASUS M5A97 R2.0, 16GB, RME UCX, Digimax DP88, Faderport 8, Revive Audio Mod Studio Channel, Vintage Audio M72, Summit Audio TLA-50, KRK Rokit 5 G2 Monitors, Guitars "If you wait till the last minute, it only takes a minute."
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:22:41
(permalink)
Interesting...
My use and understanding of mid/side was to use two mics... One which was a figure 8 pattern turned 90degrees off axis to the sound with the other mic (cardioid) directly facing the sound source... Then blending the two...
Is that not part of it?
Keni
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:31:02
(permalink)
Keni Interesting...
My use and understanding of mid/side was to use two mics... One which was a figure 8 pattern turned 90degrees off axis to the sound with the other mic (cardioid) directly facing the sound source... Then blending the two...
Is that not part of it?
Keni
I think that would be recording Mid-Side from the start. Doing the stuff discussed above would be for turning stereo signals into M/S and vice versa. I'm still very much trying to wrap my head around all this type of stuff (and really should sit down with some tuts and Channel Tools for a while to REALLY get a handle on it all) so this is a cool thread. Methinks I may bookmark it.
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:33:28
(permalink)
The two mic system is used to make a recording of an audio source and is one usage of mid/side techniques. However any stereo audio can be split into its mid and side content then processed as separate mid and side content and finally reassembled into stereo again. One example might be "centreing" the bass frequencies in a stereo track. Convert to mid/side via channel tools or a similar processor then high pass the side to cut the low frequencies while boosting them in the mid channel if necessary. Re-convert to stereo and there you are, the bass content is now centred.
post edited by tlw - 2015/06/15 14:39:33
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:36:22
(permalink)
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 14:38:17
(permalink)
tlw The two mic system is used to make a recording of an audio source and is one usage of mid/side techniques.
However any stereo audio can be split into its mid and side content then processed as separate mid and side content and finally reassembled into stereo again. One example might be "centreing" the bass frequencies in a stereo track. Convert to mid/side via channel tools or a similar processor then high pass the side to cut the low frequencies while boosting them in the mid channel if necessary.
Re-convert to stereo and there you are, the bass content is now centred.
This is shown in those X1 Advanced vids I've been blathering about. Been meaning to try it to see it it helps some of my low freq problems.
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 15:34:37
(permalink)
Beepster
Keni Interesting...
My use and understanding of mid/side was to use two mics... One which was a figure 8 pattern turned 90degrees off axis to the sound with the other mic (cardioid) directly facing the sound source... Then blending the two...
Is that not part of it?
Keni
I think that would be recording Mid-Side from the start. Doing the stuff discussed above would be for turning stereo signals into M/S and vice versa. I'm still very much trying to wrap my head around all this type of stuff (and really should sit down with some tuts and Channel Tools for a while to REALLY get a handle on it all) so this is a cool thread. Methinks I may bookmark it.
Thanks Beepster... As an old analog/tape engineer, I've done this many times and couldn't understand the need of special processing to accomplish... The off axis mic is far warmer (ribbons are very popular here) and allows a blend to create depth or width depending on the pan... So what you're suggesting makes a lot of sense... Computer processing to reduce presence and very fractional delay... I'll have to try this as I have not before... Keni
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 15:37:34
(permalink)
tlw The two mic system is used to make a recording of an audio source and is one usage of mid/side techniques.
However any stereo audio can be split into its mid and side content then processed as separate mid and side content and finally reassembled into stereo again. One example might be "centreing" the bass frequencies in a stereo track. Convert to mid/side via channel tools or a similar processor then high pass the side to cut the low frequencies while boosting them in the mid channel if necessary.
Re-convert to stereo and there you are, the bass content is now centred.
Thanks tlw... I think I understand... A recent tool using computer processing to convert a typical stereo recording so that it sounds and operates as if it were m/s... Keni
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 15:40:10
(permalink)
scook Here is a video describing M/S using Pro-Q and a bit of history about M/S recording https://youtu.be/NilfCElGJ2c
Thanks scook... I wish I could watch but I'm too severely web limited... Does it describe what I mentioned above regarding the figure 8 plus cardioid? I though that was where the concept came? Keni
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 15:47:22
(permalink)
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Channel Tools - Mid/Side Encoders
2015/06/15 22:38:51
(permalink)
scook Yes
Thanks scook... I just wanted to know that my understanding was correct.
|