benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
If this has already been covered, I apologize. Doing a "concrete limiter" search of the forum I get one result - from 2009?!?! Anyway, I have a few limiters already (the two I use most frequently are UAD's Precision Limiter and Voxengo's Elephant). Given this, I'm thinking I probably won't purchase it. That said, if it really offers something different with as-good-or-better results, I'd rather bite the bullet now than kick myself later when the introductory price has expired. Any insight is greatly appreciated.
|
inaheartbeat
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 679
- Joined: 2011/08/11 12:19:15
- Location: Nashua, NH USA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 14:21:54
(permalink)
It's only $10 if you have the other modules. I can't speak for the limiters you already have. I have a bunch including Fabfilter Pro-L. It won't replace that but having it as a PC module to me is a real convenience so it was worth the $10 I spent and it does a very nice job. Ken
PC Audio Labs mobile i7 MC, 3.46 Ghz i7 990X, 12 Gb RAM, 3 750 Gb 7200 RPM drives, 3 USB2, 2 USB 3 ports, firewire, Windows 7 64 bit Pro, Sonar X3e Producer 64 bit,
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 14:27:59
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby subtlearts 2014/05/27 13:20:36
inaheartbeat It's only $10 if you have the other modules. I can't speak for the limiters you already have. I have a bunch including Fabfilter Pro-L. It won't replace that but having it as a PC module to me is a real convenience so it was worth the $10 I spent and it does a very nice job. Ken Thanks for your response, Ken. I have Expanded, but I didn't purchase any of the add-ons. The $10 deal for folks in my boat is the expander/gate, which I'm not particularly interested in, so I'd be paying the $49 intro price for the limiter.
|
Eric Beam
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 132
- Joined: 2011/04/02 00:42:19
- Location: Los Angeles
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 14:39:48
(permalink)
I did a rather indepth comparison last night. It's a fine brickwall on par with the others. You will get great results with mastering tasks. The softclip capability is nice. With softclip activated it's in-line with FX-G & MeldaProduction. With it off You are in ozone/L3 territory. It prevents intersample clips with the best of them. We are at a point where all major digital brickwalls give more then enough needed compression. If you need more then 6-9 dB your mix needs work. I find the main attraction of Concrete Limiter it's low system load. Being able to use it as a channel protection limiter is why I made the purchase. I have it on all of my D/A outputs before I hit my outboard/console.
|
mmarton
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 666
- Joined: 2006/01/26 13:23:30
- Location: White Rock, B.C. Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 14:51:54
(permalink)
Eric Beam I did a rather indepth comparison last night. It's a fine brickwall on par with the others. You will get great results with mastering tasks. The softclip capability is nice. With softclip activated it's in-line with FX-G & MeldaProduction. With it off You are in ozone/L3 territory. It prevents intersample clips with the best of them. We are at a point where all major digital brickwalls give more then enough needed compression. If you need more then 6-9 dB your mix needs work. I find the main attraction of Concrete Limiter it's low system load. Being able to use it as a channel protection limiter is why I made the purchase. I have it on all of my D/A outputs before I hit my outboard/console. Thanks for your in-depth analysis Eric, always appreciated!!
Happy Sonar Platinum 64 bit Registered Owner Epi Casino, Les Paul, Strat, Martin GPCPA3, Cort C4Z bass, Roland D20 Synth, TC Konnekt48, Sansamp BDDI, Roland JDXI, APS Klasiks, Windows 10 64bit
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 15:01:42
(permalink)
mmarton Eric Beam I did a rather indepth comparison last night. It's a fine brickwall on par with the others. You will get great results with mastering tasks. The softclip capability is nice. With softclip activated it's in-line with FX-G & MeldaProduction. With it off You are in ozone/L3 territory. It prevents intersample clips with the best of them. We are at a point where all major digital brickwalls give more then enough needed compression. If you need more then 6-9 dB your mix needs work. I find the main attraction of Concrete Limiter it's low system load. Being able to use it as a channel protection limiter is why I made the purchase. I have it on all of my D/A outputs before I hit my outboard/console. Thanks for your in-depth analysis Eric, always appreciated!! Likewise, thanks, Eric. I'm still leaning against it as, from your description, it sounds like it's in the ballpark of other limiters, but doesn't offer anything particularly different or better. CPU usage isn't really an issue for me, at least with the UAD limiter, as the processing is done on the DSP card. Nonetheless, again, thanks for the detailed feedback.
|
listen
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 593
- Joined: 2008/09/12 06:07:55
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 17:50:29
(permalink)
 Concrete Limiter receives a thumbs up; used it today on some tracks I was finishing and there is nothing i can say negative worked like butter....
- Listen - FOH Mixer & Recording Studio Manager Nothing but the grace of God - mggtg. VS 700C - R / CONSOLE 1 / NEVE PORTICO 5017 / TASCAM UH-7000 / SONAR PLATINUM / REASON RECORD 9 / VMP 2 / UREI 7110's / UA LA-610 MkII / AUDIENT ASP 880 / CREATION STATION 450 V 5 WINDOWS 10 / HOME 64 - BIT / SKYLAKE CORE i7 (i7 - 6700, 4 CORES/8 THREADS)
|
billruys
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 852
- Joined: 2003/11/05 00:18:31
- Location: Outer Space
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 18:08:21
(permalink)
I went ahead and purchased it. I did not already have Expanded, so I bought that for $10 and the Brickwall limiter for $49. I think it sounds a whole lot better than Boost11 (which is pretty bad), but is not as transparent as TLS Pocket Limiter which, to my ears, is one of the most transparent limiters available at any cost, but it's FREE! I also think the limiter built into the Sonitus Multiband Compressor is pretty good. So in conclusion, if you can get it cheap, it's worth it for the convenience of having it in the Pro Channel. It's also sonically different to some other limiters, so maybe useful on that front too.
|
inaheartbeat
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 679
- Joined: 2011/08/11 12:19:15
- Location: Nashua, NH USA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 18:12:30
(permalink)
benjaminfrog inaheartbeat It's only $10 if you have the other modules. I can't speak for the limiters you already have. I have a bunch including Fabfilter Pro-L. It won't replace that but having it as a PC module to me is a real convenience so it was worth the $10 I spent and it does a very nice job. Ken Thanks for your response, Ken. I have Expanded, but I didn't purchase any of the add-ons. The $10 deal for folks in my boat is the expander/gate, which I'm not particularly interested in, so I'd be paying the $49 intro price for the limiter. Let me expand on my answer a bit. I think the concrete limiter is excellent on the pro channel and is very simple to use. The automatic threshold settings seem to work well. I am still unsure about the bass boost switch cause I just have not used it on enough material to say where it does and does not work well. When I tried it it did not work for me well. That is material specific though. If you have channels where ALL you have are PC modules then putting this as the last element in your signal chain is really convenient. There are plenty of times that just using the PC stuff is just fine cause I have all the plugs and they are very high quality (including the Softube stuff which is fantastic). Now the downside. Because the Pro Channel is either post or pre FX bin you have to set the Pro Channel to be post FX bin in order for the limiter to truly work. I really prefer my PC stuff to be pre FX bin so this is a problem if I have any other effects on a channel/bus. I have plenty of tracks where this is fine and the convenience of the PC paradigm coupled with the price is nice for me. For channels where I want fx it is not going to work the way I want it to. Now comparing it directly to Fabfilter Pro-L is almost not fair but since it is my goto limiter I am going to :-) The Fabfilter plugin costs a bunch more so that is a downside. For that though you get a fantastic user interface that includes great graphical display to let you know what is going on. Also, you have a choice of limiting modes so you don't HAVE to use soft clipping if you don't want to. You can do clipless limiting if that is what you want. I have the Nomad and Melba stuff also but frankly do not use them. It has nothing to do with the quality but more that it came with stuff as a package and it is not something I need to use. On a separate note I also have Ozone 5. I view that as a separate beast cause I don't have the uber version which allows you to separate out the pieces so it is not fair to compare that limiter function cause you really can't just throw it on any track you want. Ken
PC Audio Labs mobile i7 MC, 3.46 Ghz i7 990X, 12 Gb RAM, 3 750 Gb 7200 RPM drives, 3 USB2, 2 USB 3 ports, firewire, Windows 7 64 bit Pro, Sonar X3e Producer 64 bit,
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 18:25:15
(permalink)
Great stuff! I've been listening to it in conjunction with my other goto master limiter, the T-Rack singles Brick Wall Lim, and to my ears they're not a million miles apart sonically. And the Cake offering does have the added benefit of a more benign drain on resources. The T-Racks plugs are notoriously hungry beasties.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/20 22:43:56
(permalink)
Thanks for the feedback, folks. Much appreciated.
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 03:27:23
(permalink)
Eric Beam I did a rather indepth comparison last night. It's a fine brickwall on par with the others. You will get great results with mastering tasks. The softclip capability is nice. With softclip activated it's in-line with FX-G & MeldaProduction. With it off You are in ozone/L3 territory. It prevents intersample clips with the best of them. We are at a point where all major digital brickwalls give more then enough needed compression. If you need more then 6-9 dB your mix needs work. I find the main attraction of Concrete Limiter it's low system load. Being able to use it as a channel protection limiter is why I made the purchase. I have it on all of my D/A outputs before I hit my outboard/console. Excellent and thoughtful analysis. And agreed on pretty much every point.
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 03:39:19
(permalink)
benjaminfrog mmarton Eric Beam I did a rather indepth comparison last night. It's a fine brickwall on par with the others. You will get great results with mastering tasks. The softclip capability is nice. With softclip activated it's in-line with FX-G & MeldaProduction. With it off You are in ozone/L3 territory. It prevents intersample clips with the best of them. We are at a point where all major digital brickwalls give more then enough needed compression. If you need more then 6-9 dB your mix needs work. I find the main attraction of Concrete Limiter it's low system load. Being able to use it as a channel protection limiter is why I made the purchase. I have it on all of my D/A outputs before I hit my outboard/console. Thanks for your in-depth analysis Eric, always appreciated!! Likewise, thanks, Eric. I'm still leaning against it as, from your description, it sounds like it's in the ballpark of other limiters, but doesn't offer anything particularly different or better. CPU usage isn't really an issue for me, at least with the UAD limiter, as the processing is done on the DSP card. Nonetheless, again, thanks for the detailed feedback. As much as I like the Precision Limiter (very much in fact) and the UAD stuff in general, there's a few things to consider: 1) Unless you have a very powerful UAD2 card, DSP power is at a finite premium 2) The plugs are still 32-bit (although my understanding is that will change at some point) 3) The UAD card itself introduces latency (as all DSP solutions do)
post edited by Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk] - 2012/01/21 05:01:42
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 07:29:42
(permalink)
As much as I like the Precision Limiter (very much in fact) and the UAD stuff in general, there's a few things to consider: 1) Unless you have a very powerful UAD2 card, DSP power is at a finite premium 2) The plugs are still 32-bit (although my understanding is that will change at some point) 3) The UAD card itself introduces latency (as all DSP solutions do) Thanks for chiming in, Brandon. Good points. I'm not especially concerned about the first two, though, as I've got a couple cards and use relatively few tracks and UA say x64 is coming this year. I'm interested in number three, however, as I've started using limiters on individual tracks, not just one in the mastering stage. Can you speak to how much of a latency improvement I'd see using the Concrete Limiter vs. the Precision? Thanks. Also, it probably won't do any good, but, as they say, it can't hurt to ask: I'd really like to give you guys $10. Of the three PC add-ons you have available for this price, the only one that doesn't hold interest for me is the one that's available to me, the expander/gate. Any chance you'd offer up the limiter or the compressor for that price? A boy can dream.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 11:53:17
(permalink)
Doing a "concrete limiter" search of the forum I get one result - from 2009?!?! Don't use the forum's Search feature. It sucks. Use Google Search instead, e.g. concrete limiter site:cakewalk.com Just tried it, and it returned 746 results. Of course, as soon as I click the Post Message button it'll be 747.
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 12:16:48
(permalink)
Thanks for the tip, bitflipper.
|
dlesaux
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1034
- Joined: 2009/09/13 09:25:18
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 17:29:49
(permalink)
I purchased Ozone 5 and I like the limiter included. I wouldn't think of using a limiter on an individual track. I probably won't purchase this limiter although it looks great! If I did, it would just to add it to my collection. At $49 it's tempting but will save the $$$ for something else. In any case another nice offering from the folks at Cakewalk!
Peace! Daniel Sonar Platinum - 2017.10 and PreSonus Studio One 3.5.5 Windows 10 64 bit Studiocat Skylake Desktop PC with Intel i7 6700k processor @ 4.20 GHz / 16G RAM Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface and Cakewalk UM-2G Midi Interface Check out my website
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 17:39:04
(permalink)
dlesaux I wouldn't think of using a limiter on an individual track. Nor me, I wonder if we're in a minority here who are missing something fundamental? Do any of you use a limiter on a track? Or even on a 'sub' bus for that matter? I'm genuinely interested.
|
BrianSzep
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 363
- Joined: 2003/11/07 09:29:30
- Location: Amsterdam, NY USA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 18:05:08
(permalink)
Hi Steve, I use one sometimes on a sub buss (usually drums). Very rarely on a track. I do a lot of full band recording. Very little tracking. -Brian
System:i7-4770K CPU | 32 GB Ram | GTX 780 Ti 3GB | (2) PB278 27" Monitors | SSD 250GB - OS Drive | Hard DrivesSoftware:Win 10 Pro x64 | Sonar Platinum | Sound Forge 11 | Waves Diamond | Hollywood Orchestra - Diamond | EWQLSO - Gold | Storm Drum 2 Pro | Kontakt 5 | Evolve Mutations 1 & 2 | Funk Guitarist | Session Horns Pro | Razor | Skanner | Retro Mach MK2 | Vapor | EZD2 & EZK | AD2 & AK | Sytrus | Z3ta 2 | Rapture | Dimension Pro | AAS VA-2, VS-2, GS-2 | Hivewww.joeythomasbigband.com www.circuitryfilms.com
|
SCorey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 538
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:14
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 18:51:00
(permalink)
Eric Beam: It prevents intersample clips with the best of them. What are you using to test this? I've tried Ozone 5's new meters, ToneBoosters EBULoudness, and SSL's X-ISM meter, and they all indicate that the Concrete Limiter lets through intersample peaks. I've also run the r128-scanner from the libebur128 project and it also shows a true peak level higher than I've set the threshold for on the Concrete Limiter.
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 19:16:38
(permalink)
I too will use one on the drum buss subgroup or on alternative master buss to bring up the overall level if the tracks were recorded low. Then I will reference with and without the limiter.
|
ltb
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2707
- Joined: 2005/06/19 13:34:08
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 19:59:21
(permalink)
SCorey Eric Beam: It prevents intersample clips with the best of them. What are you using to test this? I've tried Ozone 5's new meters, ToneBoosters EBULoudness, and SSL's X-ISM meter, and they all indicate that the Concrete Limiter lets through intersample peaks. I've also run the r128-scanner from the libebur128 project and it also shows a true peak level higher than I've set the threshold for on the Concrete Limiter. Does this limiter feature oversampling? that could be an issue with isp clipping.
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 19:59:44
(permalink)
SteveStrummerUK dlesaux I wouldn't think of using a limiter on an individual track. Nor me, I wonder if we're in a minority here who are missing something fundamental? Do any of you use a limiter on a track? Or even on a 'sub' bus for that matter? I'm genuinely interested. I don't use one on every track, but if I get a vocal or bass sitting nicely in the mix except for the occasional note that leaps out, I'll slap a limiter on it as opposed to pushing the compressor harder.
|
mixsit
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 789
- Joined: 2004/04/30 11:04:24
- Location: CathouseSound
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 22:22:29
(permalink)
benjaminfrog SteveStrummerUK dlesaux I wouldn't think of using a limiter on an individual track. Nor me, I wonder if we're in a minority here who are missing something fundamental? Do any of you use a limiter on a track? Or even on a 'sub' bus for that matter? I'm genuinely interested. I don't use one on every track, but if I get a vocal or bass sitting nicely in the mix except for the occasional note that leaps out, I'll slap a limiter on it as opposed to pushing the compressor harder. In that context I'd say yes too, but perhaps an appropriately fast comp/limiter rather than a brickwall'? (I'm thinking 'bass track in good shape but for those dreaded slapping into the strings' spikes here
Wayne Smith Part time long time.. CathouseSound Mother Ships - StudioCat DAWs Portals - RME
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 22:42:43
(permalink)
In that context I'd say yes too, but perhaps an appropriately fast comp/limiter rather than a brickwall'? Thanks for the tip, mixsit. I'll try that out next time around.
|
mixsit
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 789
- Joined: 2004/04/30 11:04:24
- Location: CathouseSound
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/21 23:28:26
(permalink)
benjaminfrog In that context I'd say yes too, but perhaps an appropriately fast comp/limiter rather than a brickwall'?
Thanks for the tip, mixsit. I'll try that out next time around. Thank you! I didn't want to complicate but just to say if there are manageable numbers of problem ponts consider clip (or fader) automation. Presuming you don't need the sound of a particular limiter, there is total flexibility.
Wayne Smith Part time long time.. CathouseSound Mother Ships - StudioCat DAWs Portals - RME
|
benjaminfrog
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2006/11/05 12:26:57
- Location: Minneapolis
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2012/01/22 03:51:02
(permalink)
mixsit benjaminfrog In that context I'd say yes too, but perhaps an appropriately fast comp/limiter rather than a brickwall'?
Thanks for the tip, mixsit. I'll try that out next time around. Thank you! I didn't want to complicate but just to say if there are manageable numbers of problem ponts consider clip (or fader) automation. Presuming you don't need the sound of a particular limiter, there is total flexibility. Yeah, I do a lot of clip gain automation, too. It depends on the situation.
|
Dave King
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2862
- Joined: 2005/11/13 14:19:48
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2013/01/23 22:11:25
(permalink)
How are you guys getting it for $10? I see it priced at $79.99. Thanks.
Dave King www.davekingmusic.com SONAR X2 Producer 64-Bit StudioCat PC Windows 7 Home Premium, Service Pack 1 Intel Corel i5 3450 CPU @3.10 GHz RAM 8 GB M-Audio Delta 44 M-Audio MidiSport 2x2
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2013/01/23 22:26:09
(permalink)
Dave King How are you guys getting it for $10? I see it priced at $79.99. Thanks. Hi Dave, This is an old thread. I think there was a promo for it for $10 but I'm not sure. The OP is from 2012. If you're looking for a good limiter, you may want to try out Melda. They have a free suite of plug-in's and it comes with a very good limiter. I've heard a lot of good things about the Concrete Limiter though, not trying to lead you away from it, but $79.99 is a bit steep, especially for something that locks you in to Sonar and can't be used in another DAW. Bub.
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re:Concrete Limiter vs. the Competition
2013/01/23 22:26:27
(permalink)
Are you asking about a promotion that happened over a year ago?
|