Confirmed: MP3's are crap

Author
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13933
  • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
  • Location: NYC
  • Status: offline
2013/02/26 21:19:46 (permalink)

Confirmed: MP3's are crap

Interesting article about the non-linear nature of our hearing and what this means for audio compression:

http://arstechnica.com/sc...akes-mp3s-sound-worse/

James
Windows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
#1

24 Replies Related Threads

    cclarry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 20964
    • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/26 21:40:59 (permalink)
    Interesting article...


    #2
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/26 22:12:48 (permalink)
    I'd use wave files, but they take too long to create in Notepad...

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #3
    FastBikerBoy
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 11326
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
    • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 03:10:30 (permalink)
    I can confirm that too. Every time I play someone one of my songs which are always in mp3 format they say "That's crap". Not very scientific but proof none the less.
    #4
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 03:12:19 (permalink)
    craigb


    I'd use wave files, but they take too long to create in Notepad...

    But Notepad has no bugs, roight?


    #5
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 04:33:20 (permalink)
    bapu


    craigb


    I'd use wave files, but they take too long to create in Notepad...

    But Notepad has no bugs, roight?


    Ya, works great!  At least if you avoid the newest "X" versions that is.

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #6
    Moshkiae
    Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6111
    • Joined: 2009/04/27 10:26:25
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 10:19:29 (permalink)
    Hi,

    Hahaha!!! Love it!

    I wanna add to that article!!!!

    There is also a difference in each person that makes this equation even tougher ... and I BELIEVE that it also accounts for a person's tastes and ability to listen to more, and different musics, where many of its details are totally different and less linear than the majority of music that we spend our time listening to it.

    I kinda wonder, and have thought, that this is the area where "conditioning" works best ... you get used to hearing things like this, and eventually you do not think, or believe that anything else is possible, thus anything else is considered bad or not correct.

    I like to joke that this is the socialist style of thinking, where individuality is not allowed!

    As a wise Guy once stated from his holy chapala ... none of the hits, none of the time ... prevents you from becoming just another turkey in the middle of all the other turkeys! 
      
    #7
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 12:20:36 (permalink)
    So imagine now that a new codec replaces MP3 as the most-ubiquitous online format. Now fast-forward 20 years...MP3 hardware players are no longer manufactured, and the old software players won't work on Windows 19. Your massive collection of MP3s sits silently on the DVDs you backed them up to back in 2017 - but there are no more DVD players, either. 


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #8
    soens
    Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5154
    • Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
    • Location: Location: Location
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 12:25:57 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by soens - 2013/04/18 00:09:02
    #9
    drewfx1
    Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 12:27:43 (permalink)
    Unfortunately it's misleading and misinterpreted.

    The recently published underlying paper has been very popular with audiophools and other people who don't really understand it because things tend to be written about it in such a way that they seem to imply that humans beat math/physics. The truth is that what has been demonstrated is that humans do in fact beat a particular limitation involving a type of linear processing -  but this was something that was basically known but apparently unconfirmed.

    The basic idea is that there is a limit (known as the Gabor limit) in time vs. frequency resolution when performing a linear process (an FFT) and that it has now been demonstrated that humans can perform better than this limit.

    But the idea that human brain does non-linear processing has been known/assumed for a loooooong time by people who work with human audio perception. Like say, for instance, people who do things like perceptual audio coding for things like mp3's.

    Humans just don't use really a linear process like an FFT to perceive things. This isn't a new idea; it just (apparently) hasn't been scientifically confirmed before in this specific case.

    But none of this matters to the listener, because though FFT's are used in audio processing, the limit doesn't adversely affect the audio itself - it's just puts a limit on how you can process it using linear math. You can either optimize for frequency resolution or time resolution, but not both at the same time.


    What is happening here is that people who don't really have any background in or understanding of any of this stuff are starting from an interesting confirmation of what was long suspected about human audio perception being non-linear and jumping from that to ridiculous conclusions about non-existent impacts on real world audio.

    Carry on.

     In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
    #10
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 12:27:45 (permalink)
    bitflipper


    So imagine now that a new codec replaces MP3 as the most-ubiquitous online format. Now fast-forward 20 years...MP3 hardware players are no longer manufactured, and the old software players won't work on Windows 19. Your massive collection of MP3s sits silently on the DVDs you backed them up to back in 2017 - but there are no more DVD players, either. 


    Yeah, but the new neural patches allow us to hear anything we want or can dream up so it's all good.

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #11
    Mesh
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 27360
    • Joined: 2009/11/27 14:08:08
    • Location: Online right here!
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 12:33:20 (permalink)
    bitflipper


    So imagine now that a new codec replaces MP3 as the most-ubiquitous online format. Now fast-forward 20 years...MP3 hardware players are no longer manufactured, and the old software players won't work on Windows 19. Your massive collection of MP3s sits silently on the DVDs you backed them up to back in 2017 - but there are no more DVD players, either. 


    ....and you'd be a billionaire if you owned an original 8 track?

    Platinum Gaming DAW: AsRock Z77 Overclock Formula
    I7 3770k @ 4.5GHz : 16GB RAM G.Skill Ripjaws X
    250GB OS SSD : 3TB HDD : 1TB Sample HDD
    Win 10 Pro x 64 : NH-D14 CPU Cooler 
    HIS IceQ  2GB HD 7870
    Focusrite Scarlett 2i4
    The_Forum_Monkeys
    #12
    soens
    Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5154
    • Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
    • Location: Location: Location
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 12:42:30 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by soens - 2013/04/18 00:07:05
    #13
    the wildman
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 158
    • Joined: 2008/11/20 05:25:39
    • Location: United Kingdom
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 13:08:08 (permalink)
    drewfx1


    Unfortunately it's misleading and misinterpreted.

    The recently published underlying paper has been very popular with audiophools and other people who don't really understand it because things tend to be written about it in such a way that they seem to imply that humans beat math/physics. The truth is that what has been demonstrated is that humans do in fact beat a particular limitation involving a type of linear processing -  but this was something that was basically known but apparently unconfirmed.

    The basic idea is that there is a limit (known as the Gabor limit) in time vs. frequency resolution when performing a linear process (an FFT) and that it has now been demonstrated that humans can perform better than this limit.

    But the idea that human brain does non-linear processing has been known/assumed for a loooooong time by people who work with human audio perception. Like say, for instance, people who do things like perceptual audio coding for things like mp3's.

    Humans just don't use really a linear process like an FFT to perceive things. This isn't a new idea; it just (apparently) hasn't been scientifically confirmed before in this specific case.

    But none of this matters to the listener, because though FFT's are used in audio processing, the limit doesn't adversely affect the audio itself - it's just puts a limit on how you can process it using linear math. You can either optimize for frequency resolution or time resolution, but not both at the same time.


    What is happening here is that people who don't really have any background in or understanding of any of this stuff are starting from an interesting confirmation of what was long suspected about human audio perception being non-linear and jumping from that to ridiculous conclusions about non-existent impacts on real world audio.

    Carry on.

    +1

    www.soundcloud.com/the-Wildman 
    Home Studio with Sonar X2a 64bit (build 351).
    i7 Win7 64bit. 16gig Ram.
    Focusrite Sapphire Pro24DSP.
    #14
    Mooch4056
    Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7494
    • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
    • Location: Chicago
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 20:07:22 (permalink)
    bitflipper


    So imagine now that a new codec replaces MP3 as the most-ubiquitous online format. Now fast-forward 20 years...MP3 hardware players are no longer manufactured, and the old software players won't work on Windows 19. Your massive collection of MP3s sits silently on the DVDs you backed them up to back in 2017 - but there are no more DVD players, either. 

    Fast forward 20 years.  My record player can still play the Abbey Road album my dad purchased in 1970. 





    From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
     
    Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
    Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




    #15
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/27 22:06:14 (permalink)
    Mooch4056


    bitflipper


    So imagine now that a new codec replaces MP3 as the most-ubiquitous online format. Now fast-forward 20 years...MP3 hardware players are no longer manufactured, and the old software players won't work on Windows 19. Your massive collection of MP3s sits silently on the DVDs you backed them up to back in 2017 - but there are no more DVD players, either. 

    Fast forward 20 years.  My record player can still play the Abbey Road album my dad purchased in 1970. 

    Uh, check your math my liddle buddy.


    2013
    1970-
    ===
    0043 years


    I know I know, you were making a pun on Sgt. Pepper. But you did not specify that you were speaking of how it was in 1990. And then it would not hacve been as funny because it's 43 years later and we don't know if you even have the same album or "record player" as you call it (I call mine a turntable and if I hook it up to amplifier and some speakers I call it my stereo).


    LOL!!!!
    #16
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/28 00:52:16 (permalink)
    I'm still using MPX2a's...

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #17
    Glyn Barnes
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7564
    • Joined: 2009/06/10 05:12:31
    • Location: A Stone's Throw from the Line
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/28 01:21:20 (permalink)
    bitflipper


    So imagine now that a new codec replaces MP3 as the most-ubiquitous online format. Now fast-forward 20 years...MP3 hardware players are no longer manufactured, and the old software players won't work on Windows 19. Your massive collection of MP3s sits silently on the DVDs you backed them up to back in 2017 - but there are no more DVD players, either. 


    I am sure the Video converter spam boys will have an answer

    Intel i7 3770K @4.4GHz, 32GB RAM, 240GB SSD System disk, 2 x 2TB and 1 x 1TB (with SSD Cache) HDD. Windows 10,  Sonar Platinum. Roland Quad Capture. 
    Music - Switchwater on Soundclick
    Music - Goldry Bluszco on Soundcloud
    #18
    the wildman
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 158
    • Joined: 2008/11/20 05:25:39
    • Location: United Kingdom
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/28 03:46:22 (permalink)
    What about cassette tape.
    Theres enough tape emulators out there to suggest somethings good about it!
    Only kidding of course, but doesn't every format have it's own sound?

    Serious though,
    Vinyl records are still revered as the best even now, long after the 'powers that be' tried to ditch them. And for good reason.

    I believe that analogue sound recording has to be the most natural way to hear and enjoy music.
    Humans hear in analogue, not digital.
    Digital is like trying to paint a picture out of small squares.
    Digital audio recording builds sound waves out of small squares, but then tries to fool us into thinking that the curves are smooth, whereas Analogue audio recording is building sound waves out of smooth lines that more truly represent the original sound.
    Thats why Vinyl sounds better over CD.

    (not that I use Vinyl any, more BTW)

    Thats my thoughts on it

    C ya

    www.soundcloud.com/the-Wildman 
    Home Studio with Sonar X2a 64bit (build 351).
    i7 Win7 64bit. 16gig Ram.
    Focusrite Sapphire Pro24DSP.
    #19
    drewfx1
    Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/28 13:34:51 (permalink)
    the wildman

    Vinyl records are still revered as the best even now, long after the 'powers that be' tried to ditch them. And for good reason. 

    They are not by any means universally revered. Especially by people who understand the problems (and magnitude thereof) with both vinyl and digital.

    Digital is like trying to paint a picture out of small squares.
    Digital audio recording builds sound waves out of small squares, but then tries to fool us into thinking that the curves are smooth, whereas Analogue audio recording is building sound waves out of smooth lines that more truly represent the original sound.

    The curves output by a DAC are smooth. Google "reconstruction filter" and you will be enlightened.

     In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
    #20
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/28 15:04:00 (permalink)
    I am someone from an older Hi Fi era and have heard vinyl at its best. I have still got an ultra hi fi turntable setup and some of the best albums like the Sheffield lab series sounds amazing. (Sheffield lab production was direct from the recording studio to the cutting lathe with nothing in between. Leaves out the tape multitrack and two track machines all together!

    Digital at its best now sounds fantastic and just as warm and fat if it needs to but transients wise and noise wise it beats the pants of even the finest vinyl playback medium. As a drummer who has played live in front of an amazing drum set like Sonor and now recording drums digitally I am hearing back how they sound in real life. 

    If I did the test to anyone where the A side of a switch box had the turntable analog signal directly and the B Side of the switch had that same signal but passed through 16 Bit 44.1 K A to D and D to A they would not pick it in a million years!

    If you have mixed and mastered well, an mp3 file at 320 KBits/sec will sound fine. The thing is to get into the AAC file formats now. It is much superior in sound, much lower files sizes and although they still don't sound as good as wave files they are sounding better than mp3 files and are easily very useful in terms of sending stuff backwards and forwards over the internet while working on a project for example. I would not do it for sending takes of playing back and forth though. Full res files over You Send It etc is a better option. While working on a jingle project recently for example I was sending tons of mixes to directors etc and they were hearing them very well at their end being able to assess and advise me very accurately. Right at the end I sent the fully mastered wave file over You Send It.

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #21
    the wildman
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 158
    • Joined: 2008/11/20 05:25:39
    • Location: United Kingdom
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/28 16:37:03 (permalink)
    drewfx1


    the wildman

    Vinyl records are still revered as the best even now, long after the 'powers that be' tried to ditch them. And for good reason. 

    They are not by any means universally revered. Especially by people who understand the problems (and magnitude thereof) with both vinyl and digital.

    Digital is like trying to paint a picture out of small squares.
    Digital audio recording builds sound waves out of small squares, but then tries to fool us into thinking that the curves are smooth, whereas Analogue audio recording is building sound waves out of smooth lines that more truly represent the original sound.

    The curves output by a DAC are smooth. Google "reconstruction filter" and you will be enlightened.




    Thank you for trying to enlighten me, but in a mixed-signal system (analog and digital), a reconstruction filter (or anti-imaging filter) is used to construct a smooth analogue signal from the output of a digital to analogue converter (DAC) or other sampled data output device. A digital audio signal has a stair step type waveform which harbors a great deal of higher frequency energy called "images". A reconstruction ( or anti-imaging filter) is used to reconstruct a smoother representation of the original signal. The filter is similar to and anti-aliasing filter but has a different purpose.


    Sampled data reconstruction filters:
    The sampling theorem describes why the input of an ADC requires a low-pass analog electronic filter, called the anti-aliasing filter: the sampled input signal must be bandlimited to prevent aliasing (here meaning waves of higher frequency being recorded as a lower frequency). For the same reason, the output of a DAC requires a low-pass analog filter, called a reconstruction filter, as the output signal must be bandlimited, to prevent aliasing (here meaning Fourier coefficients being reconstructed as low frequency waves, not as higher frequency aliases), as in the Whittaker–Shannon interpolation formula.
    Ideally, both filters should be brickwall filters, constant phase delay in the pass-band with constant flat frequency response, and zero response from the Nyquist frequency. This is given by a filter with a 'sinc' impulse response.
    Implementation Practical filters have non-flat frequency or phase response in the pass band and incomplete suppression of the signal elsewhere, as a sinc waveform has an infinite response to a signal, in both the positive and negative time directions, which is impossible to perform in real time – it would require infinite delay.
    In systems that have both, the anti-aliasing filter and a reconstruction filter may be of identical design. For example, both the input and the output for audio equipment is sampled at 44.1 kHz. Both audio filters block as much as possible above 22 kHz and pass as much as possible below 20 kHz. Typically both filters are active op-amp filters, with exactly the same selection of resistors and capacitors.
    Whilst in theory a DAC gives a series of impulses, in practice, the output of a DAC is more typically a series of stair-steps – thus the step response of the filter (the integral of the impulse response) is of more interest. The low pass reconstruction filter smooths the stair step (removes the harmonics above the Nyquist limit) to (re)construct the analogue signal corresponding to the digital time sequence.
    Hence the reason why musicians and hi-fi buffs alike still rant on about, and use valve and valve emulation products to process, record and listen to music.

    post edited by the wildman - 2013/02/28 16:43:58

    www.soundcloud.com/the-Wildman 
    Home Studio with Sonar X2a 64bit (build 351).
    i7 Win7 64bit. 16gig Ram.
    Focusrite Sapphire Pro24DSP.
    #22
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/02/28 17:05:02 (permalink)
    Hey...  Does McQ have an alternate login now???

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #23
    Moshkiae
    Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6111
    • Joined: 2009/04/27 10:26:25
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/03/02 13:27:53 (permalink)
    bitflipper


    So imagine now that a new codec replaces MP3 as the most-ubiquitous online format. Now fast-forward 20 years...MP3 hardware players are no longer manufactured, and the old software players won't work on Windows 19. Your massive collection of MP3s sits silently on the DVDs you backed them up to back in 2017 - but there are no more DVD players, either. 

    Then you have to hope that the ORAL tradition brings the music in time, so that it can be remembered just like Bach was and such! ... by humming, and eventually someone putting it down on paper!
     
    Technology has been downword compatible quite well, all things considered, but yeah ... the spark plugs on a model T live in a museum only, now!

    As a wise Guy once stated from his holy chapala ... none of the hits, none of the time ... prevents you from becoming just another turkey in the middle of all the other turkeys! 
      
    #24
    Moshkiae
    Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6111
    • Joined: 2009/04/27 10:26:25
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confirmed: MP3's are crap 2013/03/02 13:54:36 (permalink)
    Hi,

    I have an example of the "non-linear" process in perception, that works, and I used it on the stage in preparing actors during rehearsal. I have wanted to do this with musicians, but it has been impossible since there is no rehearsal time to help put folks in the same arena, and too many egos along the way. This, ALSO, works with painting and I have an example that has also worked.

    These will be on a book that I have written already on these experiences, and when it happens, it happens.

    Biggest issues? People never believing anything and thinking that the only thing that works is what their mind can grab or understand, which has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of us, and the social mold, but that person can not see the difference, or grasp it. That's why I always say, there is a lot more out there, that I have never seen, and these are the only words I can explain them with ... there is no right or wrong ... there JUST IS what is there, which we do not know or understand ... and sometimes, there is NOTHING to understand ... it's just another "person" with hair, or whatnot!

    My exercises, were about two actors communicating and being able to exchange thoughts and ideas that the other person could pick up and see automatically ... and this "psychic" communication is very helpful to characterization and acting on the stage. It helps add a third dimention ... like thinking ... without the actor having to fake it with a hand to the chin, for example! It takes the "mechanical" out of the work!

    This can be done with musicians ... but requires a willingness that is not about the notes, or the chords ... it's about studying what is inside your head. This is not about your paranoia that someone can see your closets or crap inside the mind ... this is strictly about the work.

    And it can be done with art, and I have shown it. I had a lady draw a few things on a frame that was 24x24 inches ... in the dark, so she could not see anything ... she could touch it, if she wanted ... but not see it ... and when she was done for the night, she had to cover it, and NEVER look at it, until the day that she stated to herself ... I'm done with this one. She can, then, look at it.

    The result is different ... it's you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You can not deny that ... but there is no linear link, or design, or thought that will EVER tell you anything about the work (at first) ... that you can understand or relate to ... but just like your furthest sub-conscious that you know exists somewhere in there, you have a feeling for this work ... that you can not define ... but something is there ... right in front of you ... that you recognize, and it is not anything like you thought you were, or saw each morning in front of the mirror. In time, you will see parallels.  You can do this with music, but you do not want to know where the staff is ... so you can comeup with something that is more consistent with your FEEL, than it is with your ideas ... and this is the biggest learning point in all this ... the rest is mechanics and easy! But you won't have a 3rd dimention in the work, even if you think that you made the words askey so folks would never know that the song about asparapuss is about grandma!

    Lastly, was something I did with a kid that played goalie in the soccer team. I had him stand on the goal line with his eyes closed, and simply look strait ahead as to where the ball is, when anyone is going to kick a penalty. And keep an "eye" on the ball. After the first 10/15 kicks and the penalty, he was starting to be able to tell at a good 75% clip where the ball was going the minute it was kicked ... the following year, his team lost, but on that game, he saved two penalties ... however, by that time he became dis-enchanted with the game ... because the game had too many ugly people in it, and he lost interest. I've wanted to share this ability with some bigger teams, but JK is not interested in experiments that work ... !!!

    For me, these are just about the "person" ... and how much you can bring yourself to something ... as I like to say that many of you here do not like to hear me say it ... it's way above and beyond the notes and the chords and goes into the non-linear areas ... that might, or might not (I admit that!) help you or not!

    It's out there ... how much do you want to see or learn? Or do you just want to be the same all the time, locked up in your crib all your life? Here, have a noodle/pacifier! 
    post edited by Moshkiae - 2013/03/02 14:11:02

    As a wise Guy once stated from his holy chapala ... none of the hits, none of the time ... prevents you from becoming just another turkey in the middle of all the other turkeys! 
      
    #25
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1