ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 484
- Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
- Status: offline
Control Experiment - suggestions?
I'm using Sonar X1 and some soft synths to produce instrumental electronic music. Final results when listening outside my studio have not been good, with the songs really not sounding like the original wav at all. This is not though a normal post about songs not translating well. I would like to try and find the step along the way through my production process where I might be going wrong, the time where some mistake is made that causes the problem, or to find if any of equipment is responsible. I wondered, if I record say a simple drum loop in Sonar, and nothing else - and follow my process to listening outside the studio on other media, and if that still sounds bad, well, I could eliminate mixing as the culprit? Normally I record the soft synth tracks as midi tracks in Sonar, then I bounce the tracks as audio. I use mainly Izotope Alloy to adjust EQ etc on each audio track, adjust volumne/pan levels etc, before exporting as one stereo wave file. I then bring that wav file into Izotope Ozone, tweak the EQ, adjust compression, and then limiting. Usually there is quite a lot of limiting needed to get it to a reasonable volume. Then, I'm taking this master wav file into iTunes, and dragging the track into my iPhone - from there I listen from the phone in my car, and also on a Bose Soundlink Bluetooth Mobile speaker. Any advice how to track what is the cause of the poor quality results welcomed.
HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3 My Soundcloud
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/21 08:35:38
(permalink)
Listen. Form an opinion. React. Start listening again. That's the best advice. best regards, mike
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/21 09:23:22
(permalink)
Generally electronic stuff with synths will sound pretty good internal to the computer..... no mics and stuff involved. So that could mean that the way you are listening... the monitor speakers, the room, etc are the culprit that is throwing the mixing off. If the room is not properly set up (acoustically) and you have poor acoustics, or are using sub standard speakers or no speakers (headphone mix) you will naturally mix so it sounds good to you in that room , on those speakers, or headphones.... When you take it to a totally different room or speakers it is not mixed for that system and it sounds bad. The solution is to do acoustic treatment to the room and mix on studio reference speakers to get the flattest sound possible. You have to hear the mix "AS IT IS" not how the room affects it in order to get a mix that plays well on many different systems. I have ARC which helps, but is not the "Be ALL Cure ALL" to a bad room.... It is however, my only solution at this time to my non-treated room. Learn your system and it's speakers regardless of how you mix....
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
dmbaer
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2585
- Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
- Location: Concord CA
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/21 15:29:05
(permalink)
ULTRABRA Normally I record the soft synth tracks as midi tracks in Sonar, then I bounce the tracks as audio. I use mainly Izotope Alloy to adjust EQ etc on each audio track, adjust volumne/pan levels etc, before exporting as one stereo wave file. I then bring that wav file into Izotope Ozone, tweak the EQ, adjust compression, and then limiting. Do you export the file from Sonar on its way to Ozone as 24 bit or 16 bit? You didn't say either way. While it probably won't be a massive difference, you should not reduce the bit depth until the final export to a "playable" format. The other thing you didn't say was whether you found the post-Ozone (presumably) 16-bit file to sound good or disappointing when played through your monitors. Just play it in Windows Media Player of the equivalent. There may be something in your export parameters from either Sonar or Ozone that's causing the problem before the audio ever leaves your computer.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/21 15:48:28
(permalink)
Hi UltraBra. I produce a lot of quality instrumental electronic music and it has to go into a variety of mediums. In some ways it is a bit if a translation issue and it sort of falls into the same camp as getting any genre mixed tracks to sound good on a variety of systems. The answer to your question is that it is not just one thing but a lot of little things. With electronic music you are dealing with synths and many of them have a very extended range of frequencies and can go very deep and very high too and can be bright. The same rules apply to getting individual tracks sounding good. They create way more issues sound wise right at the source. I try to: 1 Get them sounding as good as they can within the instrument itself. And that includes effects, filtering eg HP filtering etc. There is so much one can do before the sound even leaves the hardware device or the VST, 2 Look at how hardware devices are interfaced into the world. I feed my hardware synths into a very nice Samson mixer and it has got a few things going for it. One is a very cool HPF on the input channels and a nice EQ. Between these two things along I can completely reshape the sound of an incoming synth. Fine tune here to maximise the sound you are after. 3 As per standard production procedure keep an eye on your synth sounds at a track level. They may need some more slight filtering or EQ to bring out the best in the sound. Some synths can still have too much bottom end for their own good. Check it on nice main speakers with a good bass response. Often it is just the upper part of the sound you are really after. If you want to shake the floor be careful as to what synths are doing it. Control it too here right at the source. Things like 808 kick drums etc..Deep pads.. Check your velocity editing after you have played a part in or created a part. Make sure notes are of a similar velocity unless otherwise required to be otherwise. Print synth tracks to audio and go further with the dynamics processing on the parts. Compressors will often be needed to smooth part levels out further and keep certain things tamed and under control. 4 Get a great mix. Learn to balance things nicely. I bet your mixes are probably not half as good as the things you comparing them too. Listen and analyse great mixed tracks, do the same sorts of things. Use a single point source Auratone type speaker in mono at low volume to create perfect balances. Absolutely essential. Check up loud regularly at high volume on your main monitors for bass end and reverb levels. 5 Master your tracks correctly. I bet you are comparing un mastered poorer quality mixes to fantastically mastered great mixes. That will create a great divide and you are hearing it! Once you have got a great mix you then master well. This often means a further overall EQ fine tuning, cleaning up and filtering the bottom end a little more. The top end will be fine tuned as well. The compressor will even out and give your tracks that professional glue to the sound. Then final limiting will crank the levels up big time and right up to commercial levels. If you do all this your final tracks will sound killer on everything you play them on. A great mix plus great mastering just transcends all the mediums they are played on. The is no magic potion for each medium just get greatness happening and it will sound great on everything. And that includes conversion to mp3. I pull levels down a bit before encoding to mp3. Choose a decent bit rate like 256 or 320 K/Bits per sec so that at least some quality is preserved. Make a full audio CD and test it in your car. When a track passes the car test it is perfect! The bass should be big and powerful without rattling my teeth. Mids and highs should be loud and punchy. Watch the bottom end for a great translation into ear buds. Most of all the music should be great first, everything else will fall into place much easier. Here is the big one! Make sure your parts are interesting and weave in and out of each other. Keep an eye on what parts are playing what and what parts are silent when other parts are playing. Rather than just layer stuff up, try integrating the parts more in what I call serial phrasing. Think three parts making up one phrase or statement. This all effects the production later on and adds huge amounts of clarity (and interest) to your mixes. When mixing use the minimum voltage maximum illusion approach. ie pads can be very low in a mix and yet still be heard clearly. That type of thing.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/01/21 16:02:48
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Kalle Rantaaho
Max Output Level: -5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7005
- Joined: 2006/01/09 13:07:59
- Location: Finland
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 02:38:03
(permalink)
The guys above have given some good guidance, but put shortly: Your comment " Final results when listening outside my studio have not been good, with the songs really not sounding like the original wav at all" makes me think the key is your monitoring/studio acoustics. If the projects sounds like you want them to (and acceptable compared to commercial stuff) in your studio, but not outside, you maybe just haven't "learned" your studio yet. Do you use commercial tracks for A/B-comparison inside the project? Do you use a frequency analyzer to compare the frequency curves of your stuff to those of commercial productions? IMO, no particular software or hardware alone is guilty or saviour, as with any set up you should be able to produce tracks that translate acceptably to "outside world" if you only know the strengths and weaknesses of your monitoring. The more reliable monitoring/acoustics, the easier it is to get there. I'm an amateur, and my skill level is very modest, and my monitoring/acoustics is far from pro level. I make several mixes of a project, then I listen to them "outside", make notes about the strengths/weaknesses of each mix, then make changes, and pick the one that I consider the "official" version.
SONAR PE 8.5.3, Asus P5B, 2,4 Ghz Dual Core, 4 Gb RAM, GF 7300, EMU 1820, Bluetube Pre - Kontakt4, Ozone, Addictive Drums, PSP Mixpack2, Melda Creative Pack, Melodyne Plugin etc. The benefit of being a middle aged amateur is the low number of years of frustration ahead of you.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 10:18:27
(permalink)
ULTRABRA, if I were you I'd be finding out if Kalle is local to me and offer him a lunch and a beer in exchange for picking his brain!
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 11:07:09
(permalink)
It is a translation problem. No monitoring system is flawless. What sounds brilliant on one system can produce obvious flaws on another. The real trick is to learn your monitoring systems (emphasis on the plural). Another problem is electronic music - there are no hard and fast models to follow. Everyone has an idea of how an electronic guitar sounds, or a kick drum and how that fits into a song. Synths that model acoustic instruments should fit into this scheme, but as soon as you start turning knobs you get ... differences. Turn knobs on two synths and you get all kinds of ... interference between the two - unlike traditional instruments. And as Jeff notes synths, unless told not to, produce the full range of sound we can hear, 20-20,000 Hz. That puts a strain on any monitoring system, esp. when you get several of these going at once. It becomes a real challenge. Reading your explanation of how you work sez a couple of things. The fact you say you need a lot of limiting means the mix might be low. This is usually not a problem w/ synths. Pushing digital limiters is a delicate thing. Pushing analog can be delicate too, if you don't want saturation turning to distortion. I had a light old standard done w/ vocals, guitar and a lead drop. When pushing the vol for modern sensiblilies of this soft song the limiter introduced some "hair" on the vocals, esp. Perfect for rock, not so good on a pretty jazz song tho I doubt my other systems would have revealed it as other than a smudge (which is still not good). Alloy and other digitial systems can do this in spades. I've heard a lot of good mixes that end up flat and, if my song above had hairs, they have boar snouts afterwards. iTunes and other compression software can mulitple this effect, as well, with every sound in a mix pushing the limits of sonic decency. Modern loudness is hard to get right - you need to remember that that mix and mastering engineers probably don't have better ears than you, but the mistakes they make they do them 8 hours a day w/ others around them only too willing to point mistakes out. This makes for a quick learning curve. Still, if your " mix" sounds bad on every other system but your mix system, that is the first place I'd look for an external fix. The rest is just learning. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 484
- Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 14:56:13
(permalink)
.
post edited by ULTRABRA - 2013/01/22 15:01:53
HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3 My Soundcloud
|
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 484
- Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 15:01:24
(permalink)
Thanks everyone for the replies. Some interesting and informative stuff in there. I think I get the point :-) Just to answer/respond to a few things : #Guitarhacker - yeah, my "room" is a mess, acoustically. Well, its not even a room really, its more like a cupboard. I have acoustic panels in it, and leave the door at the back open (as someone else on here suggested). Still, I do spend more time listening on (top quality) headphones, than I do listening through monitors (Yamaha HS80, one with a dodgy hissing radio frequency .... I'm thinking my "cupboard" is probably too small for ARC. #dmbaer - I export at 44100/24 bit. I think the exported unmastered wav sounds OK, but when using Ozone, particularly the limiting, I can hear it can affect the sound not in a good way. But, even when it sounds reasonable in Ozone, it can sound awful somewhere else. #Jeff Evans - thanks for some great suggestions and advice. just one thing : I am comparing my tracks mainly not to professional music, but tracks on Soundcloud that are similar-ish. So, mastered tracks yes, but usually, at least attainable. I find its my bass which sounds most "out" in comparison. #Kalle - I don't actually A/B from inside the project, thanks for the tip. I do compare outside the project using ozone to check the overall frequency of other songs. #bitflipper - ha ha, I had even though the same! Kalle, missä sä asut?! #AT - I think mostly my mixes in Sonar are quite low - eg, peaking at something like -12db, or maybe more. Is it better to up the levels to get it up naturally to more like -6/-3db, meaning less limiting? I notice when limited a lot in Ozone - this is when I can really here something bad coming in, not quite distortion, but pushing it certainly degrades the overall sound. I'm not sure what is considered "a lot" though ... pulling the threshold down to -9/-10, maybe that's too much, or maybe it depends on the source material? Anyhow, I'm in a rubbish room, with electrical issues, how much worse can it get :-) I'll probably go back to basics, keep things as simple as possible, and try and learn where it starts to go wrong.
HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3 My Soundcloud
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 15:14:57
(permalink)
... .I am comparing my tracks mainly not to professional music, but tracks on Soundcloud that are similar-ish. That is one of your major issues right there. Most of the stuff on Soundcloud is amateur to say the least and the mix and mastering is far from good. You need to stop doing that! There are way too many variables on people's music posted up on Soundcloud. Poor mixing and mastering being the main one. You need to start listening to well mixed and mastered material in the same genre and not only that but you need to do it on your speakers in your monitoring environment. That way you will get to hear what great music sounds like on your system. And when you are mixing and mastering you also have these quality reference tracks available at any time to be able to immediately switch to and compare. Bottom end can be an issue but like normal music too your bass or bottom end needs to be sorted out as early as the synth sound itself, the track EQ etc and any HPF filtering that may be required and lastly just getting the right amount of bass in your mixes. Many people go wrong here and have far too much. Simple as that. After getting what you think is the right amount of bottom end or bass in your mix try pulling down all the bass faders and then listen to your mix for 10 minutes without any bass parts present. Then after a while slowly bring the bass parts back in. You will often find the faders will be at a lower level than before once you get the right amount of bass bass back in your mix. The small mono speaker down at low volume will really let you know when the bass parts are right. You need the right amount of mid range and high end material in your bass sounds and a little less of the deep subby stuff more than likely.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/01/22 15:25:22
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Old55
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 19791
- Joined: 2008/09/19 20:10:05
- Location: Californiashire
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 15:33:51
(permalink)
It sounds to me like you're comparing a .wav file in you studio to an .mp3 file on your iPhone. For your experiment, you might find out what how much compression is being applied by iTunes. Then you could get an mp3 codec, use the same settings and see if you get similar results in your studio. Once you've done that, you'll know if it's something you have control over or if it's Apple's fault.
Should auld acquaintance be forgot--hey, who the hell are you guys? X2(X3 pending hardware upgrade), Emulator X2, E-mu 1212M, Virtual String Machine
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 16:22:12
(permalink)
iTunes has got nothing to do with it. Like I said in my original post a great mix and mastered track will transcend all the mediums it ends up on mostly. I have done some great mixes and mastered tracks in my day and many have ended up on iTunes as well and the tracks ended up sounding great there. iTunes did not change a thing.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Control Experiment - suggestions?
2013/01/22 22:37:22
(permalink)
Ultra, -12 dB or so should be fine for recording. Rather than using a compressor/limiter to make it louder, use the faders. Compressors/limiters should be used for evening out the sound, compressing the louder parts so they are softer and seeming to raise up the level of the entire track. Eq is best used trimming down the frequencies you don't want to hear. The easiest thing to do is treat the mix like a subtractive synth, removing what you don't need or steps on another sound. But it sounds like the small, reflective room is the problem. It is very hard to identify problems if there are a lot of them. A good monitoring system in a good room is easy to learn the problems - w/ enough time. A bad room can make your mix sound like swiss cheese on other systems. That may also explain why you have to push your mixes so hard. Whole bass notes and even wider mid and upper range frequencies can disappear or get reinforced in a wobbly room. You'll mix to it, and elsewhere those problems pop out. iTunes, mp3s etc. can exacerbate them, too. W/o moving to a new, treated studio room your best bet is to use some good headphones to check your mixes. I wouldn't use them to mix, but rather use them to spot check your songs. The mix should be getting close to -6 db or so. Then don't limit them so hard. I'm not familiar w/ ozone but optical comps are slower and will let more of the initial hit through. Don't worry about other songs on soundclick etc. or the radio (radio stations have their own compressors, etc.). The idea is to get the best mix, even if it is a few dBs down. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|