jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Controlled delay in X1
I was watching a UAD2 video today whereby the engineer was using PT. He had a stereo track and he split these into two mono tracks (so far, so good). Then, he went into some dark deep area of PT and delayed one of the mono tracks by 12 msec. Which, then took the track and made space in the middle of the stereo field for other instruments. Can this be done in X1 without using a plugin like in PT? Thanks, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/11 07:11:42
(permalink)
Go into clip properties and change the start time by 12ms.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Rothchild
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1479
- Joined: 2003/11/27 13:15:24
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/11 08:00:53
(permalink)
You can use Channel Tools for this also, there's independent control of delay for left and right channels. No need for deep dark anything! Child
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/11 20:08:35
(permalink)
Bristol Jonesey... Thank you... I miss the old time adjustment that used to be one of the controls in track view. I was wondering where that went. Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1160
- Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
- Location: Va Beach Virginia
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/11 21:55:02
(permalink)
I have requested many times that we to be given the ability to delay (offset) one side or the other of a stereo track for exactly the reason the op wants. According to the forum "experts", it is is unecessary and would junk up the console. I guess some of them thar experts have never worked on a real digital console. Dang! No repectable console maker would build a console that would not have the ability to do that. The effect is awesome, it's done as standard mo in a studio and it's a pity that they don't think it's needed around here. Sigh !! Standard reply is want you have received - to delay the track by X ms or use channel tools. It ain't the same and lots of luck doing that to one side or the other of a stereo track using any kind of delay. This forum is bonkers man.
post edited by pianodano - 2011/07/11 22:42:53
Best, Danny Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 01:24:09
(permalink)
pianodano ...Standard reply is want you have received - to delay the track by X ms or use channel tools.... ---well, but have you tried Channel Tools? Or are you too busy sighing about how you want to do it a different way-? RB
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 05:03:56
(permalink)
pianodano I have requested many times that we to be given the ability to delay (offset) one side or the other of a stereo track for exactly the reason the op wants. According to the forum "experts", it is is unecessary and would junk up the console. I guess some of them thar experts have never worked on a real digital console. Dang! No repectable console maker would build a console that would not have the ability to do that. The effect is awesome, it's done as standard mo in a studio and it's a pity that they don't think it's needed around here. Sigh !! Standard reply is want you have received - to delay the track by X ms or use channel tools. It ain't the same and lots of luck doing that to one side or the other of a stereo track using any kind of delay. This forum is bonkers man. A little bit of lateral thinking would give you exactly what you want. Bounce your stereo track down and select "split mono" as your output. you can do what you want then to either track, and bounce them back to stereo (if you want) when you've finished. And this forum is bonkers? Well, there's a few people here with questionable mental acuity, but by & large we're a sound bunch.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
lavoll
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 447
- Joined: 2004/10/28 13:42:50
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 07:08:05
(permalink)
channel tools is an awesome plugin!! love it for these types of things. And also for some mid side quick adjustement. also try this: on a reverb bus: do a channel swap before the reverb :)
sonar x1b, win 7, 12gig ram, 6gb ssd, i7 Hexa Processor i7-970, lynx aurora
|
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1160
- Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
- Location: Va Beach Virginia
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 09:55:36
(permalink)
RB, Yes I have tried channel tools. It is not the same. Besides, you should not need a pluggin to do what he has asked. BJ , Right, let's add one more process to do something that should take absolutely zereo time to do. Beside both things I have mentioned, the beauty of having a rotary controller when doing this on console is that it gives you the ability to find the EXACT sweet spot for maximum effect and no time wasted if it's not ultimately used. Have either of you done this this on a console ? Have you ever really adjusted the stereo width of a track on a console ?
Best, Danny Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
|
SCorey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 538
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:14
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 10:04:25
(permalink)
pianodano RB, Yes I have tried channel tools. It is not the same. Besides, you should not need a pluggin to do what he has asked. BJ , Right, let's add one more process to do something that should take absolutely zereo time to do. Beside both things I have mentioned, the beauty of having a rotary controller when doing this on console is that it gives you the ability to find the EXACT sweet spot for maximum effect and no time wasted if it's not ultimately used. Have either of you done this this on a console ? Have you ever really adjusted the stereo width of a track on a console ? How is channel tools not the same? I've done this sort of thing on a Yamaha 02R, and I find Channel Tools to be simpler. Which console are you referring to?
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 10:31:50
(permalink)
pianodano RB, Yes I have tried channel tools. It is not the same. Besides, you should not need a pluggin to do what he has asked. BJ , Right, let's add one more process to do something that should take absolutely zereo time to do. Beside both things I have mentioned, the beauty of having a rotary controller when doing this on console is that it gives you the ability to find the EXACT sweet spot for maximum effect and no time wasted if it's not ultimately used. Have either of you done this this on a console ? Have you ever really adjusted the stereo width of a track on a console ? Hi, Danny - I think what we're saying on this thread is that it's fruitless to "rail against the wind," which is what you're doing when you talk about all the prerequisites you have for what you think is a suitable approach to the OP's question. It's easy to add a delay to one channel of a track, and several ways have been listed here. They are all reasonable approaches using the tools in Sonar. Why shouldn't a plug-in be involved? Why should it take "zero time" to do it, and why do you think using Channel Tools is so time consuming and that the results are "not the same"--? Why do you think that the way a software console works has to be identical to a physical console, when there are several differences that need a small amount of adjustment to? Your complaints are more like something I would have expected to come across 10 years ago or more when sound engineers were balking at the differences between what they were used to and what could be done on a computer. It's so-- pointless. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 10:52:35
(permalink)
Have either of you done this this on a console ? Have you ever really adjusted the stereo width of a track on a console ? Nope. But I've run a stereo track out into 2 mono channels on the console and adjusted it that way. Maybe, just maybe if before you even hit the Record button with a stereo track as your source, you should consider how this will fit into the mix and whether or not it will need adjusting in the stereo field later when it comes to mix. In which case the source should have been recorded as 2 mono tracks to start with. A little bit of pre-planning goes a long way.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1160
- Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
- Location: Va Beach Virginia
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 12:50:42
(permalink)
RB, No disrepect but I know exactly what the op asked for. I don't know what the difference is between channel tools and a hardware mixer. But it is a profound difference. We (myself and associates) have speculated amogst ourselves that a phasing algorythm is involed when this channel (sample) offset effect is instituted on a console. But I don't know how it achieved. It is something that can be tried without any effort at all. It comes in very handy to collapse the stereo field width when you have spent hours and hours setting up all those perfect drum outs to a buss but you just can't get it to sit because the field is to wide or - even to increase the soundstage beyond 180deg for special effects. Tape slapback effects can be instantaneously achieved. Multiple vocal tracks are a joy to setup at mix time. But I guess we will never have the ability in Sonar because so many see no need for it. sigh.
post edited by pianodano - 2011/07/12 12:53:21
Best, Danny Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
|
Rodab
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 64
- Joined: 2011/05/31 15:59:10
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 13:45:56
(permalink)
jkleban I was watching a UAD2 video today whereby the engineer was using PT. He had a stereo track and he split these into two mono tracks (so far, so good). Then, he went into some dark deep area of PT and delayed one of the mono tracks by 12 msec. Which, then took the track and made space in the middle of the stereo field for other instruments. Can this be done in X1 without using a plugin like in PT? Thanks, Jim You should share this vid ;)
|
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6585
- Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 15:21:19
(permalink)
pianodano I have requested many times that we to be given the ability to delay (offset) one side or the other of a stereo track for exactly the reason the op wants. According to the forum "experts", it is is unecessary and would junk up the console. I guess some of them thar experts have never worked on a real digital console. Dang! No repectable console maker would build a console that would not have the ability to do that. The effect is awesome, it's done as standard mo in a studio and it's a pity that they don't think it's needed around here. Sigh !! Standard reply is want you have received - to delay the track by X ms or use channel tools. It ain't the same and lots of luck doing that to one side or the other of a stereo track using any kind of delay. This forum is bonkers man. If you insert Channel Tools and enable "Show Assignable Controls", you can assign any 4 parameters (including L & R delay) and have them easily available in console view or Track Inspector.
In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/12 21:18:51
(permalink)
OK.. sorry I started just a tizzy over this. It is a simple thing to do, used to used the track tool for TIME ADJUSTMENT, it got moved to TRACK PROPERTIES. I am good. Anyway, someone asks for the UA video demonstrating this trick, so here you go. http://www.uaudio.com/blo...-isaac-tips-and-tricks Can't just post the video link since it is embedded in the above web page. Enjoy, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
Rothchild
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1479
- Joined: 2003/11/27 13:15:24
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/13 12:35:26
(permalink)
I actually would be far less bothered if they'd baked in the channel strip function in to Sonar than I am that they put a compressor plug in in to it, especially as CS really a sop to the fact that the native pan function is somewhat lacking. I guess 'panning now works as it ought to' isn't as whizz bang wallop as 'new compressor with graphics to make it look like a famous piece you may have heard of!' Child
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/13 16:16:46
(permalink)
Rothchild, Did i read somewhere that you can change the panning laws that X1 uses? I think the default ones are kinda lacking... as soon as you take something off of Hard Left or Right, it jumps to close to the center for my tastes. But, I need to read more on how to change this. Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|
lorneyb2
Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1667
- Joined: 2007/04/26 04:02:10
- Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/13 19:06:43
(permalink)
jkleban Rothchild, Did i read somewhere that you can change the panning laws that X1 uses? I think the default ones are kinda lacking... as soon as you take something off of Hard Left or Right, it jumps to close to the center for my tastes. But, I need to read more on how to change this. Jim Preferences - Driver Settings 4th box down Stereo Panning law:
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Win 8.1 Pro 64bit, Quad Core 3.2GHz, 16G ram, Edirol FA 101, Nvidia EW (Platinum Orchestra, Hollywood Strings, Pianos, Gypsy, Fab 4, Ministry of Rock,Choirs, etc)
|
jimkleban
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1319
- Joined: 2008/11/09 09:42:45
- Status: offline
Re:Controlled delay in X1
2011/07/13 20:47:25
(permalink)
Thanks Lorney, Found it and man, WHAT A DIFFERENCE in my mixes (I need to remix everything now). I finally have more SPACE definition between panning right and left (less in the middle), very retro sounding as I was hoping. Great stuff, Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R) Apollo Duo (via TB) UAD Quad UAD Duo WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram 4 SSD for programs and sample libraries Splat (latest version)
|