Helpful ReplyCreating a bus do we then change output to none ?

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
kook
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 82
  • Joined: 2012/04/27 22:21:54
  • Status: offline
2018/03/01 03:07:51 (permalink)

Creating a bus do we then change output to none ?

So i created a bus for each of my drums going to a drum bus...so each individual drum track has a send to drum bus....now on the bottom of each channel strip should i change output to "none" its on "master"..."none" because the send is sending to the drum bus the the drum bus sends to master ?
Ty
#1
List Solutions Only

3 Replies Related Threads
    scook
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 24146
    • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
    • Location: TX
    • Status: offline
    Re: Creating a bus do we then change output to none ? 2018/03/01 03:20:28 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby kook 2018/03/11 14:57:48
    Instead of creating a send to the bus and setting the track output to none, why not set the track output to the bus and forget about adding the send?
    #2
    kook
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 82
    • Joined: 2012/04/27 22:21:54
    • Status: offline
    Re: Creating a bus do we then change output to none ? 2018/03/01 03:34:56 (permalink)
    Lol..i was just thinking that
    #3
    SuperG
    Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1371
    • Joined: 2012/10/19 16:09:18
    • Location: Edgewood, NM
    • Status: offline
    Re: Creating a bus do we then change output to none ? 2018/03/01 03:43:26 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby kook 2018/03/11 14:57:53
    Sends have their uses in parallel routing applications,  where discrete levels are needed individually for each bus sent to. But if all you want to do is control the overall volume a simple group of tracks, direct routing to a bus is less trouble.

    laudem Deo
    #4
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1