haskins02
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2004/11/30 00:49:15
- Location: San Rafael (Marin County), California
- Status: offline
Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
Are there some “tricks of the trade” to get smooth, rich, and lush sounding background vocal harmonies during the editing process that can be done with X1? I’ve compared my projects to some popular songs and they just don’t measure up. For example, I have used various types of reverb, V-Vocal to change pitch and create harmonies, the VX64 Vocal Strip (e.g. Hook Doubler) to add thickness, and other effects. Those things help, but I still cannot achieve that lush richness, while avoiding excessive echo from too much reverb. Perhaps there are some recording/editing “secrets” that have been revealed to the general public, much like the secrets of some magicians and chefs. What about making multiple copies of audio tracks, nudging some of the tracks slightly, special use of panning, reverb, delay, etc.? I am trying to minimize my time experimenting with these things, especially if there some proven techniques out there. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Greg
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/14 22:21:13
(permalink)
To my mind, the epitome of "lush" is exemplified by Fleetwood Mac's song "Tell Me Lies". That particular effect was accomplished by triple-tracking each part and giving it all a 10K boost. There is also a pretty hefty dose of Lexicon on it. Pretty much the same method was used for 10cc's classic "Not in Love" as well as Queen's "Bohemian Rhapsody" (3 singers x 3 dubs). Really thick vocal harmonies requires lots of layers. If it's possible to fake it with doublers and choruses and such, I've certainly never found any such formula. [And I've tried, too. I even went as far as buying the Waves Doubler after hearing it was a favorite among many successful engineers -- save your money, it's useless.] Here's a trick I stumbled onto once. I'd sung four harmony parts and then double-tracked each part, for a total of 8 "me's". But it wasn't as fat as I wanted, so I started experimenting and ultimately ended up layering a synth vocal pad underneath. That actually worked surprisingly well. A casual listen does not reveal the fake choir, because your ear zeroes in on the real human voices riding above it. Another thing that almost goes without saying: compression. Heavy compression. You don't want anything to stick out when you've got a virtual choir going. Set the threshold way down low, so the compressor's always engaged, give it a 4:1 ratio or higher. I usually use the old Kjearhus Classic Compressor for this task, maybe because it works so well or maybe just years of habit, I'm not sure.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
haskins02
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2004/11/30 00:49:15
- Location: San Rafael (Marin County), California
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/14 22:47:22
(permalink)
Thanks bitflipper! I'll give those a try. I assume when you say "tripple tracking" or "double tracking" you are simply cloning the track, not doing another recording take of the same thing, correct? Greg
|
Jimbo21
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 696
- Joined: 2010/02/08 19:35:48
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 00:30:36
(permalink)
Not wanting to speak for Bit, but I think you need all different takes, not cloned tracks for best effect.
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 00:39:13
(permalink)
never clone a vocal track. it will never really sound good that way. you want unique performances, and the differences between all the vibratos and timbres of voice will create the blend you are looking for. there is no 'cheating' a great vocal performance.
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 03:21:42
(permalink)
if you're editing pitch with V-Vocal, don't nudge your "wrong" notes to the exact same pitch, allow a little flexibility. Also, while you're using VV, I think it's almost as important to tighten up timing as it is pitch. There's nothing worse than hearing multiple 's's' or 't's' arriving at different times
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
MP3ISTHEDEVIL
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 68
- Joined: 2011/05/15 00:22:30
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 03:30:24
(permalink)
the Waves Doubler after hearing it was a favorite among many successful engineers -- save your money, it's useless.] Ya it is an expensive disappointment for trying to use on vocals. Ive found a couple cool other uses for it thank goodness. never clone a vocal track. it will never really sound good that way. you want unique performances, and the differences between all the vibratos and timbres of voice will create the blend you are looking for. there is no 'cheating' a great vocal performance. Thats a fact jack. Ive been desperate a couple times on straight mix gigs. One or two vocal tracks both are ridiculously wet and I dont want my name attached to the final product. So what did I do. I did around ten overdubs of my self singing and got creative burying and trickling. Ive since been hired again by the same people ; )
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 03:33:41
(permalink)
In your case, I'd say never clone a track. There are reasons you may wish to do it, but for now, forget them (for now at least), they'll almost definitely do you more harm than good. It's all about composition and performance here, I believe. If you're performing a harmony in which the backing vocals are mimicking the main vocal, I would start by recording multiple takes and begin by panning these around to create a nice wide vocal sound. You may also benefit by using a different mic. Eg use a condenser for the main vox but switch to a dynamic to do the backing vocals. You could also try eqing the high end out of your BV (backing vocals). You can vary the way you sing to create distinction and interest. Singing some of the harmonies with a 'soft' nature and some with a more aggressive style can result in an interesting blend with a nice warmth but edginess to it. Play around with it. You may notice with lots of voices going on, sharp sounds tend to all be slightly out of time (like 'p' and 's' sounds). This makes it VERY obvious to the listener that there are multiple vocals. If you want this, that's ok, but sometimes you don't. In this case, you can physically practise singing the lyrics without those sharp sounds. Almost like singing with a lisp! It will sound weird, but blended with the main vox can sound great and give it a huge, full sound, but without sounding multitracked. Another option is to manually edit each on out. This is NOT fun! You choose. If you really want to create interest, you may wish to sing the harmonies with different notes. You can sing them exactly the same, but one octave below, or above. You can sing it the same but maybe a 3rd above. I think a 3rd above tends to generally sound well but I believe singing a 5th above can sometimes result in clashes. Not to sure on this here as my music theory is a bit rusty... Experiment! Try playing your main melody on keys and then plan your harmony over the top of that piece. Bottom line, your processing you apply in X1 should simply be there to enhance an already great sounding harmony. If it doesn't sound great after a quick 2 seconds of adjusting volumes and maybe panning (if you're going for a big sound), then you're going to really struggle to get a great end result. Compose your harmonies well, record them well, and everything will fall into place. X1 is not a magic potion, YOU are the magic! So make it happen! (was that cheesy?... haha)
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 04:43:25
(permalink)
Experiment! Try playing your main melody on keys and then plan your harmony over the top of that piece Yes. Whenever we get down to detailed harmony composition, I start by writing the main vocal out on a piano track, then construct the harmonies with reference to the main track. This also provides valuable information about whether a particular line will work in a harmonic context, and also whether it fits the vocalist's range
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Danny Danzi
Moderator
- Total Posts : 5810
- Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
- Location: DanziLand, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 05:29:25
(permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey if you're editing pitch with V-Vocal, don't nudge your "wrong" notes to the exact same pitch, allow a little flexibility. Also, while you're using VV, I think it's almost as important to tighten up timing as it is pitch. There's nothing worse than hearing multiple 's's' or 't's' arriving at different times Best advice so far in my opinion...well said Jonesy! The more people correct pitch, the more you LOSE from your vocal stacks. What makes them sound thick....the flaws. You of course don't want things completely out of key, but don't correct to where all the notes are perfect. You'll know this is happening if you put two tracks up against each other and pan them...yet they will sound mono and centered. Another thing to consider is...choosing the right mic for the voice. The voice is your subject, the mic is your enhancement tool. The right mic on the right voice says it all. Some guys can print magical tracks with a 58....other guys (like me) fail with a Neumann U-87 (unless I sing in a specific key...go figure.) and do better with a cheaper mic or something that may not be the "correct choice" for most engineers on a voice. Also, and I have always considered this important....don't use the same mic you used on lead vocals to do your back-up vocals. Having a mic change here creates an entirely new pallet to work from as well as a different sound than the lead vocal print. When doing back up vocals or layering several, make them sound different each take so that the voices literally take on a different shape/sound so it doesn't sound like the same person singing all the parts. Moving your position on each vocal take can work wonders too and give you different sounds to use to further enhance your vocal stacks. It's the same as guitar layering. If we want a big modern sounding guitar layer bed, we don't use one guitar and one amp. You use different guitars, different amps, different eq curves as well as different panning. This is what gives it the layered effect because it's not the exact same sound 4 times. Change it up, experiment, make the takes different but not drastically different and then make them work as an entity. Best of luck. :) -Danny
My Site Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 13:57:00
(permalink)
We got lucky with mic choice Danny - the first half decent one we bought was an AT4033 (which was retailing for £600 [$1000] at the time) but it fitted my wife's voice like a glove! We've since acquired a small collection of less than boutique quality mics but theAT is still the goto choice when I'm tracking Lyn. Needless to say, nothing can make me sound good!
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 18:26:07
(permalink)
The word lush for me implies something else and it has nothing to do with recording technique either. It is about the harmonies themselves. eg What notes are you talking about. Time for everyone to get a serious lesson in vocal harmonies once again with the ever amazing band Steely Dan. LISTEN to the harmonies in their songs. No, sorry the old major third and fifth here will not cut the mustard. We are talking about building serious chords now eg Minor 11th or suspended notes etc. Major 7th #11 etc..Of course the music requires it to a certain extent but even with simpler music than Steely Dan, very lush harmonies and chords can be built. That is what makes a good harmony. But it does take understanding of music theory to get this happening properly. You need to always be aware of the chord progression that is running underneath and move those harmony notes around to suit. The inner lines need to move smoothly as well. Harmonies can NOT be made up on the spot. Sorry this is crap. Yes some singers can do it but all they do really is come up with is simplistic intervals and none of the serious stuff that can really create a lush harmony. One needs to sit down and work all these out first and then teach the individual lines to the singers that way.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/16 20:20:51
(permalink)
I think you're right, Jeff. To make a seriously good, moving and interesting harmony, it's going to take time to sit down and write it out. I'm sure you can get lucky, but we want consistency! I'm only at the very start of my harmony journey, but from my current readings and listenings, I have come to this interpretation - Parallel harmonies can make a vocal sound nice, but true, well written harmonies create emotion. Parallel can really only fill things out and make a vocal sound bigger, but it can't add that incredibly strong emotive feel you get with some complex chordal changes in very great harmonies. Would you agree with this assessment? As for making a vocal bigger, I remember reading that there is a perception that octaves and 5ths tend to sound very thin, due to similar harmonic content (yes?) However parallel 3rds tend to work much better and sound much bigger. As well as 4ths and 6ths I think. What say you on this idea? Another simplistic technique I remember reading was to start with main melody, 3rd, 4th and 6th and then make up your second harmony by choosing a combination of the 3rd, 4th and 6th and alternating between the three to create something new and variable. Literally going on what sounds 'right'. I guess this may be a simple approach for the person with limited music theory ability (me!)
|
whack
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1188
- Joined: 2007/10/27 04:15:03
- Location: Ireland
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/17 18:00:13
(permalink)
IMO I think one of my strongpoints are creating those lush harmonies your are talking about (not big headed, I suck in a lot of otherways!ha); I basically do a **** load of vocal takes (all separate, the different blends creates that wall of sound), and I mean doing a lower and higher octave takes of the original melody, lower and higher of one harmony and of a also of a second, I could end up with a minimum of 6. Obviously the harmony chosen has to be good. And then, but not as important, a good compressor, some reverb and a touch of high end boost. My 2 cents, Cian
|
haskins02
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2004/11/30 00:49:15
- Location: San Rafael (Marin County), California
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/18 14:19:06
(permalink)
Thanks for all the great advice! (Sorry it took me awhile to respond back.) I will give these methods a try on my next project. Also, one technique I have been using to get rid of excessive out-of-sync "s's" and "t's" at the end of words during vocal harmonies, is precise use of V-Vocal dynamics to remove or reduce them selectively. I'm sure one can adjust timing to achieve the same result or use both VV timing and dynamics. Greg
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/19 02:49:29
(permalink)
whack IMO I think one of my strongpoints are creating those lush harmonies your are talking about (not big headed, I suck in a lot of otherways!ha); I basically do a **** load of vocal takes (all separate, the different blends creates that wall of sound), and I mean doing a lower and higher octave takes of the original melody, lower and higher of one harmony and of a also of a second, I could end up with a minimum of 6. Obviously the harmony chosen has to be good. And then, but not as important, a good compressor, some reverb and a touch of high end boost. My 2 cents, Cian +1 ... Cian And a good Pre with good tubes helps for some vocs. Lush will always be pioneered ... via a lot of singing and experiments: So, per Cian, (for me) multitakes are key. So are dissonant counterpoint melodies ... if they feel right. I deal with humble choirs (of all ages) all the time ... and hope to learn more and more to manifest lush-harmonies ... publicly (as a song leader) and in the studio (recording songs) Singing intimately with the mic oft --> lush Noise-removal VSTs oft helps (get rid of 'some' of the white/pink noise) Melodyne is a close friend: Sweet non-robotic lush is quite do-able. Multi-octaves, a 5th above (iirc), whispers, soul-vocs, mic technique ... hearty singing, sincere singing, etc. sometimes succeeds. If my lush goal is to be like "Oooh Oooh Child" (Spinners irrc) I imitate the artist But most oft, lush-singing comes from a lush heart ... which I'm only blessed with 'part-time' -- haahhaha!
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/19 03:32:20
(permalink)
I remember reading once (still not personally tried it) that when writing counter melodies or harmonies, you should usually avoid ever singing an octave or a 5th from the main melody (this really only applies when it's a true counter melody). Reason being is that due to the similar harmonic content of octaves and 5ths, they tend to sound thin and not as full compared to a 3rd or 4th etc. So you can supposedly get instances in which the vocal appears to drop out if a 5th or an octave crosses over. If it's in an octave or 5th the whole time, it's fine though as nothing is changing. And of course a 2nd or 7th will often sound weird, but if you want that sound it might work for effect. As well as the 5th thing. Just something to be aware of. I am personally yet to experiment with it and see if what I read is true. If all that is true, counter melodies should supposedly work best in general if they are 3rd, 4th or 6th from the main melody line. I touched on this in my above post, just elaborating a little ;) Anyone experienced this at all? If it's just a parallel harmony then a 5th or octave should work fine.
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/06/19 09:25:01
(permalink)
This is something I have worked on for a long time...and my results still fall well short of what I would like to achieve. But I do seem to be getting better results by working on this and experimenting with varying techniques as I read threads like this one. Layers are very important as are the levels of those layers and of course the FX applied. IMHO you should never clone the tracks. record again, and again as needed. Use melodyne to get the notes correctly on pitch. Even the good singers who sound like they are dead on all the time have their studio stuff touched up. Singing well solo is one thing, and it's easy (for some to do) but when you throw in a few harmony singers, everyone has to be dead on to sound good. When you have layers of harmonies being on pitch is a must. Start allowing a few notes here and there and before long you have a mess getting started. One singer in a harmony group of 4 or 5 singers that is off pitch slightly, sticks out like the proverbial sore thumb. In a studio, you have the time and tools to get it right. I also agree that many good singers can sing on the spot nice harmonies..... but..... taking the time to work out the parts will yield better results. Use more then the obvious major 3rd/5th harmonies. Listen to the Eagles for harmonies that are rich and colorful. I have begun to use a piano to work out vocal harmony parts. My ear hears the simple harmonies when I'm singing but I tend then to double to the octave which sounds OK but in reality is nothing short of boring. To get the colorful parts, I must play the notes, already sung and what I want to sing on the keys...then I can isolate the new parts, learn them quickly and punch them in as needed. You do not really need to have dozens of layered voices to have full, fat, lush sounding vocals. A few good tracks, all singing the proper notes in tune, with colorful cord harmony, and a touch of verb, and you can have heaven on earth. Just go see a good vocal band live to know this is true. There is also the perfect balance between not enough layers and too many layers. Not enough and it sounds thin..... to many and it sounds like a freaking choir behind you. Experiment and see what works for you and what doesn't. Understand too that the commercial CD's you buy are produced in the best equipped studios with experienced people........and the big bands and singers hire the best engineers money can buy and that experience makes a difference.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
Rus W
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 541
- Joined: 2010/11/04 00:09:34
- Location: North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/01 19:06:12
(permalink)
I concur. I'd say when trying to harmonize vocally, work it out on an instrument first. Most do it with the melody, so why not? And yes, adding those "color" tones and using different voicings works wonders. As I said, try this out on a piano. (Of course, this depends on the kind of sound you want) On the part-writing thing (which is what some are alluding to) it's all about motion. When it's said that perfect unisons, fifths an octave aren't recommended (though that's not really "fair" with a m/f duet. lol), what this means is that two parts (most importantly the bass and soprano) can sing a fifth (C-G), but can't sing (D-A, E-B, etc. in the next incriment.) because they're still a fifth apart. Granted, this seems odd when building 7ths on up to 13ths from scales because, the first & third notes are a fifth apart as are the second & fourth. The exception would be the 11th because you need to alter them (raise usually to get the P5 interval (between the 7th and 11th (the altered 11th is colored purple) CMaj7 or CMaj9 (one more note added, but the third & fifth notes are a fifth apart) Find all the Perfect 5th intervals CMaj7 ( 9) - C- E- G- B-D-(F#)-A Dm7 - D- F- A- C-E Em7 - E- G- B- D-F# FMaj7 - F- A- C- E-G G7 - G- B- D- F-A Am7 - A- C- E- G-B Bm7b5 - B- D- F- A-C (not Ab) Now, chords can be sung like that, but when written (if checked), it's a no-no. However, all the other intervals are acceptable - and use those that create dissonance to add more flavor, color - or - tension, The Major 7th, minor 2nd and tri-tone are the most tense intervals - even if something else is added, but they're less tense when something is added because it's make more sense to you and your ear. F#-C or C-F#. What is that? Well, that's either the obvious D7, but also: Ab/G#7; F#/Gb7b5; F#/Gbdim7 (dim7s can be flipped; thankfully, there's only three of these as they repeat themselves.) C(b5), C7b5, Cm7b5 and so on. The thing is for a tri-tone to exist the interval is either an augmented fourth (C-F# as in D7) or a diminished fifth (C-Gb as in C7b5) A major seventh in any position other than root - although still tense in that position because the top note wants to walk up to said root (8va). (Raise the fifth and it'll really want to do that. Actually, two notes want to walk accordingly - especially, if it's a cadence. G7 b9 (color tone)-C, Db7-C ( tri-tone substitution) or CMaj7 #5 (equivalent color tone; #5 = b9)-C. G-B-D-F-Ab; although a better resolution happens when it's written/played like this: (Notes that want to resolve are red; where they resolve is blue.) G- D- F-Ab-Cb -----> C- E-G-C (V 7b9-I) D- F-Ab-Cb -----> C- E-G-C (iidim7-I) Likewise, Db-F-Ab-Cb -----> C-E-G-C (bII (VI/iii)-I) C-E- G#-B -----> C-E- G-C (I-I: where the first I has an altered tone in it) This is pretty basic, but necessary to know (=/= to spit out) when working with harmony. Most already know it's my favorite part of music. How she moves is a big part of it and if you let her she'll move on her own.
post edited by Rus W - 2012/07/01 19:11:10
iBM (Color of Music) MCS (Digital Orchestration) "The Amateur works until he (or she) gets it right. The professional works until he (or she) can't get it wrong." - Julie Andrews
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 03:39:58
(permalink)
Rus W I concur. I'd say when trying to harmonize vocally, work it out on an instrument first. Most do it with the melody, so why not? And yes, adding those "color" tones and using different voicings works wonders. As I said, try this out on a piano. (Of course, this depends on the kind of sound you want) On the part-writing thing (which is what some are alluding to) it's all about motion. When it's said that perfect unisons, fifths an octave aren't recommended (though that's not really "fair" with a m/f duet. lol), what this means is that two parts (most importantly the bass and soprano) can sing a fifth (C-G), but can't sing (D-A, E-B, etc. in the next incriment.) because they're still a fifth apart. Granted, this seems odd when building 7ths on up to 13ths from scales because, the first & third notes are a fifth apart as are the second & fourth. The exception would be the 11th because you need to alter them (raise usually to get the P5 interval (between the 7th and 11th (the altered 11th is colored purple) CMaj7 or CMaj9 (one more note added, but the third & fifth notes are a fifth apart) Find all the Perfect 5th intervals CMaj7 (9) - C-E-G-B-D-(F#)-A Dm7 - D-F-A-C-E Em7 - E-G-B-D-F# FMaj7 - F-A-C-E-G G7 - G-B-D-F-A Am7 - A-C-E-G-B Bm7b5 - B-D-F-A-C (not Ab) Now, chords can be sung like that, but when written (if checked), it's a no-no. However, all the other intervals are acceptable - and use those that create dissonance to add more flavor, color - or - tension, The Major 7th, minor 2nd and tri-tone are the most tense intervals - even if something else is added, but they're less tense when something is added because it's make more sense to you and your ear. F#-C or C-F#. What is that? Well, that's either the obvious D7, but also: Ab/G#7; F#/Gb7b5; F#/Gbdim7 (dim7s can be flipped; thankfully, there's only three of these as they repeat themselves.) C(b5), C7b5, Cm7b5 and so on. The thing is for a tri-tone to exist the interval is either an augmented fourth (C-F# as in D7) or a diminished fifth (C-Gb as in C7b5) A major seventh in any position other than root - although still tense in that position because the top note wants to walk up to said root (8va). (Raise the fifth and it'll really want to do that. Actually, two notes want to walk accordingly - especially, if it's a cadence. G7b9 (color tone)-C, Db7-C (tri-tone substitution) or CMaj7#5 (equivalent color tone; #5 = b9)-C. G-B-D-F-Ab; although a better resolution happens when it's written/played like this: (Notes that want to resolve are red; where they resolve is blue.) G-D-F-Ab-Cb -----> C-E-G-C (V7b9-I) D-F-Ab-Cb -----> C-E-G-C (iidim7-I) Likewise, Db-F-Ab-Cb -----> C-E-G-C (bII (VI/iii)-I) C-E-G#-B -----> C-E-G-C (I-I: where the first I has an altered tone in it) This is pretty basic, but necessary to know (=/= to spit out) when working with harmony. Most already know it's my favorite part of music. How she moves is a big part of it and if you let her she'll move on her own. Ya waaaa????? I thought I was starting to get an ok grasp on music theory. Till now....
|
conripping
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24
- Joined: 2012/05/23 22:56:41
- Location: Chengdu
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 05:04:05
(permalink)
Mark this post, it is pretty helpful to me. I will learn some tips there!
|
Philip
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4062
- Joined: 2007/03/21 13:09:13
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 08:56:29
(permalink)
bitflipper To my mind, the epitome of "lush" is exemplified by Fleetwood Mac's song "Tell Me Lies". That particular effect was accomplished by triple-tracking each part and giving it all a 10K boost. There is also a pretty hefty dose of Lexicon on it. Pretty much the same method was used for 10cc's classic "Not in Love" as well as Queen's "Bohemian Rhapsody" (3 singers x 3 dubs). Really thick vocal harmonies requires lots of layers. If it's possible to fake it with doublers and choruses and such, I've certainly never found any such formula. [And I've tried, too. I even went as far as buying the Waves Doubler after hearing it was a favorite among many successful engineers -- save your money, it's useless.] Here's a trick I stumbled onto once. I'd sung four harmony parts and then double-tracked each part, for a total of 8 "me's". But it wasn't as fat as I wanted, so I started experimenting and ultimately ended up layering a synth vocal pad underneath. That actually worked surprisingly well. A casual listen does not reveal the fake choir, because your ear zeroes in on the real human voices riding above it. Another thing that almost goes without saying: compression. Heavy compression. You don't want anything to stick out when you've got a virtual choir going. Set the threshold way down low, so the compressor's always engaged, give it a 4:1 ratio or higher. I usually use the old Kjearhus Classic Compressor for this task, maybe because it works so well or maybe just years of habit, I'm not sure. (This is really helpful, IMHO!)
|
Rus W
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 541
- Joined: 2010/11/04 00:09:34
- Location: North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 10:11:36
(permalink)
mattplaysguitar Rus W Ya waaaa????? I thought I was starting to get an ok grasp on music theory. Till now.... I went overboard, sorry. I do that alot.
iBM (Color of Music) MCS (Digital Orchestration) "The Amateur works until he (or she) gets it right. The professional works until he (or she) can't get it wrong." - Julie Andrews
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 14:49:20
(permalink)
Rus W ..."the first & third notes are a fifth apart as are the second & fourth"... I must have misunderstood something. The first and third notes are a third apart, as are the second and fourth, yes? No?
|
Rus W
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 541
- Joined: 2010/11/04 00:09:34
- Location: North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 15:12:21
(permalink)
Chappel Rus W ..."the first & third notes are a fifth apart as are the second & fourth"... I must have misunderstood something. The first and third notes are a third apart, as are the second and fourth, yes? No? Yes, but I wasn't referring to scale degrees. I meant the notes themselves. Look again: C-E-G-B-D The first note (C) and third note (G) are a fifth apart. The second note (E) and fourth (B) are a fifth apart. The third note (G) and fifth note (D) are a fifth apart. Does that clear it up?
iBM (Color of Music) MCS (Digital Orchestration) "The Amateur works until he (or she) gets it right. The professional works until he (or she) can't get it wrong." - Julie Andrews
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 15:36:23
(permalink)
Rus W Chappel Rus W ..."the first & third notes are a fifth apart as are the second & fourth"... I must have misunderstood something. The first and third notes are a third apart, as are the second and fourth, yes? No? Yes, but I wasn't referring to scale degrees. I meant the notes themselves. Look again: C-E-G-B-D The first note (C) and third note (G) are a fifth apart. The second note (E) and fourth (B) are a fifth apart. The third note (G) and fifth note (D) are a fifth apart. Does that clear it up? I think I get what you're saying. "Notes" can mean a lot of different things depending on the context used. I usually think in terms of scale and chord degrees which are much less ambiguous. But then, I am easily confused.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 16:03:49
(permalink)
He's just saying that the interval between the first and and third note of the chord are a fifth apart. Here is the triad of a C Major chord: C E G I II III Here it is in relation to the C Major scale: C E G I II III C D E F G A B I II III IV V VI VII As you can the third note of the triad is the fifth note of the scale. For some reason that part of the post confused me too but rereading it I don't see a much better way to word it. I think I just needed more caffeine.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 16:06:22
(permalink)
Dammit. The forum screwed up my formatting. Hopefully you get the idea. Just imagine those notes lined up vertically or toss it in notepad and fix it.
|
Rus W
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 541
- Joined: 2010/11/04 00:09:34
- Location: North Carolina
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 16:40:27
(permalink)
^Well, in this case: In the CMaj9 chord: You beat me to it. Beepster = Roadrunner? lol) This next portion has to do with voice-leading which is also essential to getting good harmony. Probably referred to as Part Writing in Theory classes! (I had a hard time, too lol) Two voices can be a fifth apart from each other, but that interval can't be present as they voices progress from chord to chord. This progression: CMaj7-Dm7-Em7 (a rootless CMaj9) The bass could walk from C-E or he could walk up then walk back down (C-D-C) the Soprano could follow him (walk up E-G) or (E-F-E) or walk down (G-F-E; contrary motion) Then, you have the inner voices: The tenor could walk up from G-B; walk down B-G; or GAG himself as can the alto; however, you have to keep in mind the interval relationship between adjacent voices. If there is a parallel fourth, fifth or octave within the relationship found anywhere in the progression once it starts, then something has to be changed. It'll take alot of practice to get this. A great way to practice is to play series of chords using inversions. C-Am-F-G (I-vi-IV-V) C in second inversion (G-C-E) , Am in root position (A-C-E), F in first inversion (A-C-F) and G in first inversion (B, D, G) This allows you to walk up to C in root position (C-E-G). Of course, if I were to add the fourth voice: C in second inversion (G-C-E-*C) , Am in root position (A-C-E-*C), F in first inversion (A-C-F-*A) and G in first inversion (B, D, G-*B) This allows you to walk up to C in root position (C-E-G-*C). * = Soprano note The outer voices - bass went G-A-A-B-C; the soprano went C-C-A-B-C The inner voices - tenor went C-C-C-D-E; the alto went, E-E-F-G-G That is an example of good voice-leading - not to mention there being as little movement as possible with the hands and fingers which is what is being asked when talking about the voices and how they're supposed to move. This is of course, referring to choral music and while this guideline can be broken, if you pretend your fingers were those voices you realize how such should be followed.
post edited by Rus W - 2012/07/02 16:46:23
iBM (Color of Music) MCS (Digital Orchestration) "The Amateur works until he (or she) gets it right. The professional works until he (or she) can't get it wrong." - Julie Andrews
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re:Editing to Achieve Lush Vocal Harmonies
2012/07/02 17:05:58
(permalink)
Again, that's a lot to parse out but I think I get what you are implying. I'll bring it back down to three note chords with three singers and we will only move between two chords. If chord one contains two notes that chord two contains the two singers singing those notes in the first chord will continue singing the same notes on the second chord. Only one singer changes notes. The second chord will be a different inversion than the first chord. I just skimmed your post so I might be completely misinterpreting what you are trying to say. Are you formally trained Rus or did you learn this stuff on your own?
|