montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
I just finished Geoff Emerick's Recording the Beatles book. A good read. I got the impression that to get extra (non actual recording room) reverb they would play the recording inside an actual space and have a mic to record it in that space...like a reverb chamber. Anyone know if that's right? I imagined they would have different sized chambers for different kinds of reverb...and also different surfaces for the sound to bounce off...such as plate...but plates of what? Any old school reverb experts around?
|
jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21760
- Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
- Location: SW Scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/08 04:41:20
(permalink)
Jyemz Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
|
infohunter
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 17
- Joined: 2007/02/11 03:01:19
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/08 04:55:12
(permalink)
took the back off a Fender Twin Reverb in about 1970. Saw a spring( like a screen door spring - quite long, like the full width of the cabinet. They split the signal. Part going through normal circitry and the other part going through the spring. It wasn't really "reverb" it was more like a "delay" When a player bumped the amp the spring would shake and you could hear it outside. I you get my drift. But, it worked pertty good if you stayed away from the amp. Didn't like fender any how. I'm curious if there are any other methods that someone older than me. May be rooms & mic. arrangements were used. Musicians are fairly clevre....!! bye bye
|
infohunter
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 17
- Joined: 2007/02/11 03:01:19
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/08 04:57:15
(permalink)
can't spell 4 doggie doo tho
|
jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21760
- Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
- Location: SW Scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/08 05:02:33
(permalink)
I remember reading a long time ago about Simon & Garfunkel recording 'The Boxer' - that bit after 'Li La Li'...the massive reverbed 'BANG', apparently they recorded a snare drum at the bottom of a lift shaft - now that's what I call reverb!
post edited by jamesg1213 - 2007/08/08 05:09:34
Jyemz Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/08 07:10:51
(permalink)
Cool. What about these reverb chambers? Sounds like Abbey Road actually had rooms where they played the signal and allowed the room the act as a reverb generator, and then they recorded the resulting sound. I suppose they could treat their chamber...have is empty, or move baffles or dividers in there or whatever for different amounts of reverb. But wouldn't adding reverb by playing the original track in the room and recording it again to get the reverb mean that is becomes a 2nd gen track then?
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/08 11:09:54
(permalink)
Hi Montezuma I'd heard the same thing you mention about the dedicated reverb rooms the Beatles [amongst others] had used when recording - I've found a WEBSITE that mentions the book you just read, here's one of the quotes from there: Today, effects like delay are easily achieved with off-the-shelf equipment costing a few hundred dollars at most. At the legendary Abbey Road studio, where many of these effects were pioneered, armies of technicians used enormous rooms to literally bounce the sound off walls. Infohunter, I once owned a JSM solid state 50W combo that had a reverb spring inside like the one you mention - bashing the top of it produced a wonderful booming sound ideal to start any Motorhead cover!
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/08 15:40:19
(permalink)
And what about the 2nd generation copy, if that's how they did get reverb? Or would they route the live performance via the reverb room and then onto tape?
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/09 12:10:37
(permalink)
MZ - I've tried looking everywhere for the answer to that! However, looking at the studio equipment they used during the years [good article here> The Evolution of Beatles' Recording Technology], I would imagine that earlier on, when they were basically playing live using ten microphones into a two track, the only way to get the reverb would be to capture it live in the room in which the amp was situated. The article also mentions that they used a 4-track in 1963 with tape hiss problems caused by bouncing tracks - I should imagine room reverb was still used live in that situation to lessen the problem by not introducing a second generation signal. I'll carry on looking MZ, and I'll post up any more concrete info as soon as I find any. Steve PS - The link is to a cached page, the correct address won't open for some reason.
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/09 15:39:47
(permalink)
Thanks Steve...I've been looking as well, but haven't found anything yet. The Emerick book seems to suggest that there were actual rooms or chambers where the signal/ track was run through...but the book didn't say whether the signal was run through live and recorded inside the chamber or if it was recorded straight to the console/ tape and then played back into the chamber to add reverb. I kind of got the impression it was played back,just from what I read.
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/13 10:25:55
(permalink)
Hi MZ I've posted a question regarding this discussion on a Beatles FORUM - so far no replies but I left a link to this thread just in case someone knows anything. Steve
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/15 04:01:24
(permalink)
Hey thanks Steve...sorry mate...hadn't noticed you reply here! I'll follow that link and keep tabs on it. It's not really important, I'm just interested. But thanks :)
|
DRHollingsworth
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 821
- Joined: 2006/11/10 16:25:42
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/16 01:03:45
(permalink)
I've been perusing some pictures of the Beatles recording session for Sgt. Pepper at Abbey Road from a recent magazine article and some books I have about the Beatles.. The recordings were done in studio 2 which appears to have a lot of space and height in it, judging from the pictures. I'm thinking that a lot of the reverb may have been a result of the room being acoustically active. In a write up in a recent Guitar World article Geoff Emerick mentioned that Revolver was recorded in Studio 3 where the room was acoustically dead, and that studio 2 was preferred for pop recordings as the room was acoustically live. I read that to be having natural reverberation. It was the primary reason that Studio 2 was selected for Sgt. Pepper. I noticed at the Abbey Road Studios web site that the Studio 1 is 456 Sq Meters, Studio 2 is 190 Sq Meters, and Studio 3 is 47 Sq Meters. I imagine that the room dimensions have not changed over the last 40 years but the acoustical treatment has. I can't see recording a playback of a single track to add reverb as there would be problems induced by the tape machines running at different speeds even though you could adjust them (they used vari-speed tape machines). The tape machines had a tendency to loose their sync speed even after a few minutes. (Just listen to the Strawberry Fields yul here a tempo change and shift from A# to a quarter step up in pitch about mid song).
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/16 03:34:27
(permalink)
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/16 07:13:48
(permalink)
Hi guys Just checked the beatles forum where I asked the question - no replies as yet. I'm not holding my breath though - the forum I posted in has only had eight posts since May, and only two of those got any replies at all!! Steve
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/16 16:00:07
(permalink)
|
Randy P
Max Output Level: -44.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3070
- Joined: 2006/11/17 11:02:45
- Location: smokin with the boys upstairs....
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/16 16:41:08
(permalink)
I have seen photos of ehco chambers, but I cant remember where. They were rectangular in shape, about 4 feet tall and 20 feet long or so. They had steel plates suspended somehow, and were miked. It's been awhile since I saw these photo's, but they do exist. Randy p.s. If you google "plate reverb" and then click "images" you can see some images of plate reverbs.
post edited by rsp@odyssey.net - 2007/08/16 16:54:03
http://www.soundclick.com/riprorenband The music biz is a cruel and shallow money trench,a plastic hallway where thieves & pimps run free and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side. Hunter S. Thompson
|
DRHollingsworth
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 821
- Joined: 2006/11/10 16:25:42
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/17 00:17:18
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: montezuma Hey check this out...I don't have time to read it all right now, but it looks like some good info, for anyone interested. Some fella even has a photo of him and his mate INSIDE the echo chamber at Abbey Road studio 2! http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showthread.php?t=123396 Both of the threads regarding the echo chamber at Abbey road 2 were a good read and provides a good description of what an echo chamber is and how it operates. I wonder if someone has taken an impulse response of it. I'll do a search and see what comes up. Shall I post what I find for those of us using impulse response convolution reverbs?
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/17 01:14:01
(permalink)
Sure you should. Would be interesting. btw..what do you mean by 'impulse response'?
post edited by montezuma - 2007/08/17 01:22:02
|
DRHollingsworth
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 821
- Joined: 2006/11/10 16:25:42
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/19 05:02:57
(permalink)
An impulse response is a recording of a circuit (electronic) or of a room's acoustical signature to replicate the room dynamics for the use of reproduction. The way I understand it (in recording a room's dynamics) a high quality mic and preamp are ported into a computer running impulse response recording and analysis software in the room in the location to be recorded. A sharp sound akin to a starters gun is used to create the sound for determination of the rooms acoustical signature from the location of the recording. This data of the room's acoustical signature can then be replicated and loaded in to a convolution impulse response reverb to recreate the room dynamics exactly or very close to as it would sound if you were recording in that room. It's a real good way of getting the reverb acoustics you are looking for without actually having to be at the location. I use SIR impulse response reverb rather than some of the ones I got with my Cakewalk software. Not to say what is there isn't good, it is. But I find that I like to replicate environments. The draw back is impulse response reverbs have a tendency to eat up chunks of processor power. I usually see an up tick of 5-10% in processor usage per instance so I have a tendency to bridge it across the Aux or Bus in Sonar. I haven't found the Abbey Road studios Reverb Chamber as an impulse response. But I am looking for reverb chambers in general now.
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/19 10:59:25
(permalink)
Thanks for the info Doc. So you reckon a software reverb may boast the Abbey Road echo chamber one day? I've used some freeware verbs on occasion and could never think of a logical use for 95% of their presets. Things like 'Stadium', 'Canyon'...even some of the halls and theatres sound way, way too huge for reasonable use. What do you reckon Doc?
|
KenB123
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1229
- Joined: 2006/08/16 12:02:50
- Location: Illinois, U.S.A.
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 08:48:22
(permalink)
I just watched the DVD "Les Paul: Chasing Sound!" Les and his wife, Mary Ford, would record in their home, or even on the road. At one point in the documentary, there is a brief tour of the home where some reminiscing was done about where some songs were recorded. Les searched for the best room/hallway/bathroom to acquire the sound and reverb effects he wanted. For one song, Mary Ford actually sang it in the kitchen. I guess my point is, in trying to keep it in topic, is that the experimenters (e,g, Les Paul, Beatles/Geoff Emerick), will find their reverbs should they not have a commercially developed alternative available. By the way, the Emerick book is excellent (was sad when I finished it). The Les Paul DVD is also excellent, especially if you wish to learn more about this innovator and truly exceptional guitarist.
post edited by KenB123 - 2007/08/20 08:49:07
|
yep
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4057
- Joined: 2004/01/26 15:21:41
- Location: Hub of the Universe
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 09:43:48
(permalink)
Reverb chambers were commonplace in the old days, and everyone had their own "recipe" or design. Before digital, reverb basically either came from actual spaces such as chambers or running the signal through a metal plate or spring. There are thousands of stories of famous sounds coming from recording a playback in a stone stairwell or a bathroom or hallway or whatever. Yes, you lose a generation but if it sounds good, who cares? Cheers.
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 10:52:32
(permalink)
Les Paul and Mary Ford did that long before the Beatles. They had a mobile recording rig and would try hallways at the different houses they stayed at on the road. Each one had it's own sound. Best I remember at Abby Road they had special halls (chambers) just for that and they were tiled for max. effect. Before digital there were many attempts to get time based effects. Springs, plates, chambers, tape, analog (delay line) electronics, all kinds of things were tried.
|
DRHollingsworth
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 821
- Joined: 2006/11/10 16:25:42
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 13:15:25
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: montezuma Thanks for the info Doc. So you reckon a software reverb may boast the Abbey Road echo chamber one day? I've used some freeware verbs on occasion and could never think of a logical use for 95% of their presets. Things like 'Stadium', 'Canyon'...even some of the halls and theatres sound way, way too huge for reasonable use. What do you reckon Doc? I have tendency to agree with you there. When the room gets too big it goes from being an effect to special effect. I guess you could say beyond reasonable usage. The nice thing about IR (impulse response) reverbs is that you can load in real room dynamics from concert halls, recording studios, venues, etc. It makes for a more "real environment." With SIR you can actually tailor the wet to dry mix, attack and decay, and duration envelope of that and get the desired response traits you are looking for. I have some where close to a gig of IR's that I can chose from. And the nice thing is that some of them are multiples of the same room with different "listening" locations within the room. This alone changes the dynamics of the reverb. I would hope that in the future someone will go as far as to make IR readings of some of the better known studio's around the world as well as things like echo chambers at these very same studios and make them publicly available. That would be a great tool to use in trying to replicate the older sounds. I definitely would pay a reasonable price for those of they weren't public access!
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 13:15:33
(permalink)
Even today it's still used. If you watch the making of stuff on the Lord of the Rings EE DVDs, there are a set of concrete bunkers outside of Wellington, connected by concrete tunnels, and so they have like this uber reberb tail. The sound guys took speakers up there and mics, which they'd place at varying distances down the tunnel, and play back some of their sounds and record them to create huge ambience.
|
DRHollingsworth
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 821
- Joined: 2006/11/10 16:25:42
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 13:35:52
(permalink)
MZ, I found an IR library of reverb chambers at digidesign and downloaded them. I'll check them out over the next few days and let you know what's in the package and how they sound with a dry drum kit.
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 14:24:50
(permalink)
I have been inside a few of these reverb rooms. One particular was actually the inside of a pyramid. They had mics at each point of the pyramid and monitors as well. The monitors were 10 inch boxes with a tweeter, not a horn. They could vary the depth by moving the speakers, the mics or just using a different mic, speaker combo. The walls were smooth as glass with high acrylic surfaces painted many times. I think they had a gloss coat on top of the paint as well. The whole pyramid was about 30 feet high and there was a small door at the base for entering. This was off to the left of the main mixing room and down some stairs. The pyramid base was in the basement and the thing rose up to 2 floors overall. Another chamber I experienced was a room with 4 walls but no two walls were parallel and none all of the walls had the same size. Also had a high gloss finish with a mic at one end and a speaker at another. Blackbird Studios in Nashville has a multifloor chamber in which the base is an elevator floor. They can resize the room for whatever room size they wish. Speakers at one end, the mics at the other. Somewhere at Gearslutz somebody took a tour and had some pictures. I couldn't find it just now but give it a shot.
|
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5147
- Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
- Location: Mountain View, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 14:36:44
(permalink)
A great reverb chamber might be a racketball court. I haven't played in a couple decades but I remember back when we'd sometimes go play some racketball, and the requirement for all hard floors and surface, plus a glass rear wall on the courts we went to would create an incredible echo effect. When you are playing and yelling back and forth, the echoes would build up on top of each other to just a complete roar, going on and on.
|
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2520
- Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Emerick - Recording the Beatles - Reverb chamber
2007/08/20 15:56:17
(permalink)
Fascinating info. You would want to have some pretty pristine speakers to play your original sound on in the echo chamber, for it to hold quality when recorded. I guess reverb can help to mask any imperfections. An amazing, to me, insight into reverb the way it was.
|