Extending Gen MIDI Velocity-Sensitive (or not) 128 Increment Boundary

As a drummer/arranger/VERY Experienced MIDI programmer going back to '88, I've noticed that the worse shortcoming of MIDI sounding like non-human robotic MIDI is NOT the linear quantization, as all the "experts", and "talking heads" proclaimed in the early days of MIDI.  Rather, it's the robotic vertical velocity-sensitive issue that, quite frankly, makes me break out in hives, even when a good drummer is playing a $5k Roland kit.  Having said that, it appears the fundamental issue here is taking the same 128-increment depth of velocity we have now, and chopping it into 1024 increments; or as we have the stnd 120 increments between a beat that can be extended to 960.
 
So, while I'm no geeky developer, the reason I'm posting it here is I know of the corporate partnership Cakewalk has with the other industry, and MIDI protocol leader, Roland Corp., and I'm just wondering with these two heavy weights if this issue can be revisited, and restructured so as to keep MIDI an even more viable musician's tool.
 
Just wanted to put this in the "...Just sayin'..." column.
KC

HD MIDI! WOW! That sure makes sense! I had no idea I was touching such a viable nerve. So, how do you think the people should revolt?  I know it took a HUGE boot up Roland's crack to get them off the fence back in the 80's.  I also put this post on Craig Anderton's forum on Harmony Central.
KC