FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS

Author
cccrna
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11
  • Joined: 2005/03/10 08:58:51
  • Status: offline
2005/03/24 21:25:33 (permalink)

FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS

Does anyone have any thoughts on Tascam FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HD. I'm changing to a laptop to be able to record live and am looking at these two interfaces.
Thanks.

HP m7060n
Intel Pentium 4 630 Processor
Sonar 2XL
MOTU Traveler
Behringer Powerplay Pro-XL
#1

7 Replies Related Threads

    johndale
    Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3228
    • Joined: 2004/03/02 15:11:37
    • Location: Red Bluff, California
    • Status: offline
    RE: FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS 2005/03/24 21:45:06 (permalink)
    I had very bad luck with Tascams support. On the other hand I have a Moyu micro express MIDI interface, their support is excellent. I'd go Motu anyday....................JDW
    #2
    cccrna
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11
    • Joined: 2005/03/10 08:58:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS 2005/03/24 22:54:10 (permalink)
    with the motu i would lose midi in/out. would i then use another interface for midi?

    HP m7060n
    Intel Pentium 4 630 Processor
    Sonar 2XL
    MOTU Traveler
    Behringer Powerplay Pro-XL
    #3
    kfischer
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 452
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:57:40
    • Location: Temple, Texas
    • Status: offline
    RE: FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS 2005/03/24 23:00:04 (permalink)
    I went with the FW, but if you're thinking of hauling it around to remote sites I'd probably lean to the MOTU. I have not had issues with Tascam... I think the FW is the bees knees. But it's rather large and not road-worthy construction. It's leave-it-on-your-desk construction.

    Depending on your need, there are tons of USB midi interface options.
    #4
    johndale
    Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3228
    • Joined: 2004/03/02 15:11:37
    • Location: Red Bluff, California
    • Status: offline
    RE: FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS 2005/03/25 06:10:46 (permalink)
    Well you can give yourself a couple of MIDI ln/outs for under $60. Tascam support when I dealt with them had Creativitis. I had the US428 which was early USB audio and there were issues, so I had to deal with support and I really didn't receive much. Motu on the other hand answer their Emails and you get someone with knowledge when you call. And I think Motu also stays on top of their drivers better. Because you know we are all gonna be going thru some driver trips with the change to 64 bits over the next 2 years....................JDW
    #5
    daverich
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3418
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 05:59:00
    • Location: south west uk
    • Status: offline
    RE: FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS 2005/03/25 06:14:32 (permalink)
    The tascam unit does look very nice.

    Personally however I would go for a Fireface and a Behringer BCF2000. - In fact I did ;)

    Kind regards

    Dave Rich.

    For Sale - 10.5x7ft Whisperroom recording booth.

    http://www.daverichband.com
    http://www.soundclick.com/daverich
    #6
    boMorger
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7
    • Joined: 2005/02/10 21:33:32
    • Status: offline
    RE: FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS 2005/03/27 21:53:00 (permalink)
    I have the motu 896HD and I'm very happy with it but! You will get some error messages when trying to go to 96 kHz/24 bit mode using WDM and sonar. It will record in this mode but you have to ignore the messages. Forget about anything higher than that in recording mode. It is a high end mixer with no digital interface at 172.4 and 192 kHz. Just audio I/O there. I haven't had much success getting anybody to care about the error messages saying that this device doesn't support the 96 mode. I have a friend with the 828mkII and he gets the same nonsense. It's a well built unit and I use it for live recordings with my laptop. I thought about the presonus firepod but at the time it wasn't available. It looks like a better bang for the buck but I've never used it. I just bought a 828mkII to add the extra features and channels it has and it interfaces with the 896HD so easily through the firewire. Read between the lines with the 896HD, it's only good up to 96 kHz like almost everything else out there on firewire. Depending on your recording needs the RME fireface 800 looks interesting! I already have to much invested in motu at this time for me and a DM-24 to figure out.
    #7
    jyoung
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 483
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 19:57:36
    • Location: Oregon
    • Status: offline
    RE: FW1884 vs MOTU 896 HS 2005/03/27 22:25:07 (permalink)
    I'm very happy with my FW-1884 but I would not consider it as a portable solution. It's far too bulky to be breaking down and setting up on a regular basis.
    #8
    Jump to:
    © 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1