FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
mdbatchelor
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 35
  • Joined: 2004/10/21 21:28:36
  • Status: offline
2011/09/17 10:30:02 (permalink)

FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7

I've been using Sonar since 1.x, and I'm writing here to express my complete displeasure with Sonar X1 Studio. I was really looking forward to some very cool features, and instead, I find Sonar X1 to have made a quantum leap backward in usability. Patches and banks end up with unintelligible names, I'm constantly fighting with the cursor to make it do what it's always done naturally in the past, and I'm continuously having to go multiple levels deep for menus that were easily located before. I'm a software engineer by trade (my day job) and I work with Sonar on the weekends for the pleasure of arranging and orchestrating music. After giving this a go for more than three weekends, I'm finished. I wish I had a way to get my $$ back. Be warned all you potential upgraders, be warned. Sonar X1 is a colossal failure when it comes to usability - something I value in a DAW. Thanks for your time.
post edited by mdbatchelor - 2011/09/17 10:31:14
#1

71 Replies Related Threads

    offnote
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 860
    • Joined: 2011/09/12 10:39:26
    • Location: Earth
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 10:41:58 (permalink)
    it's all sentiments and getting used to old versions - if you like me started using Sonar from X1 version you wouldn't complain because for me interface is very good and intuitive at least compared to other DAWs. Sometimes you have to 
    change your thinking and learn new ways of doing things, it can be rewarding in long run.  (and I'm software engineer too)
    #2
    LANEY
    Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1350
    • Joined: 2010/12/11 20:27:13
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 10:58:55 (permalink)
    Nicely put offnote!



    i7/16GB ram
    Win 7 x64
    SONAR Platinum Producer x64
    VS-700 C&R

    Octa-Capture and VS-100 for live recording
    #3
    Grumbleweed_
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 915
    • Joined: 2007/11/01 09:13:58
    • Location: Southampton, England
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 11:09:27 (permalink)
    grumbleweed4162


    I'm a Reason (and Record) user at heart so I've always started a track with Reason and then would use Sonar for my audio stuff and plug-ins, and then to master the track.  
    I have to say that these days I'm tending to boot up Sonar first. This may not mean much to some but it is a fundamental change in my way of working and says a lot about how X1 works (for me).  
    I won't drop Reason but I just wanted to express my appreciation for how Sonar has turned out. 


    From a thread I started a day or two ago. I'm starting to feel I'm one of the few who have come around and embraced X1. 
    It's a pity its birth was poorly done but it's fine now. 

    Grum.

    Grumbleweed on Soundcloud
    Grumbleweed on Bandcamp
    Grumbleweed on Soundclick

    Windows 10 Pro (64 bit), 3770K i7, 8 GB ram, Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, Cubase 9.5, Reason 10, CbB.
    #4
    Robomusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8943
    • Joined: 2004/05/30 00:54:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 11:28:54 (permalink)
    I am a new Sonar, user, but an old Cakewalk fan. I started with Cakewalk Home studio 3.0, a floppy disk midi program. It was cool, and fun, but i found other ways to finish stuff. Then i bought Cakewalk Music creator 1.0, and learned that program, liked it, but it lacked any real good synths and had a few bugs, i bought MC 2003, and that was a bit better, and i bought a VSTi wrapper and was off to the races. Later bought MC 3, then 5. Both were cool programs, but truth told i got far more work done on a more obscure program called Multitrackstudio. Still have that, and it is solid, stable, and easy.

    I was going to buy MC 6 since it has the basic look of X1, but for $50 more i could buy Essentials. While I am just starting to wrap my head around the differences, i have to say so far it is a sweet ride. I have done several head to head mix downs with Reaper 4.02, (which i also have a license for) and so far Sonar has been just a tad better. The mix was just a bit easier to tame, and i have not had a crash yet, while i had one with Reaper that lost the project for me.

    The jury is still out, on the big picture, as I could upgrade MTS to the latest version, I can use Reaper, or use Sonar X1, or Use my RealBand from PG music. But either way i have a full tool box of toys to play with. If X1 keeps ticking like it has so far, I will upgrade to Producer some day and call it a day. Maybe on the Release of X2 or 3?!?!

    What the heck is this guy rambling about here, some are wondering.

    Well I am illustrating the key point here. They are all just tools to make music, use the one you like, and get happy with it, or use something else, we all have a ton of choices. If someone wants to go back to version 7 cool, if that what works for you. It's not big deal.

    If someone hates the GUI, or the feel of X1 cool pick a software that you like and make music.

    I get that the reason folks post there dissatisfaction is because the paid money for something and it is not what they wanted, needed, or expected. But hey that is life, nothing is perfect.

    The world needs more music and less fighting, and fussing. So make us some!

    I'd Seize the day but i can't quite reach it!

    http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?AID=33477&T=1260
    Music Town
    #5
    mdbatchelor
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 35
    • Joined: 2004/10/21 21:28:36
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 11:29:00 (permalink)

    I appreciate your point of view offnote, and forums posts and e-mail are notoriously bad at communicating tone. So I'll preface my remarks by saying that this is a reasoned position without defensiveness - if you could hear my voice saying these words, you'd agree... :D
    That said, I don't ever mind changing my way of doing things if, in the long run, the change will make me faster or improve things for me. However, some changes cannot be defended in my opinion. Like shortening patch and bank names from something readable to something unintelligible. Like the cursor that used to "know" what a click meant now not having a clue. Like burying things like removing menu items that were actually useful and hiding them underneath a series of clicks that aren't intuitive.

    I take your point that sometimes, a UI has to be reinvented. I appreciate your position too Grumbleweed - but at this point, I suspect you're not using Sonar in the way that I use it. If you were recording and creating Midi, using the Piano view to edit and create midi tracks for things like drum scores, you'd be as frustrated by the schizoid cursor too.

    No matter. I'm glad that others embrace X1. For me, it's all negatives, and no positives. Oh yeah - - - I'm not a stodgy old man resistant to change - I embrace change when it makes me better or faster. I hate change for the sake of change, and I hate regressions in usability.

    Thanks for listening! Marc
    post edited by mdbatchelor - 2011/09/17 11:31:11
    #6
    Mick Moreau
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 93
    • Joined: 2009/01/02 03:19:17
    • Location: Dallas
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 11:29:42 (permalink)
    Nope, I'm one of the embracers too.  The original OP obviously has something different running under the hood than we do for sonar not to work.  Since we dont have any specs of his system we cant really offer herlp other than to refer them to Cakewalk customer service.
     
    So far, mine is rock solid through X1c.
    #7
    offnote
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 860
    • Joined: 2011/09/12 10:39:26
    • Location: Earth
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 11:44:53 (permalink)
    mdbatchelor


     That said, I don't ever mind changing my way of doing things if, in the long run, the change will make me faster or improve things for me. However, some changes cannot be defended in my opinion. Like shortening patch and bank names from something readable to something unintelligible. Like the cursor that used to "know" what a click meant now not having a clue. Like burying things like removing menu items that were actually useful and hiding them underneath a series of clicks that aren't intuitive.

    I agree sometimes changes are made for sake of changing not for improving something. I recently switched to MS Office 2010 and I hated
    Microsoft because I couldn't find a thing on these new tab menus. It's all about tools and usability as you said and don't like wasting time for searching
    features we already knew they were in one place and now were moved or removed. In general users don't like drastic UI changes from my experience.
    Cakewalk should listen more to "old" users suggestions I believe, but again 10 people likes that and 11 don't so it's not possible to please everybody anyway. BTW I remember I hated MS Windows at some point because I was so accustom to Norton Commander in text mode 
    Now I mix both windows and text modes with confidence. 
    #8
    mdbatchelor
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 35
    • Joined: 2004/10/21 21:28:36
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 12:06:51 (permalink)
    Hey Mick,

    I'm not complaining about performance in any way - in fact, to X1's credit, it runs fine, no drop-outs, no BSOD, no crash, etc. No stability or performance complaints. All my complaints are around usability changes in keyboard shortcuts, disappeared menu items, the supposed smart-cursor that isn't so smart, and taking what used to be one or two click operations and turning them into multi-level click hunts or just plain frustrating controls.

    Midi example 1: Pan, key, gain, chorus and reverb were on the track in little track widgets - you could line them all up to analyze them across multiple tracks. Now, they're in the control bar at the left and you can't easily compare the chorus or reverb settings across 15 midi tracks.

    Midi example 2: Creating track envelopes and such now hidden behind a "Clips" -vs- Automation. Used to be, I could right click on a Midi track and create an envelope. Now, it's hidden and unintuitive.

    Midi example 3: To get to the patch browser, I used to be able to right-click on the patch ... boom, patch browser. Now, I have to find the Patch Browser... button in the control pane and click it there.

    Midi example 4: Patch name used to be legible - "Cpno:03 Dynamic Grand". Now, the patch name says "Cpno03Dynm". The bank used to say "11905-Roland SRX-02 Concert ...". Now, it says "1190502150". Really...

    These aren't just "learn the new way", these are clicks and actions that drag my focus away from what I'm doing, or make it impossible for me to read the selected bank or patch. I have to hunt for things instead of just getting to them.
    I didn't want this to come off as a rant, it's really not. I intended this to be feedback to the Sonar development team. This isn't based on the specs of my equipment, rather, it's based on my use cases. If you guys mainly use Sonar X1 for audio mastering and effects, I haven't really gotten their yet. I can't get past the fact that for heavy Midi users like myself, it's a gigantic leap backward.

    To Robomusic who says "If someone hates the GUI, or the feel of X1 cool pick a software that you like and make music. " - I'd say I have for many years picked (and payed for) Sonar. I have heavy investments in Sonar, both time and money, it's impractical to discard all that and spend time and money on a new tool. I expect an upgrade to have the 'up' part. At least mostly 'up'.
    Thanks for listening, and I'm really not ranting, raising my voice or fighting. Just trying to be a voice of possible change in the next version of Sonar.
    Marc
    #9
    Grumbleweed_
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 915
    • Joined: 2007/11/01 09:13:58
    • Location: Southampton, England
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 12:08:13 (permalink)
    mdbatchelor



    I take your point that sometimes, a UI has to be reinvented. I appreciate your position too Grumbleweed - but at this point, I suspect you're not using Sonar in the way that I use it. If you were recording and creating Midi, using the Piano view to edit and create midi tracks for things like drum scores, you'd be as frustrated by the schizoid cursor too.


    Actually the whole point of my original thread was that I've embraced the piano roll view in X1 to the extent that I'll use it to start a track using midi (I rarely (never?) start with audio) hence the big shift from starting with Reason which is (was when Reason 6 comes out) all midi.
    I'm getting to the age when learning new stuff gets hard (i.e. over 25) so the new stuff can be learnt if you put the time in, or just follow your nose to the most logical menu. Or read stuff here. Or get a video.


    Grum.


    Grumbleweed on Soundcloud
    Grumbleweed on Bandcamp
    Grumbleweed on Soundclick

    Windows 10 Pro (64 bit), 3770K i7, 8 GB ram, Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, Cubase 9.5, Reason 10, CbB.
    #10
    Mick Moreau
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 93
    • Joined: 2009/01/02 03:19:17
    • Location: Dallas
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 12:59:30 (permalink)
    mdbatchelor


    Hey Mick,

    I'm not complaining about performance in any way - in fact, to X1's credit, it runs fine, no drop-outs, no BSOD, no crash, etc. No stability or performance complaints. All my complaints are around usability changes in keyboard shortcuts, disappeared menu items, the supposed smart-cursor that isn't so smart, and taking what used to be one or two click operations and turning them into multi-level click hunts or just plain frustrating controls.

    Thanks for listening, and I'm really not ranting, raising my voice or fighting. Just trying to be a voice of possible change in the next version of Sonar.
    Marc

    Ah, now that makes a lot more sense in the grand scheme of what you are going through.  Sorry i misinterpreted your post.  There have been quite a few people that jump on here that scream how awful sonar is and they are quitting etc... leaving, DAW "X" is so much better ad nauseum that sometimes its hard to seperate the people that want help from the posers.
     
    I'm not an advanced user of Sonar by any means.  Mostly hung out in Sonar/Cakewalk "home" versions for so long and only recently made the jump to producer.  So far, the learning curve is a bit much but i'm older and its sometimes hard to learn new tricks (especially when all one wants to do is get on with the composing part).  So I use the manuals, online tutorials, the Garrigus books, and the threads here in the forums to hopefully get better at what I do and avoid some of the problems that you and others have discovered.
     
    Love the Sonar product for what its doing for me so far and wish that others could find solutions so that they can compose to ;)
     
    Me
    #11
    garrigus
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8599
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
    • Location: www.garrigus.com
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 13:57:34 (permalink)
    Mick Moreau
      So I use the manuals, online tutorials, the Garrigus books

    Thanks for the mention, Mick! Glad to hear you're still enjoying the books. 


    Scott

    --
    Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
    * Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
    * Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

    #12
    mdbatchelor
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 35
    • Joined: 2004/10/21 21:28:36
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 13:59:18 (permalink)
    Thanks Grumbleweed (and all others for your posts). To the "or just follow your nose to the most logical menu. Or read stuff here. Or get a video. ", all I'd have to say is this:

    Imagine you've been buying a new Toyota Corolla every year or so for the last 12 years. Imagine you just got your latest new and shiny Corolla, but inexplicably, Toyota put the parking break in the glove box, the turn signal indicator under the passenger seat, and the windshield wipers in the trunk. No matter what logic may have preceded their changes (shirts get caught on parking breaks, hardly anyone uses a turn signal anyway, and it never rains in sunny California), if you find yourself repeatedly needing those tools, no amount of videos you could watch or manuals you could read would ever make the dang thing usable.

    Alas, so it is with Sonar X1 for me anyway. But that said, when Sonar X2 comes out, instead of just buying it unseen, I think I'll go with a trial next time to see if fundamental usability things have been repaired.

    Thanks again all,

    Marc
    #13
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 14:00:23 (permalink)
    The thing with shrunken names for things is pretty horrid, I agree. I can see how it seemed like a good idea at the time, but it generates gibberish far too often.

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #14
    musicroom
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2421
    • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 14:26:36 (permalink)

    Be warned all you potential upgraders, be warned. Sonar X1 is a colossal failure when it comes to usability - something I value in a DAW. Thanks for your time.



    I do feel for you and you sound like a good fella. But I disagree! I do a lot of audio mixed with some midi, so maybe that is the source of our seeing this product differently. I've been doing this a long time as well. Sonar X1 is a lot diiferent than the 1 through 8.5 series of product, but in a much better way for the most part - MHO. Some work still left to do...   The cake folks were fairly up front about the big changes and offered us videos prior to purchase time. I really like this product now after taking time to redo my favorite template in x1. There is little to look back at in the previous Sonar versions. I've opened 8.53 a few times, but I can't see me wanting to work with that interface again. 

    post edited by musicroom - 2011/09/17 14:28:21

     
    Dave
    Songs
    ___________________________________
    Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



     
     
    #15
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 14:27:12 (permalink)
    mdbatchelor


    I've been using Sonar since 1.x, and I'm writing here to express my complete displeasure with Sonar X1 Studio. I was really looking forward to some very cool features, and instead, I find Sonar X1 to have made a quantum leap backward in usability. Patches and banks end up with unintelligible names, I'm constantly fighting with the cursor to make it do what it's always done naturally in the past, and I'm continuously having to go multiple levels deep for menus that were easily located before. I'm a software engineer by trade (my day job) and I work with Sonar on the weekends for the pleasure of arranging and orchestrating music. After giving this a go for more than three weekends, I'm finished. I wish I had a way to get my $$ back. Be warned all you potential upgraders, be warned. Sonar X1 is a colossal failure when it comes to usability - something I value in a DAW. Thanks for your time.

    Have I been sleep-writing posts under a pseudonym again? User since 1.0, check. Software dev by day, check. Seriously disappointed with X1, check. Are you sure you aren't me, md?



    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #16
    mdbatchelor
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 35
    • Joined: 2004/10/21 21:28:36
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 14:41:26 (permalink)
    Great question Bitflipper. I think I'm me most of the time, but I may have to perform a univariate analysis on self (or *this) to be sure.

    I'll be trying out Sonar X1 on my audio mix and checking on plugs next. I just used Sonar 7.x to get through all the Midi - perhaps the new plugs will work out fine. And no - I won't be saving on top of my working Sonar 7.x project...

    Marc
    #17
    offnote
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 860
    • Joined: 2011/09/12 10:39:26
    • Location: Earth
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 14:48:51 (permalink)
    mdbatchelor


     Imagine you've been buying a new Toyota Corolla every year or so for the last 12 years. Imagine you just got your latest new and shiny Corolla, but inexplicably, Toyota put the parking break in the glove box, the turn signal indicator under the passenger seat, and the windshield wipers in the trunk.

    and wouldn't it be fun if they did something like this in boring corolla or camry??? Innovation is priceless...
    #18
    ...wicked
    Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7360
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
    • Location: Seattle
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 15:24:02 (permalink)
    Well there's no getting around the fact that you have to make an adjustment in your workflow for X1. Good side is once you stop fighting it things do get better. I wrestled with the tools for a while but now I'm zipping along pretty good. 

    ===========
    The Fog People
    ===========

    Intel i7-4790 
    16GB RAM
    ASUS Z97 
    Roland OctaCapture
    Win10/64   

    SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
    billions VSTs, some of which work    
    #19
    Myuzishin
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 39
    • Joined: 2009/01/13 01:21:01
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 15:42:39 (permalink)
    I can understand your (and others, including mine sometimes) frustration with the GUI, MD. But I would point out that a multitude of things in the interface are quite tweekable, and with some clever manipulation of the views and menu selections you should be able to have just about anything you want right where you want it. I would dedicate a portion of one of your weekends (like I had to) to tweeking the interface to your liking, then you can concentrate on getting the most out of the program. X1 is incomparably improved over 7, and if your biggest gripe is the look of it and the menu/mouse methodology (enough to make you switch back? Really?) then you bought it for the wrong reason. Its a badass program. Seems a shame to just write it off like that, at least for the reasons you gave.

    V/R,

    Myu

    Obstacles are what you see when you take your eyes off the road

    MySoundClickPage
    #20
    trimph1
    Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6348
    • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
    • Location: London ON
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 15:44:01 (permalink)
    John T


    The thing with shrunken names for things is pretty horrid, I agree. I can see how it seemed like a good idea at the time, but it generates gibberish far too often.

    ...and if you are kinda new to this....weeeelllllll......

    The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

    Bushpianos
    #21
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 20:11:57 (permalink)
    I don't kn
    what the b
    is with the
    fx bin.



    You just hav
    remember
    the compres
    is #3


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #22
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 20:18:05 (permalink)
    Dave you do have a way with words. LOL

    Best
    John
    #23
    pbognar
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 720
    • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/17 21:50:58 (permalink)
    Robomusic


    I am a new Sonar, user, but an old Cakewalk fan. I started with Cakewalk Home studio 3.0, a floppy disk midi program. It was cool, and fun, but i found other ways to finish stuff. Then i bought Cakewalk Music creator 1.0, and learned that program, liked it, but it lacked any real good synths and had a few bugs, i bought MC 2003, and that was a bit better, and i bought a VSTi wrapper and was off to the races. Later bought MC 3, then 5. Both were cool programs, but truth told i got far more work done on a more obscure program called Multitrackstudio. Still have that, and it is solid, stable, and easy.

    I was going to buy MC 6 since it has the basic look of X1, but for $50 more i could buy Essentials. While I am just starting to wrap my head around the differences, i have to say so far it is a sweet ride. I have done several head to head mix downs with Reaper 4.02, (which i also have a license for) and so far Sonar has been just a tad better. The mix was just a bit easier to tame, and i have not had a crash yet, while i had one with Reaper that lost the project for me.

    The jury is still out, on the big picture, as I could upgrade MTS to the latest version, I can use Reaper, or use Sonar X1, or Use my RealBand from PG music. But either way i have a full tool box of toys to play with. If X1 keeps ticking like it has so far, I will upgrade to Producer some day and call it a day. Maybe on the Release of X2 or 3?!?!

    What the heck is this guy rambling about here, some are wondering.

    Well I am illustrating the key point here. They are all just tools to make music, use the one you like, and get happy with it, or use something else, we all have a ton of choices. If someone wants to go back to version 7 cool, if that what works for you. It's not big deal.

    If someone hates the GUI, or the feel of X1 cool pick a software that you like and make music.

    I get that the reason folks post there dissatisfaction is because the paid money for something and it is not what they wanted, needed, or expected. But hey that is life, nothing is perfect.

    The world needs more music and less fighting, and fussing. So make us some!
    Hey Robo,



    I just checked out Multitrack Studio, and I while it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of X1, one thing did catch my eye in one of their forums - please check out the cello part near the end - see anything interesting?


    http://www.multitrackstudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1505


    And this is a $119 piece of software
    #24
    MarkSwanson
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 23
    • Joined: 2007/02/04 10:32:09
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/18 08:12:38 (permalink)
    That's exactly the feeling I have when I work with MIDI under X1.  Every control and action seems to have changed.  I do OK with audio tracks and I don't mind the docking GUI stuff, but the way the piano roll works is absolutely the pits.  I have to continually guess at which cursor I should invoke to do something I used to get with a right click menu. 
    Mark
    #25
    trimph1
    Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6348
    • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
    • Location: London ON
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/18 08:36:05 (permalink)
    bitflipper


    I don't kn
    what the b
    is with the
    fx bin.



    You just hav
    remember
    the compres
    is #3
    mmmmm...I seem to remember something about T-Racks doing that with Logic...is this the same class of bug?

    post edited by trimph1 - 2011/09/18 09:42:07

    The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

    Bushpianos
    #26
    evansmalley
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 715
    • Joined: 2005/06/07 08:25:15
    • Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/18 09:38:35 (permalink)
    I'm a huge supporter of Cakewalk- best company ever! But I agree that X1 was NOT an improvement for me- definitely worse! I'm one for lobbying Cakewalk to offer an improving, legacy version of 8.5! It's just a much easier to use and easier to look at GUI. For me. 

    I record clients for money! So what I need is a solid app that makes the act of recording audio easy. In 27 years of running a studio I've never had ANY client think about asking for a browser! If 8.5 got varispeed and one button locate points, I'd pay $500 for the upgrade without thinking about it! But after trying X1's GUI- it's just way less conducive to recording clients live. May have an advantage or 2 for sitting at a computer and tweaking other people's content... but I wouldn't be helped by that- I record "people"! 

    I mostly just don't like the new tools and all the gray! 

    I do recommend if you're sticking with the numbered, pre-X1 versions- that you upgrade to 8.5 while you still can! It is made for the newer windows version (7 and 64 bit) so it will be a huge advantage as you upgrade your computer. 

    Win7 Pro 64 bit sp1, i7-960 Intel processor, 8 gig RAM, SSD 64gig boot drive, Samsung F3 1TB D drive, nVidia Quadro 600 video card, Gigabyte X58A mobo, LG Blu-ray drive, 500 Gig E, F Drives, dual-monitors: 26" each, 2 X Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 ASIO hardware I/O's, Tascam US-428 control surface, Sonar 8.5.3 and X1 Producer, Avid Media Composer 5.0.4, Vintage 42-input Amek console, much outboard analog audio gear, acoustic world instruments, and noise toys! 
    #27
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/18 09:42:25 (permalink)
    It's... harder to record people because of all the grey...?

    I'm confused.

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #28
    trimph1
    Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6348
    • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
    • Location: London ON
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/18 09:43:18 (permalink)
    I guess it is the GUI he is on about.

    The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

    Bushpianos
    #29
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:FYI - I'm Downgrading from Sonar X1 back to Sonar 7 2011/09/18 09:43:55 (permalink)
    More seriously, what would you say has changed in terms of recording audio?

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1