bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
Replacing Q10, but with what?
OK, I think it's time to retire my Q10, but I'm not quite certain what to replace it with. Here is what I've narrowed choices to. 1. RME 9652 2. Sapphire Pro 26 I/O 3. PreSonus Firestudio Long term I want the ability to record 16 tracks simultaneously (on a rare occasion) so either of the Firewire interfaces would get me there right now ( I have a Digimax FS). RME has such a good rep. though and I could pick up another preamp to go along with it at some point. Here's my system (it's old but runs like a champ) Dual AMD 1600 MP 1 Gig Ram ADS firewire (TI chipset) Matrox G550 SB Audigy 1394 (DVD Encore chokes on the Q10) Thanks all for any input. Brett
|
rodreb
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what?
June 13, 07 9:53 AM
(permalink)
Hey! I'm in pretty much the same boat as you are with my setup, including the Aardvark Q-10! I'm also thinking about the Firestudio with an FS Digimax. It's pretty confusing trying to figure out what to get/what will be compatible with what. Also, I'm originally from Eldorado and remember Gettysburg very well!
|
bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what?
June 13, 07 10:05 AM
(permalink)
Small world! At the moment I am leaning towards the Firestudio, because I just found out that you can save settings and use it independent of the computer as a preamp, which would work great with my HD24 portable setup. It looks like the Sapphire can run effects for monitoring though and then I could ditch the mixer I use for monitoring. But then the RME has two MIDI I/O and with the digimax, it wouldn't change my physical setup at all. No perfect option and no truly bad options either. Errrrrr!!!!
|
rodreb
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what?
June 13, 07 10:31 AM
(permalink)
I haven't been back home in quite a while. I live in New Philadelphia, Ohio now. There used to be a pretty strong music scene around there considering the rural location. I've often wondered if it's still going strong and if anybody was into the recording scene at all. I've pretty much lost touch with everyone down there over the years. Rod L. Short
|
rodreb
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what?
June 15, 07 7:50 PM
(permalink)
Brett, Hi! I am leaning toward the Firestudio with a Digimax FS. I have had such a good experience with my Presonus Eureka and was very impressed with Presonus's Support ethics that I am really wanting to stay loyal to them if possible. According to the Presonus forum, there are some people having some issues with the Firestudio and Sonar 6. They are working on new drivers and expect to have that ironed out soon and, based on my experience with Presonus, I tend to believe them. Right now, I'm still using Sonar 4 and that doesn't seem to be effected. The Mackie 1200F looks real interesting. 12 pre's all in one unit, monitoring section w/ talkback, etc. Unfortunately, it has entered the realm of "vaporware". A lot of talk but still no product! I know there's also the MOTU stuff and the RME stuff which just adds to the confusion, eh? When I bought my Aardvark, I felt really good about the product and the Company. The Q-10 worked and sounded great for me, and the people at Aardvark were great, very responsive. Then, of course, they went out of business so, no new drivers or updates, or support, ever. It still works fine but, not much way to expand it's I/O thanks to the lack of ADAT I/O. I also bought the Tascam US-2400 control surface, which I absolutely love. Unfortunately, thanks to EU regulations, Tascam discontinued the US-2400 so, now when I upgrade my computer I have to stick with XP instead of Vista to assure that my control surface will still function. Of course from what I've heard, XP is still a pretty good way to go for a DAW...... for now, but I'm sure in the future Vista will be the way to go. Then it's decision time, again. I really hate all this updating/upgrading stuff. It's just impossible to keep up! I hate to sound like an "old fogey" but, it was so much easier back in the old analog days. You just bought stuff, hooked it up together and it all just worked! Imagine that!!! Sorry this is so long, I really didn't mean to write a book here! Please, keep me posted as to what you end up buying and how it all works out.
|
bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what?
June 15, 07 9:13 PM
(permalink)
When I bought my Aardvark, no one informed me that the drivers wouldn't work with a dual processor at the time so I wound up taking out one of my processor's for several months. I think they got driver for dual processor updated just in time to go out of business. So I was able to get both processors back in my computer, but there has always been some weirdness with the drivers -- not working right with vSampler, choking DVD Encore and once a session weirdness with Sonar. I haven't pulled the trigger yet, but it looks like I am going to give the FireStudio a go. If it works as advertized, the ability to use it as second set of preamps or line monitor in my HD24 setup will save me money and makes going remote easier.
|
chrysb93021
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 297
- Joined: 9/5/2004
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what?
June 18, 07 4:30 PM
(permalink)
It's been a while since I sold my Q10, but I replaced it with FF800 from RME. I've never looked back. It has all the expandibility I'll ever need with this system and more. Look to the future of your setup to see if the other interfaces mentioned have the capability to expand like the FF800. They update their drivers about every other month.
|
bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what?
June 18, 07 6:09 PM
(permalink)
The FF800 would be my first choice. It does bit more and I'm sure the software and support is better, but it's just too expensive for me right now. The Firestudio featureset is pretty comparable (at least for what I need in the foreseeable future).
|
bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 22, 07 11:45 AM
(permalink)
Got my FireStudio (Sweetwater had it to me in less than 24 hours of ordering it and that was with the free shipping) Here's my mini-review GOOD STUFF - Well constructed, the mixer software is a huge improvement over the Q10 (extremely flexible routing,9 available mixes), the preamps sound cleaner and gain control with knobs is also a big improvement over the software method with the Q10, Phantom power available for all mic inputs. BAD STUFF - BSOD in Sound Forge (reinstalled the drivers and seems OK now), BSOD if you turn off the unit or unplug the firewire while the drivers are in use, the mixer software was mind boggling to me for the first 1/2 hour and then merely confusing for the next 2, sample rate has to be changed manually Current Setup: Firestudio + Digimax FS Attached via ADAT. 6 Mixes defined (Control Room, Phones 1- 4, & FX Send (to Alesis Quadraverb). I reserved one set of Analog inputs for Stereo FX return, so there are 14 available Analog inputs. Software: Sonar 5 PE WinXP SP1. In Use: Did a quick session for a friend last night. Had one problem with audio speeding up after two takes and adding plugins. After rebooting had no more problems. The only different was that after rebooting, I didn't leave the Presonus Mixer utility open while using Sonar. Overall Impression: I think the mic pre's are slightly "cleaner" than the Q10 and the mixer utility is a huge improvement. With my setup I am able to have zero latency monitoring with FX and plenty of inputs without using an outboard mixer. I'm still a little bit nervous about the driver stability, new drivers are due out in the next few weeks though so I am hopeful that will be the final piece of the puzzle. Anyone looking for a used Q10?
|
rodreb
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 23, 07 1:28 AM
(permalink)
So, you took the plunge and got the Firestudio, eh? I really hope it works out great because, I'm still leaning toward the Firestudio myself. I like the price versus features, I have had very good experiences with Presonus and I like to try to stay loyal to companies that treat their customers right. I am a little concerned about the fact that just about everyone I've heard about seems to have had some issues with the Firestudio. Like you, I really feel that Presonus will get it all ironed out shortly. I hope so because I really want it to be my next interface, too. Please, keep me posted on how it works out. Rod L. Short
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 10/28/2006
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 23, 07 6:00 AM
(permalink)
|
bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 23, 07 8:31 AM
(permalink)
Cj, The firepod looks good but you can't add additional inputs via adat like the firestudio unless you daisy chain additional firepods and AFAIK, it can't be used as a standalone preamp, both of which were the deciding factors in my decision to get the firestudio. BTW the 2 sends for outboard effects are only channels 1 & 2 pre-converter. That's not to useful to me, cause the only thing I might use that for is limiting/compressing and since I always record at 24 bit that would be almost never. If you want to monitor to with outboard FX, you have to sacrifice a chanel or two or use an outboard mixer. PS: Presonus is coming out with a six channel headphone mixer that looks sweet. It's has a talkback mic input built into it. That's such an obviously useful feature, I don't know why I've never seen it before. Rod, From what I've read on the Presonus forums, the updated drivers which are due out soon (within weeks) will take care of the Sonar issues. I hope it takes care of the issues I've had in CD architect and DVD encore as well.
post edited by bpclark - June 24, 07 4:43 PM
|
rodreb
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 24, 07 12:08 AM
(permalink)
Just curious...... What version of SONAR are you using? As of now, I'm still using SONAR 4. Until I update my system, I just don't think updating SONAR is going to help me out that much. (Not sure if my system as it is can handle it) Also, I see you bought from Sweetwater. Just thought I would add that I have had nothing but great service from Sweetwater and Bob Mondock in particular. Again, wishing you the best experience with the Firestudio and still thinking this is probably the way I'm going to go.
|
rodreb
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 24, 07 12:32 AM
(permalink)
PS Did you get your free MSR-1 remote? You're suposed to get one free with any Firestudio purchase through August 31st. I'm hoping to buy during that time myself. That's a pretty good deal.
|
bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 24, 07 4:41 PM
(permalink)
The MSR-1 looks great, but you have to buy the Firestudio AND Cubase 4 to get it "free". PS: I'm using Sonar 5 PE
post edited by bpclark - June 24, 07 4:48 PM
|
rodreb
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
June 30, 07 11:38 AM
(permalink)
Brett, Just wondering how it's going with the new Firestudio.
|
bpclark
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 275
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Gettysburg, OH
- Status: offline
RE: Replacing Q10, but with what? UPDATE:Presonus FireStudio
July 05, 07 9:09 PM
(permalink)
I'm where I was last time I posted with it. I was out of town for a week and had some minor oral surgery this morning so I haven't had much of a chance to work any more with it. I'm gonna try to get Presonus beta drivers next week to try if they haven't gotten the new out by then. Otherwise I'm gonna exchange for the RME Hammerfall and see how that goes.
|