Ed Evans
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 89
- Joined: 2003/11/09 12:52:34
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
Converter and External Clock Recommendations
I will be buying 16 channels of ADC in the near future. My budget is around $3,000-3,600. I think I have it narrowed down to either the Lynx Aurora16 or the Apogee AD16X. In addition I’d be willing to spring for a Black Lion Audio MK2 clock ($475). I like the idea of the Aurora because it has both AD/DA conversion. The common criticism heard is that it has a thin sounding bottom end. However, it’s also commonly heard that a good clock (like Big Ben $1,350) brings out the bottom end. The Apogee certainly has a good reputation… seems more like the “sure thing†although the mid highs are probably not quite as clear as the Aurora16. My biggest concern (aside from good quality ADC) is not losing the bottom end. I’d love to hear some comments about peoples experience with these, espeically with a good clock. Thanks! Ed
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/10 12:46:49
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Ed Evans I will be buying 16 channels of ADC in the near future. My budget is around $3,000-3,600. I think I have it narrowed down to either the Lynx Aurora16 or the Apogee AD16X. In addition I’d be willing to spring for a Black Lion Audio MK2 clock ($475). I like the idea of the Aurora because it has both AD/DA conversion. The common criticism heard is that it has a thin sounding bottom end. However, it’s also commonly heard that a good clock (like Big Ben $1,350) brings out the bottom end. The Apogee certainly has a good reputation… seems more like the “sure thing†although the mid highs are probably not quite as clear as the Aurora16. My biggest concern (aside from good quality ADC) is not losing the bottom end. I’d love to hear some comments about peoples experience with these, espeically with a good clock. Thanks! Ed I would go with the Lynx Aurora. I don't think an external clock will be needed with that one. If you want a different "tone" like a different sound at the low end to that in mastering. Don't expect your converters to alter tone. In fact with the amount of compression used in todays masters a true flat sound should translate better. Most mixes are a little heavy in the low end now. I've noticed I can't turn up the volume on my car stereo with newer CDs because the low end (kick, etc.) is too much for the speakers. With older CDs like classic rock stuff I can crank the hell out of it and it all gets loud evenly.
post edited by ohhey - 2009/06/10 12:59:41
|
Ed Evans
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 89
- Joined: 2003/11/09 12:52:34
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/10 16:29:42
(permalink)
Thanks for the quick feedback, Frank. I know you've been a longtime proponent of Lynx (as have I)! The Lynx PCI card that I have is really nice! It's very tough to make these kinds of decisions (at least for me) because it's nearly impossible to do an A/B comparison of products. I suppose I could buy one of each from a retailer that has a liberal return policy, but I'm a little concerned about shelling out that kind of money and trusting that I'll get it back! I am not looking to the converters to color the sound. But, from what I've been reading the external clock can have a significant impact on the sound of the digital capture. Maybe the Lynx is the safe way to go. At least I know I like the way they sound. But I can't help but ask "Does something else sound better?" Again, thanks for the feedback. I'll see if anyone else chimes in on this one! Ed
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/10 16:33:12
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Ed Evans Thanks for the quick feedback, Frank. I know you've been a longtime proponent of Lynx (as have I)! The Lynx PCI card that I have is really nice! It's very tough to make these kinds of decisions (at least for me) because it's nearly impossible to do an A/B comparison of products. I suppose I could buy one of each from a retailer that has a liberal return policy, but I'm a little concerned about shelling out that kind of money and trusting that I'll get it back! I am not looking to the converters to color the sound. But, from what I've been reading the external clock can have a significant impact on the sound of the digital capture. Maybe the Lynx is the safe way to go. At least I know I like the way they sound. But I can't help but ask "Does something else sound better?" Again, thanks for the feedback. I'll see if anyone else chimes in on this one! Ed It would be a good idea to buy from a retailer that will take it back in all cases, not just this one.
|
IzovAge
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 398
- Joined: 2006/03/13 00:54:22
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/10 17:59:30
(permalink)
I have the Aurora 16 and I have not heard the bottom being thin at all. IMO, it's the best deal going for better than average conversion. I also have the Fireface 800 and while it's great for it's mobility, I can hear a difference in quaility. I like the Lynx better. As a side note, I also have an Audiofire 2 and believe it or not that conversion sounds as good as the RME. I would not hesitate to have 2 of the Audiofire 12's for 24 I/O. All three are very good for the money.
|
Ed Evans
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 89
- Joined: 2003/11/09 12:52:34
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/11 18:41:50
(permalink)
Thanks for the feedback, Larry. I assume that you are not using an external clock. Have you ever tried using your Aurora with an external clock? I'm just trying to figure out if it makes a material difference - be it better, worse, or just different. Thanks! Ed
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/11 20:46:27
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Ed Evans Thanks for the feedback, Larry. I assume that you are not using an external clock. Have you ever tried using your Aurora with an external clock? I'm just trying to figure out if it makes a material difference - be it better, worse, or just different. Thanks! Ed I don't think you would be able to pick the external clock in a blind listening test against the Lynx internal clock. Is that worth a grand just to say you have one ?
|
Ed Evans
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 89
- Joined: 2003/11/09 12:52:34
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/12 01:54:20
(permalink)
Nope! Definitely don't want to buy anything that's not going to add significant value to my audio chain. Plenty of other stuff to spend on! Sounds like the Aurora is the way to go. Ed
Ed Evans Sonar X3d, Roland Octa-Capture, Windows 7 x64
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/12 15:02:20
(permalink)
unless you hear a diff, I wouldn't worry about clocking a single piece of gear - esp. high end. I believe Dan Lavry (lavry converters) sez not to worry. And not to worry about the Aurora's - goldfrappe bought 'em and after millions of of CDs sold they could have picked anything. Besides, there stuff sounds great - I think "Trees" was tracked with them. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
Ed Evans
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 89
- Joined: 2003/11/09 12:52:34
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/13 01:12:41
(permalink)
Yep, I think you guys have me convinced. Thanks for the advice!
Ed Evans Sonar X3d, Roland Octa-Capture, Windows 7 x64
|
mlockett
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2099
- Joined: 2003/11/07 17:26:14
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/13 02:42:19
(permalink)
I've heard different stories on external clocks. Dan Lavry says that unless you have a bad internal clock, the external will not improve it. I have an AudioFire (which I quite like) and a Mytek which would be considered fairly high end. I tested the AudioFire using it's internal clock, and clocked to the Mytek using RightMark Audio Analyzer and there was no measurable difference. I'd be surprised if you get much, if anything, from an external clock on an Apogee or Lynx. I also doubt if you'd be disappointed with either.
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/13 10:24:03
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: mlockett I've heard different stories on external clocks. Dan Lavry says that unless you have a bad internal clock, the external will not improve it. I have an AudioFire (which I quite like) and a Mytek which would be considered fairly high end. I tested the AudioFire using it's internal clock, and clocked to the Mytek using RightMark Audio Analyzer and there was no measurable difference. I'd be surprised if you get much, if anything, from an external clock on an Apogee or Lynx. I also doubt if you'd be disappointed with either. Some devices even have clock repair technology now so if the clock is less than perfect it will just fix it. I would say external clocks are good for situations where you have a fairly bad internal clock but you still have to use the devices. The Mackie D8B digital mixer was the perfect example and also some protools gear where using a different brand interface is not an option but you still need to use the interface to run the software. The other use from them is when you need to get more then two devices going from the same clock. However, if you have one good clock you can also use a clock distribution box, but those things can be just as expensive so you may as well get one with a clock in it.
|
wst3
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1979
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
- Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/13 15:06:31
(permalink)
if I had the budget and the need this is what I would do... I'd arrange to audition both of them in my studio. There is no other way to make an informed choice. I have had the opportunity to work with both of them, and the Prism stereo converter in a really good room. They absolutely sound different. I don't think one is better than the other two, but I do believe that in the appropriate setting almost anyone would hear differences. None of them sounded thin or harsh or anything bad. Just different. I've also had the opportunity to audition the Apogee and the Lynx in my temporary studio where I normally use a pair of Frontier Design Tangos. I can not reliably pick any one of them out. Clearly my current space needs to be upgraded! If my space were up to the task I'd pick the Apogee... I just like them. That's all. And I wouldn't turn down the Lynx... in fact it'd most likely come down to price. As far as the master clock goes... if you have lots of digital devices and no clear way to establish a solid master then you might benefit from one, but in the same space where we auditioned converters we played around with clocks... no reliably discernible difference was detected. Oh, and if a master clock helps a converter you need to look for a different converter... that's just marketing hype! Once upon a time there were otherwise solid converters that benefited from external clocks, at least that's been reported by reputable folks. I've not run across it myself. Always let your ears be your guide, and always take into account the rest of the system and you'll do fine. Bill
-- Bill Audio Enterprise KB3KJF
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/13 16:04:34
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: wst3 if I had the budget and the need this is what I would do... I'd arrange to audition both of them in my studio. There is no other way to make an informed choice. I have had the opportunity to work with both of them, and the Prism stereo converter in a really good room. They absolutely sound different. I don't think one is better than the other two, but I do believe that in the appropriate setting almost anyone would hear differences. None of them sounded thin or harsh or anything bad. Just different. I've also had the opportunity to audition the Apogee and the Lynx in my temporary studio where I normally use a pair of Frontier Design Tangos. I can not reliably pick any one of them out. Clearly my current space needs to be upgraded! If my space were up to the task I'd pick the Apogee... I just like them. That's all. And I wouldn't turn down the Lynx... in fact it'd most likely come down to price. As far as the master clock goes... if you have lots of digital devices and no clear way to establish a solid master then you might benefit from one, but in the same space where we auditioned converters we played around with clocks... no reliably discernible difference was detected. Oh, and if a master clock helps a converter you need to look for a different converter... that's just marketing hype! Once upon a time there were otherwise solid converters that benefited from external clocks, at least that's been reported by reputable folks. I've not run across it myself. Always let your ears be your guide, and always take into account the rest of the system and you'll do fine. Bill The one deivce that I remember that HAD to have an external clock source to be useful was the Mackie D8B digital mixer. You paid $10,000 for it and the clock inside was total junk. What's worse is it had no word clock input so you had to buy the special Appoge clock card for it to even be able to connect an external clock. AAAhHHH! However, once you got the D8B, your recorders (HDR, etc), your computer interface, and all your digital interfaced effects working from that single external clock the entire sysem stated to be half way decent for the 1990s. Today there are $150 sound cards that sound better.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
RE: Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2009/06/16 12:20:07
(permalink)
The common criticism heard is that it has a thin sounding bottom end. However, it’s also commonly heard that a good clock (like Big Ben $1,350) brings out the bottom end. It's this kind of misinformation that makes the internet such an unreliable reference, and why you have to verify everything you read from multiple sources before accepting it as gospel. It's unlikely that ANY high-end interface produces a "thin-sounding bottom", and even if it did, it would be physically impossible for an external clock to rectify such a problem. Ironically, Apogee itself feeds the misinformation stream, which works to their benefit since they sell the most popular clock unit out there. If you read their literature, they are careful not to make untrue claims, but they also do not honestly inform consumers about why and when you need an external clock. If you are only using one digital device (the interface), there is no need for an external clock. Its function is to keep multiple devices synchronized, not to improve clocking. An external clock will not improve the sound of a properly-functioning interface. Spend that $1350 on a nice microphone instead. The Black Lion upgrade, however, may have some merit. I honestly don't know if it really does significantly decrease jitter, or if anyone has objectively shown that it does, or that the interfaces BL modifies even need such improvement. But at least the concept is credible. If you want the absolute highest quality converter and price is no object, take a look at Dan Lavry's stuff. No clock mods required.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Mbroady
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2006/03/29 18:55:59
- Status: offline
Re:Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2011/03/22 23:15:18
(permalink)
Hello All I am not sure if I should have started A new thread but it is related I have been running Sonar 8.5 Through a Rosetta 200. I have a great river NP-2NV For a pre. It seems that I have now have need for more inputs. I also have a Digi 200 sitting in the closet. If I clock the digi from the Rosetta does that mean I would have 6 inputs. 2 from the Rosetta/great river and 4 from the digi 200. If yes, how do I set this up both from the digi/Rosetta and within sonar. (it seems that I cannot use both converters independently Also, If I were get another quality pre-amp can I by pass the digi pre amps \ FYI: I do better with visuals so if you can point me in the direction of diagram that would be great. Thanks in advance for any help.
|
Shadow of The Wind
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 425
- Joined: 2005/06/09 17:39:20
- Location: Mountain View, CA (German)
- Status: offline
Re:Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2011/03/23 22:30:07
(permalink)
I do not see any advantage in using an external clock unless you have several components that you need to synchronize. A good interface will typically have a clock that does not limit its performance. I have seen a test (Sound on Sound?) that revealed that using an excellent external clock increased the clock jitter of most interfaces. The reason is that synchronizing a device to an external clock is more difficult than building a decent clock. Wilko
|
tarsier
Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3029
- Joined: 2003/11/07 11:51:35
- Location: 6 feet under
- Status: offline
Re:Converter and External Clock Recommendations
2011/03/24 10:26:55
(permalink)
using an excellent external clock increased the clock jitter of most interfaces. This bears repeating. And I'll add: an external clock never reduced the jitter of an interface. The bottom line: an external clock will only improve synchronization of multiple devices. It won't improve the sound. It especially won't improve the sound of a lousy device, since the lousy device will do a lousy job of receiving the external clock signal.
|