Latest Sonar + New PC Build

Author
montezuma
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2520
  • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
2010/03/15 19:00:24 (permalink)

Latest Sonar + New PC Build

Hi...when the next Sonar comes out...maybe Sonar 9, I want to upgrade to it and at the same time upgrade my PC. Right now my PC is one I built back in about '04 or '05. It's a good machine. Anyway...I don't know where to start looking at components. I know where to get them...I just dont know what to buy.

I want the PC to be super fast for audio I suppose and my budget is...I dunno...$1000. I need the following:

Mobo
CPU
Ram
PSU
Hard Drive

I have everything else.

I've had a basic look around and have come up with this:


Mobo:
http://www.umart.com.au/newindex2.phtml?bid=2
Gigabyte GA-785GMT-USB3 AM3 SB710 DDR3 PCI-E D-Sub DVI HDMI GLAN SATA RAID ATA
 CPU:
http://www.umart.com.au/newindex2.phtml?bid=2
AMD Phenom II AM3 955 Black Edition (3.2Ghz) 64-Bit Quad-Core CPU
 Ram:
http://www.umart.com.au/newindex2.phtml?bid=2
Corsair TW3X4G1333C9DHX 4GB (2x XMS3 2GB) PC-10600 (1333MHz) XMP DDR3 RAM
 Hard Drive:
http://www.umart.com.au/newindex2.phtml?bid=2
Seagate 1TB SV35 7200.5 SATA 32MB
 PSU
http://www.umart.com.au/newindex2.phtml?bid=2
Antec 850W CP850 ATX PSU For TWELVE-HUNDRED P183 P193 CP850

Is it any good?

Any advice?

(I'm likely to be running XP Home)

thanks


post edited by montezuma - 2010/03/15 19:02:26
#1

20 Replies Related Threads

    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/15 19:33:55 (permalink)
    montezuma


    Hi...when the next Sonar comes out...maybe Sonar 9, I want to upgrade to it and at the same time upgrade my PC.
    I have everything else.

    Who knows when that will be?  By then, a hyperthreaded four core Intel may be an also-ran (making it a fabulous choice for your purposes).
    I'm likely to be running XP Home
     
    Not the best choice, IMHO.  I'm still on XP, but when I upgrade to a new machine (probably about the time you do), I'm definitely moving to Windows 7 64-bit.



    #2
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/15 19:40:55 (permalink)
    Yeah fair point....

    As for W7...is it a flash in the pan? Or something with longevity? Hard to say I suppose...I don't know much about it...seemed like some kind of Windows Me type thing...something a bit transient...

    Anyway...these 'are these specs ok to build a PC' type threads inherently suck...too many variables.

    I dunno why I posted it...thinking out loud I suppose
    #3
    slartabartfast
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5289
    • Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/16 01:39:48 (permalink)
    As for W7...is it a flash in the pan? Or something with longevity?


    Well, if Vista had come out of the gate ready to go with a full complement of drivers, XP might be a fading memory by now. The main problem with going to the Vista/Win7 model is saying goodbye to (and paying to replace) software that will not run on versions later than XP. I am still using Win2K for everything but audio, but now even Turbotax has abandoned backward compatibility with that platform, so Win7 is looking better and better. I expect the 64 bit code in Win7 will probably be pretty similar to the next version--so the stuff that runs on Win7 will probably last a while. How long the Microsoft mafia will still support 32 bit code is anybody's guess. I expect that after the reluctance of large business customers to buy into Vista, MS will try to be conservative about making the most common business applications obsolete. The audio software guys (especially Cakewalk) are going to be pushing the envelope on anything new to sell upgrades so do not expect the new stuff from them to run on XP for much longer.
    #4
    Phoenix
    Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1886
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 18:25:33
    • Location: Long Island, New York
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/16 14:31:15 (permalink)
    montezuma, if you want your new PC to be super fast you will want the option of running 64-bit at some point, at least if you use samples, cos 64-bit systems can use more memory. If you want to go 64-bit these days, that's Win7, flash-in-the-pan or no.
    If you want to wait for Sonar 9 to upgrade, don't buy the H/W yet, cos there will definitely be some sort of shift between now and then. If my old system had held out just 6 more months the HT quads would have been out...OTOH, it might not be a bad idea to build a new system before your old one dies, and then you will have a backup system...

    #5
    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/16 16:26:54 (permalink)
    montezuma

    As for W7...is it a flash in the pan? ... seemed like some kind of Windows Me type thing...something a bit transient...

    No, that was Vista.  W7 appears to be the real deal with some staying power.  The more relevant issue is the 64-bit software that you'd run on W7.  Personally, I wouldn't feel completely comfortable taking that plunge today, but a year from now, if a vendor doesn't have their 64-bit act together, I don't think I want to be running their software anyway.  From what I read here, though, lots of folks are running 64-bit music software, when available, and mixing in 32-bit VSTs with bit bridge and enjoying a fair amount of success.

    But then I'm kind of expecting the Sonar release cycle to change... just a gut feeling.  I'm thinking that Sonar 9 (or whatever it's to be named) will not appear this fall but maybe six months later.  There're absolutely no hard facts to back up that speculation, though.  In any case, that's when I'm looking to upgrade to a more advanced computer ... about one year out from now (and I'm kind of hoping that Intel HT six core chips will have come down to consumer level prices by that time ... to be priced at about the same as the HT four core chip of today).
    #6
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/16 18:11:34 (permalink)
    I see. I was planning on updating the old PC in about 2 weeks. Maybe I'll hold out a bit longer then.

    So this Windows 7...gee, anyway just seems like there's going to be a few potholes and rocks in and on the road as some kind of standard/ accepted OS emerges.
    #7
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/16 18:27:29 (permalink)
    So this Windows 7...gee, anyway just seems like there's going to be a few potholes and rocks in and on the road as some kind of standard/ accepted OS emerges.

     
    Win7 is a fine DAW platform... that'll see us thru the next ~5 years.
     
    Prediction:
    When "Win8" is released, we'll all be running 64-core CPUs.  
     

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #8
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/16 20:10:52 (permalink)
    So Windows Vista is a bit of a white elephant is it?
    #9
    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/17 14:09:51 (permalink)
    montezuma


    So Windows Vista is a bit of a white elephant is it?


    I think more than a few people would prefer to descibe it as a steaming pile left by an elephant. 
    #10
    jcschild
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3409
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
    • Location: Kentucky y'all
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/17 17:04:56 (permalink)
    LOL +1

    well it did get its act together right before its death.

    Scott
    ADK
    Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
    #11
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/17 19:43:19 (permalink)
    But W7 will be the main thing for the next 5 or so years? Is that the word on the street?
    #12
    jcschild
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3409
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
    • Location: Kentucky y'all
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/18 09:45:45 (permalink)
    lets put it this way
    if you are buying/building a new system now there is only 1 OS worth considering and its NOT XP.
    Win7
    and no reason to not go 64 bit.

    being able to say that is such a breath of fresh air vs what i had to post last yr!


    Scott
    ADK
    Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
    #13
    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/18 13:45:24 (permalink)
    montezuma


    But W7 will be the main thing for the next 5 or so years? Is that the word on the street?


    Word on the street is that W7 is the new XP.  Seriously.
    #14
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/18 18:59:54 (permalink)
    And you can get something like W7 Ultimate right...that can mimic XP or something so that all the swathes of programs you have for XP can run on W7...am I right?
    #15
    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/18 19:21:06 (permalink)
    montezuma


    And you can get something like W7 Ultimate right...that can mimic XP or something so that all the swathes of programs you have for XP can run on W7...am I right?

    This from the MS web site:
     
    <MS>
    Most programs designed for the 32-bit version of Windows will work on the 64-bit version of Windows. Notable exceptions are many antivirus programs.
     
    Device drivers designed for 32-bit versions of Windows won't work on computers running a 64-bit version of Windows. If you're trying to install a printer or other device that only has 32-bit drivers available, it won't work correctly on a 64-bit version of Windows. If you are unsure whether there is a 64-bit driver available for your device, go online to the Windows Vista Compatibility Center.
    </MS>
     
    The area you'd have compatility issues should be running 32-bit plugs in 64-bit Sonar.  This is mostly addressed by Bit Bridge (allegedly).   Eventually (but how long it that?) all major vendors can be expected to offer native 64-bit software, so this will become less of a problem over time.
     
    The compatility center may or may not have information on music interface drivers ... don't know, haven't checked it out.  But just visit the web site of the interface manufacturer to get confirmation on that. 
     
    Most other mainstream peripherals (printers, et. al.) can be expected to have drivers available.  In fact, most will probably have drivers that work that come with W7 (at least that's been my experience with previous MS OS installs).  64-bit Windows is here to stay and no peripheral manufacturer can ignore it and expect to stay in business.
     
     
     
     

    #16
    jcschild
    Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3409
    • Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
    • Location: Kentucky y'all
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/19 08:54:53 (permalink)
    montezuma


    And you can get something like W7 Ultimate right...that can mimic XP or something so that all the swathes of programs you have for XP can run on W7...am I right?

    this just does not work for audio.
     
    and not needed as mentioned. Sonar bitbridge is improved in 8.5 and Vienna Ensemble pro or Jbridge takes care of the rest.
     

    Scott
    ADK
    Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
    #17
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/19 10:50:56 (permalink)
    I don't understand any of the terminology. I have to continue the research
    #18
    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/19 12:40:46 (permalink)
    montezuma


    I don't understand any of the terminology. I have to continue the research
     
    OK, let's try a simplified explanation.  For the most part, your Windows programs that you currently run will run just fine on 64-bit W7, once the OS and drivers are installed.  Installing the OS may in fact get you most of the way there with driver installation.  I haven't gone through this exercise so I can't say for sure.  For your sound card, you might need to visit the vendor's web site and download the 64-bit drivers for that.
     
    W7 can run 32-bit software and it can run 64-bit software, but it can't do both in one "job".  If a bunch of software "modules" are executing together ... say like Sonar and plug-ins, they all have to be 32-bit or all 64-bit.
     
    Now, say you've got 64-bit W7 up and running and you install 64-bit Sonar but have some older 32-bit plugs.  Are you out of luck?  No, but there needs to be something to allow the 64-bit software and the 32-bit software to interact.  That's what bitbridge is.  Your 32-bit plugs run in a different "job" than the Sonar "job", and bitbridge provides an interface between the two "jobs".  I'm using "job" as a substitute for the proper terms "process" and/or "address space".  Just think of "job" as being associated with something you click on in the Windows start menu.  Make sense?
     
    Apart from Sonar, it's unlikely you'll have to contend with this issue in any other software you run.  But anything that executes with software components from multiple vendors, such as we might be doing with Sonar and 3rd party plugs, it can become an issue.  If you do graphics work, you might be in the same situation.  Most of the software run all run is not of that type, though, and this is mostly something you needn't worry about.
    #19
    montezuma
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2520
    • Joined: 2004/10/07 03:44:28
    • Location: Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/19 20:10:20 (permalink)
    Thanks for dimming it down a couple of shades. I think my sc...Presonus Firebox has bot 32 and 64 bit drivers already. So that's a check in that box.

    Is it kind of a physical impossibility for a 64bit machine to naturally run 32bit stuff? Couldn't they just make 64bit machines execute 32bit stuff with no problems? If 64bit is so powerful why don't they just make it run 32bit software as well? Then there would be no need for all this bitbridge. Or....is it kind of an impossibility....therefore the need for some kind of interface (bitbridge) between the two of them?


    #20
    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Latest Sonar + New PC Build 2010/03/22 14:33:17 (permalink)
    montezuma

    Is it kind of a physical impossibility for a 64bit machine to naturally run 32bit stuff? Couldn't they just make 64bit machines execute 32bit stuff with no problems? If 64bit is so powerful why don't they just make it run 32bit software as well? Then there would be no need for all this bitbridge. Or....is it kind of an impossibility....therefore the need for some kind of interface (bitbridge) between the two of them?
    Again, there's no problem for 64-bit hardware and OS to run 32-bit software.  What cannot be done is intermixing 32-bit and 64-bit software in the same process.  I suspect (but am not dead on100% certain) that this is a hardware limitation, not a software/OS limitation.
      
    Most software that most folks run does not present that problem.  64-bit Sonar with 32-bit plugs does, however.  That's not CW's fault, nor Microsoft's fault.  In any case, it's my understating that Sonar figures out automatically for you when to bring BitBridge into the picture.  There are reported cases where 32-bit plugs are not compatible, and that's unfortunate, but mostly this is transparent to you.
     
    To the extent that it's a PITA though, well, that's just the price of progress.
    #21
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1