Timebase in HS 2004 VS HS 9

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
FrankusTheFace
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 41
  • Joined: 2003/12/28 07:49:25
  • Location: Boston MA
  • Status: offline
2004/09/01 12:03:11 (permalink)

Timebase in HS 2004 VS HS 9

I have worked with Home Studio 9 for a long time and I'm very used to editing note values using the default Timebase of 120 PPQ in HS 9. I have upgraded to Home Studio 2004 and the new default Timebase, 960 PPQ, messes me up sometimes when I am editing notes values. Is there an advantage to having the 960 PPQ in HS 2004 over the 120 in HS 9 and if I set the Timebase to 120 in HS 2004 because I am more familar with it is that going to cause any problems with HS 2004.

Frank 'Mr. bad at Math' Petruccelli
< Message edited by FrankusTheFace -- 9/2/2004 6:36:38 AM >

Best Regards Always,
Frank Petruccelli
Petruccelli Productions / Music To Die For
#1

1 Reply Related Threads
    ronniebee
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 632
    • Joined: 2004/07/27 00:12:13
    • Location: Douglasville, Georgia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Timebase in HS 2004 VS HS 9 2004/09/01 23:50:51 (permalink)
    I don't understand why this is happening for you. I have used CWHS-9 CWHS-2004, and now CWHS-2-XL, and I still have 120 ticks per track, which I use for editing.

    Ronnie Bee - X3 Producer, 64b 2.6 Q Core PC, Win7, 8mb. 11TB ATA HD Space, Focusrite Pro40 DTS SurSnd, Voice Prism Plus, Dim-Pro & Rapt 64bit. Yamaha Motif XF. RonnieBee'sGigabyteBand - Enchanting Moments Video Studio
    http://www.soundclick.com/pro/?BandID=231503
    http://www.cdbaby.com/all/ronniebee
    #2
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1