Best Audio Interface for my situation

Author
MKibble
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 41
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 21:04:10
  • Status: offline
2011/01/04 21:40:39 (permalink)

Best Audio Interface for my situation

Hi guys,

I'm new around here!

I worked with cakewalk in the 90's and now I'm considering going back. But let me tell you my story, so that you can help me better.

I have a setup that fulfill my current needs. It's basically recording 2 mic/line audio chanels, audio editing/mixing and sometimes the production of playback tracks (through softsynths like BFD, Kontakt and Reason - need MIDI chanels for that). Well the devices in question are:

- Sony Vaio VPCF115FM (Windows 7 - 64 bits - 8 GB of RAM)
- SIIG 2-port firewire - 400 ExpressCard/34
- DIGIDESIGN DIGI 002

So, it's ok as long as I stay inside Pro Tools. No matter what I do it doesn't work with other softwares (like Sonar).

As I said above, those are my current needs. But one month from now, I'll be starting to produce some soundtracks for movies, theater and more complex playbacks. In order to do this I'll buy a collection from Vienna Symphonic Library. Well, it's a VST plugin and it's advisable to work in a 64bits system to take advantage of more than 4 GB of RAM (these libraries are memory suckers!). With these 2 presupositions, I'll have to abandon Pro Tools and my DIGI (those are only RTAS and 32 bits system). Finally, that brings me to SONAR.

I'll be really out of money after Vienna, so I'll only be able to by a sound card that costs around $880 (here in my country) and I wont be able change anything from the rest of the system. I searched thru the net and I found the Edirol FA 66 very interesting for this porpouse. But when I went to buy the FA 66 in my local music store, the guy told me they have horrible drivers under Win 7 and then he suggested the Presonus FireStudio Project.

I have to admit, they are both in the same price range around here and the Presonus offer much more than the FA 66. But as I said, I don't need more than 2 mic/line inputs at the moment. So, this is my question:

Which card has the best ASIO drivers in terms of stability and latency (very important for Vienna) under Windows 7 64 bits? The Presonus FireStudio Project or the Edirol FA 66?

Do you, guys have any other suggestions in that same price range taking into consideration specially the drivers?


Thanks in advance.
#1

15 Replies Related Threads

    MKibble
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 21:04:10
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/04 23:33:01 (permalink)
    It's me again!

    Just checking the UA-25EX. If I'd buy this one I'd be able to keep the DIGI also for audio projects.

    Do you guys think this is a better option??

    How about the drivers of the UA-25EX under Windows 7?? Is it ok to be USB or firewire is better??
    #2
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 09:26:53 (permalink)
    the lowest round trip latency drivers available today, as I understand it from a professional DAW builder, are the m-audio fast track ultra and fast track ultra 8R.

    they're a little more than your needs, but the ultra (non-8R version) is only $350USD.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #3
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 10:15:21 (permalink)
    If you have a old style pci slot available you can get the stereo Lynx unit for about $700 and never have to worry about your quality of ADDA (lots of pros use lynx).  If you have a blank slot you can also add their ADAT daughter card for future expansion.

    there is also the TC Konneck 6.  FW, 2 in/out and 1 preamp but no midi if you need that built-in.  $200.  Good sound quality again (SOS called it the best-sounding sub-$500 interface they'd heard).  The drivers used to be flaky, but in the last year they've pretty much sorted that out.  I use the TCK 48 on an elderly 2-core and get about 10 ms roundtrip latentcy - so about half that for soft synths.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #4
    MKibble
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 21:04:10
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 10:17:18 (permalink)
    Hey Beagle!

    Thanks for the reply.

    I read some bad news about the stability of m-audio drivers. Have you used them under Windows 7??

    How about the Fast Track Pro?? It's cheapper, and I could keep my DIGI.

    Thanks.


    At,

    I'm on a laptop and right now I don't have the money to buy other PC. So, PCI is not an option.

    It's very difficult to find TC stuff right here. Just found a second-hand Konneckt Live! for $530. Is it better than m-audio??

    Thanks for the reply.
    post edited by MKibble - 2011/01/05 10:43:32
    #5
    johnnyV
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2677
    • Joined: 2010/02/22 11:46:33
    • Location: Here, in my chair
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 11:20:13 (permalink)
    There are huge threads on this topic so you should dig them out , there in the hardware forum which is a much better place to look than here, this is the software forum. There are hundreds of opinions on the topic so look out!
    I have a fast track pro and it works fine if you use the MIDI and the digital in and out, The audio part ( AD/DA)  is crappy. I hooked it up the other day and could not believe the high pitched scream I was hearing, Swapped back to SPDIF and clean as a whistle. I wouldn't buy another one of their products without testing it for my self. Just looking at specs will net you nothing, you really have to listen to it first, like all audio equipment, crank it up and see how much noise there is. They all work for MIDI if that's what your after.

    Sonar X3e Studio - Waiting for Professional
     Scarlett 6i6
    Yamaha Gear= 01v - NSM 10 - DTX 400 - MG82cx
    Roland Gear= A 49- GR 50 - TR 505 - Boss pedals
    Tascam Gear=  DR 40 - US1641 -
    Mackie Gear= Mix 8 - SRM 350's 
    i5 Z97 3.2GHZ quad 16 Gig RAM W 8.1  home build
    Taylor mini GS - G& L Tribute Tele - 72 Fender Princeton - TC BH 250 - Mooer and Outlaw Pedals  Korg 05/RW
     
    #6
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 11:30:59 (permalink)
    no, I haven't personally used it on a win7 machine, but the DAW builder I'm referring to is Jim Roseberry and he frequents the forum here usually in the Computer and Hardware subforums, so you could go ask him directly about it.  I trust his opinions.

    but the fast track pro is not the same low latency drivers as the ultra series.  the pro series are OK, but they do not have the fastest drivers.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #7
    MKibble
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 21:04:10
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 12:11:53 (permalink)
    johnnyV


    There are huge threads on this topic so you should dig them out , there in the hardware forum which is a much better place to look than here, this is the software forum. There are hundreds of opinions on the topic so look out!
    I have a fast track pro and it works fine if you use the MIDI and the digital in and out, The audio part ( AD/DA)  is crappy. I hooked it up the other day and could not believe the high pitched scream I was hearing, Swapped back to SPDIF and clean as a whistle. I wouldn't buy another one of their products without testing it for my self. Just looking at specs will net you nothing, you really have to listen to it first, like all audio equipment, crank it up and see how much noise there is. They all work for MIDI if that's what your after.

    Thanks johnnyV!

    I've been doing some searching thru the forum, but I found nothing about stability of the drivers and latency inside SONAR 8.5 Producer Edition (which, by the way, is the reason I posted this topic here). Things tend to change from soft to soft, so I don't consider this to be a hardware issue. Just to give you an example, my DIGI works in Pro Tools (obvious!) and sometimes in Adobe Audition, but never in Sonar. So it's important for me that this question is answered by Sonar users.

    Also I found some topics about the mentioned interfaces, but they're too old. New updates change things to better (that's what we all hope).

    Interesting your words about the Fast Track. As I'll be using MIDI just to control things from VSTi plugins, D/A conversion is important for me (A/D not very much).

    I've heard that presonus have very good A/D D/A conversion, but nothing about the drivers and apparentaly there's an issue regarding the firewire chipset they use in conjunction with Sonar. Can anybody confirm that?? 

    Beagle


    no, I haven't personally used it on a win7 machine, but the DAW builder I'm referring to is Jim Roseberry and he frequents the forum here usually in the Computer and Hardware subforums, so you could go ask him directly about it.  I trust his opinions.

    but the fast track pro is not the same low latency drivers as the ultra series.  the pro series are OK, but they do not have the fastest drivers.
    I'll check it. Thanks.

    Interesting because the latest drivers for Ultra Series are from 2009 and there's a very recent update (12/2010) for the Fast Track Pro. Is it good or bad??

    Is anybody using this latest update in Sonar?


    #8
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 12:23:59 (permalink)
    that's just because it's a different series - part of what you're paying the higher price for on the ultra series is the better drivers.  just an update to an older driver doesn't mean they are restructuring the drivers to be faster (for the pro).

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #9
    ChuckC
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1488
    • Joined: 2010/02/13 01:22:55
    • Location: Port Charlotte, Fl
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 12:30:27 (permalink)
    MKibble,
       I am using the fast track pro on win 7, Recording audio & mido (v drum tracks, & some key boards)  I haven't had any trouble with the drivers, I've had it about 8 months now & use it frequently for projects containing 25-30 tracks with fx & plug ins on.  The only time my latency gets annoying is if I have 20+ tracks & try to record more while leaving all fx on.  If I toggle them off I've had not trouble.

    ADK Built DAW, W7, Sonar Platinum, Studio One Pro,Yamaha HS8's & HS8S  Presonus Studio/Live 24.4.2, A few decent mic pre's,  lots of mics, 57's,58 betas, Sm7b, LD Condensors, Small condensors, Senn 421's,  DI's,  Sans Amp, A few guitar amps etc. Guitars : Gib. LP, Epi. Lp, Dillion Tele, Ibanez beater, Ibanez Ergodyne 4 String bass, Mapex Mars series 6 pc. studio kit, cymbals and other sh*t.
    http://www.everythingiam.net/
    http://www.stormroomstudios.com
    Some of my productions: http://soundcloud.com/stormroomstudios
    #10
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 12:50:44 (permalink)
    ChuckC - thank you for that testimony!  would you do me a favor and post your experience in this thread:

    http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=2133079

    there are users in the SHS forum who are worried about m-audio and win7 because of a "product troll" bashing it.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #11
    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 13:41:09 (permalink)
    The RME Fireface UC is a great USB sound card, if you can spend a bit more money. The drivers are outstanding and the converters are great.
    I would stay away from Presonus, as they use DICE IIFW chipsets and they can be problematic for windows and cause you major headaches. Ive been there, trust me!!!!

    Here is a little list I put together and all these cards work great with sonar:
    Recommended sound cards


    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #12
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 14:24:04 (permalink)
    MKibble


    At,

    I'm on a laptop and right now I don't have the money to buy other PC. So, PCI is not an option.

    It's very difficult to find TC stuff right here. Just found a second-hand Konneckt Live! for $530. Is it better than m-audio??

    Thanks for the reply.
    I don't know where you are - most of the mail order places have just about everything.  All the TCK stuff basically use the same hardware and drivers - it is only the number of i/o's and dsp that differ.  That seems a bit pricey for a used Live! unit and more than its replacement, the Twin.
     
    I've used the Presonus stuff and it is good sounding.  Not great, but good.  As CJ sez it uses the DiceII chipset for FW control.  It was from TC and was initially horrible.  TC's stuff, Focusrite and some other companies used it, too, and the problems were legion.  As said above, it has been sussed out and no more problems today than any other system.  I've heard people rag about RME, which is usually considered having the best drivers in the business.
     
    If I was you and had $800 for a non pci interface, I'd look at the new RME babyface, the Steinberg(yamaha) mr16, TC for sound quality.  Look around, there are lots of threads about what people use or have heard and Beale's site has some good info, too.  Whatever you buy, get it from someone who you can return to it and switch out for a second choice.  On the PC someone can have no problems and the next guy does with a specific unit.  It doesn't happen too much, but ...  Unless you want to spend time turning into self help tech support, it is often easier to just try the next unit.  there isn't too much difference between the sound quality of modern units, some, but not deal killing.  Esp if you are using soft synths, the DA is usually good enough to work w/ .  If the unit doesn't work, it doesn't matter how good it sounds.
     
    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #13
    johnnyV
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2677
    • Joined: 2010/02/22 11:46:33
    • Location: Here, in my chair
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/05 19:13:37 (permalink)
    OK pour latency which is only 1 thing to think about. For me it's not a problem. But what about sound quality?? If you do not have good quality outboard pre amps and  D/A converters then you interface is stuck with the job. The Fast track along with probably all interfaces in that price range  has entry level pre's and A/D's judging by what I hear. My work around is the fact I own an aging Yamaha 01v so I'm fine because I by pass the cheap part of the unit. . The drivers seem very stable and I am very happy with it. I bought it for the MIDI and because it had SPDIF.
    The new drivers you see are for W7 as it originally was XP being a unit that came on the market in 2006?
    I would only hope the quality of the pre amps and converters would go up with the price point. But as I said , I personally would want to try one first or I would look at brands that get good reviews for sound.   

    Sonar X3e Studio - Waiting for Professional
     Scarlett 6i6
    Yamaha Gear= 01v - NSM 10 - DTX 400 - MG82cx
    Roland Gear= A 49- GR 50 - TR 505 - Boss pedals
    Tascam Gear=  DR 40 - US1641 -
    Mackie Gear= Mix 8 - SRM 350's 
    i5 Z97 3.2GHZ quad 16 Gig RAM W 8.1  home build
    Taylor mini GS - G& L Tribute Tele - 72 Fender Princeton - TC BH 250 - Mooer and Outlaw Pedals  Korg 05/RW
     
    #14
    MKibble
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 21:04:10
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/08 13:20:11 (permalink)
    Well guys, I came to give a feedback.

    First of all, thanks for all the replies.

    Unfortunatelly I made the wrong choice! I decided to give FA 66 a shot. My thoughts were: hey, Sonar and the FA 66 are from the same company, they can't be incompatible (this reminds my previous expiriences with a DVD drive from Samsung that doesn't accept DVD-Rs from Samsung)!!! And they're not, but...

    When I came back from store, I openned the box, read the manual and downloaded the driver form www.roland.com (by the way, in www.cakewalk.com there's no driver for the FA 66). Installed the driver and plugged the interface when asked. So far, so good.

    Opened Sonar, and inserted some instrument and some audio tracks. Tried all the combinations and always heard a strange ROBOTIC sound (which happened sometimes with my DIGI inside Sonar).

    After a moment of disappointment, I had the brillant idea of changing the firewire port. I was using my SIIG (which has a TI chipset - most indicated for audio purpuses) and changed to the onboard port (which is Ricoh, I think). It worked, but there were a few problems:

    - A very light hiss through my monitors (when compared to DIGI - same cables used, same no-break). Only noticed when you stay very close to the speakers;

    - Another light strange noise on the monitors (when compared to DIGI - same cables used, same no-break). I don't know how to describe, like eletric pulses togheter with some crackles. Only noticed when you stay very close to the speakers;

    Anyways, I was accepting these minor flaws. But the came the big issue: LATENCY:

    - It was ok (at best) for slow passages, but could not play fast tempo arrangements. Then I tried to change the settings for the ASIO panel. Another disappointment. Very few controls and it doesn't show actual latency values (it looks like a cheap old windows software). Tried the "smaller" under the ASIO for buffer settings. Nothing happened! Tried to move the buffer size slider. Anything under "normal" makes the driver very unstable and causes "Engine Off" on Sonar or the sound just stops.

    - Tried WDM. Same thing (and the recomendation for Vienna is ASIO, so I wouldn't bother if it didn't work)!!!!

    Other pains in the neck:

    - Changing sample rate requires to power off the unit;

    - Changing buffer settings requires to power off the unit;

    - When there's too much time without activity from the FA 66 it just isn't recognized by the system anymore. This requires to power off the unit AND restarting the computer;

    - When you unplug the interface from electricity (after powering off, of course!), the FA 66 it just isn't recognized by the system anymore. This requires to power off the unit AND restarting the computer;

    All this I tried using soft synths. Then I tried to record something from the mic inputs:

    - Tried monitor with Echo Input (from Sonar) to listen to real time effects (which I do with DIGI on the same computer). Latency doesn't allow to make good takes (and there are the issues described above when trying to change settings in the ASIO panel). Then tried the way it's supposed to work (through the monitoring knob). Well, all I can say is that it's possible, but it's very difficult to set the levels because when you find a good input gain level, you are stucked with it to monitor also. If you turn the Director Monitor knob to the right too much you'll won't be able to listen to your computer tracks. I mean, the mixing of the signals is very strange, couldn't find confortable levels (which are done extremely easy on the DIGI). The pre-amps are ok - tranparent, but you have to set high levels of gain introcucing a bit of noise (when compared to the DIGI). Other issues:

    - The same knob that controls your monitor controls your headphones;

    - There's no mute the monitor button (which is very good if you have just one room), so everytime you will record something you have to turn off the monitors;

    - The Heaphone output doesn't supply good power to your headphones (the level is very low even with the knob almost in the maximum position - when compared to the DIGI - the headphone is a very good one);

    - Input 1 just monitors on the left side, input 2, just on the right. Which makes you turn on and off the MONO button lots of time if you are recording and checking the results.

    But, I didn't intend to use it to record, I'm just writing it to help others.


    Summing-up:

    - Very compatible with Sonar;
    - Poor drivers;
    - Latency is an issue;
    - Stable untill you change the Buffer Settings;
    - Problems with the construction of the device (cause noise through the monitors);
    - Makes difficult to record live inputs.

    So, for my situation it's not a good interface. Thanks God I bought it on a big store that gives me the possibility to exchange.

    The only model you guys posted here they have is the Fast Track Ultra (and they only have the 8r). I'll have to pay the differece, but do you think I should go for it?? Will it solve the issues?? Or is it better to ask money back??


    Thanks.

    post edited by MKibble - 2011/01/08 13:43:29
    #15
    Tony S
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 96
    • Joined: 2009/08/08 14:30:09
    • Location: South Louisiana, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Best Audio Interface for my situation 2011/01/09 14:33:59 (permalink)
    Kibble;

    Very pleased with Steinberg MR-816x. 

    I've had an E-mu1616m, a MOTU 828MKIII, and the MR-816x.

    MR-816x sounded best, then the E-mu, and then the 828MKIII.

    My ASIO latency was reported as 8.2msec with my audio buffers set at 2msec (96 samples), and play back and record buffers @ 128 each, as I recall. I have used 64 or even 32, but will get occasional drop-outs.


    I run my MIDI buffers at 128. 

    There is a long thread on Gearslutz about the MR816.

    Hope this helps.

    Tony S


    S8.5.3x64   Producer  
    Windows 7x64 
    Core 2 Quad Q9400 
    8 GB RAM
    2x 500GB SATA
    1x 250 GB SATA 
    Steinberg MR816x   
    K2600XS
    Battered Old Gibson Blue Ridge
    SM-57/SM-58 (Yeah,yeah...)
    #16
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1