Recording From The FX Send of an Amp?

Author
Adji
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 443
  • Joined: 2009/03/30 11:57:14
  • Location: Sunderland, UK
  • Status: offline
2011/01/11 14:03:32 (permalink)

Recording From The FX Send of an Amp?

Hey guys, wondering if it was possible to get success recording from an FX Send on an amp as mine doesn't have a line out? Obviously I would only be recording the preamp tone so would I need some kind of VST poweramp or would some cab impulses do the trick?
#1

16 Replies Related Threads

    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 14:27:30 (permalink)
    THIS IS BETTER.

    PALMER PDI-09
    http://www.palmergear.com/pdi09.shtml

    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #2
    Chappel
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2300
    • Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
    • Location: California
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 14:40:51 (permalink)
    A quick Google search shows that there are plenty of VST cabinet simulators available, including free ones. Not having used any of them I can't make a recommendation other than to try several and see what works best.
    #3
    Adji
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 443
    • Joined: 2009/03/30 11:57:14
    • Location: Sunderland, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 17:35:30 (permalink)
    Thanks guys, I have heard of the Palmer Speaker Sims but hadn't seen this specialised DI Box, will check it out thanks.

    Chappel, I know there are loads, I actually have a few and use them regularly but have usually DI'ed the guitar straight into the studio preamps, my quesiton was regarding the safe use of the FX Send as a Line Out basically :)
    #4
    Chappel
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2300
    • Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
    • Location: California
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 17:58:31 (permalink)
    Ah, OK. You should be fine. I've never heard of a preamp out/effects send on a guitar amp that was any higher than line level.
    #5
    Adji
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 443
    • Joined: 2009/03/30 11:57:14
    • Location: Sunderland, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 19:07:35 (permalink)
    Cheers Chappel, thanks for the clarification.
    #6
    Norrie
    Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1665
    • Joined: 2010/04/20 15:48:15
    • Location: Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 19:29:44 (permalink)
    I had a convo with some one about his recently about useing a head to record with out a cab.

    What I had been told thas is that if its a tube head then its ok to take a line out from the FX send or even the HEadphone out if the amp has one.

    But With Valve amps it needs something between to take the load like conecting the head to a hotplate then in to the PRE you will be recording from.

    Can any one comment on this ? If this info is correct or not ?

    Cheers guys

    Norrie

    SONAR X3c Producer
    Pro Tools 11
    Allen & Heath GS-R24 M
    Adam A77x
    i7 4930K @ 4.4Ghz
    #7
    Adji
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 443
    • Joined: 2009/03/30 11:57:14
    • Location: Sunderland, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 19:38:55 (permalink)
    Norrie


    I had a convo with some one about his recently about useing a head to record with out a cab.

    What I had been told thas is that if its a tube head then its ok to take a line out from the FX send or even the HEadphone out if the amp has one.

    But With Valve amps it needs something between to take the load like conecting the head to a hotplate then in to the PRE you will be recording from.

    Can any one comment on this ? If this info is correct or not ?

    Cheers guys

    Norrie

    Hey dude, I think you got your words muddled up, a valve amp and a tube amp are the same thing. Tube is the American word for Valve basically.


    Valve / tube Amps - Can never be used without being connected to a speaker or similar load bearer (Palmer PDI03 for example). Doing so WILL damage the amp and usually pretty quickly I'm told.

    SolidState Amps - Do what you want, nee damaging these by doing what you mentioned. 


    I do not know the technicalities of it but NEVER use a valve/tube head without a speaker or similar loadbox connected.


    post edited by Adji - 2011/01/11 19:40:02
    #8
    Norrie
    Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1665
    • Joined: 2010/04/20 15:48:15
    • Location: Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/11 20:10:01 (permalink)
    Sorry thats my bad I got muddled up there sorry about that ;(

    So the palmer would be Like a hot plate fo rinstance like this I have been looking at http://www.guitarguitar.c...p?stock=04050411534218

    Infact no I Might be geting muddled again From what I gather I can take a feed from the hot plate and it would take the load of the valve head instead of a cab for lets say silent recording ?

    Would I be right in saying the palmer is the same idea ?

    Sorry about his its got me a bit cofused and I am now interested in the palmer if I could use it to take the load from the head and go DI that would be awesome!!!!

    SONAR X3c Producer
    Pro Tools 11
    Allen & Heath GS-R24 M
    Adam A77x
    i7 4930K @ 4.4Ghz
    #9
    Adji
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 443
    • Joined: 2009/03/30 11:57:14
    • Location: Sunderland, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 06:18:01 (permalink)
    Hey man, the hotplate is an 'attenuator' it goes between the head and speaker cab and it acts as a secondary master volume, controlling the volume of the speakers essentially. It is not a dummy load as far as I am aware so you cannot run it straight into the computer, it must be connected to a speaker cabinet.

    The Palmer is essentially a split box, splitting the signal between a speaker and a computer, again, a speaker MUST be connected.

    The Palmer PDI03 is different though and acts AS a speaker so you can run your amp head without using a speaker, enabling silent recording. There are similar including the Torpedo which is supposed to be good, but generally dummy loads are not that common.
    #10
    Norrie
    Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1665
    • Joined: 2010/04/20 15:48:15
    • Location: Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 08:21:44 (permalink)
    Hey man thanks for the reply and sorry again for jumping on this thread

    I am glad I found it though Ive ben searching for something to be able to use heads for silent recording :) IF I can use and the palmer PD103 I shall be geting one asap

    Thanks again!

    Norrie



    SONAR X3c Producer
    Pro Tools 11
    Allen & Heath GS-R24 M
    Adam A77x
    i7 4930K @ 4.4Ghz
    #11
    Adji
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 443
    • Joined: 2009/03/30 11:57:14
    • Location: Sunderland, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 08:51:49 (permalink)
    Norrie


    Hey man thanks for the reply and sorry again for jumping on this thread

    I am glad I found it though Ive ben searching for something to be able to use heads for silent recording :) IF I can use and the palmer PD103 I shall be geting one asap

    Thanks again!

    Norrie





    Yeah man no problems, it totally replaces your speaker cabinet.
    I myself am intending to buy one when I can too.
    http://www.thomann.de/gb/palmer_pdi03.htm

    #12
    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 10:46:49 (permalink)
    i built a poor man's pdi03, by using a Weber Mass lite attenuator, and the Palmer PDI-09.


    works like a charm.

    and i prefer the design of the weber attenuator, to the design of the palmer attenuator.



    the pdi03 is an 'all in one' box, whereas the pdi-09 is only the cabinet filter/line level capture box, you still have to have a load.


    cool thing with the palmer in my setup is, i can record my amp at FULL OUTPUT, before attenuation, using the palmer.

    then i take the THRU off the palmer, and put THAT into the attenuator, and tame the volume for monitoring purposes only.


    i use my cabinet as my monitor, no playback from sonar, therefore no latency issues.


    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #13
    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 10:47:52 (permalink)

    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #14
    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 20:02:10 (permalink)
    the cool thing with this setup is, you can send 2 tracks at once, miced and direct, and blend them together.
    close micing, you get very little latency between the 2, and don't have to move the miced track.

    or

    move the mic way back, make it a room mic, and pan it to the opposite side of wherever you pan the direct track.



    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #15
    Norrie
    Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1665
    • Joined: 2010/04/20 15:48:15
    • Location: Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 21:10:12 (permalink)
    batsbrew


    the cool thing with this setup is, you can send 2 tracks at once, miced and direct, and blend them together.
    close micing, you get very little latency between the 2, and don't have to move the miced track.

    or

    move the mic way back, make it a room mic, and pan it to the opposite side of wherever you pan the direct track.


    This looks like a good set up for what I would be looking to do here.

    I am looking at an egnator amp atthe mommetn and its got a dial for going from 1 wat 2 20 wat its supoz to be the Idea recording amp I was playing one last week in a local shop and I was amaized at the sound from it only thing that put me off was that it had no reverb but I could do that in sonar couldnt I?

    That and a palmer would be cool awesome Idea you had there bats brew :D

    Norrie

    SONAR X3c Producer
    Pro Tools 11
    Allen & Heath GS-R24 M
    Adam A77x
    i7 4930K @ 4.4Ghz
    #16
    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Recording From The FX Send of an Amp? 2011/01/13 22:18:57 (permalink)
    WITH THAT EGNATOR...
    you probably wouldn't even need the attenuator.
    and some of them have a emulator out already?!
    look into that on the egnator site.

    the only reason for the attenuator, is if you HAVE to run the amp hard to get your sound happening, but can't deal with the volume.

    remember..

    IMHO.......50% of the sound of a guitar rig, is the cabinet and speaker moving air.
    any emulation, will be a compromise of that sound.

    beyond that, creativity can make up that remainder 50%.
    IMHO.


    reverb is always better put on the mix side, if you commit reverb to the recording, you cannot change it later.

    i mostly record dry, and add effects on mixdown.


    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #17
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1