Bouvrette
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 128
- Joined: 2008/01/25 18:55:50
- Status: offline
EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
Hi, When I press shift - f , I can see the totality of my song. It seems always too long since there are nodes of enveloppe somewhere along the road. Meaning, after my song is over, it still continues because some nodes are hidden. There is too many tracks and enveloppes! Is there a trick to delete all nodes after a certain point? Is it possible for me to decide to delete everything - including nodes of enveloppes - after , say, 1 min 30 ? AND by the way, do you know HOW to look at ALL the enveloppe in a track at the same time ? Thanks!
post edited by Bouvrette - 2011/04/28 18:05:13
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/28 21:17:52
(permalink)
Yes, it would be nice if there was a way to say "delete all events past this point". But there isn't. Even better would be a special End-of-Song marker that told SONAR in certain terms exactly where I want the song to end. But that doesn't exist, either. What I do is press CTL-End in Track View, which moves the Now marker to whatever SONAR considers the "end" point, then scroll up and down until I find a node, and delete it. I repeat that process until I've eradicated every node past the end of the song. It would be nice if CW provided convenient tools for this type of thing, but I guess they don't consider those "workflow" issues. Not like, say, dockable windows.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
PeterMc
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 504
- Joined: 2003/11/12 23:46:34
- Location: Tasmania
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/29 17:57:40
(permalink)
There's a kludgy way to do this. Select all tracks. Then go to the time that you want to be the end of the song (Snap to Clip Landmarks can help here). Set From=Now. Then go to the X1-defined end of the song using control-end and Set Thru=Now. Now delete, making sure to tick all the boxes. This doesn't work for bus envelopes, which also affect where the end of the song is. Cheers, Peter.
i5 6500, H170M, Intel HD 530, 16GB, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Win 10 Pro (1803) (64 bit), Cakewalk by Bandlab
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/29 22:30:14
(permalink)
It's an issue that comes up fairly often on the Forum, so it means it really does hassle a lot of people. I don't know why exactly this issue has never bothered me. I think maybe part of it is I never really expected a project to stop on its own at a particular point, because to me, it doesn't need to. Why is it a problem?--? Simpler than Peter's description of what to do - I just sweep through the time line for the part of the project I want to export as my 2-track master. I know where it ends, and I've lived with the project long enough to know where the reverb tails are really out - I just sweep through to that point, with all tracks selected, and there it is - I export and get on with it. If there's extra baggage at the end, it's just part of the editing I'm going to do in my sound editor anyway (SoundForge). Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
guitartrek
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2842
- Joined: 2006/02/26 12:37:57
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 08:19:49
(permalink)
I posted the same questions a couple months ago because I like to "cleaning up" my projects toward the end, getting rid of stray nodes. Bit - I'm glad I'm not the only one who does this. The "end of the project", wherever Sonar thinks that is, is important to me because in my work flow I don't do any post processing to the wave file after exporting. I don't like a wave file that is bigger than it has to be. Lot's of people use a different program for mastering and take care of any dead space there - but I don't do that. Once I export a Wave - it is done. I'll create an MP3 off the wave and update my web page. I don't like the MP3 to have a lot of dead space at the end. Here's my previous post which contains great feedback from Scott: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=2258418&high=nodes As it turns out you can lasso nodes and then delete them - but only in the tracks. You cannot do this on busses. Unfortunately if the envelope is not selected in the edit filter the nodes are really hard to see. I'm hoping we can get Cakewalk to change this, but it seems most users have developed a work around and don't care about this issue.
|
mixsit
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 789
- Joined: 2004/04/30 11:04:24
- Location: CathouseSound
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 10:36:16
(permalink)
guitartrek I posted the same questions a couple months ago because I like to "cleaning up" my projects toward the end, getting rid of stray nodes. Bit - I'm glad I'm not the only one who does this. The "end of the project", wherever Sonar thinks that is, is important to me because in my work flow I don't do any post processing to the wave file after exporting. I don't like a wave file that is bigger than it has to be. Lot's of people use a different program for mastering and take care of any dead space there - but I don't do that. Once I export a Wave - it is done. I'll create an MP3 off the wave and update my web page. I don't like the MP3 to have a lot of dead space at the end. Here's my previous post which contains great feedback from Scott: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=2258418&high=nodes As it turns out you can lasso nodes and then delete them - but only in the tracks. You cannot do this on busses. Unfortunately if the envelope is not selected in the edit filter the nodes are really hard to see. I'm hoping we can get Cakewalk to change this, but it seems most users have developed a work around and don't care about this issue. I know this has partly been covered, but markers defining (and later refining!) the working sections of a song, or songs within a project is one of the first things I would put in place. Refining- for example, the start marker gets updated from a position of 'count-in for overdubs, to 'the true start point for the final. Same with end point (including defining space to the next song if you're not going to a separate project to master). The up shot is, if you are using markers you are already using them to get around in the song and they're there upon export'. Then it's about four clicks, never have to 'swipe and fuss in the time, the export or bounce is consistent, accurately known every time.
Wayne Smith Part time long time.. CathouseSound Mother Ships - StudioCat DAWs Portals - RME
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 11:12:55
(permalink)
Randy, it seems to be an issue after I've shortened the song. For example, the song may start out with a long MIDI click track that will get truncated later on. SONAR initially bases its internal end-of-song marker on the last MIDI note in the click track. Any automation you add will automatically place a node at that point. Then, when you subsequently truncate the original MIDI track, you're left with a bunch of automation nodes out past the end of the song. When you ultimately export the finished audio there will be a long silence at the end that has to be trimmed. Sometimes, though, SONAR will continue to insist that the song ends out there past the real end, even after you've deleted every event. I have even seen automation continue to be applied to a MIDI track after the envelope was deleted! Makes me wonder if some internal buffer is not being flushed properly. It's been noted many times before that SONAR's automation needs some attention from CW. When it was announced that X1's focus would be on "workflow enhancements", I'd kinda hoped this was the sort of thing they were talking about. Sadly, that was not the case.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 11:22:05
(permalink)
markers defining (and later refining!) the working sections of a song, or songs within a project is one of the first things I would put in place. Absolutely! At the very least, Start-of-Song and End-of-Song markers. It could be implemented within the framework of their existing marker support with the addition of a new property to the marker object. I suggested this long ago, and at the time Noel replied that it was a good idea. I'd hoped it might be in SONAR 7, but it wasn't. Ditto for 8, 8.5 and X1.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 13:44:30
(permalink)
bitflipper Randy, it seems to be an issue after I've shortened the song. For example, the song may start out with a long MIDI click track that will get truncated later on. SONAR initially bases its internal end-of-song marker on the last MIDI note in the click track. Any automation you add will automatically place a node at that point. Then, when you subsequently truncate the original MIDI track, you're left with a bunch of automation nodes out past the end of the song. When you ultimately export the finished audio there will be a long silence at the end that has to be trimmed. Sometimes, though, SONAR will continue to insist that the song ends out there past the real end, even after you've deleted every event. I have even seen automation continue to be applied to a MIDI track after the envelope was deleted! Makes me wonder if some internal buffer is not being flushed properly. It's been noted many times before that SONAR's automation needs some attention from CW. When it was announced that X1's focus would be on "workflow enhancements", I'd kinda hoped this was the sort of thing they were talking about. Sadly, that was not the case. Right on post, David, as per your usual. That's exactly what happens with this end-of-song problem. Sonar keeps seeing automation which is no longer visible in the timeline, because in the course of the project, you've shortened the MIDI track, but the data is still there. Most of us keep the non-destructive MIDI option on, and so all sorts of hidden data piles up in our projects. Having a real, bonafide "End of Project!" marker available seems so basic, so obviously needed, but as we know, we don't have that in Sonar. I don't mean to be argumentative or coy, all I can say is that this particular issue has never been an issue for me, like I said before. I mentioned that sometimes I'll trim off excess time in SoundForge - But actually, that occasion is super rare. Most of the time, I know where the end of the project really is by listening - Sometimes I drop a marker in the time line as a guide. I sweep through the Time Line, selecting what I need - that's a 2 second operation, and without fail, I get what I want in the export. The problem is when the user doesn't make any selection - just enables all the tracks, and leaves the selection as something automatically chosen by Sonar. I know that one reason my hand-selection method in the above paragraph is so engrained in me, is that from the very start, I never let Cakewalk decide what my selection is. So - it would be great if this was fixed in Sonar, if more sophistication could be added to the program to make the end of the project more straight forward, I totally agree. In the meantime, I highly recommend people do their own time line selection - you really can pretty easily do exports that end where they should. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7360
- Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
- Location: Seattle
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 13:50:13
(permalink)
Dude c'mon, we DID get dockable windows.
=========== The Fog People =========== Intel i7-4790 16GB RAM ASUS Z97 Roland OctaCapture Win10/64 SONAR Platinum 64-bit billions VSTs, some of which work
|
guitartrek
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2842
- Joined: 2006/02/26 12:37:57
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 14:55:58
(permalink)
Randy - I must be getting cotchety and stubborn as I get older. I've always "let" Sonar determine my song length as I have always cleaned up excess crap at the end of my song. To do the time selection you've got to be 1) in track view, 2) zoomed properly and 3) it helps to have a mouse. Since I'm on a laptop I end up using a trackpad a lot of the times out of conveinience. And clicking and dragging a LARGER selection on the trackpad isn't great (especially when it needs to be precise). The other thing is I don't like leaving anything in a state of selection, so for me it would be another click to de-select. Lots of times I'm going in and out of Sonar and making a quick edit because of something I heard in my car. I go in, make the change to whatever, Ctl-S, and export. I don't want to worry about having to be in the track view much less the correct zoom. Nor do I change anything in the export dialogue box - that would be too much fiddling. I know it is only click for track veiw, and a couple clips for the proper zoom, and a precise click and drag for the selection, export, and then de-select. For a decade I've been real disciplined on cleaning up my project just so I don't have to do all that. Again - I'm stubborn about this (I know!) - and I go for the fastest possible operations. Oh - probably adding the fuel to my stubbornness is the fact that I'm a software designer and pay a lot of attention to efficiency of user interface. I just don't like the time selection idea when it is not necessary. Geno
post edited by guitartrek - 2011/04/30 15:00:11
|
PeterMc
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 504
- Joined: 2003/11/12 23:46:34
- Location: Tasmania
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 18:11:39
(permalink)
It looks like Sonar has an implicit marker at its end of song. If you put a marker at the end of the song as you want it, then left-click after this marker just above the timeline (the area where you select everything between two markers), the time between your end of song and Sonar's end of song is highlighted. You can also go to Sonar's end of song using control-end. The same happens at the start, although it's more obvious. So my question is: what functionality do we not already have? I think the answer is that we would like to be able to tick a box to export between two special markers called StartOfSOng and EndOfSong (which we would have to define anyway.) And maybe this could be the default: if the special markers exist, only export between them (perhaps with a tiny extra time before and after, and of course with FX tails enabled.) Sonar is pretty close to being able to do what we want. If we are clear about the extra functionality required, perhaps this could be implemented pretty easily. Cheers, Peter.
i5 6500, H170M, Intel HD 530, 16GB, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Win 10 Pro (1803) (64 bit), Cakewalk by Bandlab
|
mixsit
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 789
- Joined: 2004/04/30 11:04:24
- Location: CathouseSound
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 18:39:52
(permalink)
bitflipper markers defining (and later refining!) the working sections of a song, or songs within a project is one of the first things I would put in place. Absolutely! At the very least, Start-of-Song and End-of-Song markers. It could be implemented within the framework of their existing marker support with the addition of a new property to the marker object. I suggested this long ago, and at the time Noel replied that it was a good idea. I'd hoped it might be in SONAR 7, but it wasn't. Ditto for 8, 8.5 and X1. Eh. I see you completely misunderstood. I place the markers, and they define start and end points. But now I see why. You guys aren't in or don't use track view so the 'markers method I mentioned doesn't even relate. Fantastic, and each to their own.
Wayne Smith Part time long time.. CathouseSound Mother Ships - StudioCat DAWs Portals - RME
|
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7360
- Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
- Location: Seattle
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 18:59:59
(permalink)
Oh I think he gets it, but if you label a marker "END" SONAR doesn't make any special distinction for it, it's still just a marker. But Start and End markers could have enhanced functionality, least of which is this problem. It could also be used to sort of circumvent the "negative measures" request, and add a pre-roll to the top of a track.
=========== The Fog People =========== Intel i7-4790 16GB RAM ASUS Z97 Roland OctaCapture Win10/64 SONAR Platinum 64-bit billions VSTs, some of which work
|
ampfixer
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5508
- Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
- Location: Ontario
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 22:00:39
(permalink)
I'm a total noob so this may be stupid. If you guys are doing something like a commercial, could you predefine track templates of 15, 30 or 60 seconds with pre-recorded clicks? essentially a track with nothing on it. I know nothing of track templates so this may not work. If I was doing that kind of work I think I'd want to sit down and load up a blank template for a spot and build my tracks within the pre-defined template. This is likely too obvious to be valid but I'm learning.
Regards, John I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps. WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig, Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 23:35:26
(permalink)
Yes, you could do that. You could, for example, create a one-note MIDI clip and then slip-edit it out to 15, 30 or 60 seconds. It would give you a handy reference in the navigator pane.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/04/30 23:40:49
(permalink)
You guys aren't in or don't use track view... I may have misunderstood your point, but in fact I live in the track view. That and the PRV. What I'm suggesting is user-placed markers just like we all drop into every new project as a matter of course, but adding the ability to optionally assign special meaning to some of them. Such as "song starts here" and "song ends here".
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Bouvrette
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 128
- Joined: 2008/01/25 18:55:50
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/05/01 14:27:03
(permalink)
Allright guys, I get it! There is no way to order Sonar to cut - after a certain point - every **** you made. OK. BUT NOBODY TOLD ME IF THERE WAS A WAY TO LOOK AT ALL YOUR ENVELOPP AT THE SAME TIME !!! HAAH!!! yeah... because, you see, when you have like 7 envelopp per tracks and 30 tracks, that makes a lot of clicks just to check WHERE and WHICH and WHOS ENVELOPP and TRACK is the one making your project to be too long... ---------for the moment, the only way I found, export, import again in a new project, cut off the end. thanks all !
post edited by Bouvrette - 2011/05/01 14:30:03
I know what you are thinking! but your wrong... I'm not a paranoiac!!
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/05/01 16:10:48
(permalink)
We become accustomed to working in particular ways, and we develop different expectations. All I know is that exporting the portion of the time line I want, making my own selection, has always been such a simple, fast procedure. I don't get why it's any kind of hassle. Oh well. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:EASY ENVELOPPE QUESTION
2011/05/01 23:49:56
(permalink)
NOBODY TOLD ME IF THERE WAS A WAY TO LOOK AT ALL YOUR ENVELOPP AT THE SAME TIME !!! There isn't.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|