Rick Gehrke
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 28
- Joined: 2009/04/20 13:46:38
- Status: offline
VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
We have X1 Producer and are tracking vocals for an album. We have the processors that come with Producer (e.g. Vocal Strip, etc.), and also a TC Helicon VoiceLive 2 that's connected as an outboard insert through a USB interface. Assuming we've done all of the other pre-processing stuff right (e.g. singing well, good preamps, good mic placement, etc), and will be going to a pro studio for mastering, does anyone have any experience to share on which has worked best for them: VST (and which ones) or incorporating an outboard processor for vocal effects and pitch polishing? Thanks!
Rick Singer/Guitarist/Amateur Engineer Yogi Bone reverbnation.com/yogibone -- Roland Octa Capture Asus G74SX i7 running Windows 7 Sonar X2 Producer (64 Bit)
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/02 12:35:55
(permalink)
There are some who swear by quality outboard gear and some who reckon that quality plugins are now every bit as good as there hardware counterparts. I subscribe to the latter doing most things in the box. BUT good preamps for vocals and guitars are essential . Sometimes the singing talent isn't good enough to bring into the DAW raaw and you need alittle compression to keep down those wild dynamics a bit. Once you've sorted out what you need in that range of things you'll have a better idea what to do. It will also depend on what sort of monitor mix you're sending your vocalist/s. If you need plugins you're going to incur extra latency esp if using external insert feature as it will add the plugin delay compensation to the Round trip latency of the interface etc. If you can monitor in hardware you can eliminate this but you'll need external hardware to send out some fx. So you've still gota few things to work out. I'm sure that many will come along and tell you what you should do. I recommend that you try a few different things to work out what works for you with your gear as well as increase your knowledge. Essential there are some basic principles to follow but if it sounds good it is good. Your mastering engineer won't be able to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear if you get my drift. All the best. generally if you have no plugins besides what come with X1 Producer you should be able to get a good enough mix but your tracking and mixing chops are what are most important.
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
LANEY
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1350
- Joined: 2010/12/11 20:27:13
- Location: USA
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/02 12:41:23
(permalink)
I like Melodyne, even if you don't use it for pitch is has a nice shine to a final vocal. Something about the way it processes it.
i7/16GB ram Win 7 x64 SONAR Platinum Producer x64 VS-700 C&R Octa-Capture and VS-100 for live recording
|
sharpdion23
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 784
- Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/02 13:44:24
(permalink)
I use vocal strip, reverb and v-vocal for the vocals
Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE * Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276 A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
|
Rick Gehrke
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 28
- Joined: 2009/04/20 13:46:38
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/05 17:39:41
(permalink)
Thanks, guys! The biggest challenge we have on this is really the vocal performance (I can say that, as the singer), but with voice lessons and practice taken as far as budget permits, the only thing left to blame is the engineering team (us) and the equipment. Mike, I like your suggestion about staying in the box, because it makes automation so much easier.
Rick Singer/Guitarist/Amateur Engineer Yogi Bone reverbnation.com/yogibone -- Roland Octa Capture Asus G74SX i7 running Windows 7 Sonar X2 Producer (64 Bit)
|
Rick Gehrke
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 28
- Joined: 2009/04/20 13:46:38
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/05 17:39:42
(permalink)
Thanks, guys! The biggest challenge we have on this is really the vocal performance (I can say that, as the singer), but with voice lessons and practice taken as far as budget permits, the only thing left to blame is the engineering team (us) and the equipment. Mike, I like your suggestion about staying in the box, because it makes automation so much easier.
Rick Singer/Guitarist/Amateur Engineer Yogi Bone reverbnation.com/yogibone -- Roland Octa Capture Asus G74SX i7 running Windows 7 Sonar X2 Producer (64 Bit)
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/06 00:37:57
(permalink)
Unless the TC has an effect you absolutely must use, itb should work fine (and this coming from someone who appreciates TC effects). Today, you are seldom going to run out of computer CPU and the packaged effects are pretty good. That being said, if it is easy to hook up the external hardware (spdif etc.) no problem w/ integrating it. I've got a TC 48 w/ built in effects but that can get a little funky to integrate and the VST version of the them tend to cause stutters at times. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
JoshWolfer
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 372
- Joined: 2011/05/22 03:55:26
- Location: California, USA
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/06 04:14:00
(permalink)
The helicon is a nice unit. I've used the first version. I personally do everything in the sonar, for flexibility. The vocal strip is really nice. I'd go as far to say freakin fantastic when it comes to getting a vocal sittin right. I almost always throw the waves renn compressor on vox, because it sounds really nice, but I'm starting to appreciate the pro channel comp. I'm not completely sold yet, but it's gettin there for me. The main thing I like about doing vox through sonar are automating reverb and delays. For example, one nice technique I've used is to create a send off the vocal track / bus that goes into a cool (as in low to mids cut) reverb that has heavy saturation. it fattens up the vocal when there is singing, but it sounds way too saturated when the voice stops and the reverb takes forever to decay. So I automate the volume on the reverb bus (I usually automate the send as well depending on what I need) in order to manually chop cut off the reverb when the singer stops singing. You'll get a fat sound without getting a "I don't want to sound like an 80s singer" response from the singer. I do the same with delays, especially big slaps. You don't want them going all the time. The voice live is awesome for live shows and even pretty darn good for studio, but it doesn't give you that kind of flexibility. I do enjoy the thickener on the TC though, so maybe get a good base vocal sound with the helicon, but fine tune other FX in sonar. Just some thoughts.
Josh Wolfer - Big Dumb Monkey Productions - www.bigdumbmonkey.com (Twitter @bigdumbmonkeyp) Sonar 8.5.3 / X1b :: 2.8 Ghz core i7 :: 8GB ram :: V-Studio 700 C+R :: Maudio Profire 2626 (ADAT lightpipe into Vstudio)
|
Rick Gehrke
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 28
- Joined: 2009/04/20 13:46:38
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/14 16:26:07
(permalink)
Thanks, guys! Yeah, I can definitely see the utility in automating the effects, so that's a big reason to stay inside Sonar. Think I'll cough up the bucks for a copy of Antares Auto Tune and use the other fx that come with X1.
Rick Singer/Guitarist/Amateur Engineer Yogi Bone reverbnation.com/yogibone -- Roland Octa Capture Asus G74SX i7 running Windows 7 Sonar X2 Producer (64 Bit)
|
jungfriend
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 746
- Joined: 2005/06/04 00:42:15
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/14 18:38:47
(permalink)
I vote for Celemony Melodyne over Antares Autotune. I think is sounds better, with fewer artifacts, and kind of forces you to study the way you are correcting intonation. Autotune lends to automatic settings instead of paying attention to what is really going on in the track. It might take more time with Melodyne, but the results will sound more natural. At least that is my experience, though I am such a spot on singer I rarely need it (not). Paul
Sonar X2 PE, ADK Core i7 920 3.6ghz 12gb, UAD-2 Quad, 2x20"+2x19" LCDs, Focal CMS 50, POD HD500, Layla 3G, PoCo mkII PCI-e, Tranzport, Edirol M-16DX, Remote SL61, Mackie MCU, NI Kore 2, NI Komplete, NI Maschine, etc.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/14 18:50:18
(permalink)
In my view, this is primarily a technique question. If you like to compress and / or EQ on the way in, then you need to use outboard, for the simple reason that a VST can't be "on the way in". If you're not using that approach, and you're talking about processing after recording, then outboard vs VST is not that meaningful a distinction. Use the best sounding stuff you have to hand, whether it's VST or outboard. In a more general sense, you can waste a lot of time and energy chasing that elusive and possibly imaginary last 1% of magic from specific bits of hardware or plug-ins. Upgrading your skills is almost always more effective than upgrading your gear. The stock plug-ins that comes free with the main DAWs these days are well capable of achieving pro results. Some people will tell you that's all nonsense, but that's the kind of people who think they can tell what kind of wood a guitar is made from by listening to a recording of it; they are talking out they ass.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
Rick Gehrke
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 28
- Joined: 2009/04/20 13:46:38
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/14 19:30:37
(permalink)
I downloaded the demos for Melodyne and Autotune 7 this afternoon. The Antares plug-in didn't seem to make much of a difference unless I cranked the speed all the way to T-Pain setting. I can't get the Melodyne demo version to run as a plug-in. Did the install and set Sonar to scan the program folders, but it doesn't show up on the fx list when I try to add it to the bin. I'm not sure this is worth $300!
Rick Singer/Guitarist/Amateur Engineer Yogi Bone reverbnation.com/yogibone -- Roland Octa Capture Asus G74SX i7 running Windows 7 Sonar X2 Producer (64 Bit)
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/15 04:39:12
(permalink)
I think you should at least experiment with V-Vocal and see what results you get. Opinion on these forums is divided about V/V's capability and stability, but if you can get it to process your vocal tracks the way you want, you'll save a load of cash.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
GIM Productions
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 860
- Joined: 2005/12/14 05:07:56
- Status: offline
Re:VST versus Outboard Processor for Vocals in X1 Producer
2011/06/15 10:46:51
(permalink)
Hi all,+ 1 for V Vocal is awesome for pitch and time correction.I use it on bass and sax too.Many Sonar users don't waste their time to learn more on this fantastic tool. The only caution is bounce to clips when the edit is done. It' s only my experience... Good luck! Roby
|