Vocals with large dynamic differences

Author
sharpdion23
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 784
  • Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
  • Status: offline
2011/06/06 15:29:31 (permalink)

Vocals with large dynamic differences

I have a vocal recorded and the dynamics of the vocal are quickly changing from -20db to 0db. What do you do with this?
I tried v-vocal dynamics section but it takes too long to do every single one.
 
Is there any Compressor settings you use for this kind of problem with boost11 or Sonitus compressor
 
 
 Is there also a way to edit the vocal timing to match the project tempo? I tried using audiosnap, but when I adjust the threshold it never gets all the correct transients I want. What happens is when I put the threshold lower, it catches the parts of the vocals where its not right. When I adjust the threshold higher it wont get the parts of the vocal where I want the transients enabled. and so If I quantize the vocals with the lower threshold settings, it makes the vocals fast forward in some spots of the vocals. If I edit the vocals one at a time vith v-vocal it will take forever as this is a long song.  As for adding transients to the spots I want them in or editing the transients, it too will take long.
post edited by sharpdion23 - 2011/06/06 15:42:18

Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire

Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE *

Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276


A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
#1

27 Replies Related Threads

    Stone House Studios
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3550
    • Joined: 2004/05/07 15:07:32
    • Location: Natural Bridge, VA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 15:42:12 (permalink)
    sharpdion23


    I have a vocal recorded and the dynamics of the vocal are quickly changing from -20db to 0db. What do you do with this?
    I tried v-vocal dynamics section but it takes too long to do every single one.
     
    Is there any Compressor settings you use for this kind of problem with boost11 or Sonitus compressor
     
     
     
    Are you tired of me yet? 
     
    If it's that bad, you may want to do some compression on the way in (external compressor) or record with a good bit of head room then use a dynamics processor.
    Best answer is practice  practice  practice!
     
    Brian


     Core i7-6700@3.40Ghz  Windows 10x64 16 GB RAM
    Sonar Platinum/Studio One     PreSonus Studio 192
    #2
    JoshWolfer
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 372
    • Joined: 2011/05/22 03:55:26
    • Location: California, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 15:43:57 (permalink)
    As long as you recorded in a quiet environment, you should be able to squash the living hell out of it (I prefer Waves renn compressor) and still be happy. However, this is highly subjective. Is this pop music? If so, no problem. Use a fast attack, more release (probably 100 ms) and high ratio. 

    If this is music where the vocal dynamics are extremely important, this won't work.

    Are the dynamics constantly fluctuating +/- 20 dB? If that's the case... wow.. Tell your singer to back up off the mic! 

    I suspect that it's only certain points that hit that high volume. For that, I'd gain ride with automation to manually fix the dynamics and use a compressor for all else. One big thing about super squashing with a compressor is that the makeup gain raises the noise floor and you can have some varying tonal warmths, especially if the proximity effect is happening. 

    Hope that helps. If you post a sample of the vocal, I can provide more direct input for how I'd muck with it :).

    Cheers

    Josh Wolfer - Big Dumb Monkey Productions - www.bigdumbmonkey.com (Twitter @bigdumbmonkeyp)
    Sonar 8.5.3 / X1b :: 2.8 Ghz core i7 :: 8GB ram :: V-Studio 700 C+R :: Maudio Profire 2626 (ADAT lightpipe into Vstudio)

    #3
    JoshWolfer
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 372
    • Joined: 2011/05/22 03:55:26
    • Location: California, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 15:45:44 (permalink)
    Are you tired of me yet?   
     
    If it's that bad, you may want to do some compression on the way in (external compressor) or record with a good bit of head room then use a dynamics processor.
    Best answer is practice  practice  practice!
     
    Brian

    As long as he's not clipping, processing it with plugins should yield similar results, varying of course on the compressor used in both cases. 

    Josh Wolfer - Big Dumb Monkey Productions - www.bigdumbmonkey.com (Twitter @bigdumbmonkeyp)
    Sonar 8.5.3 / X1b :: 2.8 Ghz core i7 :: 8GB ram :: V-Studio 700 C+R :: Maudio Profire 2626 (ADAT lightpipe into Vstudio)

    #4
    sharpdion23
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 784
    • Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
    • Location: Vancouver, BC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 15:45:49 (permalink)
    Stone House Studios


    sharpdion23


    I have a vocal recorded and the dynamics of the vocal are quickly changing from -20db to 0db. What do you do with this?
    I tried v-vocal dynamics section but it takes too long to do every single one.
     
    Is there any Compressor settings you use for this kind of problem with boost11 or Sonitus compressor
     
     
     
    Are you tired of me yet? 
     
    If it's that bad, you may want to do some compression on the way in (external compressor) or record with a good bit of head room then use a dynamics processor.
    Best answer is practice  practice  practice!
     
    Brian

    Hey Brian.....AGAIN! Thanks for responding to my posts. Maybe come to vancouver sometime and drop by
     
    Thanks I will try looking and researching on how to use dynamics proccessor. Do you know any good places to start my research?
     
    Oh and I edited my first post with another question.
    post edited by sharpdion23 - 2011/06/06 15:48:31

    Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire

    Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE *

    Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276


    A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
    #5
    JoshWolfer
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 372
    • Joined: 2011/05/22 03:55:26
    • Location: California, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 15:48:54 (permalink)
    For timing, I'd only use manual edits. Oldschool, but reliable. And very quick when using the keypad nudges. I have modified my low nudge to be pretty small so I can just tap tap tap the vocal cuts in place. 

    If you're lining up harmony tracks or doubles, I turn on the mouse aim ('x' key) in order to visually see where the clips are lining up.

    Josh Wolfer - Big Dumb Monkey Productions - www.bigdumbmonkey.com (Twitter @bigdumbmonkeyp)
    Sonar 8.5.3 / X1b :: 2.8 Ghz core i7 :: 8GB ram :: V-Studio 700 C+R :: Maudio Profire 2626 (ADAT lightpipe into Vstudio)

    #6
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 15:54:47 (permalink)
    Stone House Studios


    sharpdion23


    I have a vocal recorded and the dynamics of the vocal are quickly changing from -20db to 0db. What do you do with this?
    I tried v-vocal dynamics section but it takes too long to do every single one.
     
    Is there any Compressor settings you use for this kind of problem with boost11 or Sonitus compressor
     
     
     
    Are you tired of me yet? 
     
    If it's that bad, you may want to do some compression on the way in (external compressor) or record with a good bit of head room then use a dynamics processor.
    Best answer is practice  practice  practice!
     
    Brian


    This is exactly what I do as well, Sharp. I like to record going in at about -6dB and use a compressor while recording so it keeps me close to -6dB. Nothing too extreme here because you don't want to kill your dynamics. I'm sort of using the compressor as a conditioner so to speak, just so it stops me from going all over the place. Also, it is wise to use movement techniques when singing. For example, if you are going to belt something out, you should move away from the mic a bit. For more intimate passages, you move closer in to the mic. For the most part though, when I set up my input signals and my actual placement for where I will stand and sing, I set the levels so that I'm never going over -6dB at my loudest vocal part. The little bit of compression going in using a hardware comp keeps things nice and tight without squashing the heck out of the vocal track. Then you can add more compression to taste using a plugin once you've recorded tha track, and then you should use some automation on the vocal track as well to keep it consistent. The Sonitus compressor or one of the Pro Channel comps should be perfect for this after you've recorded your tracks. Best of luck. :)

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #7
    sharpdion23
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 784
    • Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
    • Location: Vancouver, BC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 16:03:16 (permalink)
    Danny Danzi


    Stone House Studios


    sharpdion23


    I have a vocal recorded and the dynamics of the vocal are quickly changing from -20db to 0db. What do you do with this?
    I tried v-vocal dynamics section but it takes too long to do every single one.
     
    Is there any Compressor settings you use for this kind of problem with boost11 or Sonitus compressor
     
     
     
    Are you tired of me yet? 
     
    If it's that bad, you may want to do some compression on the way in (external compressor) or record with a good bit of head room then use a dynamics processor.
    Best answer is practice  practice  practice!
     
    Brian


    This is exactly what I do as well, Sharp. I like to record going in at about -6dB and use a compressor while recording so it keeps me close to -6dB. Nothing too extreme here because you don't want to kill your dynamics. I'm sort of using the compressor as a conditioner so to speak, just so it stops me from going all over the place. Also, it is wise to use movement techniques when singing. For example, if you are going to belt something out, you should move away from the mic a bit. For more intimate passages, you move closer in to the mic. For the most part though, when I set up my input signals and my actual placement for where I will stand and sing, I set the levels so that I'm never going over -6dB at my loudest vocal part. The little bit of compression going in using a hardware comp keeps things nice and tight without squashing the heck out of the vocal track. Then you can add more compression to taste using a plugin once you've recorded tha track, and then you should use some automation on the vocal track as well to keep it consistent. The Sonitus compressor or one of the Pro Channel comps should be perfect for this after you've recorded your tracks. Best of luck. :)

    For recording is there a compressor plugin instead of using a hardware for recording?

    Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire

    Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE *

    Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276


    A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
    #8
    Frank Haas
    Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2490
    • Joined: 2005/01/14 06:32:54
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 16:04:51 (permalink)
    and in case you already recorded the vocals.. you could use 2 or 3 compressors/limiters (just use one compressor as your pretend to be hardware compressor with a light setting..) then another one with a 8:1 ratio, and a limiter to cut of the last peaks.. (that's just the quick and easy way to do it..)
    better and as mentionend,.. use "gain"(!) automation before the signal hits the compressor, or automate the threshold of your compressor(s) whenever necessary..

    melodyne works quite ok to fix some timing issues.. but if the vocals are so bad I'd start all over again with the vocal-tracks.

    For recording is there a compressor plugin instead of using a hardware for recording?

    given that you don't overdrive your a/d converters(headroom!!!), and given that you can run a low latency,.. then you can take any compressor plugin during recordings..
    post edited by Frank Haas - 2011/06/06 16:06:28
    #9
    M@ B
    Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1128
    • Joined: 2010/01/05 20:54:54
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 16:08:19 (permalink)
    hello sharp, i agree with those who have already suggested retracking the vocal with a bit of compression while also being mindful of mic technique. a 20 db swing is kind of a lot. unless the track in question has some unique, never-to-be-done-again content, just take it as a learning experience and do it again. that's one of the luxuries of unlimited tracks. good luck.

    #10
    sharpdion23
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 784
    • Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
    • Location: Vancouver, BC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 16:53:03 (permalink)
    Frank Haas


    and in case you already recorded the vocals.. you could use 2 or 3 compressors/limiters (just use one compressor as your pretend to be hardware compressor with a light setting..) then another one with a 8:1 ratio, and a limiter to cut of the last peaks.. (that's just the quick and easy way to do it..)
    better and as mentionend,.. use "gain"(!) automation before the signal hits the compressor, or automate the threshold of your compressor(s) whenever necessary..

    melodyne works quite ok to fix some timing issues.. but if the vocals are so bad I'd start all over again with the vocal-tracks.


    For recording is there a compressor plugin instead of using a hardware for recording?

    given that you don't overdrive your a/d converters(headroom!!!), and given that you can run a low latency,.. then you can take any compressor plugin during recordings..

    given that you don't overdrive your a/d converters(headroom!!!), and given that you can run a low latency,.. then you can take any compressor plugin during recordings..

     
    What compressor plugin do you suggest using and what kind of settings do you use?

    Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire

    Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE *

    Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276


    A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
    #11
    Guitarpima
    Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4125
    • Joined: 2005/11/19 23:53:59
    • Location: Terra 3
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 17:24:35 (permalink)
    Why not use clip envelopes? Divide the track up and add envelopes to the louder parts. Essentially what your doing is creating another mix in the track. You can easily get similar volumes that way and then compress.

    Other than that, if you can re-record it, do that.

    Notation, the original DAW. Everything else is just rote. We are who we are and no more than another. Humans, you people are crazy.
     
     Win 7 x64  X2  Intel DX58SO, Intel i7 920 2.66ghz 12gb DDR3  ASUS ATI EAH5750  650w PSU 4x WD HDs 320gb  DVD, DVD RW Eleven Rack, KRK Rokit 8s and 10s sub
    #12
    sharpdion23
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 784
    • Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
    • Location: Vancouver, BC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 17:26:52 (permalink)
    This is a long long song and so doing envelopes manually takes time

    Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire

    Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE *

    Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276


    A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
    #13
    JoshWolfer
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 372
    • Joined: 2011/05/22 03:55:26
    • Location: California, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 17:36:10 (permalink)
    I haven't done it yet, but can't you draw envelopes in X1? Drawing dips should make it a lot faster. Again I haven't tried this yet, I just thought it was a feature. I'll check when I get home.

    Josh Wolfer - Big Dumb Monkey Productions - www.bigdumbmonkey.com (Twitter @bigdumbmonkeyp)
    Sonar 8.5.3 / X1b :: 2.8 Ghz core i7 :: 8GB ram :: V-Studio 700 C+R :: Maudio Profire 2626 (ADAT lightpipe into Vstudio)

    #14
    jonny3d
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 179
    • Joined: 2010/05/02 11:51:37
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 21:01:16 (permalink)
    Two cents:
    I would probably do a 3 pronged attack!

    1: I would  go in and use the "gain automation"  (the rubber bands) and bring the loudest parts down to help balance the track within itself, volume wise.

    2: I would then compress to the point that it improves the dynamic range to a point that causes no ill artifacts.

    3: Finally I would run it through a limiter to 'squash' the peaks to a final degree.

    Good Luck!
    post edited by jonny3d - 2011/06/06 21:02:41
    #15
    Stone House Studios
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3550
    • Joined: 2004/05/07 15:07:32
    • Location: Natural Bridge, VA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 21:03:58 (permalink)
    sharpdion23


    This is a long long song and so doing envelopes manually takes time

    Ahem . . . .  Let us never forget the investment of time!  Only the Beatles can record a hit record in a day!  
     
    (Somebody please get my Star Trek China/Nixon joke here!)
     
    Brian

     Core i7-6700@3.40Ghz  Windows 10x64 16 GB RAM
    Sonar Platinum/Studio One     PreSonus Studio 192
    #16
    Zuma
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 525
    • Joined: 2006/01/13 17:56:03
    • Location: SoCal...High and dry in LA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 21:51:46 (permalink)
    Voxengo Voxformer. As someone who loves to sing I will never part with that channel strip. It is easy as sin to use and flat out awesome on vocals. You can dial in a vicious bite or silky smooth vocals with little to no effort. Makes my SM58 sound like an expensive condenser. Blows my mind how sweet that plug is on vocals and really anything else you want to run through it. Money well spent IMO.

    http://zumajunction.bandcamp.com/

    "the bus came by and I got on that's when it all began. There was cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never ever land."_



    #17
    ...wicked
    Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7360
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
    • Location: Seattle
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/06 22:57:58 (permalink)
    +1 to what's said above:

    In the future counsel your performers on mic technique. Backing off on louder passages will save you headaches in the future.

    You can add a hardware unit to massage the signal on the way to the computer, which will ease your life later  but you need to spend time tweaking it in rehearsals.

    And, once it's in, if you haven't clipped it you just compress that sucker! How much obviously will depend on the material. A singer/songwriter with a guitar can get away with a large dynamic range in a performance. A metal song with a thick musical bed? Not so much.

    ===========
    The Fog People
    ===========

    Intel i7-4790 
    16GB RAM
    ASUS Z97 
    Roland OctaCapture
    Win10/64   

    SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
    billions VSTs, some of which work    
    #18
    LpMike75
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1621
    • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 01:37:40 (permalink)
    I am a fan of tedious envelope tweeking.  Not that I love doing it but because I get a more natural sound than when you are heavily taxing a compressor(s).  If you were to sit in on a professional mixer, you would see that they do quite alot of envelope tweeking, I would be very surprised to see a professional slap on a compressor as their first answer to extreme volume fluctuations. 

    I dont think there is an easy way around the tedious task of volume editing with your track, if you want a decent sounding result.  (I have done this with long songs and feel your pain)  Manually D'essing a long vocal track is also a blast!
    Good luck


    - Mike
    Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
    http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
    Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
    HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
    Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
    #19
    Kalle Rantaaho
    Max Output Level: -5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7005
    • Joined: 2006/01/09 13:07:59
    • Location: Finland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 02:39:52 (permalink)
    A lot of good advice above. Just to summarize..

    - Mic technique is the essential thing. Practice!
    - External compressor helps (subtly!). A plugin can not replace the external compressor in preventing clipping, but a "pre-SONAR" compressor that many soundcards offer, does help to get more even dynamics on the track.
    - If you try to squash the dynamics with a compressor in one go, the result is most likely not satisfactory
    - Spending a day or two just adjusting volume envelopes for a vocal part is not uncommon. If
    you have to do it, you do it.
     

    SONAR PE 8.5.3, Asus P5B, 2,4 Ghz Dual Core, 4 Gb RAM, GF 7300, EMU 1820, Bluetube Pre  -  Kontakt4, Ozone, Addictive Drums, PSP Mixpack2, Melda Creative Pack, Melodyne Plugin etc.
    The benefit of being a middle aged amateur is the low number of years of frustration ahead of you.
    #20
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 06:38:39 (permalink)
    Spending a day or two just adjusting volume envelopes for a vocal part is not uncommon. If you have to do it, you do it.


    +1

    You didn't really think it was going to be EASY did you?

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #21
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 09:46:09 (permalink)
    Rather than using a single compressor set to a higher compression ratio, try running several compressors in series... set to a lower compression ratio.
    This will yield a smoother sounding result.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #22
    sharpdion23
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 784
    • Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
    • Location: Vancouver, BC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 11:36:38 (permalink)
    Four Questions here

    what settings would you use,what compressor do you use, is this for recording or after and why is using multple compressors better than one Jim?

    Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire

    Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE *

    Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276


    A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
    #23
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 12:13:07 (permalink)
    Using multiple compressors is analogous with painting - you don't just slap one thick coat on and be done with it - you build it up in coats/layers. You'll get a much smoother response this way no matter which compressors you use.

    You've got the Sonitus - use it! It's a very good workhorse comp and lends itself well to lots of different applications.

    You can record with the compressor in the bin but you won't be recording what the compressor does. The only way you can affect an incoming signal this way is by using hardware BEFORE your AD (Interface/soundcard)

    Nobody can tell you what settings to use because each case is totally different from every other case. We don't know how hot your signal levels are and this will dictate where the threshold - the most important parameter - is set.

    You need to spend a LOT of time investigating & experimenting with different settings so you get to know what each one does and how they interact with each other.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #24
    sharpdion23
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 784
    • Joined: 2009/04/26 18:07:59
    • Location: Vancouver, BC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 12:33:55 (permalink)
    Bristol_Jonesey


    Using multiple compressors is analogous with painting - you don't just slap one thick coat on and be done with it - you build it up in coats/layers. You'll get a much smoother response this way no matter which compressors you use.

    You've got the Sonitus - use it! It's a very good workhorse comp and lends itself well to lots of different applications.

    You can record with the compressor in the bin but you won't be recording what the compressor does. The only way you can affect an incoming signal this way is by using hardware BEFORE your AD (Interface/soundcard)

    Nobody can tell you what settings to use because each case is totally different from every other case. We don't know how hot your signal levels are and this will dictate where the threshold - the most important parameter - is set.

    You need to spend a LOT of time investigating & experimenting with different settings so you get to know what each one does and how they interact with each other.

    The only way you can affect an incoming signal this way is by using hardware BEFORE your AD (Interface/soundcard)

     
    I don't know if this has been answered, so feel free to point it out, but is there really no compressor plugin that affects my incoming signal other than gain control?

    Win7 pro 64bit*SonarX1 PE 64 bit* AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 Dual Processor 6000+ 3.00 Ghz* 4GB Ram* 232GB HD* Cakewalk MA-15D* SPS-66 FireWire

    Owner of Sonar 6 Studio* Sonar 7 PE * Sonar 8.0 PE * Sonar 8.5.3 PE * Sonar X1 PE *

    Link to upload Screens: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1592276


    A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
    #25
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 13:11:54 (permalink)
    Sharp,

    no plugin will help control the incoming dynamics - any more than doing it post recording.  It seems to me, like others, that reducing the dynamics going in is the best way.  There are several things you need to do.

    Work on vocal delivery.  I'm not competent to make suggestion here, esp. if you have ever heard my attempts at singing.
     
    A preamp w/ high gain.  This will let you back off the mic, which naturally "compresses" the sound since volume falls off geometrically w/ distance - it is squared.  Compared to most built in interfaces, an external preamp will deliver more pure gain, so you can turn it up and back off the mic.  You need to address room problems before you can take advantage of this, but even in an OK room it can really help the dynamics of a song.  Backing the singer off 6 inches to a foot (or more!) solves all kinds of problems - dynamics, timbre changes with head movements, proximity effects, etc.  The preamp doesn't have to be a hand made tubey $2000 job - there are plenty of mid range preamps that can accomplish this.  Gap pre, Isa One, FMR.  any of these (and some others even cheaper) can deliver more gain w/ less stress than even a good built-in preamp (my TC impact preamps are good, but the ISA One is much better in relative terms).
     
    a compressor going into the AD.  Obviously, you can let it do the gain riding.  Just a touch can help and provide the singer confidence to deliver a good performance without worrying about volume.
     
    EQ - a low cut on your mic or preamp can get rid of a lot of rumble low end crud that you won't use and don't need (I usually cut vox up to 150+ Hz in the box anyway and cutting out lower stuff provides more headroom).
     
    If you can't re-record (and you could always do 2 takes - one close and one far and use the best parts from each w/o spending a cent more), the above suggestions will allow you to work on your chops.  And remember, use your own judgment about these things.  Others can provide techniques, but it is the ones you choose to employ that make you an engineer.
     
    @


    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #26
    Zuma
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 525
    • Joined: 2006/01/13 17:56:03
    • Location: SoCal...High and dry in LA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/07 15:10:21 (permalink)
    Working a mic is the simplest thing in the world once you're conscious of it. As already pointed out, coming forward for quiet passages and backing off when you need to howl is your own natural way of keeping the dynamics in the same ballpark.  I don't even use compression on the way in. Just slap voxformer in the bin to give my SM58 some bite and have at it. No pop filter either. Yes that takes a bit of practice, but so does playing guitar, bass, drums, etc. Levels too are very important so that you're not straining. It should be an effortless experience once you have everything right... obviously, lol.

    http://zumajunction.bandcamp.com/

    "the bus came by and I got on that's when it all began. There was cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never ever land."_



    #27
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Vocals with large dynamic differences 2011/06/08 06:17:50 (permalink)
    sharpdion23


    Bristol_Jonesey


    Using multiple compressors is analogous with painting - you don't just slap one thick coat on and be done with it - you build it up in coats/layers. You'll get a much smoother response this way no matter which compressors you use.

    You've got the Sonitus - use it! It's a very good workhorse comp and lends itself well to lots of different applications.

    You can record with the compressor in the bin but you won't be recording what the compressor does. The only way you can affect an incoming signal this way is by using hardware BEFORE your AD (Interface/soundcard)

    Nobody can tell you what settings to use because each case is totally different from every other case. We don't know how hot your signal levels are and this will dictate where the threshold - the most important parameter - is set.

    You need to spend a LOT of time investigating & experimenting with different settings so you get to know what each one does and how they interact with each other.


    The only way you can affect an incoming signal this way is by using hardware BEFORE your AD (Interface/soundcard)

     
    I don't know if this has been answered, so feel free to point it out, but is there really no compressor plugin that affects my incoming signal other than gain control?


    A little bit of thought will tell you the answer (not trying to sound disrespectful) but ANY plugin MUST, by it's very nature, be AFTER your AD & soundcard. It plugs-into Sonar, so by that very definition, if the signal is too hot or too dynamic by the time it reaches your converters - it's too late

    Microphone > Pre-amp > Interface > Sonar > Plugins

    Compress here             ^^

    You need to apply compression BEFORE it his your interface, not after

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #28
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1