Helpful ReplyProblem with SONAR and AVID hardware.

Author
tdawgg
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Joined: 2007/10/10 13:08:30
  • Status: offline
2011/06/16 21:03:00 (permalink)

Problem with SONAR and AVID hardware.

I have ever used. I used SONAR from the beginning, up to ver. 6, and then, because I had alot of M-Audio hardware, went to ProTools M-powered, then moved to a 003 rack (Black Lion Audio Sig Series mod), and now PT 9, which has ADC, and allows you to use pretty much any interface. I decided to try SONAR again, and bought a "upgrade" version. the first problem I encountered is that you have to download a ton of files, and then they must all be in the same folder to run...I think...I STILL cant get the "extra content" to install, so when I open a demo session, it tells me all kinds of plug-in files are missing..the next problem, that has been on-going for almost a week now, is that SONAR X1 (and I have d/l'ed BOTH patches) does not like the Digi 003 rack interface. I have tried everything, using ASIO drivers, WDM drivers..everything. The software will work with the 003 in WDM mode, to a degree, but at low latency settings that PT works flawlessly with, SONAR pops and clicks. If I adjust anything having to do with latency, in WDM driver mode, the program locks up, If I run in ASIO mode, the time line ruler will move about half a second and freeze, as the audio keeps playing. I tried recording like this, with a live input, no dice. The software synths sound incredible...when they work and don't lock up. I called Cakewalk support, and was told that the Digi hardware needs standalone drivers to work with SONAR..he thinks..So, I searched Digi's (AVID) sight and there ARE no standalone drivers that would also work with PT 9. Isn't this something that Cakewalk should warn people who own this hardware about, BEFORE they plunk down thier hard-earned money, and sit around for a week trying to make the two work together?? I have yet to record a single note into this software. I really, really wish I could get my money back...that is about 12-16 hours of my life that I ill never get back, and I could have been recording something in ProTools...sorry, Cakewalk, barring some sort of miracle, like one of your tech support people actually tries to help me and comes up with a solution thats better then "well, your hardware just wont work with our software, sorry we didn't warn you before you bought it", you have lost me as a customer forever....
post edited by Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk] - 2011/06/16 21:37:15
#1
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk]
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 2084
  • Joined: 2008/07/17 04:38:03
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 21:16:34 (permalink)
I'm sorry to hear about your frustrations, Tdawgg. Sadly, there is nothing we can do about Avid's driver support for their hardware. Their hardware has always been designed to run first and foremost with Pro Tools. Third-party software support has always been on the back burner for them. Unfortunately, we can't write drivers for hardware that isn't ours.

However, you might try disabling multi-processor support in SONAR. I've heard Avid's drivers don't work well with third-party hosts and multi-cpu support, which is a limitation of their driver. 

It's too bad you don't have another audio interface somewhere, because if you had one from literally any other manufacturer, I think your experience would be vastly different.

Again, there is absolutely nothing we can do about Avid's hardware. BTW, I doubt they told you that their audio interfaces don't work well with third-party software when you bought it.

Here's a link to Avid's standalone ASIO driver ...

http://avid.custkb.com/avid/app/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=355067  SP

#2
gwp99
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 507
  • Joined: 2005/02/12 12:42:46
  • Location: Canada
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 21:18:45 (permalink)
I used the Eleven for a while with Reaper and couldn't use their drivers (Avid) at all - I had to connect via S/DIF.  

(Seth, I was getting a headache trying to read the original post - congratulations for getting through it in that format without paragraphs)
post edited by gwp99 - 2011/06/16 21:23:03

  X1E-64bit, Windows 7 64-bit, Sonica Labs Hush QT- Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 2.66G, 8GB  RAM, RME Fireface UFX (using Firewire), 3 eSata internal/many external hdd's    
#3
sykodelic
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 612
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 15:44:28
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 21:21:43 (permalink)
I think this one falls more on digidesign than cakewalk.  they don't want you jumping ship so they make it so you need there software to use their interface.  It's not cakes job to update digidesigns drivers.  I have seen people complaining about the 003 not playing nice with a few other daw's lately also. 

the upgrade download mess.  well you got a point there.  I didn't have the problems your having though.  I downloaded all the files which took forever and ran the installer and that was it.  The content file you can just drag to your harddrive and point sonar too it.  

Asus P8P67 pro, I7 2600K, 8G Kingston Hyperflex, 2 1T WD Caviar Black(sytem,audio), 2T WD Caviar Black(samples), RME Multiface, Roland A500 Pro, Windows 7 Ultimate 64, Sonar X1C, Ableton Live 8, Reason 6, Komplete 7, DCAM Synth Squad, Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trillian
#4
tdawgg
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Joined: 2007/10/10 13:08:30
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 21:39:04 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby mudgel 2015/12/20 10:49:16
I understand about the Digi hardware and driver thing, but my point was this:
Shouldn't Cakewalk notify the potential customer  that there are certain interfaces that may not work with thier software?
As far as the download, Avid has a seemless download process, that was very easy to install, and it installs all the software and VI stuff at the same time.
To the english professor that commeted about my lack of paragraphs, sorry...I was/am very frustrated.
I do have a M-audio FW 1814, tha has also been modded by BLA, so maybe I will give that a go, since it doesn't look like Cakewalk would be willing to reimbursh me for the $ I spent for software that  I can't use, and they are now telling me "sorry, it's Avid's fault"
Can't we all just get along?
#5
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk]
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 2084
  • Joined: 2008/07/17 04:38:03
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 21:45:27 (permalink)
Lets all take one step back and not worry so much about grammer and punctuation, although, yes, paragraphs do make long posts much easier to read. 

Back to the topic at hand ...

Avid's older hardware, as far as I know, never officially supported third-party software. That is their limitation and not ours. IMHO they should be letting their customers know that their drivers are crippled with third-party software. I'm really sorry to put it this way, but there's nothing we can really do about this.

Since you have an 1814 I would go ahead and use that with SONAR. You can have both interfaces connected to your system at the same time, so that shouldn't be a problem. Just turn on the 003 when using PT, and then turn on the 1814 when using SONAR. 

I know people here have used the 1814 and SONAR together with success so I would be very surprised if things didn't work out with that combo.

If you have any more questions or issues setting up the 1814 with SONAR, feel free to ask.

SP
#6
sykodelic
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 612
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 15:44:28
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 21:46:45 (permalink)
Shouldn't Cakewalk notify the potential customer  that there are certain interfaces that may not work with thier software?


 Digi really is the one that needs to tell you that there interface will not work with other manufacturers software.  They will never let you leave.  



Asus P8P67 pro, I7 2600K, 8G Kingston Hyperflex, 2 1T WD Caviar Black(sytem,audio), 2T WD Caviar Black(samples), RME Multiface, Roland A500 Pro, Windows 7 Ultimate 64, Sonar X1C, Ableton Live 8, Reason 6, Komplete 7, DCAM Synth Squad, Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trillian
#7
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 22:04:43 (permalink)
Shouldn't Cakewalk notify the potential customer that there are certain interfaces that may not work with thier software?

 
I look at this way...   The number of available interfaces far outweighs the number of avalable DAWs.  So it seems more practical that the interface manufacturer would take that responsibility... if it's even feasible. 
 
But getting back to Avid, I'm currently running SONAR X1 B with an MBOX 2, v7.4 drivers, on Vista 32 with no problems to speak of.  And overall it runs as well as Pro Tools or better.   Maybe it's the driver/OS combination, maybe it's just luck.   So in my case saying that there are certain interfaces that won't work with SONAR simply isn't true.
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
#8
tdawgg
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Joined: 2007/10/10 13:08:30
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 22:07:21 (permalink)
interesting..the title of my post changed..
I believe that BOTH manufactuer's should post some kind of warning to thier customers about the hardware/software issue
For the record, Avid seems much more interested in responding to their customers requests then Digidesign ever did...ADC, anyone?
And, my other interfaces (POD HD 300, M-Audio FW1814) both work flawlessly with PT. I understand that CW can't be responsible for Avid's drivers, but some type of warning would have been nice
#9
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk]
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 2084
  • Joined: 2008/07/17 04:38:03
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 22:17:42 (permalink)
I guess you could say Avid is listening to their customers by adding ADC to PT9, but its a 'feature' we've had for almost two decades.  

Is that how long its going to take them to make a 64-bit DAW?  
 
Anyways, I hope you get SONAR up and running. Let us know how it works out.

SP


#10
Fog
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12302
  • Joined: 2008/02/27 21:53:35
  • Location: UK
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 22:29:26 (permalink)
tdawgg ,  the short version.. change your hardware and you find your issues are gone. sonar uses "generic" stuff.. so it doesn't know what maker you have.. e.g. roland / rme / motu etc etc etc

avid / digi = basically same company for 10+ years avid own digi IRC.. (and m-audio) ...oh and thats the same company that puts out PT... or am I being cynical ?



#11
sykodelic
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 612
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 15:44:28
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 23:00:59 (permalink)
the title should have been changed to protools sucks and so does their hardware.....

Asus P8P67 pro, I7 2600K, 8G Kingston Hyperflex, 2 1T WD Caviar Black(sytem,audio), 2T WD Caviar Black(samples), RME Multiface, Roland A500 Pro, Windows 7 Ultimate 64, Sonar X1C, Ableton Live 8, Reason 6, Komplete 7, DCAM Synth Squad, Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trillian
#12
sykodelic
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 612
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 15:44:28
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 23:02:22 (permalink)
why would they need to make 64bit.  they sold all their customers interfaces that only work with their software...they can't leave anyway.....

Asus P8P67 pro, I7 2600K, 8G Kingston Hyperflex, 2 1T WD Caviar Black(sytem,audio), 2T WD Caviar Black(samples), RME Multiface, Roland A500 Pro, Windows 7 Ultimate 64, Sonar X1C, Ableton Live 8, Reason 6, Komplete 7, DCAM Synth Squad, Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trillian
#13
tdawgg
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Joined: 2007/10/10 13:08:30
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 23:12:48 (permalink)
wow...sorry to invade your world..FYI, I don't see this kind of hate over on the PT boards.
I realize my post didn't start off with a glowing review of SONAR, but after a week of trying to set-up a DAW, I was obviously frustrated, especially when Cakewalk support basically said there is nothing they can do for me, and I realized I was out $200. Shame on both companies for not letting thier customers know about this issue...and shame on the people here for being narrow minded instead of helpful (except for the moderator, who I assume changed the title of my post for some reason)...good luck to you all and happy recording!
#14
sykodelic
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 612
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 15:44:28
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 23:19:35 (permalink)
I'm not a fan of pro tools not you.  they took my money years ago and charged me more money every time i had to call with a problem.  sorry your having issues with cakewalk.  I'm sure if you get your interface figured out you'll be happy in the end.  Welcome to the forums!!!!

Asus P8P67 pro, I7 2600K, 8G Kingston Hyperflex, 2 1T WD Caviar Black(sytem,audio), 2T WD Caviar Black(samples), RME Multiface, Roland A500 Pro, Windows 7 Ultimate 64, Sonar X1C, Ableton Live 8, Reason 6, Komplete 7, DCAM Synth Squad, Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trillian
#15
Fog
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12302
  • Joined: 2008/02/27 21:53:35
  • Location: UK
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 23:41:05 (permalink)
tdawgg , not at all narrow minded, if you read it out of context so be it.. I own a number of m-audio things (axiom / ozone (and the plugin with the same name that was distro'd in the UK by them) / 1010LT ) , but sadly because of their drivers and lack of customer care /  support  on 1 item will not be buying any of their products in the future . If Avid want to bother to reply to emails , then perhaps they should contact me via here. Not like my custom has counted for anything so far.

I switched hardware makers / sound card.. = zero problems now.... and I used a few hosts besides sonar.. and all 3 hosts gave problems that vanished after I switched... coincidence ? I can't blame sonar, I know that much. I blame their drivers.

it's not hate.. it's a case of .. would you rather make music (which I'm sure you would)
 or d*** around with sound cards ...

THATS WHAT IT BOILS DOWN TO... nothing else

I've had 2-3 times where just switching hardware fixed such issues and yep I use more hosts than sonar so can't exactly be called a fan boy.

if companies tout their cards as "asio" based etc.. then make sure they test em on ALL hosts.. not  their own brand of DAW

I have been there myself with cards / hardware in general and it's infuriating , so believe it or not I know where your coming from


post edited by Fog - 2011/06/16 23:49:36
#16
sykodelic
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 612
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 15:44:28
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/16 23:46:04 (permalink)
if companies tout their cards as "asio" based etc.. then make sure they test em on ALL hosts.. not  their own brand of DAW 


+1

Asus P8P67 pro, I7 2600K, 8G Kingston Hyperflex, 2 1T WD Caviar Black(sytem,audio), 2T WD Caviar Black(samples), RME Multiface, Roland A500 Pro, Windows 7 Ultimate 64, Sonar X1C, Ableton Live 8, Reason 6, Komplete 7, DCAM Synth Squad, Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Trillian
#17
SCorey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 538
  • Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:14
  • Location: Salt Lake City, UT
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/17 10:47:15 (permalink)
adding ADC to PT9, but its a 'feature' we've had for almost two decades.

I seem to recall an interview with former Cakewalk CTO Ron Kuper who was talking about plugin delay compensation. He said something along the lines of why would you not have it? It's a no-brainer feature that they included in the first ProAudio version, and they never even thought of documenting it on a marketing "feature list" since it would quite simply be a broken DAW without it.

-Steve Corey
#18
BEATZM1D10T
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 285
  • Joined: 2009/05/22 12:43:50
  • Location: Mid-West
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/17 11:00:43 (permalink)
tdawgg


wow...sorry to invade your world..FYI, I don't see this kind of hate over on the PT boards.
I realize my post didn't start off with a glowing review of SONAR, but after a week of trying to set-up a DAW, I was obviously frustrated, especially when Cakewalk support basically said there is nothing they can do for me, and I realized I was out $200. Shame on both companies for not letting thier customers know about this issue...and shame on the people here for being narrow minded instead of helpful (except for the moderator, who I assume changed the title of my post for some reason)...good luck to you all and happy recording!


All it really boils down to is being an informed consumer. It's neither companies fault for you not doing your own research. It's widely known Avid/Digi hardware doesn't play nice with other programs. It's been that way for over a decade.

I apologize if that's a narrow mindset.

EDIT: I think these are the drivers Cakewalk told you to use. Funny how Avid didn't even know they had them.
post edited by BEATZM1D10T - 2011/06/17 11:05:43
#19
Fog
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12302
  • Joined: 2008/02/27 21:53:35
  • Location: UK
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/19 23:03:29 (permalink)
BEATZM1D10T



All it really boils down to is being an informed consumer. It's neither companies fault for you not doing your own research.

certain companies (and I'm not referring to Cakewalk) HAVE changed the goal posts "mid version" or with an "update" AFTER they get your money for the .Zero version.. I doubt I'm the only one thats happened to.. and it feels sometimes as soon as a company see's the "legacy" period is due.. they quite happily turn into "LA LA LA I'm not listening" mode.. even when hardware is perfectly fine IF they bothered to write decent drivers..

been there.. got the t-shirt.. and any company who thinks thats "fine" to do, doesn't get my business later if I can possibly / hopefully avoid it.



post edited by Fog - 2011/06/19 23:05:05
#20
zarcondeegrissom
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 30
  • Joined: 2011/06/18 02:31:34
  • Status: offline
Re:This is the worst SONAR... 2011/06/20 05:29:29 (permalink)
You got the Digi installed without the iLok driver blue-screening your computer(s). Your lucky.

All I wanted to do was benchmark my headphone amplifier with a descent piece of hardware, that never happened.

I tried every single version of there drivers on ALL of my computers (Except the 286's). Half of the iLok drivers blue-screened on install, and the rest blue-screened the instant the USB thing was plugged in. I had to wipe and reinstall the graphics drivers on three computers after that waste of time, just to get them functional again.

I don't care how good people claim there software/hardware to be. If it requires something that Blue-screens the computer, it is useless. The Digi001, Digi002 and Digi003 have already been sent off to be smelted down for there metal. I have a Roland UA-25EX now, that actually works.

iLok required... Never Again!

That's reason #1 why I upgraded ProAudio9 with Sonar X1 instead of ProTools HD.

P.S.
I noticed that the installer put the default VST plugin folder inside the Session drummer folder for some reason. I ended up with two Dimension Synths, one worked and the other had no audio output. That was easy to fix. Uninstall Dimension Pro and Session Drummer, then install Sonar X1. That was the only glitch I came across at this point with Sonar.
post edited by zarcondeegrissom - 2011/06/20 10:57:30
#21
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Problem with SONAR and AVID hardware. 2011/06/20 08:24:18 (permalink)
tdawgg


If I run in ASIO mode, the time line ruler will move about half a second and freeze, as the audio keeps playing. I tried recording like this, with a live input, no dice.
tdawgg, I have the same exact problem here. I only run PT because some people are just programmed to believe it's the only DAW for music. Rather than tell them to go ef themselves and lose the work, I bought PT and just export their projects out, and load them into Sonar. LOL!
 
Now, like I said, I had all the same issues as you. What I did was, I dropped another soundcard in and make sure my digi is turned off and it all works fine. You just will not be able to use your Digi with Sonar. Don't be mad at the Cakewalk guys...it's just the way it is. Some people have good results, others like you and me do not. But seriously, grab a soundcard and drop it in. I promise you'll love Sonar way better than PT if you get it working and get familiar with it. I know it sucks to have to buy an interface, but it will be well worth it once you do. I had 2 old Layla 24/96 cards laying around that I dropped in that pc and everything is great. I have the Digi blocked in Sonar so it doesn't even see those drivers. You're seriously better off getting a decent independent card for Sonar. It will end all your issues, I assure you. Just make sure that Digi is turned off unless you're running PT.


My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
#22
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Problem with SONAR and AVID hardware. 2011/06/20 08:43:24 (permalink)
I think Danzi has it right there..it makes more sense than bashing your head against the wall trying to get Avid to talk with Cakewalk...

There are many different soundcards out there that work just fine with X1...

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
#23
rscain
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 784
  • Joined: 2004/03/23 09:52:29
  • Location: Kentucky
  • Status: offline
Re:Problem with SONAR and AVID hardware. 2011/06/20 23:09:29 (permalink)

My Tunes On SoundClick  
 
 
 AMD FX9350 @4 gHz, 16 gb ram, 240 gb SSD, 2 1Tb SS/Hybrid HDs, 1 Tb Fantom External HD, Windows 10 64 bit, Sonar Platinum 64 bit, Studio One 4 Pro, Harrison Mixbus, Izotope Neutron 2 Advanced and Ozone 8 Advanced, ARC 2, NI Komplete 11 Ultimate, TC-Helicon VoiceLive 3, Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 DSP, Focusrite Octopre MkII, KRK Rokit 8 monitors, Sennheiser HD 280 pro headphones, MidiMan Oxygen 8, Behringer X-Touch, guitars and stuff 
#24
DaSpot
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Joined: 2015/02/02 22:53:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Problem with SONAR and AVID hardware. 2015/12/19 15:44:59 (permalink)
I have had the same problem exactly,  Sonar does work with the digi 003 of you use an older driver for you 003 use  8.04 and it works fine.  
post edited by DaSpot - 2015/12/19 15:57:59
#25
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2685
  • Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
  • Location: Montreal
  • Status: offline
Re:Problem with SONAR and AVID hardware. 2015/12/20 02:53:14 (permalink)
DaSpot
I have had the same problem exactly,  Sonar does work with the digi 003 of you use an older driver for you 003 use  8.04 and it works fine.  


Hey DaSpot, I'm not sure if you're aware that you're responding to a four-and-a-half-year-old thread, but... welcome !
 
We haven't seen much mention of protools or avid interfaces lately.  I wonder if that's because they're losing ground.  I know my brother-in-law is apple+protools because the hollywood film industry more or less requires it, but for those of us with the freedom to choose, we tend to choose differently.
 
post edited by Paul P - 2015/12/20 03:05:45

Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
#26
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1