cryptexmarble 
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 289
- Joined: 2008/01/30 15:05:37
- Location: Zürich , Confoederatio Helvetica
- Status: offline
STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
OMG
Is there still no bugfix for the strange behaviour while bouncing an audio track ? I have learned , if one closes the transport overview before bouncing ; it behaves normal --BUT if not closing sayd window --it takes ages --its a real psycho bug ---its like in the bad movies --Cakewalk ...since weeks and weeks ..are you kidding me ?? --Do you have a problem ? lol
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/02 20:43:51
(permalink)
You've tried THIS presumably?
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/03 00:23:11
(permalink)
Without doing arcane edits to the config file, which obviously the average user isn't going to even be aware of when expecting a program to just function as expected - then yes, it's still the case that one has to close the control bar before bouncing. -- That's the work around. It must be Really Difficult for the programmers to fix that major flaw, since it's been there in X1 since day one.
Meanwhile, the average user who doesn't know squat about editing the config file, has no way of knowing that the--um--the CONTROL bar there at the top of the program can't be on while bouncing. Since it makes no sense to close it before bouncing, the only sure way a new user would find out about that stupid fix is if he/she spent time here on the Forum listening to all of us natter on about Sonar. Crazy. People across the world are sitting there thinking, "Wow--this program sure takes a loooooong time just to bounce an audio track." So lame.
RB
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/03 03:08:19
(permalink)
Wow that's pretty bitter stuff, Randy. I recall doing various edits in the Sonar config file since at least V2. It's nice to have the option IMHO.
AFAIK there is also no need to close the control bar. I certainly don't and mine is fine. Is the "listening to all of us to natter" a reference to the wealth of misinformation promulgated here by some?
I feel bad if the programs not working as well for you/others as it is some of us but is it really neccesary to jump into so many threads with a diatribe on the program. If it's that bad move on to something new or stay with 8.x and leave the rest of us to try and help work through the problems others are having with X1.
Some seem to have forgotten but there were problems in Sonar before X1, some more than others. IIRC I believe V5 was my worst experience I worked through it and have been reasonably happy with the rest so far. X1 so far for me has been very good thank you and a welcome revelation YMMV.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/03 05:41:17
(permalink)
I for one am truly appalled that a problem for some users has been identified and a workaround published in the support section of the site while a fuller fix is still pending. What awful support that is. I don't know how they sleep at night.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
codamedia
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1185
- Joined: 2005/01/24 09:58:10
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/03 08:07:47
(permalink)
rbowser
Meanwhile, the average user who doesn't know squat about editing the config file, has no way of knowing that the--um--the CONTROL bar there at the top of the program can't be on while bouncing. Since it makes no sense to close it before bouncing, the only sure way a new user would find out about that stupid fix is if he/she spent time here on the Forum listening to all of us natter on about Sonar. Crazy. People across the world are sitting there thinking, "Wow--this program sure takes a loooooong time just to bounce an audio track." So lame.
RB
Your post is implying that everybody faces the same problems but some of us are too stupid to know it. Please - stop insulting us! I do NOT need to close the control bar when bouncing, and speed is not a problem for me. I am sure I am not the only one! I am not saying this problem does not exist. I am merely saying that this problem does not exist for everyone like you are suggesting.
Don't fix it in the mix ... Fix it in the take!
Desktop: Win 7 Pro 64 Bit , ASUS MB w/Intel Chipset, INTEL Q9300 Quad Core, 2.5 GHz, 8 GB RAM, ATI 5450 Video Laptop: Windows 7 Pro, i5, 8 Gig Ram Hardware: Presonus FP10 (Firepod), FaderPort, M-Audio Axiom 49, Mackie 1202 VLZ, POD X3 Live, Variax 600, etc... etc...
|
Grem
Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5562
- Joined: 2005/06/28 09:26:32
- Location: Baton Rouge Area
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/03 08:40:34
(permalink)
OK here's the deal: When I bounced after I first got X1, it took a long time. Then the fix came X1a. Then it didn't do it any more. Problem solved. Then it started again. That's when I did the config thing. Problem solved. Now it's doing it again.
The only thing I can figure is one of the small quickfix updates screwed it up. And I don't have the Cbar open all the time so I went a long time before I noticed it. But it won't happen when the Cbar is closed.
Grem
Michael Music PC i7 2600K; 64gb Ram; 3 256gb SSD, System, Samples, Audio; 1TB & 2TB Project Storage; 2TB system BkUp; RME FireFace 400; Win 10 Pro 64; CWbBL 64, Home PCAMD FX 6300; 8gb Ram; 256 SSD sys; 2TB audio/samples; Realtek WASAPI; Win 10 Home 64; CWbBL 64 Surface Pro 3Win 10 i7 8gb RAM; CWbBL 64
|
cryptexmarble
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 289
- Joined: 2008/01/30 15:05:37
- Location: Zürich , Confoederatio Helvetica
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/11 20:11:34
(permalink)
cryptexmarble
OMG
Is there still no bugfix for the strange behaviour while bouncing an audio track ? I have learned , if one closes the transport overview before bouncing ; it behaves normal --BUT if not closing sayd window --it takes ages --its a real psycho bug ---its like in the bad movies --Cakewalk ...since weeks and weeks ..are you kidding me ?? --Do you have a problem ? lol
dudes SH&/&(/ like that JUST does NOT happen with CUBASE ! face it !
|
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
- Total Posts : 6475
- Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Status: offline
Re:STil NO fix for the "takes years to bounce to track " BUG???
2011/08/12 07:41:42
(permalink)
This is fixed in X1C. In fact fast bounces will be slightly faster than 8.5. Till you get this try closing any open plugin windows before doing the bounce. It should speed up considerably.
post edited by Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk] - 2011/08/12 07:45:23
|