Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency?

Author
Piers66
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 24
  • Joined: 2011/08/23 06:04:13
  • Location: London, UK
  • Status: offline
2011/08/28 16:21:30 (permalink)

Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency?

Hello,
 
I've been recording some keyboard parts in a project to midi, and then, when I've done whatever editing is needed to sort out my dodgy playing, I use the midi track to trigger my hardware synth and record the audio.

I've just noticed that the audio track is out of sync with the rest of the project, but strangely playing slightly ahead of the beat. To see how bad it is, I've muted everything except the midi track and the recorded audio, and there's a definite slapback echo effect between the two. Turning on the metronome, the midi triggered audio is nicely in time, but the recorded version is definitely ahead of the beat.
 
I presume Sonar is in some way compensating for latency when recording, but is overdoing it. Can someone tell me how / where I can change settings to correct this?
 
My setup is in my signature, using X1, not 8.5.
 
Thanks,
 
Piers.
post edited by Piers66 - 2011/08/28 16:22:43

Sonar 8.5 / X1c | WinXP SP3 | Intel Core2 Duo 2.26GHz 2GB RAM | Yamaha MW12cx | Kurzweil K2600, Roland JV-1080, Hammond XB-1 & Verghese ProSoloistRack

http://www.g2online.co.uk
#1

7 Replies Related Threads

    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency? 2011/08/28 17:27:00 (permalink)
    Piers66: I've just noticed that the audio track is out of sync with the rest of the project, but strangely playing slightly ahead of the beat.

    tell me about your setup..asio>?
    #2
    Piers66
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24
    • Joined: 2011/08/23 06:04:13
    • Location: London, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency? 2011/08/28 18:54:01 (permalink)
    StarTekh

    tell me about your setup..asio>?
    Hello again,

    When I said newbie, I meant it -  I had to go and google ASIO to find out what it stands for!
     
    In answer to what I'm guessing is your question - I looked at Driver Mode in the Playback & Recording section of preferences, and it says I'm using WDM/KS. I tried changing it to ASIO to see what happened, and a message popped up saying that my USB Audio device (The Yamaha MW12cx) was no longer available.

    I'm guessing this means it either isn't an ASIO device, or I don't have the driver installed...?
     
    As for the problem, I'm afraid it's being a bit random.
     
    As an experiment I reduced the Mixing Latency buffer size from 90 msec to 30, and the timing issue went away. I set it to 60, still fine. Set it back to 90, still fine... Obviously not that then!
     
    I then recorded several takes, and it sometimes happens and sometimes doesn't. Here's a screen shot that should show the problem:
     

     
    As you can see, the first take is early, and the other two are fine. When I left it recording with Loop ON, I got 6 takes, all in the correct timing, including the first. If it's not replicable, I can't see how to avoid it.
     
    I don't suppose there's some known issue concerning recording audio from the first beat of a project, or something daft like that? All of the other projects I've tried recording have started a few bars in...
     
    Any ideas?
     
    Thanks for the help,
     
    Piers.

    Sonar 8.5 / X1c | WinXP SP3 | Intel Core2 Duo 2.26GHz 2GB RAM | Yamaha MW12cx | Kurzweil K2600, Roland JV-1080, Hammond XB-1 & Verghese ProSoloistRack

    http://www.g2online.co.uk
    #3
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency? 2011/08/28 19:10:18 (permalink)
    let me go see about your interface  bbs ...

    For Window XP environments the standard Windows driver and ASIO are supported

     bb reading

    post edited by StarTekh - 2011/08/28 19:12:58
    #4
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency? 2011/08/28 19:18:10 (permalink)
    switch to asio and reboot, il bb-soon

    No Driver Installation Required (page 7)
    The MW system uses the standard drivers included in your
    computer’s operating system, so there’s no need to install
    any extra driver software.

    now i dont know about you computer setup you might require some chipset drivers and updated video drivers

    download CPU-Z ,, this will tell you make and model of the motherboard.. if you know what video card you have ....tell me

    post edited by StarTekh - 2011/08/28 19:26:24
    #5
    Piers66
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24
    • Joined: 2011/08/23 06:04:13
    • Location: London, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency? 2011/08/28 20:38:51 (permalink)
    Hello again,

    I tried setting the driver mode to ASIO, and it didn't seem to work. To be honest, I'm now not sure if that was Sonar or just me being dim because I took a couple more steps and only now wonder if they were necessary.
     
    Anyway, I searched on loads of Yamaha web pages (which are really badly signposted, and keep sending you from one site to another), and eventually found their own USB driver, which I installed. I think this driver was probably necessary, because when I looked through the hardware settings in the control panel there wasn't anything that looked obviously like ASIO, but it's now too late to go back and check!

    So, this time when I started Sonar, instead of saying the USB audio device was no longer available, it said that Master was assigned to a silent output. Then it was just a question of picking the new Yamaha driver from the drop down list for it to be back to normal.

    I've recorded a few takes of the same part since then, and there's a very slight difference between the new one and the old, but nothing like as bad as it was. In fact, they're sufficiently close for me to not know which is really the one in time.

    Anyway, it's half past one in the morning now, so I'm giving up for the night. Tomorrow I'll do some more tests, but my guess is that it's good now.

    Thanks for the help and suggestions,

    Piers.

    Sonar 8.5 / X1c | WinXP SP3 | Intel Core2 Duo 2.26GHz 2GB RAM | Yamaha MW12cx | Kurzweil K2600, Roland JV-1080, Hammond XB-1 & Verghese ProSoloistRack

    http://www.g2online.co.uk
    #6
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency? 2011/08/28 20:46:45 (permalink)
    Piers66 : good work and yes yamaha support is a nightmare

    I think this driver was probably necessary, 100% correct.. we can
    go over more stuff tomorow.
    #7
    bitman
    Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4105
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
    • Location: Keystone Colorado
    • Status: offline
    Re:Confused Newbie - Is Sonar overcompensating for latency? 2011/08/29 00:01:07 (permalink)
    try asio4all it's free and provides asio support for all devices even lowley onboard sound chips.

    #8
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1