New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1?

Author
djtrailmixxx
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 235
  • Joined: 2008/10/29 13:47:01
  • Status: offline
2011/10/12 10:10:06 (permalink)

New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1?

Just curious. I'm really interested in the AVX extensions added to it and wonder if Sonar X1 will put it to use.

Sonar Platinum X64 - Win 10 x64 - Intel SB-E 3930 - Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - 16GB DDR3 - AMD R290X - 4x 1TB SSD RAID 0 (Sys and Data partitions) - 2x UAD2 Quad - 1x UAD2 Octo - UAD Apollo Dual
#1

27 Replies Related Threads

    djtrailmixxx
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 235
    • Joined: 2008/10/29 13:47:01
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 10:59:31 (permalink)
    Not looking so good. Noel gets a mention in this article BTW: http://www.tomshardware.c...ozer-990fx,3043-5.html

    Sonar Platinum X64 - Win 10 x64 - Intel SB-E 3930 - Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - 16GB DDR3 - AMD R290X - 4x 1TB SSD RAID 0 (Sys and Data partitions) - 2x UAD2 Quad - 1x UAD2 Octo - UAD Apollo Dual
    #2
    adrian4u
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 568
    • Joined: 2010/12/07 19:07:11
    • Location: Poland
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 11:13:33 (permalink)
    just stay with Phenom :) In a fact I had a "problem" what to choose in performance/codsts categories - and you can see as below. Next computer I think wil be on i7 or successor, but for now Phenom1100T oc@4,1gHz should be enough for me.

    Phenom II x6 1100T (OC to 6x 4,1gHz), 8gB DDR3/1600gHz RAM, Win7/64; SONAR Producer X1c; Korgs: Z1, M50, Triton Rack, TRinity Rack; NI Maschine; Behringer BCF-R2000; MOTU 828mk3 FW; Edirol Edirol UA-1000; guitars: Cort Z-Custom, LAG JET100 totally customed, Cort SFX-DAO; some other music toys, one very musical cat 
    ***************************************
    Be patient for newbie ;)
    #3
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 11:39:02 (permalink)
    If/when AMD leap-frogs Intel, I'd be just as happy to use them (have in the past).
     
    At the moment, the sweet-spot price/performance wise is the Intel i7-2600k running at ~4.5GHz.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #4
    Keni
    Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5769
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
    • Location: Willits, CA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 11:49:38 (permalink)
    Jim Roseberry


    If/when AMD leap-frogs Intel, I'd be just as happy to use them (have in the past).
     
    At the moment, the sweet-spot price/performance wise is the Intel i7-2600k running at ~4.5GHz.


    Ahh... the stuff of dreams...

    I'm still stranded on a Core2Duo... <sigh>...

    Keni


    Keni Fink
    Keni - Facebook
    Deep Space Records
    http://www.reverbnation.com/inexile
    http://www.cdbaby.com/artist/inexile
    Out Of My Head Music (BMI)

    SPlat/MacPro/Dual Xeon 3.06GHz 6-core (12 total)/64GB/Win8.1X64/Presonus 1818VSL/Soundscape SS8IO-1
    #5
    vintagevibe
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2446
    • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
    • Location: Atlanta, Ga
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 12:41:06 (permalink)
    Jim Roseberry


    If/when AMD leap-frogs Intel, I'd be just as happy to use them (have in the past).
     
    At the moment, the sweet-spot price/performance wise is the Intel i7-2600k running at ~4.5GHz.


    How do you get it to run at 4.5GHz? 
    #6
    Splat
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8672
    • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
    • Location: Mars.
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 12:54:31 (permalink)
    In theory testing AMD CPU's is not Cakewalks responsibility. Microsoft should be testing their Windows in these environments, and AMD/Microsoft should be making sure their drivers work OK.

    AMD/Microsoft makes the car and Cakewalk is merely the passenger.

    In reality the customer ends doing the final testing, any issues that may be discovered will almost certainly not be the fault of Cakewalk.

    Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
    @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

    Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
    #7
    adrian4u
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 568
    • Joined: 2010/12/07 19:07:11
    • Location: Poland
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 13:07:30 (permalink)
    Jim Roseberry


    If/when AMD leap-frogs Intel, I'd be just as happy to use them (have in the past).
     
    At the moment, the sweet-spot price/performance wise is the Intel i7-2600k running at ~4.5GHz.

    Jim, excuse me but I can't fully agree with you. Taking i7-2600, very good motherboard and good RAM, you'll spend almost 1/2 more of money, you would spend on Phenom II 1100T, one of the best motherboard and very good RAM.
     
    I won't do "exchange" from Polish zloty to US dollars, but here it looks like this.
     
    And - here are people, who know how to build computer, so we don't need to buy any Dells, HPs or other "brand" computers, that have the same elements but you pay more only because of the sticker on the box.

    Phenom II x6 1100T (OC to 6x 4,1gHz), 8gB DDR3/1600gHz RAM, Win7/64; SONAR Producer X1c; Korgs: Z1, M50, Triton Rack, TRinity Rack; NI Maschine; Behringer BCF-R2000; MOTU 828mk3 FW; Edirol Edirol UA-1000; guitars: Cort Z-Custom, LAG JET100 totally customed, Cort SFX-DAO; some other music toys, one very musical cat 
    ***************************************
    Be patient for newbie ;)
    #8
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 14:16:34 (permalink)
    w do you get it to run at 4.5GHz?

     
    The 2600k is multiplier-unlocked from Intel.
    IOW, It was designed specifically with controlled over-clocking in mind.
     
    You need a quality 3rd party CPU cooler, the right motherboard, and you have to tweak a couple BIOS settings. 
     
    To be absolutely sure it's 100% stable, you need to run a hard-core stress-test.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #9
    Splat
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8672
    • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
    • Location: Mars.
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 14:28:11 (permalink)
    Sorry totally wrong!!!!
     
     
    > And - here are people, who know how to build computer, so we don't need to buy any Dells, HPs or other "brand" computers, that have the same elements but you pay more only because of the sticker on the box.

    I've probably built over 1000 PC's in my time. No I am not exaggerating.

    I used to build my own PC's but then I bought Dell as realized:
    * When things go wrong one manufacture often blames another and you are stuck in the middle
    * If the product is out of warranty I have to replace like with like, if the parts get old it can be difficult to replace.
    * It can actually be MORE expensive than buying from an all in one supplier who gets bulk discounts.
    * Dell's profit margins on PC's are no more than 10% say (probably less).
    * Dell has a great warranty whereby an engineer will swap out parts the next day. Beats running around or trolling through ebay for something difficult to find.
    * Dell keeps compatible parts when things go wrong.
    * I can still customize a Dell PC if necessary.
    * Consumer power works when if something similar and serious goes wrong everybody complains about the same thing. Dell has no choice but to listen. A person with a whole load of parts delivered from all over the place is often dismissed.
     
    The only advantage of building your own box is that smug feeling, a bit like after you have assembled a model airplane, but just like model airplanes often they tend to fall apart after a year or so.
     
    Good luck with your custom boxes. I learnt my lesson.!!!
     
    Cheers...
     

    Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
    @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

    Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
    #10
    adrian4u
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 568
    • Joined: 2010/12/07 19:07:11
    • Location: Poland
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 14:45:17 (permalink)
    Alex - no offence, "Dell" or "HP" were just examples as good as others, so don't be upset :)

    I know that computer market in US is very strange, mostly because 80% (or even more) people are just users, and don't have enough knowledge to build their own "tailor made" computers.

    Here is more-less (less) similar, but believe me or not - there are many even 15yo kids who can do it by themself.

    And - will the manufacturer of "brand" computer help you everytime you'll screw up something? Drivers, maybe you won't install software properly, maybe something else.... I doub't.

    Maybe in your area "brand" cmputers are cheaper than tailor-made, but here I have no such problem - moreover - "brand" computers here are more expansive - because of sticker.
    Different problem is with "supermarket" computers - cheap, but very weak and you cant open the box because of loosing warranty.

    Phenom II x6 1100T (OC to 6x 4,1gHz), 8gB DDR3/1600gHz RAM, Win7/64; SONAR Producer X1c; Korgs: Z1, M50, Triton Rack, TRinity Rack; NI Maschine; Behringer BCF-R2000; MOTU 828mk3 FW; Edirol Edirol UA-1000; guitars: Cort Z-Custom, LAG JET100 totally customed, Cort SFX-DAO; some other music toys, one very musical cat 
    ***************************************
    Be patient for newbie ;)
    #11
    vintagevibe
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2446
    • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
    • Location: Atlanta, Ga
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 15:06:55 (permalink)
    Jim Roseberry



    w do you get it to run at 4.5GHz?

     
    The 2600k is multiplier-unlocked from Intel.
    IOW, It was designed specifically with controlled over-clocking in mind.
     
    You need a quality 3rd party CPU cooler, the right motherboard, and you have to tweak a couple BIOS settings. 
     
    To be absolutely sure it's 100% stable, you need to run a hard-core stress-test.


    Thanks.  But then of course is the question:  Is there any real need to overclock at all?
    post edited by vintagevibe - 2011/10/12 15:57:21
    #12
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/12 15:43:31 (permalink)
    Hi Alex,
     
    With all due respect, if you've built 1000+ PCs, then you know that you can choose better components (for DAW purposes) than what Dell/Gateway/Apple/etc uses. 

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #13
    Splat
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8672
    • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
    • Location: Mars.
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 18:24:23 (permalink)
    Adrian - Not problem - I'm just over opinionated sometimes! :)

    Jim - Did you read all the points in my last post correctly, esp about customization?
    BTW What you wrote is what I used to think, and if you talking just about specifications of course you would be correct, but then 6 months down the line you will be running a slow PC compared to others. Experience has told me in the real world there are other things to think about. A lot of people think better technology = latest and fastest components, in fact the better technology is generally that has been around for at least a year after all the issues have settled.

    All in the last post anyway.

    Thanks

    Alex

    Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
    @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

    Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
    #14
    Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
    Cakewalk Staff
    • Total Posts : 6475
    • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
    • Location: Boston, MA, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 18:34:38 (permalink)
    to answer thee op question, yes we have tested with amd hardware, just not theoir recent avx compatible offerings which were reviewed in the toms hardware article cited earlier in this thread. we havent received any eval units from them yet.

    Noel Borthwick
    Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
    My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
    #15
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 19:18:38 (permalink)
    Jim, excuse me but I can't fully agree with you. Taking i7-2600, very good motherboard and good RAM, you'll spend almost 1/2 more of money, you would spend on Phenom II 1100T, one of the best motherboard and very good RAM. I won't do "exchange" from Polish zloty to US dollars, but here it looks like this.

     
    Hi Adrian,
     
    Here in the US:
    The AMD FX-8150 is $280 (top of line AMD)
    The Intel i7-2600k can be had for $280
    Quality motherboard for both platforms is right about $200.
    RAM is a wash
     
    At 4.5GHz, the 2600k is delivering the performance of Intel's $1000 CPU.
    It's faster than the 8150... for right about the same money.
    Note:  I'm not saying the 8150 is a dog (slow), but the 2600k at 4.5GHz is hard to beat (extremely fast). 
     
    We live in great times...
    Back in the original Pentium days, $300 bought an entry-level processor.  
     

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #16
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 19:39:21 (permalink)
    Jim - Did you read all the points in my last post correctly, esp about customization?

     
    Hi Alex,
     
    You probably know what I do for a living...  
    Few individuals have assembled more computers than I.
    My machine never gets "old"... as I'm always changing/updating/etc.
    For me, the appeal of a PC is that *I* have 100% control over exactly what goes in my DAW.
    ie: I test all the top-tier socket 1155 motherboards... and choose the one I like best for DAW purposes.
    I choose the case I want... the power-supply... the 3rd party cooler... I use the fastest drives available... etc.
    I build exactly what I want... every component specifically chosen for use in a DAW.
    You're not going to get that level of attention to niche detail any other way.
    If any of those parts fail, it's easy to get a replacement (exact or commensurate).
    This may or may not matter to you... but it is what it is   
     

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #17
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 19:50:26 (permalink)
    Thanks. But then of course is the question: Is there any real need to overclock at all?

     
    The 2600k is fast at stock speed.
    At 4.5GHz, it's amazingly fast.
     
    All depends on what you're looking do accomplish.
     
    At 4.5GHz, you can run substantial loads (glitch-free) at the smallest ASIO buffer sizes.
    This kicks open to door for things like effective software based input monitoring.
    You can play/monitor in realtime (using smallest possible ASIO buffer size to minimize round-trip latency)... and you don't have to worry about running out of CPU power.
    I'm not going to say it's "unlimited" processing power... but it almost feels like it.
    ie:  I virtually never move my MOTU 896HD off the 64-sample ASIO buffer size. 
    I can keep my round-trip latency low from project start to finish.  If I decide to overdub a DI electric guitar or some extra harmony vocal tracks at the last minute, I've got the speed to do it while monitoring in realtime thru software EFX/processing.
    While I don't always need all available speed, it's quite liberating to know it's available.

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #18
    Splat
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8672
    • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
    • Location: Mars.
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 20:01:56 (permalink)
    Then we agree to disagree :) And that's fine as it works for you. I've done that as well many times and realised at the end of the day it really wasn't worth the hassle (time vs cost vs reliability vs supplier nightmare and real world overall benefit).

    Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
    @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

    Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
    #19
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 20:12:22 (permalink)

    Intel: 8 cores 16 threads... wise people use intel and their support
    and ..chipsets..drivers..
    #20
    musicroom
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2421
    • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 21:03:09 (permalink)
    CakeAlexS


    Then we agree to disagree :) And that's fine as it works for you. I've done that as well many times and realised at the end of the day it really wasn't worth the hassle (time vs cost vs reliability vs supplier nightmare and real world overall benefit).



    Hi Alex,


    Reading this exchange is a little maddening - please click the url in Jim's signature. Whew! I feel better now.  BTW - He knows what he speaks, the daw he built for me a couple of years ago still purrs at blazing speed.




    Cheers


     
    Dave
    Songs
    ___________________________________
    Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



     
     
    #21
    Player
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 330
    • Joined: 2006/03/05 23:29:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/13 21:44:04 (permalink)
    I am with Musicroom; it has been almost two years since I purchased my StudioCat DAW and it also is still "purring." This is the only way to go for those of us who like to make music and don't want to make computers. Obviously, I can't say enough good about Jim, but we all do what we can do.

    Studio Cat i7
    #22
    Splat
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8672
    • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
    • Location: Mars.
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/14 08:19:27 (permalink)
    > Reading this exchange is a little maddening

    I can't see why it's maddening, unless everything has to be bi-polar i.e. only right or wrong. I just come from a different mindset, Jims comments are entirely valid from the specification wars perspective (there will always be people who want to feel they have a "Rolls Royce PC"), I however take an entirely different route for the reasons I have explained.

    I don't see this an "exchange" or an arugment at all. Jim has some good points, I'd like to think I have the same. Take or leave what you will out of them.  BTW I'm sure Jim's boxes are great!

    Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
    @48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

    Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
    #23
    scottfa
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 453
    • Joined: 2005/04/23 06:25:47
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/14 12:09:54 (permalink)
    I like to roll my own because I can upgrade only the parts that need it. I upgraded to a i7 w600k and just replace the motherboard, RAM and CPU. Kept the drives, case power supply etc. I could not afford it otherwise.

    Intel I7 2600K (OCed to 4.0)
    Gigabyte Ga-Z68X-UD3H-B3
    16G Corsair 1600  Memory 4 sticks
    1 SSD, 1WD 650 SATA and 1 Samsung 1G SATA    
    Steinberg MR816X 
    Mackie R800 Adat to the Steinberg
    Windows 10 64 bit     
    Sonar Platinum Lifetime
    UAD-2  Solo
    #24
    hockeyjx
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 839
    • Joined: 2003/12/09 18:36:28
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/14 12:45:28 (permalink)
    +1000 on Jim's and other folks points. 

    Alex, the point is that the components Dell(or any maker) uses, what I and others that put together machines are usually not the "high-end". Which when trying to squeeze every ounce of horsepower out of these machines with the greatest stability  ...well, for a lot of us, cookie-cutter pc's WILL NOT do. PC manufacturers, such as Dell, do not update their drivers as much and the "tweakability" is not there. For a motherboard, this is obviously critical.

    Your points on replacement and support are correct. If I build a water-cooled system and I flub it and it sprays my board, oh ...I AM HOSED!!!! But if I know what I am doing, I know everything on and in that box (cases, fans, vid cards). I make an image. I update drivers and configure it the way *I* want. It is both practical (I get good deals on hardware) and rewarding to make a solid DAW.

    My last three boxes lasted years - then I sold them off and upgraded.



    Intel i7 950 Proc, Asus Sabertooth x58 MB, 2 Crucial 128GB SSDs and Seagate 1TBGB drive, 12GB Corsair 1600mhz 8-8-8-24 Memory, Nvidia GeForece 8400 Dual Monitor vid card
    Cooler Master Silent Pro 700w Power Supply, Cooler Master Sileo 500


    Win 7 64 bit, SPlat 64-bit, Komplete 10 Ultimate, AmpliTube3 and AD2


    Tascam FW-1884 and AKAI MPK-49
    #25
    Mesh
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 27360
    • Joined: 2009/11/27 14:08:08
    • Location: Online right here!
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/14 12:45:38 (permalink)
    Jim Roseberry


    Hi Alex,
     
    With all due respect, if you've built 1000+ PCs, then you know that you can choose better components (for DAW purposes) than what Dell/Gateway/Apple/etc uses. 

    This was the major factor in building my own system (for the 1st time) back in 2008 as I had complete control on which components I wanted/could afford. Although my system isn't as powerful like most people here, I'm glad I went this route as the only thing I ever had to replace was a bad stick of RAM. Although now, you can get a really powerful PC off the shelf.....(I'd still like to build my own).
    If not for Jim & Scott's expert advice here on all these forums, I just may have gone through Alex's route.  

    Platinum Gaming DAW: AsRock Z77 Overclock Formula
    I7 3770k @ 4.5GHz : 16GB RAM G.Skill Ripjaws X
    250GB OS SSD : 3TB HDD : 1TB Sample HDD
    Win 10 Pro x 64 : NH-D14 CPU Cooler 
    HIS IceQ  2GB HD 7870
    Focusrite Scarlett 2i4
    The_Forum_Monkeys
    #26
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/14 13:35:22 (permalink)
    I don't see this an "exchange" or an arugment at all.

     
    We can agree that we disagree... without the conversation degenerating to conflict.  

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #27
    musicroom
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2421
    • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:New AMD CPUs, has Cakewalk tested them with X1? 2011/10/14 14:05:30 (permalink)
    i7
    CakeAlexS


    > Reading this exchange is a little maddening

    I can't see why it's maddening, unless everything has to be bi-polar i.e. only right or wrong. I just come from a different mindset, Jims comments are entirely valid from the specification wars perspective (there will always be people who want to feel they have a "Rolls Royce PC"), I however take an entirely different route for the reasons I have explained.

    I don't see this an "exchange" or an arugment at all. Jim has some good points, I'd like to think I have the same. Take or leave what you will out of them.  BTW I'm sure Jim's boxes are great!

    No problem Alex - I used an off the shelf for a few years prior to a custom daw... It did the job. I had to put up with some noise and performance hiccups, but I kept on recording and enjoying. I agree with the stance you have considering it is the one that you feel good about. Those Dell's, etc can get the job done no doubt. However, once you driven a Rolls Royce Daw.... just saying.


    :)





     
    Dave
    Songs
    ___________________________________
    Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



     
     
    #28
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1