Waves IR-L convolution reverb (the lite version of IR-1) -- do you recommend it?

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
cecelius2
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1494
  • Joined: 2009/11/06 16:12:11
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
  • Status: offline
2011/10/18 00:20:28 (permalink)

Waves IR-L convolution reverb (the lite version of IR-1) -- do you recommend it?

Is Waves IR-L recommended?  It is the lite version of Waves IR-1.  As far as I can tell from the Waves site, the IR-L has the same Library of convolutions & presets as the full IR-1, but is not as tweakable, but is designed to use with minimum controls--more out of the box use.

For $49 or so on the Waves site, it seems to be something to consider.  Yes, it requires an ILok.

What are your thoughts about it?

Cecelius2




#1

1 Reply Related Threads
    ltb
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2707
    • Joined: 2005/06/19 13:34:08
    • Status: offline
    Re:Waves IR-L convolution reverb (the lite version of IR-1) -- do you recommend it? 2011/10/18 09:02:21 (permalink)
    It's a perfectly good convo with less features than IR-1. It's the ir's themselves that the important factor, the ones included are good quailty.
    Years ago I also got additional ir's from Waves website. 

    I also have Voxengo's Pristine Space for 3rd party ir's which I like & use just as much.
    Three's also LiquidSonics & AltiVerb



    Here's some free Bricasti M7 ir's that will work on each.
    http://www.samplicity.com/bricasti-m7-impulse-responses/

    Be careful as some free impulses available online are crap.
    post edited by carl - 2011/10/18 09:06:39
    #2
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1