Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch...

Author
lowthert
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1
  • Joined: 2011/10/26 04:42:57
  • Status: offline
2011/10/26 07:33:12 (permalink)

Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch...

Hello all... I guess the title says it all. Long time user of PT... After the recent launch of PT10 - which is STILL not 64 bit and therefore will not make the most of my 12G RAM (and as well as that Avid are asking another $300.00 a year after launching PT9)...and they are launching features that Sonar and other DAW's have had for a long time - as revolutionary.... As well as that they are launching a new plug in format called AAX that has no guarantees that my plug in manufacturers will support (IK for example).....so the risk is rendering me with a rig that is useless...once they go with 64 bit PT11... I am exhausted with it and have had enough. Of all the bugs, error messages, instability and the frankly terrible ripping off attitude from Avid. Clearly they have made up their mind to concentrate on Pro studios... So......... I am minded to switch to a 64 bit platform that will enable me to compose and record midi and audio and be stable. Hopefully I am in the right place...(please reassure me here!!) My simple questions are - before I jump....  1. What should I do with my existing PT sessions to save them in a format I can use later? Should I just bounce them down as L&R .wav tracks. At what bit rate and quality?? What about OMF? Is it easy to do?? 2. My rig - Windows 7 64 (black viper services tweaked), i7 960 cpu, 12G DDR3 RAM, MBox 3 Pro, Plugs by izotope, IK, NI, Toontrack, Mellowmuse - anyone see a problem here offhand....? Appreciate your advice folks - will place my order immediately I feel reassured I am doing the right thing.... Keep well all Tony
#1

13 Replies Related Threads

    Chregg
    Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2382
    • Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
    • Location: Perth, Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 07:48:26 (permalink)
    yeah just render your projects wavs or omf,as for the bit depth, keep them at the original bit depth (and sample rate) you recorded at, all the best to you with your jump, but in all honesty keep your options open to wat DAW you want to jump to............OMF (open media file) is a container file that stores the wavs/aiffs exactly like its set out in your pro tools session (minus plug-in) but rendering them as broadcast wavs is just the same
    #2
    Chregg
    Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2382
    • Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
    • Location: Perth, Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 07:50:03 (permalink)
    from the way your talking i can understand why the uni im at still havent bothered upgrading PT since version 7 and 6 on some machines
    #3
    daryl1968
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10984
    • Joined: 2010/06/01 22:51:43
    • Location: Englishman in deepest, darkest Wales
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 08:00:01 (permalink)
    Yeah - OMF in the original bit depth. I have worked on several projects that have been brought to me from PT studios with no problems. Also, tempo is not saved so write them down or save as e.g. 'Song name 110'
    #4
    Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
    Cakewalk Staff
    • Total Posts : 6475
    • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
    • Location: Boston, MA, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 09:03:07 (permalink)
    You could use OMF or export all tracks and waves as broadcast wave files and then import them into SONAR. Its a bit of a painful process if you have very large projects but definitely doable. My last CD project originated from protools sessions and I brought in all the files in just a couple of hours of work.
    Note that you will not get any effects or mix settings/envelopes. So you will have to remix the projects, or alternatively flatten the tracks applying any automation within PT itself.

    Noel Borthwick
    Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
    My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
    #5
    Mully
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1545
    • Joined: 2004/09/15 02:08:05
    • Location: Adelaide, Oztralia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 09:05:19 (permalink)
    Welcome Tony... hope it works out ok for you.

    As for the 64bit issue, you are in the right place but we are (hopefully) nearing the end of a bumpy period with the X1 release which entailed what appears to be a complete recode to start afresh in the whole new world of 64 bit... that's how I see it anyways.

    There's been some pain but if you stay with 64bit plugs etc and actually know what you are doing with a computer setup, you 'should' be fine here. There are plenty of us blissfully using the 64bit platform and for a lot of us, Sonar has never been more stable.

    As a new user, you'll prolly find a lot of the common annoyances you will read around here are not relative.... I hope anyway.

    Please note that Sonar is not bug free yet but what really is...  certainly the best 64bit option IMO and there is incredible support in this forum from some very helpful and knowledgable people who are more interested in lifting a hand to help as opposed to pushing some keys to rant.

    Cheers and happy reading!

    ASUS H270, i7-7700, JLM BA & 1290, LA2A Opto4, loads of guff.
    #6
    konradh
    Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3325
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 10:38:07 (permalink)
    Interesting to hear from a PT user.  Since this is a Cakewalk forum, we naturally hear various complaints about Cakewalk, but a view from a PT user gives us a good balanced perspective.  No application is perfect, but I think Cakewalk has done a really good job of packaging features and keeping the price reasonable.

    I thought about switching to PT right before X1 came out, but the feature/price ratio made X1 a clear winner.  I also like the integration with the V-Studio 700.  (Say what you will about Roland, but they make rock-solid stuff.  I still have a U-20, a JV-1080 and a VS-1680  that haven't been turned off since they came out of the boxes, except for moving them to a new studio one day.)

    To be fair, my past use of Roland and Cakewalk made the X1 learning curve more gentle than it would have been for PT; but that was not the deal-breaker for PT: it was price, function, and stability.
     
    Edit: I should have added that 64-bit was a consideration.  I honestly had issues getting some of my virtual instruments to work under 64-bit (including the Fantom packaged with the V-Studio), but they have all been resolved.  Most software companies (e.g., MusicLab) have now addressed this, and there is plenty of help on this forum.  I bought most equipment and software from Sweetwater and those techs definitely now understand how to make everything run in 64-bit.
    post edited by konradh - 2011/10/26 10:48:03
    #7
    FastBikerBoy
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 11326
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
    • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 10:51:54 (permalink)
    Strange I thought everyone was leaving Sonar...........
    #8
    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 11:06:16 (permalink)
    lowthert 

    Should I just bounce them down as L&R .wav tracks.  


    I've never tried importing tracks from Pro Tools into Sonar, but I recall regular stereo tracks imported from Sonar and/or Logic into Pro Tools being converted when I imported, as if Pro Tools was using 2 dual mono files instead of regular stereo. 


    I'm curious how it'd work importing stereo tracks from PT into Sonar. Anyone?


    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #9
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 11:07:04 (permalink)
    lowthert: buy full box latest software from cakewalk directly!
                   going over your system's drivers/chipset/inf.. video
                   will make your system perform..have inteface drivers
                   ready for win7 32/64..

                  Note: you are not alone about the 300.00 update ..its
                  all over the net and the FU's are a site to see....
                  and many are doing just what you are !! enjoy
    #10
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 11:57:30 (permalink)
    Rain


    lowthert 

    Should I just bounce them down as L&R .wav tracks.  


    I've never tried importing tracks from Pro Tools into Sonar, but I recall regular stereo tracks imported from Sonar and/or Logic into Pro Tools being converted when I imported, as if Pro Tools was using 2 dual mono files instead of regular stereo. 


    I'm curious how it'd work importing stereo tracks from PT into Sonar. Anyone?

    Never seen anything strange with exported stereo Wavs from PT. Behaved just like any other stero wav imported into Sonar. I don't think PT can do interleaved stereo files and split them in "halves" and treat them as one whole. Or it does something to the wavs before working with them. Dunno but I've seen the converting process many times. I don't really care as long as it works
     

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #11
    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 12:33:04 (permalink)
    That's what I thought. Took a while before Digi implemented stereo tracks into PT - I guess it may have to do with voices/channels/hardware, and I suppose they opted for dual mono.

    Anyway, thanks for confirming that it works when going from PT to others.

    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #12
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 17:58:31 (permalink)
    No worries. Now, I haven't actually tried moving stereo tracks between PT and anything else for a few years, I mainly dabble in mono It may have changed since then - for the better. But shouldn't be any problems.

    i agree, I guess the hardware integration have had something to do with it.

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #13
    Jimbo 88
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1828
    • Joined: 2007/03/19 12:27:17
    • Location: Elmhurst, Illinois USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Please Help! ProTools user wants to switch... 2011/10/26 18:38:06 (permalink)
    I work in Sonar,  but go back and forth with others working in Ptools and we use OMFs.   Dual split mono just as the others have said.

    What I do is mix down stems,  because (like Noel said)  you loose all the plug-ins and mixing.  Then send an OMF.

    If you are a composer under dealines you will like how fast Sonar can mix down and create OMF's as opposed to the way Pro Tools works.
     
    For composing i think you'll find working on Sonar way better/easier. 
    #14
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1