Kewl Hendagang
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 60
- Joined: 2011/06/04 12:00:56
- Status: offline
long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
I've never been into the Matrix, ableton Live is the king of that kind of workflow, and does it the right away in a stable fashion. If I wanted that kind of workflow, I would switch to ableton Live. I've never been into audiosnap. The feature was very poorly implementated, and logic and even Studio one is far more advanced in that department. If my life depended on those functions, I would use those applications. I've never been into the step sequencer, another stitched ''functionality'' that just doesn't flow as well as it does with a program like Fruity Loop in wich everything revolves around that kind of workflow. I've been a sonar user for years, and what I liked about it has slowly but surely been stripped away. And with the release of X1, what has been going on for years is pretty obvious, at least to me. X1 is just a vehicle for all of roland technology, all of the v-vocal stuff is based on their Variphrase technology, the Prochannel stuff is probably based around their COSM modeling technology, all of that and more, foreced-fed into a poor lil application that needs more basic fixing than gadget transplanting. we were close with 8.5.3, and all I baddly want from x1 is the media browser, wich although present in 8.5.3 is pretty useless and pretty bugged up. I just can't be forced-fed X1, I don't want to be trapped in an occult interest war beetween a decaying industry giant such as roland and a bullied industry second... I'm sure this will resonate with a lot of users, so please cake, fix whatever's left to fix in 8.5.3, maybe throw us a usable media browser as a nice gesture, and we'll be pretty happy -
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/03 19:11:14
(permalink)
I'm actually still pretty happy. Happily making records with 8.5.3, that is. Sure, it's got bugs that will never be fixed, but at least I know about them and I know how to work around them. X1 doesn't do it for me, either, but I'm not overly concerned about that. It's not as if 8.5 isn't a viable alternative while we wait to see what happens next with SONAR. And even if the next version is equally unattractive, Reaper and Studio One won't have been sitting still in the meantime. They're both growing up fast. Meanwhile, now free of DAW-related distractions, I'm making more music nowadays than ever before. So I'm happy still.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Kewl Hendagang
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 60
- Joined: 2011/06/04 12:00:56
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/03 20:14:52
(permalink)
I agree, I get a lot done with 8.5.3, but it's natural to feel a bit shortchanged when you're like me, almost begging to pay to have that application more stable and FINAL, with all implemented feature working & stable, and being told ''change your work habits, feast your eyes on new colors and gadgets, and don't take for granted that decade old bugs and performance issues will be fixed anytime soon''
|
quibb
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 308
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:42:52
- Location: Utah
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/03 20:58:52
(permalink)
Hey Kewl, Just out of curiosity, what do you feel has been stripped away? No offense intended, but have you tried X1 demo? Not a big Matrix user either, but as you mentioned, the browser alone is worth the price of admission. In my mind, the new functions in X1 are complimentary to the previous versions. Can't think of anything I've lost (other than an undo button )... 8.5.3 worked great for me as well. Can't go wrong with either version. V
I7, 8GB, Win 7 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, R11 driver, Focusrite Pro40, Helios II fly rod
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/03 21:06:02
(permalink)
Can't think of anything I've lost I can't help thinking that an upgrade should be about what you'd actually gain. I'm just old-fashioned that way I guess.
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
quibb
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 308
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:42:52
- Location: Utah
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/03 21:08:25
(permalink)
Not my intention to infer that... More interested in what he thinks has been stripped from 8.5.3... IMHO X1 was a worthwhile upgrade. V
post edited by quibb - 2011/11/05 02:58:48
I7, 8GB, Win 7 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, R11 driver, Focusrite Pro40, Helios II fly rod
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/03 21:09:03
(permalink)
"I can't help thinking that an upgrade should be about what you'd actually gain." You get a extra version of Windows Explorer colored up in black with blue lettering. Back in the early 90's that would have driven the Mac guys crazy with envy.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/04 14:46:28
(permalink)
Some losses, such as hiding the interleave indicator, are just minor annoyances. But for me, the showstopper was the loss of ability to edit multiple automation envelopes at once. Imagine if you could only edit one MIDI track at a time in the PRV. That's what put me off Studio One, and why I couldn't consider it as a replacement. But now they've dealt with that objection in version 2, plus they've handled automation better than SONAR all along. And now that automation editing has actually been deprecated in X1, Studio One will look all the more attractive if and when they beef up support for hardware synths, the last major area where S1 lags SONAR. Until that happens SONAR 8.5.3 remains the best solution available, at least for me.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
cornieleous
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 809
- Joined: 2004/11/04 03:17:18
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/04 15:09:40
(permalink)
bitflipper I'm actually still pretty happy. Happily making records with 8.5.3, that is. Sure, it's got bugs that will never be fixed, but at least I know about them and I know how to work around them. X1 doesn't do it for me, either, but I'm not overly concerned about that. It's not as if 8.5 isn't a viable alternative while we wait to see what happens next with SONAR. And even if the next version is equally unattractive, Reaper and Studio One won't have been sitting still in the meantime. They're both growing up fast. Meanwhile, now free of DAW-related distractions, I'm making more music nowadays than ever before. So I'm happy still. Also still on 8.5.3 and I feel the same way. X1 was a disappointment, but its not holding me back. I have been using NI Maschine along with 8.5.3 and keeping things simple, and its made music fun again. I was originally pretty dismayed by the apparent change in direction at Cakewalk, but with all the alternatives out there - its really up to Cake to pay attention to the substance of their program next go around and get a lot of things right if they want to stay competitive. Like the OP says - most of us will simply use the right tool instead of a half baked feature (such as using Ableton instead of the half finished matrix view in Sonar). If Cake continues with unfinished features and lacks focus to finish things out and fix old bugs I imagine many of us will not be back to the upgrade path. And well, if it doesn't work out - Reaper with SWS extensions and Reamenus installed is very clean, and the feature set is very rich these days. There is little it cannot do that Sonar can, so if future versions of Cakewalk don't pan out I think I will still be all set. D
|
ba_midi
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14061
- Joined: 2003/11/05 16:58:18
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/04 15:11:45
(permalink)
bitflipper Some losses, such as hiding the interleave indicator, are just minor annoyances. But for me, the showstopper was the loss of ability to edit multiple automation envelopes at once. Imagine if you could only edit one MIDI track at a time in the PRV. That's what put me off Studio One, and why I couldn't consider it as a replacement. But now they've dealt with that objection in version 2, plus they've handled automation better than SONAR all along. And now that automation editing has actually been deprecated in X1, Studio One will look all the more attractive if and when they beef up support for hardware synths, the last major area where S1 lags SONAR. Until that happens SONAR 8.5.3 remains the best solution available, at least for me. It's wild you brought up the inability to edit multiple auto envies. I was trying to do that the other night, and forgot it was not possible in X1. I guess I was just in a good mood and simply said to myself "yeah, that's cakewalk for ya..." and went on. But it actually is a weird thing to remove that ability. Just another one of those "annoyances" (for me) that, when added into the mix of other annoyances, becomes a huge sigh of angst when working in Sonar. And, without wanting to turn this into a "this app vs that app" thread, I definitely have been spending some 'extra' time with Studio One. There's not doubt it's growing up fast, as you rightly mentioned.
|
ba_midi
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14061
- Joined: 2003/11/05 16:58:18
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/04 15:16:42
(permalink)
cornieleous bitflipper I'm actually still pretty happy. Happily making records with 8.5.3, that is. Sure, it's got bugs that will never be fixed, but at least I know about them and I know how to work around them. X1 doesn't do it for me, either, but I'm not overly concerned about that. It's not as if 8.5 isn't a viable alternative while we wait to see what happens next with SONAR. And even if the next version is equally unattractive, Reaper and Studio One won't have been sitting still in the meantime. They're both growing up fast. Meanwhile, now free of DAW-related distractions, I'm making more music nowadays than ever before. So I'm happy still. Also still on 8.5.3 and I feel the same way. X1 was a disappointment, but its not holding me back. I have been using NI Maschine along with 8.5.3 and keeping things simple, and its made music fun again. I was originally pretty dismayed by the apparent change in direction at Cakewalk, but with all the alternatives out there - its really up to Cake to pay attention to the substance of their program next go around and get a lot of things right if they want to stay competitive. Like the OP says - most of us will simply use the right tool instead of a half baked feature (such as using Ableton instead of the half finished matrix view in Sonar). If Cake continues with unfinished features and lacks focus to finish things out and fix old bugs I imagine many of us will not be back to the upgrade path. And well, if it doesn't work out - Reaper with SWS extensions and Reamenus installed is very clean, and the feature set is very rich these days. There is little it cannot do that Sonar can, so if future versions of Cakewalk don't pan out I think I will still be all set. D I honestly believe the powers that be at Cakewalk don't give too much of a hoot of what goes on here on the forum - except to put out the wild fires that break out now and then. I may be wrong, but I don't think so. I think the powers that be (this does not include Brandon or Seth, or Willy, as they make a good effort) care about the newer users they can grab who don't bring any baggage to the table of wanting this or that feature and seem to settle for WAY less than some of us do. I also think it's about finances. How does a company the size of Cakewalk keep revenues flowing. There are probably multiple ways, but they have made some choices and now have to live (or fade) with it. Time will tell where all this goes. 8.5.3 was good. X1(E) for me is at least as stable now. But the bugs just keep on comin', and the business approach CW is dishing out these days is very disturbing. The PR rhetoric is even more so.
|
quibb
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 308
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:42:52
- Location: Utah
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/05 02:53:05
(permalink)
Hey Bit, I can see how that would be frustrating. I don't know if I would have ever thought to edit multiple envelopes at the same time Kind of goes back to personal workflow like was mentioned a while back. What may be a deal-breaker for some is not even on the radar for others. I just can't quite get why someone (op) would critique a product they've only read about. Kind of like reviewing a movie from the trailer, or a book from the cliff notes. Just not something I would personally do. I guess he never answered my question, so perhaps he has tried X1. Always good to hear someone else is having fun though! V
I7, 8GB, Win 7 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, R11 driver, Focusrite Pro40, Helios II fly rod
|
bitman
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4105
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
- Location: Keystone Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/05 08:33:54
(permalink)
While doing some development, I have had the need to run all the many Sonar versions. I am currently at x1e but bounce back and forth between x1 and 8.5 to check my work. While I am sympathetic to the onward and upward spirit that the market dictates I like how 8.5 has everything in front of me. I even loaded up Sonar 4's demo last night to do some testing. They really had it goin on even back then. Or so we thought
|
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1160
- Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
- Location: Va Beach Virginia
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/05 09:03:27
(permalink)
bitman While doing some development, I have had the need to run all the many Sonar versions. I am currently at x1e but bounce back and forth between x1 and 8.5 to check my work. While I am sympathetic to the onward and upward spirit that the market dictates I like how 8.5 has everything in front of me. I even loaded up Sonar 4's demo last night to do some testing. They really had it goin on even back then. Or so we thought Yes they did. I remember many posts from the top programmer seeking input from users or to explain exactly why somthing was developed the way it was.
Best, Danny Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
|
Glyn Barnes
Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7564
- Joined: 2009/06/10 05:12:31
- Location: A Stone's Throw from the Line
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/05 10:03:00
(permalink)
|
deswind
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 952
- Joined: 2003/11/23 14:07:13
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/05 12:12:56
(permalink)
If it is about money - Cakewalk could use this forum to poll information. For instance, how many 8.5.3. users (and I suppose 7 and 6 users) would pay $300 for a 8.5.3. update? If enough would do it, maybe they would take it to the next level?
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:long, long time user, stuck at 8.5.3
2011/11/05 13:13:39
(permalink)
If it is about money - Cakewalk could use this forum to poll information. For instance, how many 8.5.3. users (and I suppose 7 and 6 users) would pay $300 for a 8.5.3. update? If enough would do it, maybe they would take it to the next level? It's doubtful a company the size of Cakewalk has the resources to maintain two versions. One last fix release would buy a lot of goodwill and extend customer loyalty, but it would also open the floodgates for further requests and imply an obligation to keep working on 8.5, and that's probably not feasible. Cakewalk is not alone in this policy. You won't be seeing any more bug fixes for Kontakt 4, SampleTank 2.5 or Ozone 4, either. Our best hope is that the next version of SONAR addresses current customer objections, and that is almost certainly going to happen. Patience.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|