Saxman6
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10
- Joined: 10/2/2004
- Status: offline
Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
I'm looking for some advice on these 2 interfaces. I like the fact that the Q10 has 8 XLR Mic Preamp opposed to 2 on the Layla, but the Q10 doesn't have ADAT optical digital I/O. Does anyone using these 2 interfaces have any advice, pro's or con's they could share. Thanks, Will
< Message edited by Saxman6 -- 10/5/2004 4:53:09 PM >
|
hornplayer
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1024
- Joined: 5/4/2004
- Location: Sacramento
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 2:04 AM
(permalink)
Hi Will: I use the Q10 and am quite happy with it. I know there are also a lot of people on the forum that use the Q10. I think probably fewer people use the 3G. I'm not intending to imply anything about quality there - I'm only saying that because I don't see the 3G mentioned as much. I know if you do a search of the forum, you will see a lot about the Q10. The main complaint I have seen about the Q10 is related to problems with the drivers. I have had no such problems. I use my setup mostly for songwriting and recording my horn and some auxillary keyboards. I am having most of the rhythm tracks done in a pro studio. My goal is to upgrade so I have one stereo pair that really rocks. For that, I plan to get pair of API preamps and a pair of Benchmark A/D converters that I will send into the Q10's S/PDIF. That will give me one high-quality pair and 8 more that are very useable. I get compliments on my horn sound now (i.e., through the stock preamps/converters). But, I know it could be better. Happy shopping!
|
netstat
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 323
- Joined: 8/4/2004
- Location: Central
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 8:34 AM
(permalink)
I agree with hornplayer recommendation. I also think you will find spdif more useful that adat optical (unless there is a specific unit that you have in mind with adat outs).
|
nivlem
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 84
- Joined: 1/16/2004
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 9:02 AM
(permalink)
I love my q10 my only problems have been with the recent drivers. I have had the unit for 3years now and still working fine, the pres are very nice sounding. I used the spdif to my advantage, I bought a ART tube preamp (rack mount) with the digital outs, wich I connect to the spdif in on the aardvark, so now I also have two warm tube pres, totaling to xlr mic pres. very nice set up.
|
xackley
Max Output Level: -45.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2973
- Joined: 1/30/2004
- Location: USA
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 9:13 AM
(permalink)
I also don't know about the 3G. One thing I really like about the q10 is the sends Before the A/D converters on the first 4 channels. Besides being able to throw a compressor behind the builtin preamp before conversion, you can use the Return on the the Send to bypass the Builtin Pres, if you have a direct box or other Preamp you want to use. There is a little difference in the sound when bypassing the builtin Pres, even adjusted to 0db gain. Don
|
haluSin8
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 92
- Joined: 2/19/2004
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 9:26 AM
(permalink)
Another vote here for the Q10. I have the same setup as nivlem...the Q10 with the Art DPS with two digital outs. I have consistently recorded 10 simultaneous tracks using this setup and never had a problem with S3PE and now with S4PE. I haven't run into any problem with the drivers and I'm using the latest (7.13 I think). Good luck with the decision. Oh yeah, I saw a Q10 go for about $400 on eBay the other day....almost bid just because it was so cheap!!
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 10:22 AM
(permalink)
The Layla 3G just came out so I would take a wait and see on it. The Q10 has been around long enough that there have been work done on the driver.
|
daverich
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3418
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: south west uk
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 10:30 AM
(permalink)
dont buy the q10 if you want to use an athlon64 with it. They don't support athlon64 chipsets. Kind regards Dave Rich.
|
Elepha3
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 189
- Joined: 11/7/2003
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 10:33 AM
(permalink)
Like ohhey said, the Layla 3G just started shipping, but i think historically Echo Audio's drivers have been very stable and reliable. I work with the Gina 24 and have never had any problems whatsoever. Having said that, i've searched the forum for this before and it seems the Q10 is a very popular choice among Sonar users. jason
|
nnc studio
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 102
- Joined: 3/19/2004
- Location: Woodstock, NY
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 10:34 AM
(permalink)
I wouldn't dimiss the 3G so quickly ...I was waiting for a firewire version to come out....but Echo delayed its release so I went elsewhere (MOTU). the Layla has really good spec... I don't know if you should worry about the drivers. I have an Echo Mia card and the WDM drivers are solid...and the layla itself has been around for an eternity --this is just a beefed up version hardware wise....
|
Saxman6
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10
- Joined: 10/2/2004
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 10:49 AM
(permalink)
Thanks folks for your replies about the Q10 it seems to be a great interface with some great features, the ability to link up to 4 together is a plus. I'd been running Pro tools LE & Digi 001 interface with a Fostex VM200 digital mixer with ADAT I/O for 8 additional I/O, now I plan on moving to back to Cakewalk exclusivly. I was always a Cakewalk user and kept up with software updates, I'm at Sonar 3.1 now, thats why I considered the Layla 3G to make use of the VM200 mixer. Great food for thought. Will
|
Razorwit
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1235
- Joined: 11/5/2003
- Location: SLC, UT
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 11:53 AM
(permalink)
Just a quick note about the Q10. While the pre's are OK, I can't suggest it as a major purchasing point. I've been using my Q10 for a year or two now and have liked it just fine, but a few months ago I picked up a focusrite pre and suddenly "saw the light". Looking back, I now kinda wish that I'd gone a different route with an I/O an spent more money on nice preamps rather than using the builitin stuff on the Q10 for so long. While certainly it's an OK unit (minor driver irritation aside) and the builtin pres are serviceable, to my ears they aren't playing in the same ballpark as the good preamps out there (focusrite, et. al.), especially for vocal work (which probably means micing horns also). Just my .02 Dean
|
daverich
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3418
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: south west uk
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 11:57 AM
(permalink)
personally I can't imagine how anyone could buy other than the emu 1820m. You can add the ADA8000 for 8 very usable preamps too. Kind regards Dave Rich.
|
hornplayer
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1024
- Joined: 5/4/2004
- Location: Sacramento
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 3:02 PM
(permalink)
the builtin pres are serviceable, to my ears they aren't playing in the same ballpark as the good preamps out there (focusrite, et. al.), especially for vocal work (which probably means micing horns also). I would tend to agree with this. But, obviously, you should spend some time thinking about what you will most likely be using it for. And sometimes that evolves, or "devolves" in my case, over time. If I have two high quality inputs through the S/PDIF, and eight more serviceable ones - that's all I need. Are you going to be micing a drum set? Are you going to be having more than a couple guys over at a time to record? If so, and if it's likely that you are going to want to upgrade more than two preamps and/or converters, then you should consider an option other than the Q10. If you only record one or two things at a time, but could use eight more very serviceable inputs for synths (or whatever), the Q10 works well for that. The stock preamps don't suck. But, they're not Neve or API either. I'm presuming you're a sax player. If you listen to my horn at the link below, that's an NT1 through the stock Q10 preamps. Yes, it's an MP3, but it will give you an idea. I've used better equipment in better rooms and it does make a difference. But, for now, what I have works. Good luck!
< Message edited by hornplayer -- 10/5/2004 3:10:15 PM >
|
Saxman6
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10
- Joined: 10/2/2004
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 4:43 PM
(permalink)
Nice stuff Charley, real smooth and I hear ya it's sound pretty damn good with the Q10 pre's. I been using a NT1 for sax also with good results, again thanks for your advice I appreciated it. Will
|
hornplayer
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1024
- Joined: 5/4/2004
- Location: Sacramento
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 5:12 PM
(permalink)
Thanks! Good luck with whatever you choose. Sonar is a great program - I think you'll find that the software will not be your limiting factor. It's the other stuff, like getting a good performance, rooms, mics, pre's (with the relative importance probably in approximately that order). Glad to see another saxophonist around here!
|
daverich
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3418
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: south west uk
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 6:01 PM
(permalink)
moniker is a sax player too - damn good one. I wonder what the draw to sonar is for all these sax players - weird. ;) Kind regards Dave Rich.
|
hornplayer
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1024
- Joined: 5/4/2004
- Location: Sacramento
- Status: offline
RE: Layla 3G or Aardvark Q10
October 05, 04 10:11 PM
(permalink)
I wonder what the draw to sonar is for all these sax players Dave, we know a good thing when we see it, which is why we picked the saxophone in the first place! P.S. moniker is a sax player too Hey, Dave, where can I hear his stuff (i.e., outside the U.K.!)?
< Message edited by hornplayer -- 10/5/2004 10:29:22 PM >
|